Title: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 20, 2019, 01:15:29 AM
Post by: JOE on January 20, 2019, 01:15:29 AM
USSR may have lost anywhere between 16 and 50 million people.
Ultimately they may have been the true victors of that War but it came at a huge price.
Soviet losses may have been 20 times greater than Germany's
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Odinson on January 20, 2019, 01:19:40 AM
Post by: Odinson on January 20, 2019, 01:19:40 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 02:16:21 AM
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 02:16:21 AM
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 04:16:59 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 04:16:59 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Gaon on January 20, 2019, 10:24:40 AM
Post by: Gaon on January 20, 2019, 10:24:40 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 11:25:39 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 11:25:39 AM
I was born in the former Soviet Union. I remember as a little boy being made aware of the horrors of world war 2.Quote from: "Gaon"
I believe that.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Frood on January 20, 2019, 01:55:08 PM
Post by: Frood on January 20, 2019, 01:55:08 PM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
It was genocide.
Truman and every commander who went along with him should have been put behind bars forever. They started something that one day will have horrifying effects for the entire world.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Zetsu on January 20, 2019, 04:23:33 PM
Post by: Zetsu on January 20, 2019, 04:23:33 PM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 06:09:27 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 06:09:27 PM
It wouldn't be surprising if the Red army and IJA were one of the most fearless soldiers that ever existed.Quote from: "Zetsu"
Japan had a formidable war machine..
I had relatives that were forced to serve in the IJA.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 06:17:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 06:17:46 PM
Then, in[size=150]1945[/size] , it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
Are you really this ignorant or are you just shitposting? A combined Allied invasion of Sicily began on 10 July 1943 with both amphibious and airborne landings at the Gulf of Gela. The land forces involved were the U.S. Seventh Army, under Lieutenant General George S. Patton, and the British Eighth Army, under General Bernard Montgomery. The Italian campaign continued for nearly two years, until shortly before VE Day. Not to mention the Normandy invasion on 6 June 1944. If the foe was "beaten" why did so many people have to die over the next 2 years?
Russia lost more soldiers and more civilians than Germany. Russia had to fight WW2 with Attitude and Weather and Persistence, the only weapons it had at hand. Russia is also the only country in the 20th century to have burned its capital city rather than let the foe have it. It's arguable that without Hitler's bone-headed decision to follow Napoleon into Russia in 1942, the US would have been too late to be effective and all you guys would be speaking Russian now.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Zetsu on January 20, 2019, 07:03:10 PM
Post by: Zetsu on January 20, 2019, 07:03:10 PM
It wouldn't be surprising if the Red army and IJA were one of the most fearless soldiers that ever existed.Quote from: "Zetsu"
Japan had a formidable war machine..
I had relatives that were forced to serve in the IJA.
This is kind of depressing thinking about it and never know there were difference races other than Japanese in the IJA. But at the same time I always wondered what it would be like if Japan did took over China.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 07:03:28 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 07:03:28 PM
The US losses in WW2 were proportionally LESS than those of the UK and Australia....0.32%. That is one third of the UK losses, and just under half of Australian losses. Japan lost 10 times that amount of its population...with Truman's barbarity a major contributor. The USSR lost
In terms of pure numbers, US losses were only slightly less than the UK's. A country a third its size.
America watched as Europe and the UK withered under German aggression. Not only watched, but continued to do business with companies that fed the Nazi war machine. German military transports were made by Ford.
America was hedging its bets, ready to profit from the war by any and all means. Japan foolishly spoiled the party.
America's posturing that it "won the war" is fatuous and disingenuous. When it finally committed, Germany was on the ropes, losing ground to the Soviets, and defeated in North Africa.
America loves to be the hero, even to the extent of lying to itself. Were it not for dogged British resistance and victories against the odds, and the Soviet's almost maniacal defence of its lands, Europe would have been lost to Hitler.
And you can be DAMN sure America would be knocking on his door looking to make a buck.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 07:16:15 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 07:16:15 PM
Then, in[size=150]1945[/size] , it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
Are you really this ignorant or are you just shitposting? A combined Allied invasion of Sicily began on 10 July 1943 with both amphibious and airborne landings at the Gulf of Gela. The land forces involved were the U.S. Seventh Army, under Lieutenant General George S. Patton, and the British Eighth Army, under General Bernard Montgomery. The Italian campaign continued for nearly two years, until shortly before VE Day. Not to mention the Normandy invasion on 6 June 1944. If the foe was "beaten" why did so many people have to die over the next 2 years?
Russia lost more soldiers and more civilians than Germany. Russia had to fight WW2 with Attitude and Weather and Persistence, the only weapons it had at hand. Russia is also the only country in the 20th century to have burned its capital city rather than let the foe have it. It's arguable that without Hitler's bone-headed decision to follow Napoleon into Russia in 1942, the US would have been too late to be effective and all you guys would be speaking Russian now.
I wanted to say something too Peaches, but I was to scared to provoke the bear out of hibernation.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 09:00:05 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 09:00:05 PM
It wouldn't be surprising if the Red army and IJA were one of the most fearless soldiers that ever existed.Quote from: "Zetsu"
They had good military leadership.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 10:44:41 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 20, 2019, 10:44:41 PM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 11:30:20 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 20, 2019, 11:30:20 PM
They had massive arms factories turning out thousands of cheap but effective planes and tanks.Quote from: "Bricktop"
And first rate soldiers that made other naions green with envy. All hail the Japanese Imperial Army. You guys were legendary.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:14:23 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:14:23 AM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:08 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:08 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:33 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:33 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:52 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:19:52 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:20:11 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:20:11 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:20:43 AM
Post by: JOE on January 21, 2019, 12:20:43 AM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Zetsu on January 21, 2019, 12:54:34 PM
Post by: Zetsu on January 21, 2019, 12:54:34 PM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
To answer ur question Joe, why did Japan decided to attack the US, there're a few reasons. Japan was a nation with a history of being heavily ruled by their shoguns/generals and other crazed fanatics so they where never really politically stable. They defeated China, Russia and the Western colonies of South East Asia with ease and kind of got too cocky thinking they beated at least 2 giant nations and assumed the US wasn't much different from the Euro colonies, assuming they lived a life of comfort and luxuary, which is kind of true considering the US never got into much wars until after WWII. Another reason is Japan always thought the West would one day retaliate and attack them back for taking over their colonies, so they thought it would be wise to raid Pearl Harbour first hoping to cripple them before hand.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 21, 2019, 03:52:18 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 21, 2019, 03:52:18 PM
To answer ur question Joe, why did Japan decided to attack the US, there're a few reasons. Japan was a nation with a history of being heavily ruled by their shoguns/generals and other crazed fanatics so they where never really politically stable. They defeated China, Russia and the Western colonies of South East Asia with ease and kind of got too cocky thinking they beated at least 2 giant nations and assumed the US wasn't much different from the Euro colonies, assuming they lived a life of comfort and luxuary, which is kind of true considering the US never got into much wars until after WWII. Another reason is Japan always thought the West would one day retaliate and attack them back for taking over their colonies, so they thought it would be wise to raid Pearl Harbour first hoping to cripple them before hand.
Japan did seem too confident because they never lost a war.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Zetsu on January 21, 2019, 04:29:33 PM
Post by: Zetsu on January 21, 2019, 04:29:33 PM
To answer ur question Joe, why did Japan decided to attack the US, there're a few reasons. Japan was a nation with a history of being heavily ruled by their shoguns/generals and other crazed fanatics so they where never really politically stable. They defeated China, Russia and the Western colonies of South East Asia with ease and kind of got too cocky thinking they beated at least 2 giant nations and assumed the US wasn't much different from the Euro colonies, assuming they lived a life of comfort and luxuary, which is kind of true considering the US never got into much wars until after WWII. Another reason is Japan always thought the West would one day retaliate and attack them back for taking over their colonies, so they thought it would be wise to raid Pearl Harbour first hoping to cripple them before hand.
Japan did seem too confident because they never lost a war.
That's true, even if they weren't always at their peak it they sometimes have good luck with them. Not to mention even just a small group of Ronins that fled Japan was enough to put the Ming dynasty at it's knees.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Bricktop on January 21, 2019, 04:32:35 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 21, 2019, 04:32:35 PM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 10:49:41 AM
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 10:49:41 AM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
Men love war.. they love killing. It's what they do.
They're killers, it's in their nature.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Odinson on January 22, 2019, 11:40:38 AM
Post by: Odinson on January 22, 2019, 11:40:38 AM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
Men love war.. they love killing. It's what they do.
They're killers, it's in their nature.
Women love killing too..
The difference is that women want their men to do the killing.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Anonymous on January 22, 2019, 01:23:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 22, 2019, 01:23:46 PM
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 02:39:45 PM
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 02:39:45 PM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
Men love war.. they love killing. It's what they do.
They're killers, it's in their nature.
Women love killing too..
The difference is that women want their men to do the killing.
only bad guys... we don't want to kill the good guys... we need them for heavy labour.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: Odinson on January 22, 2019, 02:49:23 PM
Post by: Odinson on January 22, 2019, 02:49:23 PM
The USA sat on its duff watching as the UK stood alone against Hitler, and again when Hitler invaded and laid waste to vast areas of the Soviet Union.Quote from: "Bricktop"
Than Japan sunk its naval vessels in one of the dumbest decisions any government has made in its history.
Even then, the US focused its attention on Japan rather than Europe...a country a quarter of its size, in the greatest mismatch since PeeWee Herman fought Mohammed Ali.
Then, in 1945, it joined forces with the UK and Soviet Union to open a front in France, when Germany was already staggering, and joined the war in Europe against a beaten foe.
It then claims it won the war!!! Ask yourself which, of all the allied nations, suffered NO attack on its mainland, and not a single bomb fell on any of its cities. Was it England? Nope. Was it Australia? Nope. How about Canada. And the US? Yep. Not a bomb. Not a firecracker. Not even a single bullet. How they suffered...
Then it nuked a thoroughly beaten Japan simply to test its new toys.
Its one of the reasons I am anti-America. Its mouth rarely matches its deeds.
I don't really think if that War on such a context, BT.
It saddens me more than anything. Think of all the wasted potential. Men who could have risen to greatness but were slaughtered on the battlefield
Other than the evil ones who started that war & committed the most heinous war crimes, I'm dure every life lost was as precious as the next. I can imagine that the loss of life hit each family on the axis side as the allied one.
As for Japan, I think many Japanese people also asked themselves why they bothered fighting a war with the United States. Of course in hindsight it was clearly a better decision to stay out of the war. And there were possibly many who were opposed to starting a war with America. However I think it was more about their axis allegiance with Germany that forced their hand. Sooner or later Japan would have been forced to enter the War. I think the USA would have also been forced into the conflict too. They were all in on it whether they liked it or not.
Even the admiral who planned the attack on Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto, didn't want to do it. But pressure and obligation forced him into that position.
Men love war.. they love killing. It's what they do.
They're killers, it's in their nature.
Women love killing too..
The difference is that women want their men to do the killing.
only bad guys... we don't want to kill the good guys... we need them for heavy labour.
And in time, you are gonna want new slaves because the old ones are too nasty..
And you think the slavegirls are too pretty.
Title: Re: SovietUSSR losses during World War II
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 03:11:37 PM
Post by: caskur on January 22, 2019, 03:11:37 PM