//https://www.foxnews.com/great-outdoors/poaching-footage-released-alaska-father-son-killing-protected-bears-report
Killing wild animals for the sake of it.
People like this should be released in the wilderness where bears are known to roam, without weapons.
Payback is a bitch.
Looks like a set up scene.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
//https://www.foxnews.com/great-outdoors/poaching-footage-released-alaska-father-son-killing-protected-bears-report
Killing wild animals for the sake of it.
People like this should be released in the wilderness where bears are known to roam, without weapons.
Payback is a bitch.
terrible
Such is the gun culture of the US, where any form of killing is regarded as "natural" and "manly".
My wife and I have not seen any large wildlife in Canada other than bald eagles when we went to Vancouver Island. We would feel so lucky to see bears or large deers and moose in the wild. We will shoot them with our phones if we see them.
Quote from: "Gaon"
My wife and I have not seen any large wildlife in Canada other than bald eagles when we went to Vancouver Island. We would feel so lucky to see bears or large deer and moose in the wild. We will shoot them with our phones if we see them.
We know people that hunt..
And we have been given wild game..
But, shooting those bears was senseless slaughter.
It's in the American DNA.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
There are lots of urban Americans who would like a total ban on hunting.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
There are lots of urban Americans who would like a total ban on hunting.
Yes, but they wear skinny jeans, scarves, top knots, and drink craft beer and soy lattes while fingering themselves to the thought of the reanimated corpses of Marx and Trotsky slow dancing and making out in the Oval Office.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Gaon"
My wife and I have not seen any large wildlife in Canada other than bald eagles when we went to Vancouver Island. We would feel so lucky to see bears or large deer and moose in the wild. We will shoot them with our phones if we see them.
We know people that hunt..
And we have been given wild game..
But, shooting those bears was senseless slaughter.
Killing anything without a clear purpose in mind is wrong. Most hunters would be horrified to watch that footage.
I've known plenty of rural folk over the years who have destroyed their own dogs if they got out and acquired the taste for pack hunting young animals. It's something extremely difficult to stop after the habit imprints on the dogs and it's more humane to the wildlife and the pet to end it. So when I watch a video like that, it enrages me on a certain level. Senseless pointless no benefits killing.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
There are lots of urban Americans who would like a total ban on hunting.
Yes, but they wear skinny jeans, scarves, top knots, and drink craft beer and soy lattes while fingering themselves to the thought of the reanimated corpses of Marx and Trotsky slow dancing and making out in the Oval Office.
Hey, I resemble that remark. Just kidding, but I am a city boy to the core.
I do not know anyone that hunts and I haven't seen much wildlife outside a zoo. I will reserve judgment on hunting.
You should do it even if just once or twice. Go with an experienced hunter who shows you the ropes safely and responsibly. Small game is easier and you'll get the chance to field dress it, process it, and eat it.
It's a spiritual act, particularly the first time. Teaches you to value and respect life plus it puts existence in perspective. I think everyone who eats animal products should experience and participate in the process rather than only getting it from a cellophane wrapped tray at the supermarket.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Such is the gun culture of the US, where any form of killing is regarded as "natural" and "manly".

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fthediscipleproject.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fcartman_lame-1046.jpg&f=1%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%20...%2046.jpg&f=1%22%3Ehttps://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fthediscipleproject.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fcartman_lame-1046.jpg&f=1%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
There are lots of urban Americans who would like a total ban on hunting.
Yes, but they wear skinny jeans, scarves, top knots, and drink craft beer and soy lattes while fingering themselves to the thought of the reanimated corpses of Marx and Trotsky slow dancing and making out in the Oval Office.
:laugh:
When the hunter have to cuss with teh poor dead bear, think he's all tough when he has a gun, the guy seriously deserves to be banned from hunting, I can never trust these people with a firearm.
I finally watched the video, those fuckers are even more stupid shooting with skis on against a bear. I dont condone illegal hunting nor killing of young animals. I let many young deer go in my time of hunting, they deserve to live a lil too. These fuckers are what gives good hunters a bad name.
Quote from: "Zetsu"
When the hunter have to cuss with teh poor dead bear, think he's all tough when he has a gun, the guy seriously deserves to be banned from hunting, I can never trust these people with a firearm.
I aint arguing with that. I shoot badgers and coyotes on my farm because they are frickin pests. I don't need the old lady's horse or my cattle stepping in giant badger holes and breaking their legs. And both coyotes and badgers will eat my chickens and turkeys. I see the bastards, I shoot the bastards. But, a bear on it's own turf. That was stupid.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
When the hunter have to cuss with teh poor dead bear, think he's all tough when he has a gun, the guy seriously deserves to be banned from hunting, I can never trust these people with a firearm.
I aint arguing with that. I shoot badgers and coyotes on my farm because they are frickin pests. I don't need the old lady's horse or my cattle stepping in giant badger holes and breaking their legs. And both coyotes and badgers will eat my chickens and turkeys. I see the bastards, I shoot the bastards. But, a bear on it's own turf. That was stupid.
I agree with ya brother, and in your case it makes much more sense to take the pest out that is killing your live stocks and damaging your property. But these guys are different, they just seem to have little respect for nature itself. IMO there's really only 3 reasons I can think of to kill an animal, it's either to protect yourself and other lives/homes, etc, or to eat, and last to end any pain and suffering they're going through.
:smiley_thumbs_up_yellow_ani:
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
When the hunter have to cuss with teh poor dead bear, think he's all tough when he has a gun, the guy seriously deserves to be banned from hunting, I can never trust these people with a firearm.
I aint arguing with that. I shoot badgers and coyotes on my farm because they are frickin pests. I don't need the old lady's horse or my cattle stepping in giant badger holes and breaking their legs. And both coyotes and badgers will eat my chickens and turkeys. I see the bastards, I shoot the bastards. But, a bear on it's own turf. That was stupid.
I agree with ya brother, and in your case it makes much more sense to take the pest out that is killing your live stocks and damaging your property. But these guys are different, they just seem to have little respect for nature itself. IMO there's really only 3 reasons I can think of to kill an animal, it's either to protect yourself and other lives/homes, etc, or to eat, and last to end any pain and suffering they're going through.
Very good post Zetsu.
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
When the hunter have to cuss with teh poor dead bear, think he's all tough when he has a gun, the guy seriously deserves to be banned from hunting, I can never trust these people with a firearm.
I aint arguing with that. I shoot badgers and coyotes on my farm because they are frickin pests. I don't need the old lady's horse or my cattle stepping in giant badger holes and breaking their legs. And both coyotes and badgers will eat my chickens and turkeys. I see the bastards, I shoot the bastards. But, a bear on it's own turf. That was stupid.
I agree with ya brother, and in your case it makes much more sense to take the pest out that is killing your live stocks and damaging your property. But these guys are different, they just seem to have little respect for nature itself. IMO there's really only 3 reasons I can think of to kill an animal, it's either to protect yourself and other lives/homes, etc, or to eat, and last to end any pain and suffering they're going through.
Pretty sensible my friend. Until about six or seven years ago I had been hunting since I was twelve years old. I gave it up and gave most of my rifles to my nephews. They in turn supply me with moose, elk and venison.
I never enjoyed watching big game die when I hunted. It was all about filling my freezer. Shooting coyotes and badgers is different and you get that. They are vermin.
So connecting back as part of nature is really lame award worthy?
Hunting and eating my first kill was as spiritual to me as the first time I slept in a hand made bough shelter under the stars or as luck actually had it, a freak electrical storm which descended on the mountain-top and pulverized the trees all around.
Holding your first born in ypur hands for the first time is also a spiritual experience. Is that really lame too?
Let's discuss your feelings and thoughts about what is really lame. If you're capable.
Your reply to my honest question is really lame.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
That's fricking preposterous. There IS no specifically American DNA, as you'd know if you actually visited the country and sampled it.
All the same, it's nice to read a thread where you and Dinky sort of agree about something, even if it's not til after the ceremonial pie throwing. ac_dance
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
That's fricking preposterous. There IS no specifically American DNA, as you'd know if you actually visited the country and sampled it.
All the same, it's nice to read a thread where you and Dinky sort of agree about something, even if it's not til after the ceremonial pie throwing. ac_dance
That American DNA comment was a it silly, but Bricktop knows that anyway..
Is if feeling like spring yet where you live..
We are going to get cold again next week.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
You should do it even if just once or twice. Go with an experienced hunter who shows you the ropes safely and responsibly. Small game is easier and you'll get the chance to field dress it, process it, and eat it.
It's a spiritual act, particularly the first time. Teaches you to value and respect life plus it puts existence in perspective. I think everyone who eats animal products should experience and participate in the process rather than only getting it from a cellophane wrapped tray at the supermarket.
No thanks. My idea of "roughing it" is a golf course that doesn't have a happy hour in the club house.
Quote from: "Peaches"
There IS no specifically American DNA, as you'd know if you actually visited the country and sampled it.
I have visited your country.
When is the last time you were in Australia?
The reference to "American DNA" was, I thought, an obvious reference to CULTURAL DNA.
And killing is very much a part of that cultural DNA.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It's in the American DNA.
That's fricking preposterous. There IS no specifically American DNA, as you'd know if you actually visited the country and sampled it.
All the same, it's nice to read a thread where you and Dinky sort of agree about something, even if it's not til after the ceremonial pie throwing. ac_dance
That American DNA comment was a it silly, but Bricktop knows that anyway..
Is if feeling like spring yet where you live..
We are going to get cold again next week.
Yes, it was silly. But I knew Brick would jump on it like a hungry wren jumps on a morning roundworm.
Weather-wise, the beginning of last week was several days of 0°C at daybreak with highs of 15-20 with good sun. The lows were more like 10 later in the week, even nicer. But today it rained and the front came from the north (indicating a jet stream vortex) with northerly winds and dropping temps. By morning we'll be back to a repeat of last week, looks like. Dogwoods have blossomed and it's definitely spring. Some years we'll have a fake spring or two, but maybe not this year.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Peaches"
There IS no specifically American DNA, as you'd know if you actually visited the country and sampled it.
I have visited your country.
When is the last time you were in Australia?
The reference to "American DNA" was, I thought, an obvious reference to CULTURAL DNA.
And killing is very much a part of that cultural DNA.
There are around a dozen Balkanized sub-regions in the US, and I'm just wondering how many of them you've seen. I've been in Australia only once, about 55 years ago, but only Sydney (and briefly Melbourne,) so as you may've noticed I don't claim or imply any expertise in its culture.
I did assume you meant the DNA remark metaphorically, but I found the metaphor itself to be faulty so I questioned it. And since you chose to double down on it, I have to say that not only do prevailing attitudes about "killing" vary noticeably amongst those regions, they also vary inside all those regions and often within biological families, which suggests that unlike hair color the said attitudes are not heritable.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Your reply to my honest question is really lame.
If the word "honest" suddenly leapt out of a dictionary and slapped your stupid bald head, you'd still wonder what it meant.
Your presence here is a troll. Every post you spit out is just a part of that troll.
One day, if and when you grow up and act like an adult, perhaps then we might engage in a conversation. But that's a long shot.
To me it seems a bit narcissistic of you to say this, and your constant reiteration of it has failed so far to convince me it's true. I'll concede that DD does seem to have a bit of a crusty front towards you, but I often get the same kind of front from "her." Just consider that maybe it's not about you at all, and Diana's just a bitch.
Quote from: "Peaches"
There are around a dozen Balkanized sub-regions in the US, and I'm just wondering how many of them you've seen. I've been in Australia only once, about 55 years ago, but only Sydney (and briefly Melbourne,) so as you may've noticed I don't claim or imply any expertise in its culture.
I did assume you meant the DNA remark metaphorically, but I found the metaphor itself to be faulty so I questioned it. And since you chose to double down on it, I have to say that not only do prevailing attitudes about "killing" vary noticeably amongst those regions, they also vary inside all those regions and often within biological families, which suggests that unlike hair color the said attitudes are not heritable.
I do not much care how you attribute and distribute your nation's cultural DNA. It bemuses me when someone makes a comment on some American trait, and the response is often "oh, that's in another State". America is a single nation. And its NATIONAL cultural DNA contains a disturbing propensity for violence and killing.
Quote from: "Peaches"
To me it seems a bit narcissistic of you to say this, and your constant reiteration of it has failed so far to convince me it's true. I'll concede that DD does seem to have a bit of a crusty front towards you, but I often get the same kind of front from "her." Just consider that maybe it's not about you at all, and Diana's just a bitch.
Now there's an about face. It WAS you who regaled Freud's troll as succeeding day by day, was it not?
However, of greater significance is the fact that I know Dinky is Freud and if you're not convinced it is of absolutely NO consequence either way.
Your post smells of duplicity. You know full well Dinky is Freud, yet you seem to be joining in the troll by offering doubt and denial.
With respect, it would be better if you confined this sort of agitating to your own forum, where it is more de rigeur...
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Peaches"
There are around a dozen Balkanized sub-regions in the US, and I'm just wondering how many of them you've seen. I've been in Australia only once, about 55 years ago, but only Sydney (and briefly Melbourne,) so as you may've noticed I don't claim or imply any expertise in its culture.
I did assume you meant the DNA remark metaphorically, but I found the metaphor itself to be faulty so I questioned it. And since you chose to double down on it, I have to say that not only do prevailing attitudes about "killing" vary noticeably amongst those regions, they also vary inside all those regions and often within biological families, which suggests that unlike hair color the said attitudes are not heritable.
I do not much care how you attribute and distribute your nation's cultural DNA. It bemuses me when someone makes a comment on some American trait, and the response is often "oh, that's in another State". America is a single nation. And its NATIONAL cultural DNA contains a disturbing propensity for violence and killing.
Quote from: "Peaches"
To me it seems a bit narcissistic of you to say this, and your constant reiteration of it has failed so far to convince me it's true. I'll concede that DD does seem to have a bit of a crusty front towards you, but I often get the same kind of front from "her." Just consider that maybe it's not about you at all, and Diana's just a bitch.
Now there's an about face. It WAS you who regaled Freud's troll as succeeding day by day, was it not?
However, of greater significance is the fact that I know Dinky is Freud and if you're not convinced it is of absolutely NO consequence either way.
Your post smells of duplicity. You know full well Dinky is Freud, yet you seem to be joining in the troll by offering doubt and denial.
With respect, it would be better if you confined this sort of agitating to your own forum, where it is more de rigeur...
Be that as it may, I'm far more concerned by your having doubled down on the DNA trope -- and just now, having compounded it by dismissing the points I laboriously made in my prior post out of hand, by not deigning to acknowledge them and thus not feeling any duty to rebut them before plowing ahead.
There are no scientific studies out there about "cultural DNA" as one might imagine, since it's a sort of word salad not connected to anything real. But social scientists have done a thorough job of identifying and describing the eleven or twelve cultural regions of the US, to which your response is "America is a single country."
That's a significant move of the goalposts, pal, from biology to politics.
America is a single, sovereign nation.
At THAT level, it has demonstrated, constantly, a propensity for violence and killing.
Let us take Hollywood, for example. It churns out thousands of deaths (fictitious in the main) a year. Is that not part of American culture?
School shootings have occurred in many parts of the US. Is that not part of the American culture?
America, for no supportable or lawful reason, has attacked Cuba, Vietnam, Korea (although that was the UN...so you get half a pass), Iraq, Libya, Panama, Nicaragua (via proxy) and has meddled in the affairs of Chile, Iran, and Syria. America is the one and only nation to have used nuclear devices against another country with NO redeeming justification whatsoever.
America is a country that turns violence into profit, and venerates firearms. Guns and killing are problem solvers in the US.
I will stand by my position that violence and killing is deeply woven into the fabric of American culture and society. Prove me wrong.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
America is a single, sovereign nation.
At THAT level, it has demonstrated, constantly, a propensity for violence and killing.
Let us take Hollywood, for example. It churns out thousands of deaths (fictitious in the main) a year. Is that not part of American culture?
School shootings have occurred in many parts of the US. Is that not part of the American culture?
America, for no supportable or lawful reason, has attacked Cuba, Vietnam, Korea (although that was the UN...so you get half a pass), Iraq, Libya, Panama, Nicaragua (via proxy) and has meddled in the affairs of Chile, Iran, and Syria. America is the one and only nation to have used nuclear devices against another country with NO redeeming justification whatsoever.
America is a country that turns violence into profit, and venerates firearms. Guns and killing are problem solvers in the US.
I will stand by my position that [size=150]violence and killing is deeply woven into the fabric of American culture and society.[/size] Prove me wrong.
I've bolded a few of your words prior to the last paragraph which is in larger type. This is a serious comment, so please take it as such.
America, as a monolithic entity, has rarely existed. Its psyche has been largely one of deep divisions.
Aside from genocides and slavery, though, its history up to the turn of the twentieth century is no more bloody than those of the European countries that settled its white population.
America from Teddy Roosevelt's time onward is a different story. And America from the WW2 era onward is a much different story. But what you are attributing to "culture" is a violent set of behaviors that I attribute to the triumph of corporatism, the military-industrial complex, and a profoundly disgusting series of wealth transfers upward to its kleptocracy.
I'll stipulate that Hollywood may be a part of American "culture" but it's not one that arises sui generis from the ground up, but rather is imposed downward by moneyed interests. The same is true of the music business and the other arts, but to a lesser extent. For this reason, America is schizoid in its observable culture just as in its politics. Too much of the observable culture is driven by disinformation and propaganda.
Bottom line is, I attribute America's violent nature with factors that are more social and economic than they are "cultural." You probably won't like this, but to me words are important and need to be chosen carefully.
Quote from: "Peaches"
America from Teddy Roosevelt's time onward is a different story. And America from the WW2 era onward is a much different story. But what you are attributing to "culture" is a violent set of behaviors that I attribute to the triumph of corporatism, the military-industrial complex, and a profoundly disgusting series of wealth transfers upward to its kleptocracy.
Hogwash.Post WW2 US saw the expansion of the middle class, living standards and upward mobility.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Peaches"
America from Teddy Roosevelt's time onward is a different story. And America from the WW2 era onward is a much different story. But what you are attributing to "culture" is a violent set of behaviors that I attribute to the triumph of corporatism, the military-industrial complex, and a profoundly disgusting series of wealth transfers upward to its kleptocracy.
Hogwash.Post WW2 US saw the expansion of the middle class, living standards and upward mobility.
Nevertheless, in Chapter 3 of Bucky Fuller's 1981 book Critical Path he shows how between 1945 and 1980, some forty-five trillion dollars had been transferred upward. He also made this prediction:
Quote
Eventually the U.S. taxpayers will be asked to make "free-of-risk" bail-outs of "private" enterprises
— Fuller, p.87
Quote from: "Peaches"
America, as a monolithic entity, has rarely existed. Its psyche has been largely one of deep divisions.
Aside from genocides and slavery, though, its history up to the turn of the twentieth century is no more bloody than those of the European countries that settled its white population.
That is a spurious position at best.
Denying that America is a single cultural entity is a specious argument. All its citizens live under the same rules of governance, the same cultural influences and the same social traits...with local variations that add different tones and highlights.
Just like Australia. Each State has its own peculiarities and social imperatives (some States favour Australian Rules football, others favour rugby), but there are core cultural values that are common to all. For example, Australia is intensely egalitarian, no matter the geographical location.
Australians value fairness over wealth and power. Despite its reputation as a racist nation, it is multicultural with very little racially based social disharmony. An Australian has a sense of duty to help people in distress, because we live in a vast land where assistance and emergency services are often distant.
These, I must add, are not unique to Australia. But they are part of our culture, as well as many others. And yes, some of them are rather negative and unwholesome.
To deny a social culture exists in America makes no sense, given the mountain of evidence that describes certain widely distributed characteristics of American beliefs and behaviour. Many things Americans embrace are unique...and that is not a bad thing in general.
However, it's passion for guns, violence and killing is a bad thing.
Quote from: "Peaches"
[
Nevertheless, in Chapter 3 of Bucky Fuller's 1981 book Critical Path he shows how between 1945 and 1980, some forty-five trillion dollars had been transferred upward. He also made this prediction:
I am not going to comment on what is really an op-ed.
The US, Gross Domestic Product increased from $228 billion in 1945 to just under $1.7 trillion in 1975. The US underwent its own golden age of economic growth. This growth was distributed fairly evenly across the economic classes, which some attribute to the strength of labor unions in this period—labor union membership peaked during the 1950s. Much of the growth came from the movement of low-income farm workers into better-paying jobs in the towns and cities—a process largely completed by 1960.
Libertarian historian Burton W. Folsom Jr. argues that under the leadership of Senator Walter George, Congress ended most economic controls, cut taxes, slashed spending, and expected entrepreneurs to create the jobs needed for the returning soldiers. The predicted postwar depression never happened and the economy grew rapidly as unemployment stabilized at 3.9 percent.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
'
That is a spurious position at best.
Really, is that the best you can do?
spurious
adjective
not being what it purports to be; false or fake.
While I found your description of what you call Australian culture interesting and informative, you did nothing to support your notion that my position is "spurious." Nor, for that matter, did you support your later use of "specious."
Ultimately, it's just a flowery way for you to walk back from the DNA metaphor without admitting it was lame. ac_umm
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I am not going to comment on what is really an op-ed.
A preposterous characterization. Perhaps you are aware of some work that refutes Fuller's argument, which of course you'd have to read in order to identify its flaws, if any there be. Last time I looked, the entirety of that chapter was available online, but I certainly won't be arsed to find it and post it here for people not interested in considering it fairly.
And if indeed you aren't going to comment on it, I'll take the liberty of not reading or commenting on your shitposting a couple of paragraphs of dry statistics that neither support nor refute Fuller's argument.
Fuller derived his number, 45 trillion dollars, with the Ockham's Razor of simple accountancy, not with statistics. It's the same approach the IRS uses to build a "net worth" case against a taxpayer.
And of course I didn't bother to mention the tens of trillions that have similarly been transferred upwards in the 38 years since Fuller wrote.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Peaches"
[
Nevertheless, in Chapter 3 of Bucky Fuller's 1981 book Critical Path he shows how between 1945 and 1980, some forty-five trillion dollars had been transferred upward. He also made this prediction:
I am not going to comment on what is really an op-ed.
The US, Gross Domestic Product increased from $228 billion in 1945 to just under $1.7 trillion in 1975. The US underwent its own golden age of economic growth. This growth was distributed fairly evenly across the economic classes, which some attribute to the strength of labor unions in this period—labor union membership peaked during the 1950s. Much of the growth came from the movement of low-income farm workers into better-paying jobs in the towns and cities—a process largely completed by 1960.
Libertarian historian Burton W. Folsom Jr. argues that under the leadership of Senator Walter George, Congress ended most economic controls, cut taxes, slashed spending, and expected entrepreneurs to create the jobs needed for the returning soldiers. The predicted postwar depression never happened and the economy grew rapidly as unemployment stabilized at 3.9 percent.
It was the golden age for American wage earners. Labour was needed and there was upward mobility. It was not the golden age for American manufacturers. They realized that they had competition in Europe and especially Asia. No major economy will ever go back to that. Automation has reduced the need for mass labour and not just in blue collar production jobs. Even China, where I was recently, automation is replacing increasingly expensive production jobs. And China is starting to get illegal alien workers.
Quote from: "Peaches"
Ultimately, it's just a flowery way for you to walk back from the DNA metaphor without admitting it was lame. ac_umm
My words were, as usual, specifically chosen. Your claim that AMERICA does not have a cultural DNA because it has a diversity of sub-cultures is in my view fallacious...or spurious, if you will.
My usage of "DNA" as a metaphor for intrinsic and inherent cultural traits for a given population is clear and accurate. I still await your rebuttal, rather than bickering on semantics.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Ultimately, it's just a flowery way for you to walk back from the DNA metaphor without admitting it was lame. ac_umm
My words were, as usual, specifically chosen. Your claim that AMERICA does not have a cultural DNA because it has a diversity of sub-cultures is in my view fallacious...or spurious, if you will.
My usage of "DNA" as a metaphor for intrinsic and inherent cultural traits for a given population is clear and accurate. I still await your rebuttal, rather than bickering on semantics.
Alright. If you want to go down that route, Australia's DNA is based on cowardice during and after the Eureka Stockade, small town village condescension, and an inability to stand up for themselves against one another.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Peaches"
[
Nevertheless, in Chapter 3 of Bucky Fuller's 1981 book Critical Path he shows how between 1945 and 1980, some forty-five trillion dollars had been transferred upward. He also made this prediction:
I am not going to comment on what is really an op-ed.
The US, Gross Domestic Product increased from $228 billion in 1945 to just under $1.7 trillion in 1975. The US underwent its own golden age of economic growth. This growth was distributed fairly evenly across the economic classes, which some attribute to the strength of labor unions in this period—labor union membership peaked during the 1950s. Much of the growth came from the movement of low-income farm workers into better-paying jobs in the towns and cities—a process largely completed by 1960.
Libertarian historian Burton W. Folsom Jr. argues that under the leadership of Senator Walter George, Congress ended most economic controls, cut taxes, slashed spending, and expected entrepreneurs to create the jobs needed for the returning soldiers. The predicted postwar depression never happened and the economy grew rapidly as unemployment stabilized at 3.9 percent.
It was a good time. No billionaire owned prog social media undermining liberty and prosperity.