THeBlueCashew

General Discussion => The Flea Trap => Topic started by: cc on March 22, 2019, 09:07:51 PM

Title: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 22, 2019, 09:07:51 PM
all a big POOF



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://image.shutterstock.com/image-vector/balloon-deflate-pop-sketch-line-450w-258438926.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://image.shutterstock.com/image-ve%20...%20438926.jpg%22%3Ehttps://image.shutterstock.com/image-vector/balloon-deflate-pop-sketch-line-450w-258438926.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)





Millions of poofs on suicide watch



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://media1.tenor.com/images/b332b7f7327f1632734a9c8f328d6ba3/tenor.gif%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://media1.tenor.com/images/b332b7f%20...%20/tenor.gif%22%3Ehttps://media1.tenor.com/images/b332b7f7327f1632734a9c8f328d6ba3/tenor.gif%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2019, 09:15:46 PM
I don't believe it was ever really about Russian collusion..



The investigations have just begun.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 22, 2019, 09:25:26 PM
If Mueller found nothing, there is nothing
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2019, 09:28:25 PM
Quote from: "cc"If Mueller found nothing, there is nothing

I don't mean Mueller..



I mean the House of Reprehensibles..



This reminds me so much of the presidency of Chen Shiu Bian..



The KMT controlled Legislative Yuan did everything they could to obstruct his presidency.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 22, 2019, 09:35:14 PM
I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2019, 09:42:56 PM
Quote from: "cc"I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss

They have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Blazor on March 22, 2019, 10:10:50 PM
Oh man, some people be losing their marbles tomorrow lol. Hopefully no riots.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 22, 2019, 10:11:05 PM
QuoteThey have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.



That would guaranty  4 more years
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2019, 10:17:10 PM
Old Peaches is burning his bra as I type.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 23, 2019, 12:12:18 AM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc"I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss

They have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.
I think that's absolutely right. it may hurt them politically, as CC said, but they are long past being not capable of rational behavior at this point.  They are obsessed with getting Trump any way they can.  And they haven't paid a price for it yet.  Hopefully they will.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on March 23, 2019, 12:17:20 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc"I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss

They have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.
I think that's absolutely right. it may hurt them politically, as CC said, but they are long past being not capable of rational behavior at this point.  They are obsessed with getting Trump any way they can.  And they haven't paid a price for it yet.  Hopefully they will.

They couldn't prove collusion, so now they will look for something, anything until the nation says enough already.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 23, 2019, 12:42:10 AM
Quote from: "Gaon"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc"I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss

They have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.
I think that's absolutely right. it may hurt them politically, as CC said, but they are long past being not capable of rational behavior at this point.  They are obsessed with getting Trump any way they can.  And they haven't paid a price for it yet.  Hopefully they will.

They couldn't prove collusion, so now they will look for something, anything until the nation says enough already.
Using the power of the house to endlessly harass Trump with a fishing expedition into everything he's ever done is completely unethical, especially when he has already been investigated for over two years.



We talk a lot about politicians and the media failing, but the public has a responsibility too.  when a party goes batshit crazy like the dems its up to the American people to punish them and tell them that it's unacceptable.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on March 23, 2019, 01:02:27 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Gaon"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc"I realize that, but the public is getting very impatient on this and that impatience will skyrocket after today's news



Still the losers can't accept the loss

They have most media on their side..



|believe they will double down on investigations.
I think that's absolutely right. it may hurt them politically, as CC said, but they are long past being not capable of rational behavior at this point.  They are obsessed with getting Trump any way they can.  And they haven't paid a price for it yet.  Hopefully they will.

They couldn't prove collusion, so now they will look for something, anything until the nation says enough already.
Using the power of the house to endlessly harass Trump with a fishing expedition into everything he's ever done is completely unethical, especially when he has already been investigated for over two years.



We talk a lot about politicians and the media failing, but the public has a responsibility too.  when a party goes batshit crazy like the dems its up to the American people to punish them and tell them that it's unacceptable.

I agree, it is unethical. But, the extremist element of the Democratic party doesn't care.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 23, 2019, 01:08:10 AM
very true.  They're long past caring about right or wrong.    And I don't think even bad polling would dissuade them either.  the AOCs in the house don't think about polls and such.  They are like rabid dogs.



------




QuoteMSNBC host Chris Matthews expressed outrage on Friday upon hearing reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had completed his Russia investigation and submitted it to the attorney general -- with further indictments not expected.



Matthews began his show by summarizing the breaking news, but stressed that Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice "without ever directly interviewing the president of the United States."



"That means no charges against the president, his children or his associates after all those meetings with the Russians," a visibly upset Matthews told his viewers.


The leftards loved Mueller, I wonder if they will start badmouthing him now that he hasn't come up with anything. :pop:
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 01:32:51 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"very true.  They're long past caring about right or wrong.    And I don't think even bad polling would dissuade them either.  the AOCs in the house don't think about polls and such.  They are like rabid dogs.



------




QuoteMSNBC host Chris Matthews expressed outrage on Friday upon hearing reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had completed his Russia investigation and submitted it to the attorney general -- with further indictments not expected.



Matthews began his show by summarizing the breaking news, but stressed that Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice "without ever directly interviewing the president of the United States."



"That means no charges against the president, his children or his associates after all those meetings with the Russians," a visibly upset Matthews told his viewers.


The leftards loved Mueller, I wonder if they will start badmouthing him now that he hasn't come up with anything. :pop:

MSNBC is another American news/editorial source I won't watch.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 23, 2019, 04:56:18 AM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"very true.  They're long past caring about right or wrong.    And I don't think even bad polling would dissuade them either.  the AOCs in the house don't think about polls and such.  They are like rabid dogs.



------




QuoteMSNBC host Chris Matthews expressed outrage on Friday upon hearing reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had completed his Russia investigation and submitted it to the attorney general -- with further indictments not expected.



Matthews began his show by summarizing the breaking news, but stressed that Mueller handed his report to the Department of Justice "without ever directly interviewing the president of the United States."



"That means no charges against the president, his children or his associates after all those meetings with the Russians," a visibly upset Matthews told his viewers.


The leftards loved Mueller, I wonder if they will start badmouthing him now that he hasn't come up with anything. :pop:

MSNBC is another American news/editorial source I won't watch.


I just go to Drudge and let them aggregate the newsworthy headlines and links for me.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 09:30:54 AM
Quote from: "Herman"Old Peaches is burning his bra as I type.

It's hardly necessary to make this a trophy thread about me, Herman.



Especially when anyone familiar with American practice knew months ago that there were no more bombshells coming directly from Mueller.  (That, of course, includes me because I'm smart about this kind of stuff.)



That said, I can't quite agree with cc's summary, to wit:


Quote from: "cc"all a big POOF




The delivery of Mueller's report signals that he has fulfilled his charter and he is done with indicting people himself as part of that charter.  But it's safe to assume there is plenty of other stuff in his report that Congress will claim (with valid precedent) that it has a duty to see.  There will no doubt be lawsuits, as was the case in 2012, to decide what Congress gets to see (assuming the AG doesn't just give them the report which is quite unlikely.)  That material has the potential to provide a roadmap for further investigations by the House.



"NO COLLUSION"  -- Mueller has already said that he doesn't consider indicting the president to be within the scope of his authority.  Thus, "no more indictments" does not equate to "no collusion."



Everyone wants to know what else is in the report, and it's safe to assume that there is plenty of unseemly stuff and probably criminal behavior being discussed.  But it's stuff NOT related directly to the scope of Mueller's charter, just stuff he thinks the AG should make further prosecutorial decisions about.  As I said, the next act in this melodrama will lie in answering the question of who will get to see that information, and finding out exactly how big a turd the AG is.



It's also necessary for people to keep in mind that Mueller's job was to be a prosecutor.  To me that means that his report will include plenty of INCULPATORY stuff that is NOt balanced by EXCULPATORY stuff, and thus that material will be potentially incendiary, and thus inappropriate viewing for most.



And we already know that all of this is far too nuanced for media or American citizens to have the first clue about proper behavior or good judgment or patience.  



So it's not the end of anything ... except the beginning.  It's the end of the beginning.



There will be an intermission while stuff goes on behind the curtain and the scenery is rearranged.  It's far too soon for the audience to have to view the naked bricks in the back wall of the theater.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 23, 2019, 10:09:29 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Herman"Old Peaches is burning his bra as I type.

It's hardly necessary to make this a trophy thread about me, Herman.



Especially when anyone familiar with American practice knew months ago that there were no more bombshells coming directly from Mueller.  (That, of course, includes me because I'm smart about this kind of stuff.)



That said, I can't quite agree with cc's summary, to wit:


Quote from: "cc"all a big POOF




The delivery of Mueller's report signals that he has fulfilled his charter and he is done with indicting people himself as part of that charter.  But it's safe to assume there is plenty of other stuff in his report that Congress will claim (with valid precedent) that it has a duty to see.  There will no doubt be lawsuits, as was the case in 2012, to decide what Congress gets to see (assuming the AG doesn't just give them the report which is quite unlikely.)  That material has the potential to provide a roadmap for further investigations by the House.



"NO COLLUSION"  -- Mueller has already said that he doesn't consider indicting the president to be within the scope of his authority.  Thus, "no more indictments" does not equate to "no collusion."



Everyone wants to know what else is in the report, and it's safe to assume that there is plenty of unseemly stuff and probably criminal behavior being discussed.  But it's stuff NOT related directly to the scope of Mueller's charter, just stuff he thinks the AG should make further prosecutorial decisions about.  As I said, the next act in this melodrama will lie in answering the question of who will get to see that information, and finding out exactly how big a turd the AG is.



It's also necessary for people to keep in mind that Mueller's job was to be a prosecutor.  To me that means that his report will include plenty of INCULPATORY stuff that is NOt balanced by EXCULPATORY stuff, and thus that material will be potentially incendiary, and thus inappropriate viewing for most.



And we already know that all of this is far too nuanced for media or American citizens to have the first clue about proper behavior or good judgment or patience.  



So it's not the end of anything ... except the beginning.  It's the end of the beginning.



There will be an intermission while stuff goes on behind the curtain and the scenery is rearranged.  It's far too soon for the audience to have to view the naked bricks in the back wall of the theater.


Go lick your wounded taint and stop wasting retinas viewing your revisionist come-again-double-down bullshit.



No new indictments means no valid claims.



It's over. Attack the people who got him elected instead and see how that works out for you.



Except that you lost.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 10:41:17 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Herman"Old Peaches is burning his bra as I type.

It's hardly necessary to make this a trophy thread about me, Herman.

That's not what he was doing.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 23, 2019, 11:16:36 AM
The Russian collusion conspiracy was nothing but the democrats and the media's version of the Jussie Smollett hoax.



After 25 million dollars and two years wasted the only thing learned was that the US media is lying piece of trash, and the democrat party are entitled tyrants on the level of corrupt third world countries.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on March 23, 2019, 11:46:26 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"The Russian collusion conspiracy was nothing but the democrats and the media's version of the Jussie Smollett hoax.



After 25 million dollars and two years wasted the only thing learned was that the US media is lying piece of shit, and the democrat party are entitled tyrants on the level of corrupt third world countries.

Should there be consequences for investigations into hoaxes like Russia collusion. In my opinion, yes.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 12:22:49 PM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Go lick your wounded taint and stop wasting retinas viewing your revisionist come-again-double-down bullshit.



No new indictments means no valid claims.



It's over. Attack the people who got him elected instead and see how that works out for you.



Except that you lost.


Kind of early in the day for you to be shitfaced, isn't it?  



I realize this is going to be a weekend where everyone hangs an imaginary law degree on the wall above his monitor, but there are choices.



Evidently yours is from the Moscow campus of Trump University.   :crazy:








Quote from: "Fashionista"
That's not what he was doing.


Sorry, but I have to be allowed to respond to the words on the monitor before and after my username.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 23, 2019, 12:42:22 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Go lick your wounded taint and stop wasting retinas viewing your revisionist come-again-double-down bullshit.



No new indictments means no valid claims.



It's over. Attack the people who got him elected instead and see how that works out for you.



Except that you lost.


Kind of early in the day for you to be shitfaced, isn't it?  



I realize this is going to be a weekend where everyone hangs an imaginary law degree on the wall above his monitor, but there are choices.



Evidently yours is from the Moscow campus of Trump University.   :crazy:








Quote from: "Fashionista"
That's not what he was doing.


Sorry, but I have to be allowed to respond to the words on the monitor before and after my username.


 ac_lmfao



Build a bridge without government edicts or taxation theft and get over it, you geriatric dole bludger!  ac_biggrin



You know... grow an actual spine.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 01:13:07 PM
Quote from: "Gaon"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"The Russian collusion conspiracy was nothing but the democrats and the media's version of the Jussie Smollett hoax.



After 25 million dollars and two years wasted the only thing learned was that the US media is lying piece of shit, and the democrat party are entitled tyrants on the level of corrupt third world countries.

Should there be consequences for investigations into hoaxes like Russia collusion. In my opinion, yes.

If Mueller needs work, maybe Trump should appoint him special prosecutor to investigate collusion between the FBI, the Clinton camp that lead to the fake Russia collusion investigation.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 23, 2019, 03:22:00 PM
CNN won't know how to fill 23 hours a day of their programming.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 23, 2019, 06:33:45 PM
They'll think of something...



Trump is an alien.



Trump is transgender.



Trump wants to cancel elections.



Trump is Luke's father.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 23, 2019, 08:51:03 PM
Now I gotta know who is Luke



so I  can sleep tonight
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 23, 2019, 09:49:50 PM
Quote from: "cc"Now I gotta know who is Luke



so I  can sleep tonight


(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fprofile_images%2F30646462%2Fluke_400x400.jpg&f=1%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%20...%2000.jpg&f=1%22%3Ehttps://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fprofile_images%2F30646462%2Fluke_400x400.jpg&f=1%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)



DERP!
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 24, 2019, 06:40:00 AM
Not remotely a Star Wars aficionado - left that for kids



It's very very late ... but I can now sleep tonight
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 02:55:12 PM
Quote from: "Bricktop"They'll think of something...



Trump is an alien.



Trump is transgender.



Trump wants to cancel elections.



Trump is Luke's father.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 24, 2019, 03:02:34 PM
Apparently it doesn't matter to those calling for Trump's removal from office. He just looks guilty of something, of anything, and that's good enough for them.



They still won't respect the office and outcome of the election. They'd rather push for the abolishment of the electoral college, lower the voting age, and let in as many illegal immigrants as possible while systematically limiting free speech and confiscating firearms so that nobody in the fly over states will ever be able to speak against or resist Coastal Edicts.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on March 24, 2019, 03:49:35 PM
All is see here is premature ejaculation. Sheesh. We do not know what is in that report. No one here has a copy of that report so it is absurd to be declaring anything yet as of this moment or celebrating when we have not heard anything from Attorney General Barr. We are still waiting.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on March 24, 2019, 03:50:04 PM
Resist your need to assume you know it all.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 03:50:43 PM
Democrats won't accept election results and they won't accept the Mueller witch hunt results.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/24/democrat-nadler-mueller-report-collusion/?utm_medium=email

TOP-RANKING DEMOCRAT SAYS MUELLER REPORT DOESN'T MATTER — 'WE KNOW THERE WAS COLLUSION'



House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler confirmed Sunday that Congress will continue to investigate President Donald Trump regardless of the conclusions reached by special counsel Robert Mueller.



"We know there was collusion," Nadler insisted several times during an appearance on CNN's "State of the Union" with guest host Dana Bash. "Why there's been no indictments, we don't know."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 03:52:50 PM
Adam Shit wants to keep the expensive witch hunt alive.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/24/adam-schiff-mueller-report/?utm_medium=email

ADAM SCHIFF STILL BELIEVES THERE IS 'COMPELLING AND INCRIMINATING' EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION



Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that there is compelling evidence that President Donald Trump colluded with Russian interests during the 2016 presidential election.



The accusation comes as special counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation without charging any U.S. citizen with a collusion-related crime, though six Trump associates were charged for unrelated criminal offenses.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 24, 2019, 03:53:47 PM
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"All is see here is premature ejaculation. Sheesh. We do not know what is in that report. No one here has a copy of that report so it is absurd to be declaring anything yet as of this moment or celebrating when we have not heard anything from Attorney General Barr. We are still waiting.


No new indictments is all we need to know. It's over.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on March 24, 2019, 03:55:21 PM
Quote from: "Herman"Adam Shit wants to keep the expensive witch hunt alive.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/24/adam-schiff-mueller-report/?utm_medium=email

ADAM SCHIFF STILL BELIEVES THERE IS 'COMPELLING AND INCRIMINATING' EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION



Democratic California Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that there is compelling evidence that President Donald Trump colluded with Russian interests during the 2016 presidential election.



The accusation comes as special counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation without charging any U.S. citizen with a collusion-related crime, though six Trump associates were charged for unrelated criminal offenses.


Adam Schifty
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 03:59:26 PM
The democRATS are heart broken. ac_lmfao



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/23/many-claimed-mueller-closing-in-report/?utm_medium=email

MANY CLAIMED COUNTLESS TIMES OVER THE LAST 2 YEARS THAT 'MUELLER IS CLOSING IN' — THEN HE FILED HIS REPORT



After news broke Friday that the Mueller report was finished and no more indictments were forthcoming, the walls "closed in" around an ominous phrase that many political and media figures used frequently over the past two years.



Presumably hoping that his two-year inquiry would lead to President Donald Trump's impeachment and removal from office, many verified Twitter accounts had described special counsel Robert Mueller as "closing in" around the president at various times throughout the investigation.



One of the earliest uses of the phrase seems to be from a tweet by Foreign Policy magazine that touted a column by Max Boot, a Washington Post columnist and senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations. "Trump should be scared," the tweet warned. "Robert Mueller is closing in on him."



Written June 2017, a month after the special counsel's appointment, Boot's piece claimed that Trump was terrified in light of Mueller's character—"universally respected for his integrity and doggedness"—and the tenacious competence of his "hunter-killer team of crack investigators and lawyers." He asserted that "what worries Trump is not that Mueller may be a Democratic partisan [...] but that the Marine combat veteran cannot be bought off or intimidated.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 04:03:18 PM
This aint over. Not by a long shot.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/24/ted-cruz-democrats-impeach-donald-trump/?utm_medium=email

TED CRUZ BLASTS HOUSE DEMOCRATS: 'THEY ARE GOING TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT FOR BEING DONALD TRUMP'



Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz tore into House Democrats on Sunday, arguing that they absolutely intend to impeach President Donald Trump — and that they don't even care why.



Cruz appeared on CNN's "State of the Union" with guest host Dana Bash on Sunday, immediately following House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, and he pointed out what he felt was telling about Nadler's comments.



Listen, if anyone thinks that the Mueller report being concluded is the end of the Democrats' attempt to take down President Trump, they haven't been paying attention the last two years. It's striking as I listened to your interview with Congressman Nadler that he was immediately pivoting away.



He then turned back to Bash, saying, "You asked Congressman Nadler whether the House is going to impeach the president. I'll answer that for you. Yes. They fully intend to impeach the president and they don't care about the basis."



But then Cruz brought up the point he found telling. "Twice Congressman Nadler said something remarkable," he began. "He said, 'listen, the special counsel is focused on crimes. We're not all that concerned with crimes. Our focus, this is Democrats in the House, is much broader than crimes.' What they are basically saying is they are going to impeach the president for being Donald Trump. And they don't care about the evidence."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 04:05:57 PM
The American media was indicted.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/23/lara-logan-mueller-indictment-media/?utm_medium=email

LARA LOGAN'S RESPONSE TO MUELLER REPORT IS AN INDICTMENT OF AMERICAN MEDIA



Journalist Lara Logan said Saturday that the response to the Mueller report was striking because of what was not happening: there were no blaring headlines boldly proclaiming the vindication of President Donald Trump.



Logan, during an appearance on "Fox & Friends" Saturday, argued that if the Mueller report had resulted in indictments or charges of any kind, that would most certainly be the top story in every paper.



My question is this: If charges had been brought against the president, then the headlines would all be screaming about, you know, victory, right, for the left. Vindication. This proves that what the left has been saying is right. Now, no charges have been brought but I don't see screaming headlines that say this vindicates the president.



The former CBS correspondent also argued that she found coverage of the whole investigation to be problematic, noting how often it was mentioned that Mueller had indicted people close to Trump — but only adding as an afterthought that the indictments had nothing to do with the president or ties to Russia.



There is something else that bothers me with much of the reporting on this from the beginning is that you keep seeing high-up, featured prominently in many articles, this line that 'six members of the Trump campaign have been indicted by the Mueller investigation' — but you don't read in the same space right there, nobody writes 'although none of them were charged with conspiracy with Russia,' the central question of the Mueller investigation. That always comes way, way, way down further in the reporting.



Logan explained that, as a journalist, there was "a very simple fix." She explained, "You can say six people were charged, but none of those charges had anything to do with conspiring with Russia. That gives — that doesn't mislead the reader or the viewer, right? Because it's very clear what people were charged with and that it's not related to conspiracy or to the central focus of the Mueller investigation."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 24, 2019, 05:54:43 PM
The damage to America's integrity has been done. Its media, its politicians, its bureaucracy and its ability to govern itself have all been mortally damaged.



There will be no faith, no trust, no confidence and no unity left. The US is on the verge of a political collapse...and perhaps a total implosion of its societal structure.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2019, 10:59:37 PM
Quote from: "Bricktop"The damage to America's integrity has been done. Its media, its politicians, its bureaucracy and its ability to govern itself have all been mortally damaged.



There will be no faith, no trust, no confidence and no unity left. The US is on the verge of a political collapse...and perhaps a total implosion of its societal structure.

The US will be a leftist third world dictatorship within twenty years.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 24, 2019, 11:55:29 PM
Well, a dictatorship anyway.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 12:33:34 AM
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Bricktop"The damage to America's integrity has been done. Its media, its politicians, its bureaucracy and its ability to govern itself have all been mortally damaged.



There will be no faith, no trust, no confidence and no unity left. The US is on the verge of a political collapse...and perhaps a total implosion of its societal structure.

The US will be a leftist third world dictatorship within twenty years.

That's very pessimistic Herman.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 25, 2019, 12:57:04 AM
Yet not hard to rationalise.



The left has done a highly effective and thorough job of infiltrating the major pillars of society at all levels.



It is not within their nature to let go of a throat it has a firm grip on.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 01:04:57 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"Yet not hard to rationalise.



The left has done a highly effective and thorough job of infiltrating the major pillars of society at all levels.



It is not within their nature to let go of a throat it has a firm grip on.

Wazzzup doesn't see a future for the USA either.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 25, 2019, 01:16:17 AM
There will never NOT be a USA.



It does seem to be heading towards a major collapse, however.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 25, 2019, 01:18:08 AM
It's on borrowed time.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 01:19:07 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"There will never NOT be a USA.



It does seem to be heading towards a major collapse, however.

How about Europe in your opinion?
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 11:01:30 AM
Poor Maxine Waters and Adam Shit.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/24/democrats-trump-russia-collusion/?utm_medium=email

DEMOCRATS GUARANTEED TRUMP-RUSSIA COLLUSION. MUELLER COULDN'T FIND IT



High-profile Democrats repeatedly promised the public they would see evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russia.



But special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia's 2016 election meddling, according to a four-page letter that Attorney General William Barr sent to Congress on Sunday.



The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr's letter states.



Mueller's findings are a major blow to Democrats like California Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, who repeatedly asserted as fact Trump colluded with Russia.



Democratic California Rep. Maxine Waters guaranteed in September 2017 that Trump colluded with Russia.



Here you have a president who I can tell you and guarantee you is in collusion with the Russians to undermine our democracy," Waters said.



Waters predicted in December 2017 that Mueller's report is "going to lead right to, not only collusion, obstruction of justice, money laundering."



Swalwell, Schiff and other Democrats didn't wait for Mueller to finish his investigation to claim that collusion had already been proven.



The evidence is pretty clear that there was collusion between  the Trump campaign and the Russians," Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal told MSNBC in February 2018.



Swalwell in February 2018 published a powerpoint titled "Evidence of Collusion" that failed to include any evidence of collusion. He repeated his assertion of Trump-Russia collusion on several occasions, despite lacking the evidence to substantiate it.





Schiff, too, claimed there was evidence of collusion before learning Mueller's conclusion.



"You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion — pretty compelling evidence," Schiff declared on February 17.



Hours before receiving Barr's memo on Sunday, Schiff was still defending the collusion narrative.



"There's a difference between compelling evidence of collusion and whether the special counsel concludes that he can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the criminal charge of conspiracy," Schiff said.



"I have trust in [Mueller's] prosecutorial judgment. But that doesn't mean, of course, that there isn't compelling and incriminating evidence that should be shared with the American people," he added.



House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler similarly refused to accept Mueller's lack of evidence for collusion.



"We know there was collusion," Nadler said Sunday. "Why there's been no indictments, we don't know."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: JOE on March 25, 2019, 01:23:15 PM
I don't think there was any need for Trump to collude because his friend Putin did all the work for him.



However there is little doubt that Putin meddled in the US election & manipulated the result.



Russia was caught trying to meddle in the France national elections too & get LePenn elected.



No doubt Putin is an evil man with sinister global ambitions.



Cozying up to Putin is like making friends with a poisonous snake.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 01:50:45 PM
^How predictable. Progs cannot accept there was no collusion.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 06:06:56 PM
If Russia did interfere in the US election, it happened on Obama's watch.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/plitsas-obama-russia/?utm_medium=email

IS IT TIME TO REMEMBER THE ROLE PRESIDENT OBAMA PLAYED IN ALLOWING RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE?



Attorney General William Barr has delivered the summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian "collusion." The findings vindicate President Trump, but more importantly, could cause some to question President Obama's culpability in the matter.



In his summary, Barr described not only the special counsel's conclusion that there was no evidence of collusion, but also the scale and completeness of the investigation. Robert Mueller "employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The special counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 order authorizing the use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed more than 500 witnesses."



This description provides context regarding an exhaustive two-year effort led by what some Washington insiders have described as the prosecutorial dream team of the century.



Many in Washington predicted that Mueller would issue a final set of indictments at the conclusion of his investigation, but they were wrong. Among the loudest voices were former Obama administration officials, such as former CIA Director John Brennan who went on CNN two weeks before Mueller delivered his report and predicted there would be more indictments to come and even speculated on the date the report would be delivered.



The irony is that while Mueller didn't issue any more literal indictments, his conclusions summarized by Barr serve as the most damning indictment stemming from the special counsel's work. But it's not an indictment of Trump or his team — it's an indictment of the Obama administration.



Mueller concluded that Russia had in fact conducted a concerted effort to influence the 2016 presidential election, though there is no evidence that they were successful. Barr's letter described two distinct efforts to influence the election. The first was an effort by a Russian entity called the "Internet Research Agency" tasked with spreading propaganda on social media. The second was a Russia government effort to hack into computer systems belonging to persons who were then working for Hillary Clinton's Campaign for President or the Democratic National Committee to obtain damaging emails which were then disseminated to organizations such as "Wikileaks."



These efforts by the Russian government took place during the 2016 election while the Obama administration was in office. We know from public statements issued by a number of former Obama administration officials that they were aware of the Russian efforts and did little to nothing to stop them.



In fact, the most serious response the administration took was to have President Obama tell Russian President Vladimir Putin to "cut it out" on the sidelines of an international event.  When asked by the Washington Post about the administration's failure to stop Russia, a former senior official said "I feel like we sort of choked."



Their abject failure to protect the nation from Russian attacks, which can only be described as dereliction of duty, resulted in social and political discord on a scale that has not been seen in this country for a long time.



To make matters worse, former Obama officials then spent two years falsely accusing President Trump of colluding with Russia. That resulted in further societal discord and fanned the flames of the nation — the outcome the Russians were seeking. Not only did the Obama administration do little to stop the Russian effort, but former members of the Obama administration played right into Russia's plans by contributing to and exacerbating societal discord.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 06:09:53 PM
DementocRATS don't know what to do now.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/madeleine-dean-cnn-mueller-report/?utm_medium=email

HOUSE DEMOCRAT LISTS PROBLEMS HER PARTY WILL FACE AFTER MUELLER FINDINGS



Democratic Rep. Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania listed special counsel Robert Mueller's findings from the Russia probe on CNN Monday, and it's not good news for Democrats.



"My reaction is a couple of things. We ought to recognize something good. Number one, special counsel Mueller completed his investigation with a team of able investigators and prosecutors, and I'm thankful that that investigation has come to a close," she said on "CNN Today."



"Number two, we should be glad that the preliminary finding that we know of the Mueller report is that there was no coordination, no conspiracy," Dean said. "Notice the words that they used:  no coordination, no conspiracy of the Trump campaign with Russia's known interference with the 2016 election. Number three, there was known interference by Russia in a very serious and great way with the election of 2016. I hope this administration, and I'm certain Congress will take that very seriously, as we head into the next election."



Dean's statement is a vast departure from the Democratic narrative of collusion and obstruction of justice. Congressional Democrats had expressed concern that President Donald Trump would fire Mueller, but he was allowed to finish his investigation. Trump was also accused of blatant coordination and collusion, but Mueller's report has cleared him and his campaign of such charges.



Dean did call Attorney General William Barr's summary letter into question and asked why the entire report wasn't released to the public for examination.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 25, 2019, 06:15:30 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"There will never NOT be a USA.



It does seem to be heading towards a major collapse, however.

How about Europe in your opinion?


Europe is not comparable, because it is not a sovereign state. Europe is a land mass, and many nations live within its boundaries.



The European Union does not embrace all European nations. The UK is leaving, of course. But Switzerland and Norway are not in the Union, nor wish to be. Turkey had indicated it wanted to join, but has since withdrawn its interest after the EU declared it would not admit it.



The two largest European nations, France and Germany, essentially bind the Union together.



Brexit has thrown a fox in the henhouse, however. Whilst the focus is on the chaos in the UK at the moment, the EU is also in a perilous situation. If they come to an agreement with the UK that provides an acceptable compromise between being in the EU, or being out of the EU but still benefiting from favourable trading terms, other countries will want to follow their example, and the EU will collapse.



In my view, the EU as it stands at the moment is unsustainable, thanks to Germany's folly of flooding the continent with refugees. If belonging to the EU means they must accept a quote of refugees, many countries will simply say no and leave. Hungary and Poland have already done so.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 06:41:22 PM
The EU is a bureaucratic wasteland. The semi sovereign nations within the EU have seen their rights to say what's on their minds repressed by an out of elitists in Brussels. Slow growth, stagnant wages and islamic extremism. Most of Western Europe is FUBAR.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 25, 2019, 07:12:07 PM
Not to mention being beholden to a German led parliament. German domination did not end well the last time it was implemented.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 25, 2019, 07:55:37 PM
And it truly is German dominated at present. Expect another  bad ending
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2019, 08:19:48 PM
Quote from: "cc"And it truly is German dominated at present. Expect another  bad ending

Who couldn't use a happy ending.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 25, 2019, 09:19:55 PM
We all need some sunshine in this disconsolate world we've created right now.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on March 26, 2019, 12:15:45 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"Not to mention being beholden to a German led parliament. German domination did not end well the last time it was implemented.

Israel is an associate state of the EU. I don't want Israel to ever become a full EU member.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on March 26, 2019, 12:03:31 PM
Special counsel Robert Mueller has definitively put to rest the collusion theory of President Trump's election. That's not a little embarrassing for the many journalists, talking heads, celebrities and instant experts who spent more than two years furiously speculating about Moscow "pee-pee" tapes, treasonous rendezvous and the president's imminent arrest.



The president's haters no doubt wish to memory-hole collusion and move on to the next anti-Trump theory. But not so fast: We want to laurel the punditry "champion" — the one who peddled the most nonsensical nonsense, the wildest inanities, the weirdest theories and unsubstantiated stories.



MORE (//https)



Right-click > Open image in new tab for full size



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/26n.muellermadnessbracket.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=3000%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2%20...%20all&w=3000%22%3Ehttps://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/26n.muellermadnessbracket.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=3000%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 26, 2019, 05:28:16 PM
Quote from: "cc"Special counsel Robert Mueller has definitively put to rest the collusion theory of President Trump's election. That's not a little embarrassing for the many journalists, talking heads, celebrities and instant experts who spent more than two years furiously speculating about Moscow "pee-pee" tapes, treasonous rendezvous and the president's imminent arrest.



The president's haters no doubt wish to memory-hole collusion and move on to the next anti-Trump theory. But not so fast: We want to laurel the punditry "champion" — the one who peddled the most nonsensical nonsense, the wildest inanities, the weirdest theories and unsubstantiated stories.



MORE (//https)



Right-click > Open image in new tab for full size



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/26n.muellermadnessbracket.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=3000%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2%20...%20all&w=3000%22%3Ehttps://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/26n.muellermadnessbracket.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=3000%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)

So many nominees for the fake journalism award.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 26, 2019, 10:28:58 PM
Let's hope the British wanker is right and this fake Russia collusion hoax, most of the progtard media promoted gets Trump reelected.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/piers-morgan-collusion-hoax-trump-2020/?utm_medium=email

PIERS MORGAN CALLS IT: THE RUSSIA COLLUSION HOAX WILL DELIVER TRUMP'S 2020 WIN



British journalist and television personality Piers Morgan blasted the "Russia collusion hoax" as a "disgraceful fake news witch-hunt" by President Donald Trump's enemies that very well could end up ensuring his re-election in 2020.



In a fiery column published Monday on DailyMail.com, Morgan criticized Trump's enemies for propagating an "obsessively unrelenting campaign" to bring down the president by essentially accusing him of the worst thing possible: betraying his own country.



"Today, he stands completely vindicated," Morgan wrote, citing the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's "long-awaited report"  that "sensationally cleared Trump of any collusion."



While acknowledging that Trump is "jubilant," Morgan turned his focus to the president's enemies:



[M]y overwhelming feeling today is one of fury that [Trump] had to endure such a disgraceful, deceitful and concerted attack on his presidency based on nothing but a fervent desire to destroy him and his family.



Make no mistake, this was a 'Get Trump' mission driven by a collection of people who just couldn't stomach the thought that he won the White House.



The Democrats, led by the demented Adam Schiff, screamed 'COLLUSION!' so often I'm amazed their larynxes didn't explode.



But at least they had an obvious political motive for wanting Trump gone.



What is far worse is the way so many mainstream US media networks, newspapers and individual journalists fuelled the fake frenzy.



They let all the normal rules of balanced reporting fly out the window as they competed with each other over who could land the biggest Pulitzer prize-winning Trump/Russia sucker punch that would KO the President they loathe.



Only it turned out they were all punching thin air.



Morgan's lengthy piece breaks down every aspect of the collusion hoax and the media's role in it before concluding with a silver lining for Trump, who can now declare: "I delivered on defeating ISIS, I delivered on the economy – and I crushed the fake news attempt to destroy me on Russia collusion."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 26, 2019, 11:06:21 PM
I agree.



2020 is a shoe-in now.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 26, 2019, 11:07:42 PM
Quote from: "Bricktop"I agree.



2020 is a shoe-in now.

You are being sarcastic, but the odds just got better.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Frood on March 27, 2019, 09:59:34 AM
Quote from: "Herman"Let's hope the British wanker is right and this fake Russia collusion hoax, most of the progtard media promoted gets Trump reelected.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/piers-morgan-collusion-hoax-trump-2020/?utm_medium=email

PIERS MORGAN CALLS IT: THE RUSSIA COLLUSION HOAX WILL DELIVER TRUMP'S 2020 WIN



British journalist and television personality Piers Morgan blasted the "Russia collusion hoax" as a "disgraceful fake news witch-hunt" by President Donald Trump's enemies that very well could end up ensuring his re-election in 2020.



In a fiery column published Monday on DailyMail.com, Morgan criticized Trump's enemies for propagating an "obsessively unrelenting campaign" to bring down the president by essentially accusing him of the worst thing possible: betraying his own country.



"Today, he stands completely vindicated," Morgan wrote, citing the release of special counsel Robert Mueller's "long-awaited report"  that "sensationally cleared Trump of any collusion."



While acknowledging that Trump is "jubilant," Morgan turned his focus to the president's enemies:



[M]y overwhelming feeling today is one of fury that [Trump] had to endure such a disgraceful, deceitful and concerted attack on his presidency based on nothing but a fervent desire to destroy him and his family.



Make no mistake, this was a 'Get Trump' mission driven by a collection of people who just couldn't stomach the thought that he won the White House.



The Democrats, led by the demented Adam Schiff, screamed 'COLLUSION!' so often I'm amazed their larynxes didn't explode.



But at least they had an obvious political motive for wanting Trump gone.



What is far worse is the way so many mainstream US media networks, newspapers and individual journalists fuelled the fake frenzy.



They let all the normal rules of balanced reporting fly out the window as they competed with each other over who could land the biggest Pulitzer prize-winning Trump/Russia sucker punch that would KO the President they loathe.



Only it turned out they were all punching thin air.



Morgan's lengthy piece breaks down every aspect of the collusion hoax and the media's role in it before concluding with a silver lining for Trump, who can now declare: "I delivered on defeating ISIS, I delivered on the economy – and I crushed the fake news attempt to destroy me on Russia collusion."


Is he still anti-guns?
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 27, 2019, 01:29:12 PM


https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2019-03-26/despite-report-findings-almost-half-of-americans-think-trump-colluded-with-russia



This is what happens when the media, who is charged with informing people, are a bunch of activist liars promoting their own political agenda.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2019, 03:19:02 PM
Wazzzup, it doesn't help when members of congress won't accept the results of Mueller's investigation.



'Undoubtedly there is collusion': Trump antagonist Adam Schiff doubles down after Mueller finds no conspiracy

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/undoubtedly-there-is-collusion-trump-antagonist-adam-schiff-doubles-down-after-mueller-finds-no-conspiracy/ar-BBVhfsS?li=AAggFp5&ocid=mailsignout
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on March 27, 2019, 05:57:12 PM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"


Is he still anti-guns?


Most intelligent, reasonable, responsible adults outside of America are.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2019, 08:09:09 PM
A Russia collusion conspiracy show's ratings have dropped like a rock off a cliff. What a frickin shame.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/27/msnbc-rachel-maddow-tv-ratings-russia-collusion/?utm_medium=email

MSNBC'S RACHEL MADDOW LOSES HALF-A-MILLION VIEWERS AFTER IMPLOSION OF COLLUSION CONSPIRACY



MSNBC host Rachel Maddow lost half-a-million viewers in just one week after special counsel Robert Mueller's report indicated that he did not find enough evidence to support collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.



Maddow has been one of the most prominent voices on the collusion conspiracy, spending most of her programs over the past two years on allegations that President Donald Trump coordinated with the Russian government to win the 2016 presidential election. Maddow struggled to hold back tears as she delivered her opening monologue last Friday, clearly stunned that Mueller did not bring any indictments against the president or his family.



The implosion of the Russian collusion narrative damaged more than just Maddow's ego — it also destroyed her ratings, at least temporarily.



"The Rachel Maddow Show" on MSNBC delivered monster ratings for the network, cementing the cable host as the left-wing foil to Fox News' Sean Hannity. Maddow consistently finished 1st or 2nd in overall cable news ratings over the past year, sometimes garnering more than 3 million viewers.



But according to The Daily Beast, Maddow's show dropped 500,000 viewers in just one week after the Mueller report dropped.



"Maddow, who has consistently vied for the first or second top-rated cable news program, was sixth on Monday evening, down almost 500,000 total viewers from the previous Monday, as was MSNBC's second top-rated program in primetime, 'The Last Word With Lawrence O'Donnell,'" The Daily Beast reported.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on March 27, 2019, 10:44:50 PM
The media and the Democrats spent so much time trying to convince Americans of the Trump-Russia collusion, it is hard to walk that back now.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2019, 05:39:25 PM
I would go after all the agents in government that pushed this fraud.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/28/republicans-turn-attention-to-john-brennan-after-mueller-findings/?utm_medium=email

REPUBLICANS TURN ATTENTION TO JOHN BRENNAN AFTER MUELLER FINDINGS



Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the White House are turning their attention to former CIA Director John Brennan after special counsel Robert Mueller's findings of no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.



Brennan insinuated on several occasions in the interim two years that there was evidence of contacts between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, serving as one of the most prominent critics of the administration. The former CIA director even testified before Congress in May 2017 that there was evidence of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign figures, though now says he might have been given "bad information."



Trump directly accused Brennan of lying before Congress in a Wednesday evening interview on the Fox News Channel, saying "Brennan lied. Many of these people lied to Congress and nothing happened," adding, "I think Brennan is a sick person. I think there's something wrong for him. And I watch — for him to come out of the CIA and act that way was so disrespectful to the country and to the CIA and to the position he held."
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 31, 2019, 10:16:20 AM
Quote from: "Herman"I would go after all the agents in government that pushed this fraud.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/28/republicans-turn-attention-to-john-brennan-after-mueller-findings/?utm_medium=email

REPUBLICANS TURN ATTENTION TO JOHN BRENNAN AFTER MUELLER FINDINGS



Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the White House are turning their attention to former CIA Director John Brennan after special counsel Robert Mueller's findings of no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.



Brennan insinuated on several occasions in the interim two years that there was evidence of contacts between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, serving as one of the most prominent critics of the administration. The former CIA director even testified before Congress in May 2017 that there was evidence of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign figures, though now says he might have been given "bad information."



Trump directly accused Brennan of lying before Congress in a Wednesday evening interview on the Fox News Channel, saying "Brennan lied. Many of these people lied to Congress and nothing happened," adding, "I think Brennan is a sick person. I think there's something wrong for him. And I watch — for him to come out of the CIA and act that way was so disrespectful to the country and to the CIA and to the position he held."
IMO there should be a special prosecutor appointed to look into how this all went down.  And possibly investigate Hillary's emails and other corrupt BS.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on March 31, 2019, 10:19:24 AM
The New York Times reported Thursday, "Democrats, who like all other lawmakers have not seen the report, have all but accused Mr. Barr of covering up damaging information it contains."



Some have indicated that because Barr summarized a 300-page report in just a four page letter, he must be oversimplifying or misinterpreting the results of Mueller's investigation.



If Barr does not release the report in its entirety, including grand jury information, one anonymous Hill staffer told the Washington Post, then he will be participating in a "coverup."[/quote]
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 01:04:06 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"The New York Times reported Thursday, "Democrats, who like all other lawmakers have not seen the report, have all but accused Mr. Barr of covering up damaging information it contains."



Some have indicated that because Barr summarized a 300-page report in just a four page letter, he must be oversimplifying or misinterpreting the results of Mueller's investigation.



If Barr does not release the report in its entirety, including grand jury information, one anonymous Hill staffer told the Washington Post, then he will be participating in a "coverup."
[/quote]
They go from one baseless conspiracy theory.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 11:38:23 AM
Chapter two in the Democrats sour grapes playbook.



By Larry Elder



Has the Trump 2020 collusion investigation started yet?



The two-year-in-the-making Mueller report has finally concluded. The main takeaways: no further indictments, no allegations of interference with the investigation and no finding of collusion with Russia. So, let's go to the videotape.



Before Robert Mueller's report:



"The bombshell revelation that U.S. officials have information that suggests Trump associates may have colluded with the Russians means we must pause the entire Trump agenda. We may have an illegitimate President of the United States." — Rep. Ted Lieu, D-calif., March 23, 2017.



"Here you have a President who, I can tell you and guarantee you, is in collusion with the Russians to undermine our democracy." — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-calif., Sept. 21, 2017.



"I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight." — Rep. Adam Schiff, D-calif., Aug. 5, 2018



On television, Schiff, who early on claimed evidence of collusion, became quite the workhorse. According to the Washington Free Beacon, during the first six months of Donald Trump's presidency, Schiff had "done 123 national television interviews totalling more than 14 hours of air time since January, according to a tracking report provided to the White House ... The vast majority of them have been on cable networks CNN and MSNBC, although Schiff has also done interviews on Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, Comedy Central, and HBO." After the Mueller report: "There was a big difference between whether there was evidence of collusion — and I think that evidence is in plain sight — and whether you can establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal conspiracy." — Schiff, March 25, 2019.



"Given the lengthy redactions in many of the pleadings of the special counsel eluding to other investigations, I think it's entirely possible if not likely that there will be other indictments." — Schiff, March 22, 2019.



"We don't know much. I'm just going to go by what we do know, and I must say, I don't think it looks good. No further indictments ... Did the Democrats put too much trust in the Mueller report? Because I don't need the Mueller report to know he's a traitor. I have a TV." — HBO host Bill Maher, March 22, 2019.



"You have a President who, in my opinion, beyond a shadow of a doubt, sought to, however ham-handedly, collude with the Russian government or foreign power to undermine and influence our elections." Presidential candidate Rep. Beto O'rourke, D-texas, March 23, 2019.



The Democrats now demand that the Mueller report be made public. Trump said he wants it made public, too. As to whether it will be made public, and how much, former special prosecutor Ken Starr outlined what happens next:



"Under the regulations that governed his appointment and now guide his final acts, Mueller is to provide a confidential report to one person only: the attorney general. The regulations, which were promulgated during the final months of the Clinton administration, do not contemplate any sort of report sent directly from the special counsel to Congress or the general public. To the contrary, the regulations call upon the attorney general, William Barr, to receive the confidential report and then do two things: First, to notify Congress of the investigation's completion and, second, to provide an explanation for certain specifically enumerated actions. There is no requirement for a Barr-edited version of the Mueller report ...



"The attorney general also has the raw power to jettison the regulations entirely. Unlike a statute, the regulations may be dispatched by the stroke of a pen, and new ones put in place. He may determine that the public interest requires maximum transparency, as long as grand-jury secrecy is scrupulously maintained. But unless and until the attorney general takes that bold action, the current regulations stand and have the force of law."



In sum, for anti-trumpers, hope appears to have run out on the Mueller team, which, at one time, was perhaps the only mostly all-white, mostly allmale group that today's Democrats could love and embrace. Now, in fairness, not all liberal Trump critics got it wrong about the Mueller report. CNN host Van Jones, in June 2017, was approached in the street by a man working with Project Veritas, who secretly taped their conversation. The man, after claiming the two met a few years earlier, asked Jones what he thought of the Russian collusion investigation. Jones, unaware he was being taped, replied: "The Russia thing is just a big nothing burger. There's nothing there you can do."



Will Trump haters and semi-haters see the Mueller report as the President's vindication? Not likely. An Economist/yougov poll from last November found 67% of Democrats believe that Russia, despite a complete and total lack of evidence, "definitely" or "probably" not only interfered with the election but changed vote tallies.



Now that the report found no collusion, we can expect the Democrats and much of the media to get back to basics: calling the President racist, fascist, sexist, xenophobic, anti-semitic, homophobic, anti-hispanic, etc. It's going to be a long two years, and likely, thanks to the Mueller report, a long six years.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 02:56:52 PM
Investigate the Steele dossier.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/31/steele-dossier-russian-disinformation/?utm_medium=email

INVESTIGATE STEELE DOSSIER AS RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION, INTEL EXPERTS SAY



Special counsel Robert Mueller's finding of no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia undercuts the Steele dossier's core claim of a "well-developed conspiracy" to influence the 2016 election.

Intelligence experts said the dossier should be investigated as possible Russian disinformation.

"The intelligence community was misled," an intelligence expert said.

In a deposition for a lawsuit related to the dossier in June 2018, former British spy Christopher Steele acknowledged his infamous report could be the product of Russian disinformation.



But Steele, a former MI6 officer who worked in Moscow, dismissed the possibility he was hoodwinked by Russian operatives who planted anti-Trump dirt.



"All material contained this risk, but that any information that was actually provided would have been subject to scrutiny in respect of this risk," Steele said in a June 18, 2018, deposition for a lawsuit against BuzzFeed, the original publisher of the dossier.



In other words, Steele believed he had enough experience dealing with Russian sources that he could spot Kremlin attempts to provide him disinformation.



But the prospect that Steele did fall victim to a Russian hoax became more likely in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's finding that the Trump campaign did not conspire or coordinate with the Kremlin to influence the 2016 election.



"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities," reads a letter Attorney General William Barr sent Congress summarizing Mueller's findings.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 01, 2019, 04:19:24 PM
Lindsey Graham 2.0 who finally found his balls after the Kavanaugh hearings says an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the dossier and Hillary and her crimes.  



https://www.dailywire.com/news/45346/lindsey-graham-reveals-ag-bill-barr-pretty-upset-ryan-saavedra


QuoteSenate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) revealed during an interview on Sunday that Attorney General William Barr is "pretty upset" over the way the criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton was handled and that he hopes "there's a special counsel appointed to look at DOJ corruption and political bias."



Appearing on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," Graham told Maria Bartiromo that there needs to be an investigation into the other side regarding the 2016 election, including the "Clinton campaign, the FISA warrant abuse [and] the counterintelligence investigation."



"Nobody in the Clinton e-mail investigation went to jail for lying about the process, because there was no process," Graham said. "And I know Bill Barr pretty well, and he's pretty upset about the way all this was handled. I don't know if he's going to have a special prosecutor to look at the probability of criminal misbehavior. I'm going to look at what happened from an oversight role, but I hope there's a special counsel appointed to look at DOJ corruption and political bias, because Mueller did his job against Trump. Nobody's really looked at the Clinton campaign, the FISA warrant abuse or the counterintelligence investigation, criminality yet — and somebody should."


Its up to Barr though.   We are going to find out whether he is another Jeff Sessions or whether he has a spine.



Maybe he is waiting till the Mueller report is released in April. IMO it should be NOW.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 04:21:46 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"Lindsey Graham 2.0 who finally found his balls after the Kavanaugh hearings says an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the dossier and Hillary and her crimes.  



https://www.dailywire.com/news/45346/lindsey-graham-reveals-ag-bill-barr-pretty-upset-ryan-saavedra



Its up to Barr though.   We are going to find out whether he is another Jeff Sessions or whether he has a spine.



Maybe he is waiting till the Mueller report is released in April. IMO it should be NOW.

More investigations though..



I thought everyone who is not an elected Democrat was tired of investigations.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on April 01, 2019, 04:42:54 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"Lindsey Graham 2.0 who finally found his balls after the Kavanaugh hearings says an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the dossier and Hillary and her crimes.  



https://www.dailywire.com/news/45346/lindsey-graham-reveals-ag-bill-barr-pretty-upset-ryan-saavedra



Its up to Barr though.   We are going to find out whether he is another Jeff Sessions or whether he has a spine.



Maybe he is waiting till the Mueller report is released in April. IMO it should be NOW.

More investigations though..



I thought everyone who is not an elected Democrat was tired of investigations.

Tired of phony investigations based upon no infractions



Hot for "REAL" investigations  based upon real infractions
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 04:54:35 PM
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"Lindsey Graham 2.0 who finally found his balls after the Kavanaugh hearings says an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the dossier and Hillary and her crimes.  



https://www.dailywire.com/news/45346/lindsey-graham-reveals-ag-bill-barr-pretty-upset-ryan-saavedra



Its up to Barr though.   We are going to find out whether he is another Jeff Sessions or whether he has a spine.



Maybe he is waiting till the Mueller report is released in April. IMO it should be NOW.

More investigations though..



I thought everyone who is not an elected Democrat was tired of investigations.

Tired of phony investigations based upon no infractions



Hot for "REAL" investigations  based upon real infractions

I know I am. Bring on an investigation into the Clinton camp/Steele dossier.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Thiel on April 02, 2019, 12:50:56 AM
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"Lindsey Graham 2.0 who finally found his balls after the Kavanaugh hearings says an independent prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the dossier and Hillary and her crimes.  



https://www.dailywire.com/news/45346/lindsey-graham-reveals-ag-bill-barr-pretty-upset-ryan-saavedra



Its up to Barr though.   We are going to find out whether he is another Jeff Sessions or whether he has a spine.



Maybe he is waiting till the Mueller report is released in April. IMO it should be NOW.

More investigations though..



I thought everyone who is not an elected Democrat was tired of investigations.

Tired of phony investigations based upon no infractions



Hot for "REAL" investigations  based upon real infractions

There must be consequences for those responsible for the Russia-Trump collusion hoax.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 02, 2019, 02:15:25 AM
And those who knowingly and willingly perpetuated the lie with a view to undermining the Presidency.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 09:00:02 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"And those who knowingly and willingly perpetuated the lie with a view to undermining the Presidency.

They are the same people.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 05:38:46 PM
We should have known who was behind it.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/01/fusion-gps-steele-soros-millions/?utm_medium=email

FIRMS TIED TO FUSION GPS, CHRISTOPHER STEELE WERE PAID $3.8 MILLION BY SOROS-BACKED GROUP



The Democracy Integrity Project, a nonprofit that receives funding from George Soros, paid firms tied to Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele more than $3.8 million in 2017.

Tax filings show that The Democracy Integrity Project provided its research to "government entities."

The group's founder, a former staffer for Dianne Feinstein, has described it as a "shadow media organization" that helps the government.

A nonprofit group partially funded by billionaire activist George Soros paid firms tied to Fusion GPS and dossier author Christopher Steele more than $3.8 million in 2017 to provide research and analysis to "government entities," according to IRS filings.



The payments made by The Democracy Integrity Project are more than three times what the DNC and the Clinton campaign paid Fusion GPS and Steele during the 2016 presidential campaign to investigate Donald Trump's possible ties to Russia.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 02, 2019, 05:55:46 PM
Soros is a menace to freedom.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 10, 2019, 02:34:24 PM
Something tells me that Adam Schitt won't be as enthusiastic about this investigation if it happens.



https://www.rt.com/usa/456129-trump-russia-probe-coup/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=push_notifications

Those who started Russia probe were attempting a 'coup', AG must start investigation – Trump



President Donald Trump has called the FBI's investigation into alleged 'Russian collusion' a "coup" attempt, and said he wants Attorney General William Barr to investigate the probe's origins.

"It was an illegal investigation, it was started illegally, everything about it was crooked," Trump told reporters outside the White House. "It was an attempted coup."



Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has been investigating the FBI's alleged misuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for just over one year, and Barr told a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday that Horowitz's final report should be completed by "May or June."



Horowitz's investigation centers around the FBI's use of the now-infamous 'Steele Dossier' as evidence to acquire a warrant to wiretap Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The dossier was compiled by a former British spy, paid for by Trump's opponents within Hillary Clinton's campaign, and contained a raft of unverified claims about Trump's supposed contact with Russians.



Speaking at Tuesday's hearing, Barr also told lawmakers that he may open a broader investigation into the FBI's 2016 'Crossfire Hurricane' counterintelligence investigation against Trump, opened by openly Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: cc on April 10, 2019, 04:27:51 PM
From what Barr said before congress, he IS investigating everything to do with how it was all started and by whom.



Quote: Barr says " Trump campaign was spied on, and it 'is a big deal'"



And the IG  is investigating parts of it and other bad stuff for Barr's  office - report due in a month or so
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 10, 2019, 04:31:30 PM
Will CNN spend 90 per cent of it's broadcast time investigating this conspiracy against Trump like the Russia collusion hoax. Not a chance.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 10, 2019, 08:30:57 PM
I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork--



AP Interview: Pelosi: 'I don't trust Barr; I trust Mueller'

https://apnews.com/c1e53f17e84b4bd285b01b53f657ce7e
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 10, 2019, 08:45:57 PM
And this from an elected representative...



Who is she speaking on behalf of?
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 11, 2019, 11:18:41 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"And this from an elected representative...



Who is she speaking on behalf of?
I wonder who is she to tell anyone who to trust?  She and her dem party pushed a russia collusion hoax for over two years and no evidence was found.  Who can't be trusted? She should look in the mirror.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 11, 2019, 11:23:14 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Bricktop"And this from an elected representative...



Who is she speaking on behalf of?
I wonder who is she to tell anyone who to trust?  She and her dem party pushed a russia collusion hoax for over two years and no evidence was found.  Who can't be trusted? She should look in the mirror.

She should be included in any investigation into the whole Russia collusion hoax.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 11, 2019, 11:30:49 AM
^yep She should be.  



---

https://pics.me.me/hope-you-had-fun-investigating-me-now-its-my-turn-47888420.png[/img]
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 11, 2019, 11:34:33 AM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"^yep She should be.  



---

https://pics.me.me/hope-you-had-fun-investigating-me-now-its-my-turn-47888420.png[/img]

Hey Chuck, you are the pot. Say hello to the kettle.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 12, 2019, 06:01:28 PM
[size=150]Nunes sends criminal-referral notification to Barr, alleges several 'potential violations' in Russia probe[/size] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nunes-sends-criminal-referral-notification-to-barr-alleges-several-potential-violations-in-russia-probe?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20foxnews%2Fpolitics%20%28Internal%20-%20Politics%20-%20Tex



Its says there are 8, but does not say who--



(guessing) A possible list



Comey

McCabe

Strzok

Page

Clapper

Brennan

Ohr

Lynch
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 12, 2019, 06:07:45 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Seems Paul Manafort may have some company.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 12, 2019, 07:00:59 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"

Where's the Godfather?



Obama.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2019, 12:29:58 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"

Where's the Godfather?



Obama.

You got that right. He was the president when these potential crimes took place.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 13, 2019, 02:48:38 PM
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"

Where's the Godfather?



Obama.

You got that right. He was the president when these potential crimes took place.


I expect Obama was involved, but its going to take a lot of evidence to bring him down, and even then its highly unlikely.  The dems and the media (same thing) are going to do everything they can to mess up any chance at justice.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2019, 03:20:55 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"

Where's the Godfather?



Obama.

You got that right. He was the president when these potential crimes took place.


I expect Obama was involved, but its going to take a lot of evidence to bring him down, and even then its highly unlikely.  The dems and the media (same thing) are going to do everything they can to mess up any chance at justice.

It won't happen.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 15, 2019, 12:16:38 PM
Comey's ridiculous quote--



https://www.foxnews.com/politics/comey-scoffs-at-barr-testimony-claims-surveillance-is-not-spying


QuoteTestifying before a Senate subcommittee earlier this week, the Attorney General told lawmakers that "spying did occur" and that he was looking into whether the government abused its power.



"When I hear that kind of language used, it's concerning because the FBI and the Department of Justice conduct court-ordered electronic surveillance," Comey said during a cybersecurity conference in California Thursday adding, "I have never thought of that as spying."


Well there you go, surveillance isn't spying. :001_rolleyes:  :oeudC:
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 18, 2019, 06:41:15 PM
Just to show what a joke American media is these days this is an actual headline and actual article from Newsweek Magazine--



As special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is reportedly coming to an end, elderly and sick Americans are trying to hold on to their lives so they can read the highly-anticipated report that has been nearly two years in the making.[/quote]

What a Ridiculous POS :oeudC:
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 18, 2019, 06:58:05 PM
Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on April 18, 2019, 08:21:22 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"Just to show what a joke American media is these days this is an actual headline and actual article from Newsweek Magazine--



As special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is reportedly coming to an end, elderly and sick Americans are trying to hold on to their lives so they can read the highly-anticipated report that has been nearly two years in the making.

What a Ridiculous POS :oeudC:[/quote]
Quote from: "Bricktop"Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?
 Its supposed to be.  It used to be second only to Time magazine for weekly news magazines.  Several comments on the site said they thought they were reading the onion or other satire.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 18, 2019, 08:26:58 PM
I guess, like all media outlets, they join in the headline click-bait feeding frenzy...so matter how ludicrous and ill conceived it may seem.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 18, 2019, 08:41:44 PM
Quote from: "Bricktop"Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?

Like Wazzzup said, it's a big organization, but so is CNN.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Gaon on April 18, 2019, 09:22:10 PM
The full Mueller report is out. I haven't read it. but CNN is spinning it as a basis for the Democrats to impeach Trump.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2019, 11:14:01 AM
Quote from: "Gaon"The full Mueller report is out. I haven't read it. but CNN is spinning it as a basis for the Democrats to impeach Trump.

It doesn't matter what's in it. The Dems and their media minions will spin it.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Bricktop on April 19, 2019, 07:20:46 PM
The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2019, 08:35:54 PM
Quote from: "Bricktop"The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".

Wazzzup talks a lot about this..



Apparently, it's not just at the federal level either.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2019, 09:22:50 AM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".

Wazzzup talks a lot about this..



Apparently, it's not just at the federal level either.

Look at Broward county, Florida. Finding or losing boxes of ballots. A corrupt Democrat scumbag in charge of elections. That's just one corrupt Democratic county.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Wazzzup on May 06, 2019, 02:25:55 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork


Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are. :negative:
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on May 06, 2019, 02:32:08 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork


Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are. :negative:

I would love to see the tables turned on the Democrats. Go Barr go.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on May 06, 2019, 03:34:59 PM
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork


Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are. :negative:

I haven't been following the Dems latest antics. I will take a closer look this week.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Odinson on May 07, 2019, 10:05:18 PM
They are questioning his skills as a business man based on the 1985-1994 tax reports..



He took overall 1,17 billion dollar losses..





What I know about the business world is that its hardly a smooth ride.



You bankrupt yourself and then you rise again harder and stronger..



You fake it until you make it.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on May 08, 2019, 01:15:34 PM
The tax return push is a smokescreen. The Dems do not want to fight the 2020 election on the economy.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on July 22, 2019, 06:42:02 PM
Robert Mueller is a piece of shit. It is up to the GOP to ask him the tough questions he does not want to answer.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/22/fitton-mueller-clinton/?utm_medium=email

Congress Should Stop Wasting Time On Mueller — And Investigate Hillary Clinton's Role In Steel Dossier



Congressional Democrats will finally get an opportunity to put on a public show starring former Special Counsel Robert Mueller when he appears before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.



Mueller was last seen at his May 29 press statement, in which he attacked President Trump by promoting a tenuous theory of obstruction of justice as grounds for impeachment. Mueller, despite the "no collusion, no obstruction" conclusion of his dubious report, smeared the president by presuming him guilty anyway, claiming he was not exonerated and signaled House Democrats to begin impeachment proceedings.



This hearing will give Mueller and the Democrats an opportunity to once again push the "destroy Trump" narrative and jump-start the impeachment process. Mueller's testimony will be geared to that end. Democratic questions will seek to fill in the blanks to preserve Mueller's manufactured reputation for probity. And the mainstream media will be primed — and probably pre-briefed — to drive the point home.



However, unlike at his press statement where he allowed no questions, Mueller will now have to face hard scrutiny from Republicans and honest Democrats about the origins of his investigation, misconduct during the process, and his questionable, sometimes completely erroneous conclusions.



For example, why did Mueller sit on the fact that his team had early-on discovered that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which was the central question of the entire Russiagate hoax? Were the midterm elections a factor in his delay for exonerating President Trump of Russia collusion?



Why did Mueller continue as special counsel after learning that former FBI Director James Comey broke the law to get him appointed by leaking information from President Trump's FBI files to the New York Times, using a Columbia professor friend of his as a cut-out?



Why did Mueller populate his investigative team almost exclusively with people with obvious political bias against President Trump? What was the role of chief prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who hired many of the conflicted members of the team and who had been spotted at Hillary Clinton's election night party?



Why did Mueller hide from the American people for four months Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's outrageous conduct and flagrant anti-Trump bias, which necessitated they be fired from the investigation? And why did his office quietly delete all the text messages they passed while on his team, going so far as to reformat their government-issued phones?



Did Mueller's office have any contacts with the media, such as leaking information regarding the massive pre-dawn raid on Roger Stone's home, or the inexplicable guns-drawn action at the home of Paul Manafort?



Why didn't Mueller investigate the Steele dossier that was the basis for the Russian collusion hoax? Why didn't Mueller examine contacts between Steele, Fusion GPS employees like Nellie Ohr, and/or members of the Clinton campaign with the sketchy Russian sources who fed the rumors that were the basis of the dossier?



These are important questions since this was the only demonstrable Russian collusion in 2016, as the dossier was the prime vehicle for Russian interference in the election.



Critical questions can also be asked about Mueller's report to the attorney general, 400 pages of rumor, innuendo and noise that boiled down to "no collusion, no obstruction." Why did Mueller withhold information from the report that would have tended to make President Trump look good, such as the fact that Carter Page, far from being a Russian colluder, was in fact an FBI informant against Russia?



What does Mueller make of the fact that United States District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich issued an opinion on July 1 that Mueller did not in fact establish a Kremlin connection to the Internet Research Agency, the Russian organization Mueller claimed ran Moscow's 'active measures' social media campaign in 2016?



Democrats, of course, won't want to ask these hard questions because they are implicated in the scandal. Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff has a history of lying about President Trump's alleged collusion with Russia and has serious ethics problems over mishandling of classified info and irregular communications with anti-Trump witnesses.



But regardless of what Mueller says or doesn't say, it is critical to remember that this entire enterprise was illegitimate from the start. We arrived here largely because of one person — Hillary Clinton. The Clinton campaign paid for a smear operation against Donald Trump using Russian rumors filtered through Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS, and a dossier laundered through the Obama Justice Department and FBI to create a bogus psy-operation that ultimately led to the special counsel. Without Hillary Clinton, and the need to minimize the damage from her email scandal, there would have been no dossier, no FISA spy warrants, no collusion hoax, no special counsel, no coup cabal, no threats of impeachment, and no continued partisan harassment from Congress.



This is rooted in a Clinton campaign operation seeking to create a false narrative that the Russians were conspiring with Donald Trump to rig the 2016 election. But she was the one subverting the American electoral process, with the unprecedented and illicit cooperation of corrupt swamp dwellers in the upper reaches of the Obama administration. And it is important that the sedition be exposed, and Hillary Clinton and the rest be held accountable.



To this end the president should start releasing all the key documents that detail the depth and breadth of the scandal, who was involved in it, and how it unfolded. Attorney General William Barr needs to investigate how the Mueller investigation came about and, in particular, the matter of the manufactured predicate for the unprecedented and troubling mobilization of government resources to spy on the Trump presidential campaign.



Meanwhile, Judicial Watch has over 50 lawsuits to uncover more information, of which over a dozen relate to Mueller himself.  The Democrat circus hearing may boomerang as the "investigation of the investigators" accelerates.
Title: Re: NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed
Post by: Anonymous on July 26, 2019, 09:58:00 AM
The public is getting a taste of the rot that was the Mueller investigation, but I'm afraid it's not enough. Fraud be damned, the political outcome of this had prearranged.