Title: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Wazzzup on March 31, 2019, 05:59:02 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on March 31, 2019, 05:59:02 PM
Moar censorship plz. Much like the need for power once you start censoring the appetite for more censor grows.
Just in time to gear up for the 2020 election. How convenient.
Good we need more of these lawsuits. Its time for the courts to decide whether these are monopolitic entities needing regulation or private companies who can do what they want. Congress should have passed legislation about this a long time ago, but republicans are cowards.
Its about time. Better late then never though.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 06:21:47 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 06:21:47 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 06:35:16 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 06:35:16 PM
I don't use Twitter, but I would probably be censored.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 07:56:57 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 31, 2019, 07:56:57 PM
Got a lot of links --please discuss any that interest youQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/30/mark-zuckerberg-calls-for-tighter-internet-regulations-we-need-a-more-active-role-for-governments.html
Moar censorship plz. Much like the need for power once you start censoring the appetite for more censor grows.Twitter may begin labeling tweets that violate its rules from public figures, including Trumphttps://www.ktvb.com/article/news/nation-world/twitter-may-begin-labeling-tweets-that-violate-its-rules-from-public-figures-including-trump/277-e0cc1c5b-c2b5-41c6-a6cb-c99250e440db
Just in time to gear up for the 2020 election. How convenient.Nunes says $250M lawsuit against Twitter is 'the first of many,' accuses company of 'gaslighting'https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nunes-says-250m-lawsuit-against-twitter-is-the-first-of-many-accuses-company-of-gaslighting-for-all-of-the-news
Good we need more of these lawsuits. Its time for the courts to decide whether these are monopolitic entities needing regulation or private companies who can do what they want. Congress should have passed legislation about this a long time ago, but republicans are cowards.
I see nothing there about censoring antifa. Isn't that strange.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Gaon on March 31, 2019, 08:45:26 PM
Post by: Gaon on March 31, 2019, 08:45:26 PM
Got a lot of links --please discuss any that interest youQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/30/mark-zuckerberg-calls-for-tighter-internet-regulations-we-need-a-more-active-role-for-governments.html
Moar censorship plz. Much like the need for power once you start censoring the appetite for more censor grows.Twitter may begin labeling tweets that violate its rules from public figures, including Trumphttps://www.ktvb.com/article/news/nation-world/twitter-may-begin-labeling-tweets-that-violate-its-rules-from-public-figures-including-trump/277-e0cc1c5b-c2b5-41c6-a6cb-c99250e440db
Just in time to gear up for the 2020 election. How convenient.Nunes says $250M lawsuit against Twitter is 'the first of many,' accuses company of 'gaslighting'https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nunes-says-250m-lawsuit-against-twitter-is-the-first-of-many-accuses-company-of-gaslighting-for-all-of-the-news
Good we need more of these lawsuits. Its time for the courts to decide whether these are monopolitic entities needing regulation or private companies who can do what they want. Congress should have passed legislation about this a long time ago, but republicans are cowards.
Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey have no right to dictate what is hate speech. They are essentially monopolies. I would like to see a free speech alternative to leftist social media.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on March 31, 2019, 09:14:04 PM
Post by: Bricktop on March 31, 2019, 09:14:04 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Gaon on March 31, 2019, 09:20:55 PM
Post by: Gaon on March 31, 2019, 09:20:55 PM
Try Gab.Quote from: "Bricktop"
If Twitter keeps censoring speech it may become a serious rival.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 11:17:35 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 11:17:35 AM
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg called for new global regulations governing the internet, recommending overarching rules on hateful and violent content, election integrity, privacy and data portability.
in a statement that was also published as an op-ed in The Washington post, Zuckerberg said the company is seeking regulations that would set baselines for prohibited content and require companies to build systems for keeping harmful content to a minimum.
"We have a responsibility to keep people safe on our services," he said. "That means deciding what counts as terrorist propaganda, hate speech and more. We continually review our policies with experts, but at our scale we'll always make mistakes and decisions that people disagree with."
Zuckerberg's comments mark his most visible effort so far to shape the discourse around the way the company collects information, uses and disperses it around the world.
Facebook has been the target of probes by various governments after news broke about a year ago that it allowed the personal data of tens of millions of users to be shared with political consultancy Cambridge analytica.
Earlier this month, Facebook came under fire for how long the company took remove a live video of a shooting in new Zealand and allowing it to be circulated across the internet. Millions of users also had personal information accessed via a recent breach.
over the past year, lawmakers have focused greater scrutiny on the company and its immense influence, asking its executives — including Zuckerberg— to testify in front of Congress to explain the proliferation of misinformation, hate speech and election manipulation on the platform. in his op-ed, Zuckerberg proposes that "regulation could set baselines for what's prohibited and require companies to build systems for keeping harmful content to a bare minimum."
The tech industry has long said that Section 230 of the Communications decency act is vital to its ability to operate open platforms. The provision exempts companies from being liable for user-generated content.
Facebook built a contentscanning system that over the years has added rules based on reactions to changes in user behaviour or public uproar after an occurrence such as the new Zealand mass shooting. last week, the company moved to ban from its platform content that references white nationalism or white separatism.
When the website's users or computer systems report posts as problematic, they're sent to one of the company's 15,000 content moderators around the world, who are allowed to take content down only if it violates a rule.
But that process is not always precise. "lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly i agree," Zuckerberg wrote in Saturday's post. "i've come to believe that we shouldn't make so many important decisions about speech on our own."
Zuckerberg said Facebook would welcome common standards for verifying political actors, citing practices deployed by advertisers in many countries of verifying identities before buying political ads. He also suggested updating laws to include "divisive political issues" in addition to candidates and elections. "Every day we make decisions about what speech is harmful, what constitutes political advertising, and how to prevent sophisticated cyberattacks," he said. "But if we were starting from scratch, we wouldn't ask companies to make these judgments alone.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 02:02:38 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2019, 02:02:38 PM
Facebook CEO calls for more outside regulation
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg called for new global regulations governing the internet, recommending overarching rules on hateful and violent content, election integrity, privacy and data portability.
in a statement that was also published as an op-ed in The Washington post, Zuckerberg said the company is seeking regulations that would set baselines for prohibited content and require companies to build systems for keeping harmful content to a minimum.
"We have a responsibility to keep people safe on our services," he said. "That means deciding what counts as terrorist propaganda, hate speech and more. We continually review our policies with experts, but at our scale we'll always make mistakes and decisions that people disagree with."
Zuckerberg's comments mark his most visible effort so far to shape the discourse around the way the company collects information, uses and disperses it around the world.
Facebook has been the target of probes by various governments after news broke about a year ago that it allowed the personal data of tens of millions of users to be shared with political consultancy Cambridge analytica.
Earlier this month, Facebook came under fire for how long the company took remove a live video of a shooting in new Zealand and allowing it to be circulated across the internet. Millions of users also had personal information accessed via a recent breach.
over the past year, lawmakers have focused greater scrutiny on the company and its immense influence, asking its executives — including Zuckerberg— to testify in front of Congress to explain the proliferation of misinformation, hate speech and election manipulation on the platform. in his op-ed, Zuckerberg proposes that "regulation could set baselines for what's prohibited and require companies to build systems for keeping harmful content to a bare minimum."
The tech industry has long said that Section 230 of the Communications decency act is vital to its ability to operate open platforms. The provision exempts companies from being liable for user-generated content.
Facebook built a contentscanning system that over the years has added rules based on reactions to changes in user behaviour or public uproar after an occurrence such as the new Zealand mass shooting. last week, the company moved to ban from its platform content that references white nationalism or white separatism.
When the website's users or computer systems report posts as problematic, they're sent to one of the company's 15,000 content moderators around the world, who are allowed to take content down only if it violates a rule.
But that process is not always precise. "lawmakers often tell me we have too much power over speech, and frankly i agree," Zuckerberg wrote in Saturday's post. "i've come to believe that we shouldn't make so many important decisions about speech on our own."
Zuckerberg said Facebook would welcome common standards for verifying political actors, citing practices deployed by advertisers in many countries of verifying identities before buying political ads. He also suggested updating laws to include "divisive political issues" in addition to candidates and elections. "Every day we make decisions about what speech is harmful, what constitutes political advertising, and how to prevent sophisticated cyberattacks," he said. "But if we were starting from scratch, we wouldn't ask companies to make these judgments alone.
I can't stand that little prick Zuckerberg.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on April 01, 2019, 06:40:59 PM
Post by: Bricktop on April 01, 2019, 06:40:59 PM
This will, of course, open up a whole new can of worms. We're already seeing freedom of speech eroded in many countries.
Zuckerberg's tactic is all too obvious, however. He is saying "if you governments want censorship on the web, YOU do it", full in the knowledge that procuring global consistency on controlling freedom of speech is impossible.
What is a more likely outcome is that social media operators will require a licence in the countries it wishes to conduct its business. Licences will be issued by governments, and they will be subject to monitoring and controls to ensure they comply with the laws of the the respective countries.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 02, 2019, 12:19:55 AM
Post by: Thiel on April 02, 2019, 12:19:55 AM
What he is, in effect, saying is that he wants Governments to act as censors on the web to alleviate the responsibility from organisations like Facebook.Quote from: "Bricktop"
This will, of course, open up a whole new can of worms. We're already seeing freedom of speech eroded in many countries.
Zuckerberg's tactic is all too obvious, however. He is saying "if you governments want censorship on the web, YOU do it", full in the knowledge that procuring global consistency on controlling freedom of speech is impossible.
What is a more likely outcome is that social media operators will require a licence in the countries it wishes to conduct its business. Licences will be issued by governments, and they will be subject to monitoring and controls to ensure they comply with the laws of the the respective countries.
He wants the government to do his dirty work for him. And it's inevitable that licenses will be a requirement for social media. It will be under the guise of protecting people from hate speech and fake news. Nothing fancy, but just enough to ensure compliance.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 12:32:42 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 12:32:42 AM
I only use it to stay in touch with family and friends around the world.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 06:10:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2019, 06:10:46 PM
GOOGLE EMPLOYEES PROTEST COMPANY'S PRO-BORDER WALL BOARD MEMBER. EXECS STAND PAT
Google employees are circulating a petition protesting the Silicon Valley company's decision to appoint a conservative woman who supports President Donald Trump's border wall to its advisory board on artificial intelligence.
Employees want Google to rescind its decision to include Heritage Foundation President Kay Coles James on the Advanced Technology External Advisory Council (ATEAC). More than 1,000 "Googlers" signed the Monday petition, which claims that James's supposedly anti-immigrant positions run contrary to Google's ethics.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on April 02, 2019, 06:25:30 PM
Post by: Bricktop on April 02, 2019, 06:25:30 PM
Since when?
At least it's not hiding the fact that it is a socialist organisation.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Wazzzup on April 05, 2019, 12:09:51 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on April 05, 2019, 12:09:51 PM
The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has ordered Christian activist William Whatcott to pay $55,000 to trans activist Morgane Oger.Quote
Tribunal member Devyn Cousineau said $35,000 was compensation for a hate-filled flyer that Whatcott published when Oger was running for provincial office in 2017, and $20,000 was to punish Whatcott for improper conduct during the five-day hearing in December.
According to the tribunal ruling, Whatcott printed 1,500 of the flyers and distributed them in the Vancouver-False Creek riding that Oger was contesting as an NDP candidate. The flyer had a photo of Oger, described her as a "biological male" and claimed she was promoting "homosexuality and transvestism." It went on to state transsexuals were prone to sexually transmitted diseases and at risk of domestic violence, alcohol abuse and suicide.
The flyer concluded, "Thankfully Jesus Christ paid the price for your sin. You can turn to the merciful Christ and ask for forgiveness and when the NDP come knocking at your door you can tell them, you wont vote for them because you believe in God's definition of gender and marriage."
Dissent ist verboten. Free speech RIP.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2019, 12:32:13 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2019, 12:32:13 PM
A bit off topic since its not social media, but rather the Canadian government, but I didn't know where else this could go.Quote from: "Wazzzup"[size=150]Anti-gay activist ordered to pay $55,000 to B.C. trans candidate in fight over hateful flyer[/size] The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has ordered Christian activist William Whatcott to pay $55,000 to trans activist Morgane Oger.Quote
Tribunal member Devyn Cousineau said $35,000 was compensation for a hate-filled flyer that Whatcott published when Oger was running for provincial office in 2017, and $20,000 was to punish Whatcott for improper conduct during the five-day hearing in December.
According to the tribunal ruling, Whatcott printed 1,500 of the flyers and distributed them in the Vancouver-False Creek riding that Oger was contesting as an NDP candidate. The flyer had a photo of Oger, described her as a "biological male" and claimed she was promoting "homosexuality and transvestism." It went on to state transsexuals were prone to sexually transmitted diseases and at risk of domestic violence, alcohol abuse and suicide.
The flyer concluded, "Thankfully Jesus Christ paid the price for your sin. You can turn to the merciful Christ and ask for forgiveness and when the NDP come knocking at your door you can tell them, you wont vote for them because you believe in God's definition of gender and marriage."
Dissent ist verboten. Free speech RIP.
I have heard of that Whatcott guy. He used to be gay.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2019, 05:49:12 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2019, 05:49:12 PM
Progtard social media billionaire tycoons have no tolerance for anti progs. And they don't care if they are black women.Quote from: "Herman"
https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/02/google-conservatives-heritage-president/?utm_medium=email
GOOGLE EMPLOYEES PROTEST COMPANY'S PRO-BORDER WALL BOARD MEMBER. EXECS STAND PAT
Google employees are circulating a petition protesting the Silicon Valley company's decision to appoint a conservative woman who supports President Donald Trump's border wall to its advisory board on artificial intelligence.
Employees want Google to rescind its decision to include Heritage Foundation President Kay Coles James on the Advanced Technology External Advisory Council (ATEAC). More than 1,000 "Googlers" signed the Monday petition, which claims that James's supposedly anti-immigrant positions run contrary to Google's ethics.
Progs are really vicious on minorities who don't share their open border agenda.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2019, 01:26:53 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2019, 01:26:53 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2019, 03:22:59 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2019, 03:22:59 PM
A documentary detailing the extent to which Facebook and Google profit by exploiting and manipulating nearly every facet of their users' lives came out about six months ago, and some are claiming it is starting to change the conversation about big tech.
The title of the documentary, "The Creepy Line," got its name from an infamous 2010 speech by then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who said it was his company's policy "to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it."
The documentary has interviews with several high-profile public figures, including clinical psychologists Dr. Jordan Peterson and Dr. Robert Epstein, who explain how, in their estimation, these tech giants hold great power that threatens society.
The Daily Caller interviewed the film's director, M.A. Taylor, on how the general perception of Google and Facebook has changed since the movie's debut.
"The film's arguments have been considered. Really, probably the biggest show of force was with the [Google CEO] Sundar Pichai hearings, where research from the film was brought up many, many times on both sides of the aisle—whether the Democrats were denouncing it or the Republicans were promoting it," Taylor stated. "So I think, you know, you don't get a more direct response than having the CEO of Google asked specifically about things that we had in our film."
He went on to call Pichai's testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee last December "a large part of our goal" in making the film.
Pichai was peppered with questions about political biases from Republican lawmakers like Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz. Committee members also asked him about leaked communications published by The Daily Caller News Foundation in November. The documents showed the tech giant's employees debated burying conservative media outlets in Google's search function as a response to President Donald Trump's election.
Many Democrats spent the hearing dismissing claims of anti-conservative bias.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2019, 06:33:58 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2019, 06:33:58 PM
Facebook executives did not provide many details during a congressional hearing Tuesday about why their algorithms are unable to distinguish the difference between hate speech and legitimate conservative content.Quote
Tech experts argue that the tools Facebook, Twitter and Google use to moderate content might not be up to the task.
Google and Facebook told Congress Tuesday that their algorithms make mistakes and sometimes nix content that does not specifically violate company policies.
Google and Facebook executives were grilled Tuesday over their inability to govern white nationalism on their platforms, but they gave few answers about why their algorithms are dinging conservative content.
Neil Potts, Facebook's director of public policy, and Alexandria Walden, counsel for free expression and human rights at Google, spoke to the House Judiciary Committee alongside activists of the Anti-Defamation League, among other groups. House lawmakers asked the two executives about the effectiveness of their artificial intelligence.
That's why hate speech and violent extremism have no place on YouTube," Walden said during the House Judiciary Committee, noting what Google is doing to combat white nationalism on its platform. Walden and Potts also noted that their algorithms sometimes have a difficult time fleshing out the difference between legitimate forms of speech and language that is not permitted.
"We don't and we won't always get it right, but we've improved significantly," Potts added, referring to Facebook's new stance on nixing white nationalism. He noted that the company is not prohibiting people from expressing their love for country and community, but it does not permit bigotry and hatred. Walden made similar comments.
"Hate speech removals can be particularly complex compared to other types of content," she said. "Hate speech, because it often relies on spoken rather than visual ques, is sometimes harder to detect that some forms of branded terrorist propaganda. It's intensely content specific." Neither executive gave a detailed explanation of as to whether either company is capable of making these distinctions.
Conservatives meanwhile argue that Facebook is targeting them because of their politics. President Donald Trump's social media director Dan Scavino Jr., for instance, was temporarily blocked in March from making public Facebook comments.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2019, 10:04:51 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2019, 10:04:51 AM
It looks like Prime Minister Justin trudeau may have found some inspiration in the Jussie smollett case and has himself decided to cry racism as a Pr ploy.
"white supremacy has no place in Canada," trudeau posted to social media the other day. we'd certainly agree with that statement. but trudeau didn't leave it at that.
"It's time for all parties, including Andrew scheer's Conservative Party, to stand together in denouncing hatred in all its forms," trudeau continued.
It's part of a larger drive-by smear, an attempt to imply in the lead up to the election that scheer is somehow supportive of or in allegiance with white supremacists. It's a completely groundless accusation, which is why they're so vague in making it. but their goal is to clearly plant the seed.
border security Minister bill blair went one step further in his accusations: "white nationalism is a threat to Canada and the safety of our communities," he posted. "Andrew scheer panders to people promoting these hateful views. This isn't leadership."
This all came after the Liberals pounced upon comments made by Conservative senator Leo Housakos who was pressing Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland to be more specific in her suggestion that Canada was somehow a cesspool of white supremacy that places us in grave danger.
because Housakos was reluctant to believe that our streets have been overrun with violent white supremacists and that Canadians are somehow weak-willed enough to fall prey en masse to such an awful ideology, the Liberals are trying to shamelessly twist it into something it's not. It's pretty weak sauce.
It's interesting timing that they're playing this cynical game, because the Liberals are now being denounced by refugee advocates for changes that make it more difficult to claim asylum if you've crossed into Canada illegally at places like roxham road.
Canadians should welcome these changes to the asylum rules. but it sure came at a cost. The Liberals dragged their feet on this file for years and whenever anyone wanted action on this unsustainable situation they called these people racist and other nasty names.
Are the Liberals racist now for clamping down on the border? of course not.
This should be a lesson for them about how reckless it is to toss around these sorts of terms.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2019, 09:20:06 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2019, 09:20:06 PM
Mayor Brian Bowman calls for groups to remove controversial speaker from eventQuote
Mayor Brian Bowman is calling for the removal of a controversial speaker from an event Friday.
Linda Sarsour, an American left-wing activist, has been denounced as "anti-Semitic" by politicians, activists and scholars. She is one of three panelists scheduled to speak at the Sorry Not Sorry: Unapologetically Working for Social Justice event, being held at The Ukrainian Labour Temple.
Mayor Bowman said he didn't feel it was "appropriate to provide this individual a public platform to further propagate anti-Semitic views and hate." He and members from B'Nai Brith and the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg held a press conference Tuesday afternoon.https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/mayor-brian-bowman-calls-for-groups-to-remove-controversial-speaker-from-event/ar-BBWdHZI?li=AAggFp5&ocid=mailsignout
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on April 23, 2019, 09:30:53 PM
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on April 23, 2019, 09:30:53 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2019, 10:21:15 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2019, 10:21:15 PM
This is interesting. The mayor of Winnipeg is trying to block islamofascist, Linda Sarsour from speaking at an event in his city.Quote from: "Shen Li"Mayor Brian Bowman calls for groups to remove controversial speaker from eventQuote
Mayor Brian Bowman is calling for the removal of a controversial speaker from an event Friday.
Linda Sarsour, an American left-wing activist, has been denounced as "anti-Semitic" by politicians, activists and scholars. She is one of three panelists scheduled to speak at the Sorry Not Sorry: Unapologetically Working for Social Justice event, being held at The Ukrainian Labour Temple.
Mayor Bowman said he didn't feel it was "appropriate to provide this individual a public platform to further propagate anti-Semitic views and hate." He and members from B'Nai Brith and the Jewish Federation of Winnipeg held a press conference Tuesday afternoon.https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/mayor-brian-bowman-calls-for-groups-to-remove-controversial-speaker-from-event/ar-BBWdHZI?li=AAggFp5&ocid=mailsignout
I have seen posts from cc about Linda Sarsour, but I don't know about her myself.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on April 23, 2019, 10:46:34 PM
Post by: Bricktop on April 23, 2019, 10:46:34 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Gaon on April 23, 2019, 11:02:55 PM
Post by: Gaon on April 23, 2019, 11:02:55 PM
I cannot stomach her. However, I enjoy listening to Qanta A. Ahmed.Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
Linda Sarsour's feminism is fake just like Justin Trudeau's feminism.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2021, 10:46:22 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2021, 10:46:22 PM
YouTube removed a video of Gov. Ron DeSantis' discussion with credentialed medical experts, saying it violated Community Guidelines
YouTube has removed a video of a public health roundtable hosted by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) with a panel of scientists and researchers who challenged the effectiveness of COVID-19 lockdowns and masks, claiming the discussion violated its Community Guidelines.
The roundtable, which took place at the state Capitol on March 18 and was streamed and posted to YouTube by WTSP-TV, featured former Trump White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas, epidemiologist Professor Sunetra Gupta, and researchers Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff.
The scientists and researchers discussed how public policy measures adopted during the pandemic to mitigate spread of the virus, including quarantining healthy people, shutting businesses down, and mandating mask-wearing, were inspired in part by fear rather than by scientific evidence.
Dr. Bhattacharya called lockdowns "the single biggest public health mistake in history" and argued they failed to protect vulnerable populations like senior citizens from contracting COVID-19. The panel discussed evidence that contradicted some studies that suggest lockdowns may have saved millions of lives globally.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 08, 2021, 10:50:15 PM
Post by: cc on April 08, 2021, 10:50:15 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 08, 2021, 11:20:41 PM
Post by: cc on April 08, 2021, 11:20:41 PM
A Facebook spokesperson said on Wednesday that the tech company didn't notify the more than 530 million users whose personal data was obtained through inappropriate means, further noting that they don't have the intention to do so either.
Business Insider first reported the data leak which included information about user's phone numbers, Facebook IDs and names, locations, email, and birthdays.
A Facebook spokesperson told Reuters it also took into account that users could not fix the issue and that the data was publicly available in deciding not to notify users.
The collected information, however, could potentially cause valuable data hacks or prompt other mistreatment.
While the information appears to be several years old, but
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2021, 08:24:08 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2021, 08:24:08 AM
Facebook Has No Plans of Notifying More Than 530 Million Users Whose Data Was Leaked(//http)
A Facebook spokesperson said on Wednesday that the tech company didn't notify the more than 530 million users whose personal data was obtained through inappropriate means, further noting that they don't have the intention to do so either.
Business Insider first reported the data leak which included information about user's phone numbers, Facebook IDs and names, locations, email, and birthdays.
A Facebook spokesperson told Reuters it also took into account that users could not fix the issue and that the data was publicly available in deciding not to notify users.
The collected information, however, could potentially cause valuable data hacks or prompt other mistreatment.
While the information appears to be several years old, butit's another example of the vast amount of information collected by Facebook and other social media sites, and the limits to how secure that information is.
I'm not happy with Facebook, but I still use IM and video messaging.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2021, 12:10:12 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2021, 12:10:12 PM
Facebook Has No Plans of Notifying More Than 530 Million Users Whose Data Was Leaked(//https)
A Facebook spokesperson said on Wednesday that the tech company didn't notify the more than 530 million users whose personal data was obtained through inappropriate means, further noting that they don't have the intention to do so either.
Business Insider first reported the data leak which included information about user's phone numbers, Facebook IDs and names, locations, email, and birthdays.
A Facebook spokesperson told Reuters it also took into account that users could not fix the issue and that the data was publicly available in deciding not to notify users.
The collected information, however, could potentially cause valuable data hacks or prompt other mistreatment.
While the information appears to be several years old, butit's another example of the vast amount of information collected by Facebook and other social media sites, and the limits to how secure that information is.
Typical.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2021, 01:05:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2021, 01:05:32 PM
'I'm not running to go post Twitter bail when I did nothing wrong'
Conservative journalist Jason Whitlock was suspended by Twitter after he criticized Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors for her $1.4 million home purchase in "1.4 percent" black Topanga Canyon in Southern California.
But Whitlock insisted Monday he has no intention of bowing to the social media giant in order to get his account unblocked: "I'm not running to go post Twitter bail when I did nothing wrong."
What's the background?
Khan-Cullors was sharply criticized last week over numerous reports that she had purchased the pricey home — particularly given her self-described Marxist ideology. What's more, reports noted that Khan-Cullors had purchased three other homes since 2016 for a grand total of $3.2 million in real estate.
Upon hearing the news, Hawk Newsome — leader of Black Lives Matter Greater New York City — demanded an "independent investigation."
Whitlock joined in on the criticism: "Black Lives Matter founder buys $1.4 million home in Topanga, which has a black population of 1.4 percent," he tweeted Friday. "She's with her people!"
Twitter told Whitlock that he violated the platform's rules for posting personal information about others without their permission.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2021, 05:17:14 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2021, 05:17:14 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 12:13:43 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 12:13:43 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 12:32:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 12:32:00 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 11:35:08 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2021, 11:35:08 AM
A CNN staffer was recently caught on hidden camera saying that the network worked during the 2020 presidential election to produce content that would help lead President Joe Biden to victory. Project Veritas published the first of three recordings on April 13.
Charlie Chester, a technical director at CNN, was secretly filmed by Project Veritas during a number of fake Tinder dates set up over the past month. He suggested that if it weren't for the network's "propaganda," former President Donald Trump would have been reelected in 2020.
"Look at what we did, we got Trump out," Chester said. "I am 100 percent going to say it. And I 100 percent believe it that if it wasn't for CNN, I don't know that Trump would have got voted out."
He told the undercover reporter, who pretended to be a nurse during the fake dates, that he decided to work at the network because he "wanted to be a part of that."
"Our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was," Chester said.
Other videos showed that a CNN head had personally intervened to order the cable network's staff to display the number of people who have died of COVID-19 during a broadcast.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2021, 11:10:01 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2021, 11:10:01 AM
Facebook and Instagram are censoring users from sharing a New York Post report regarding the luxury homes purchased by Black Lives Matter Co-founder, Patrisse Khan-Cullors, in predominantly white neighborhoods.
The article was published on April 10 and states that Cullors had purchased "four high-end homes for $3.2 million" in the United States since 2016.
She had also looked into purchasing a residence in the Bahamas at an ultra-exclusive resort where Justin Timberlake and Tiger Woods both have homes, according to the report.
The Post learned that apartments and townhouses at the beachfront Albany resort outside Nassau run from $5 million to $20 million.
Facebook users noticed on Thursday that they could not share the link to the Post's article on Cullors' multi-million-dollar property portfolio directly on their timeline or through the Messenger app.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 08:35:10 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 08:35:10 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on May 13, 2021, 08:50:19 PM
Post by: cc on May 13, 2021, 08:50:19 PM
All we have posting now is a bunch of wonky wokies .. authoritarianists
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 11:23:20 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 11:23:20 PM
This cancel culture is shutting everyone with a brain down .. by deleting posts and by public pressure / attack
All we have posting now is a bunch of wonky wokies .. authoritarianists
Universities too. They used to be bastions of free speech.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 11:25:42 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 13, 2021, 11:25:42 PM
I never liked KIss, but old Gene Simmons is one okay Jew.https://twitter.com/genesimmons/status/1392227451774767104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1392227451774767104%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Fkiss-gene-simmons-tim-tebow-faith
Gene Simmons is friends with Donald Trump.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 14, 2021, 03:26:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 14, 2021, 03:26:32 PM
Pro-mask social media melts down over updated CDC guidance, vows to wear masks indefinitely: 'Empowering anti-maskers and anti-vaxers'
Social media users have come out en masse against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's new guidance regarding masks, vowing to continue covering their faces indefinitely.
On Thursday, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced that fully vaccinated Americans can return to life without masks.
The directive was a full pivot from advice issued earlier in the month.
Prominent gun control activist David Hogg added, "I feel the need to continue wearing my mask outside even though I'm fully vaccinated because the inconvenience of having to wear a mask is more than worth it to have people not think I'm a conservative."
What else?
During Thursday's White House press briefing, Walensky said that Americans who have waited two weeks after receiving their second COVID-19 vaccine can return to mostly normal, pre-pandemic behaviors in the vast majority of settings.
In her remarks, Walensky said, "Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. If you are fully vaccinated, you can start doing the things that you had stopped doing because of the pandemic. We have all longed for this moment, when we can get back to some sense of normalcy."
The infectious diseases expert added, "Based on the continuing downward trajectory of cases, the scientific data on the performance of our vaccines, and our understanding of how the virus spreads, that moment has come for those who are fully vaccinated."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on May 14, 2021, 04:21:40 PM
Post by: cc on May 14, 2021, 04:21:40 PM
Prominent gun control activist David Hogg added, "I feel the need to continue wearing my mask outside even though I'm fully vaccinated because the inconvenience of having to wear a mask is more than worth itQuoteto have people not think I'm a conservative."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 14, 2021, 05:11:20 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 14, 2021, 05:11:20 PM
Prominent gun control activist David Hogg added, "I feel the need to continue wearing my mask outside even though I'm fully vaccinated because the inconvenience of having to wear a mask is more than worth itQuoteto have people not think I'm a conservative."
:roll: progs are funny to watch
He's young and a product of public school indoctrination.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on May 14, 2021, 07:53:17 PM
Post by: cc on May 14, 2021, 07:53:17 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 15, 2021, 12:28:52 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 15, 2021, 12:28:52 PM
Prominent gun control activist David Hogg added, "I feel the need to continue wearing my mask outside even though I'm fully vaccinated because the inconvenience of having to wear a mask is more than worth itQuoteto have people not think I'm a conservative."
:roll: progs are funny to watch
He's going to continue this performative horseshit despite science saying otherwise. Not because he cares about protecting people, but because his 'moral superiority' needs to be constantly validated.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on May 15, 2021, 12:38:13 PM
Post by: cc on May 15, 2021, 12:38:13 PM
He's going to continue this performative horseshit despite science saying otherwise. Not because he cares about protecting people, but because his 'moral superiority' needs to be constantly validated.
Exactly
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 17, 2021, 04:31:47 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 17, 2021, 04:31:47 PM
After the CDC unveiled the new face mask guidance last week, Republicans immediately accused the Biden administration of a politically motivated decision, pointing to numerous crises facing President Joe Biden.
"While the new mask guidance is encouraging, the CDC and my Far Radical Left colleagues only chose to do this to distract from the consequences of catastrophic policy decisions that have been heard around the world," Rep. Andy Biggs, chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said.
"Inflation is rising, the Middle East is in shambles, the working class can't fill up their gas tanks, our border is being overrun and the Biden Administration's leadership is nowhere to be found," he added.
What did Walensky say?
Speaking on ABC's "This Week," Walensky denied her agency was motivated by politics when issuing their newest guidance.
Instead, Walensky claimed the science had "evolved" over the last two weeks revealing the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
"We now have science that has really just evolved even in the last two weeks that demonstrates that these vaccines are safe, they are effective, they are working in the population, just as they did in the clinical trials, that they are working against our variants that we have here circulating in the United States, and that, if you were to develop an infection, while— even if you got vaccinated, that you can't transmit that infection to other people," Walensky said.
In fact, Walensky claimed the "science was really evolving as late as last Thursday."
What was the reaction?
Walensky was widely mocked after the interview. As critics pointed out, COVID vaccines have been proving their efficacy for more than five months now.
In fact, countries that have a high percentage of vaccinated people — Israel, the United States, Great Britain, for example — have experienced significant decreases in COVID cases and deaths.
Meanwhile, states that reopened and dropped mask mandates have not seen spikes in cases or deaths.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 17, 2021, 04:34:38 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 17, 2021, 04:34:38 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 25, 2021, 11:04:58 AM
Post by: Anonymous on May 25, 2021, 11:04:58 AM
A number of free speech advocates, including Cuban and Venezuelan exiles, state senators, and deplatformed influencers, stood behind DeSantis as he made the announcement at Florida International University on May 24.
Courts may award up to $100,000 in damages to an individual if a social media platform censors or shadowbans a user's content, deplatforms a user, or if it hasn't applied censorship or deplatforming standards in a consistent manner, according to the text of the bill.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 25, 2021, 07:32:49 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 25, 2021, 07:32:49 PM
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has signed into law a bill—the first of its kind in the United States—allowing Floridians to sue Big Tech platforms.
A number of free speech advocates, including Cuban and Venezuelan exiles, state senators, and deplatformed influencers, stood behind DeSantis as he made the announcement at Florida International University on May 24.
Courts may award up to $100,000 in damages to an individual if a social media platform censors or shadowbans a user's content, deplatforms a user, or if it hasn't applied censorship or deplatforming standards in a consistent manner, according to the text of the bill.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2021, 03:49:06 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2021, 03:49:06 PM
Some Facebook users have recently reported being sent warning messages from the social media giant relating to "extremists" or "extremist content."
"Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist?" one message reads. "We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your situation have received confidential support."
The message also provides a button to "Get Support," which leads to another Facebook page about extremism.
Redstate editor Kira Davis, who said was sent a screenshot of the message from a friend, wrote: "Hey has anyone had this message pop up on their FB? My friend (who is not an ideologue but hosts lots of competing chatter) got this message twice. He's very disturbed."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 01:05:01 AM
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 01:05:01 AM
Massie posted a screenshot of the warning that he says was sent to his friend about his Facebook post.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on July 04, 2021, 01:09:29 AM
Post by: cc on July 04, 2021, 01:09:29 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 01:15:38 AM
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 01:15:38 AM
And extremism is ................................. whatever we deem it to be
white supremacism
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 04:19:45 AM
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2021, 04:19:45 AM
And extremism is ................................. whatever we deem it to be
white supremacism
That and males being excluded from female sports. The biggest threats to mankind.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 14, 2021, 03:56:17 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 14, 2021, 03:56:17 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 06, 2021, 11:55:47 AM
Post by: Anonymous on August 06, 2021, 11:55:47 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on August 06, 2021, 12:03:41 PM
Post by: cc on August 06, 2021, 12:03:41 PM
Twitter suspended a member of Spain's Parliament last week after the politician wrote on the social media platform that "a man cannot get pregnant."
They must have missed that class
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 06, 2021, 12:05:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on August 06, 2021, 12:05:46 PM
Twitter suspended a member of Spain's Parliament last week after the politician wrote on the social media platform that "a man cannot get pregnant."
They must have missed that class
Spain's parliament has no class.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 10, 2021, 05:27:24 PM
Post by: Anonymous on August 10, 2021, 05:27:24 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 11, 2021, 05:00:05 PM
Post by: Anonymous on August 11, 2021, 05:00:05 PM
"A badge of honor," Paul tweeted on Tuesday from his official social media account.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on August 11, 2021, 05:29:04 PM
Post by: cc on August 11, 2021, 05:29:04 PM
YouTube Censors Rand Paul After He Accuses
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul announced Tuesday he has been censored by YouTube, which he described as becoming an "arm of the government."
"We've had two speeches taken down, and this last one was, I think, a short speech," Paul told Just the News Tuesday on a conference call. "The access to the entire YouTube channel is no longer available."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 12, 2021, 02:35:02 AM
Post by: Anonymous on August 12, 2021, 02:35:02 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 19, 2021, 10:39:51 AM
Post by: Anonymous on August 19, 2021, 10:39:51 AM
Underwood liked a tweet from Matt Walsh that included a video of his speech to the Nashville school board arguing against "the cruel and indefensible mask mandate for children."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on September 15, 2021, 12:56:59 PM
Post by: Anonymous on September 15, 2021, 12:56:59 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on September 29, 2021, 11:09:01 PM
Post by: Anonymous on September 29, 2021, 11:09:01 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on September 29, 2021, 11:13:25 PM
Post by: Anonymous on September 29, 2021, 11:13:25 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/243721145_10158317789900869_5346969434822364878_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=IDI7_6PfH8IAX_9SHh_&tn=PE4L2MkH9Q1I7DiI&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=79a95cdcb0c6f033b1184568878f9c8a&oe=615AE7B9%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=615AE7B9%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/243721145_10158317789900869_5346969434822364878_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=IDI7_6PfH8IAX_9SHh_&tn=PE4L2MkH9Q1I7DiI&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=79a95cdcb0c6f033b1184568878f9c8a&oe=615AE7B9%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
lol, he's cute.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on September 30, 2021, 12:28:36 AM
Post by: Anonymous on September 30, 2021, 12:28:36 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 12, 2021, 01:09:42 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 12, 2021, 01:09:42 PM
But while his trial takes place, a Facebook search for Rittenhouse turns up no results, even when using both the mobile and desktop version of the platform.
A screenshot posted by Daily Caller shows no results when "Kyle Rittenhouse" is typed into the Facebook search bar and Fox News found the same result. The Epoch Times also found the same result.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 12, 2021, 03:13:28 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 12, 2021, 03:13:28 PM
Facebook users are unable to find anything when searching for the name "Kyle Rittenhouse" in the social media platform's search bar as the 18-year-old appears in court at his homicide trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
But while his trial takes place, a Facebook search for Rittenhouse turns up no results, even when using both the mobile and desktop version of the platform.
A screenshot posted by Daily Caller shows no results when "Kyle Rittenhouse" is typed into the Facebook search bar and Fox News found the same result. The Epoch Times also found the same result.
Only the prog narrative of him is allowed.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 14, 2021, 01:16:21 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 14, 2021, 01:16:21 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 15, 2021, 01:03:03 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 15, 2021, 01:03:03 PM
Big tech became a monopolized entity and a dictatorial shadow government under the Obama administration.
Are you saying he facilitated their rise?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 15, 2021, 02:53:49 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 15, 2021, 02:53:49 PM
Big tech became a monopolized entity and a dictatorial shadow government under the Obama administration.
Are you saying he facilitated their rise?
Most definitely yes. Near the end of his administration, the extent of Obama's commitment to Silicon Valley became clear. And nowhere is that more evident than net neutrality, an issue where the president pressured the government to pass regulations with major implications for how consumers experience the Internet.
The rules, passed by the Federal Communications Commission, limit Internet providers from auctioning off the fastest download speeds to the highest bidders, all but ensuring that Web firms — not cable companies — will retain control of what consumers see on their browsers. It marked a major win for Silicon Valley, an industry that has built a close relationship with the president and his staff over the last six years.
Business
Why Silicon Valley is the new revolving door for Obama staffers
President Obama meets with leading tech executives, including Google's chairman and the CEOs of Yahoo and Twitter, at the White House in December 2013. (Michael Reynolds/EPA)
By Cecilia Kang and
Juliet EilperinFebruary 28, 2015
In 2004, when Barack Obama was running for the U.S. Senate, he made his first visit to Google's campus and saw firsthand how a search on the Internet worked. It left such a strong impression that he returned during his first presidential run vowing to protect the industry.
Now, near the end of his administration, the extent of Obama's commitment to Silicon Valley has become clear. And nowhere is that more evident than net neutrality, an issue where the president pressured the government to pass regulations with major implications for how consumers experience the Internet.
The rules, passed Thursday by the Federal Communications Commission, limit Internet providers from auctioning off the fastest download speeds to the highest bidders, all but ensuring that Web firms — not cable companies — will retain control of what consumers see on their browsers. It marked a major win for Silicon Valley, an industry that has built a close relationship with the president and his staff over the last six years.
The affinity between the White House and the tech industry has enriched Obama's campaigns through donations, and it has presented lucrative opportunities for staffers who leave for the private sector.
In addition to net neutrality, Obama has supported immigration reforms favored by tech firms such as Facebook, Yahoo and Microsoft and decried by labor unions. He has pushed for patent reforms that Google and Apple have championed. The president even sided with the tech industry — and against dependable Democratic allies in Hollywood — to block a copyright bill in early 2012.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 06:57:47 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 06:57:47 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on November 29, 2021, 07:44:28 PM
Post by: cc on November 29, 2021, 07:44:28 PM
Big tech became a monopolized entity and a dictatorial shadow government under the Obama administration.
That's when it started
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 07:47:26 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 07:47:26 PM
Big tech became a monopolized entity and a dictatorial shadow government under the Obama administration.
That's when it started
That's when social media got supersized.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on November 29, 2021, 08:53:25 PM
Post by: Thiel on November 29, 2021, 08:53:25 PM
Not that I care, but Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter stepped down.
Twitter is worse than FB for censorship.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 09:11:59 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2021, 09:11:59 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on November 30, 2021, 08:02:16 PM
Post by: Anonymous on November 30, 2021, 08:02:16 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on November 30, 2021, 10:38:16 PM
Post by: Bricktop on November 30, 2021, 10:38:16 PM
What this means is that bringing in laws to control them will have overflow effects on a wide range of private media companies. It is a principle of western democratic governments that you cannot implement laws targeting a specific individual or organisation.
The only way these corporations will change their conduct is if their profits fall...in other words, people stop using their platforms.
It will need other entrepreneurs to invest in similar service platforms and differentiate themselves from the other players in the market.
It is a mystery to me why this hasn't happened already in western democracies. Surely, the opportunity to create a less politically motivated media platform is begging for investment.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on December 01, 2021, 06:34:53 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 01, 2021, 06:34:53 AM
This (rather long) video shines a light on the real issue of censorship and control on social media platforms; these organisations are PRIVATELY owned companies, and can do what they like with their product.
What this means is that bringing in laws to control them will have overflow effects on a wide range of private media companies. It is a principle of western democratic governments that you cannot implement laws targeting a specific individual or organisation.
The only way these corporations will change their conduct is if their profits fall...in other words, people stop using their platforms.
It will need other entrepreneurs to invest in similar service platforms and differentiate themselves from the other players in the market.
It is a mystery to me why this hasn't happened already in western democracies. Surely, the opportunity to create a less politically motivated media platform is begging for investment.
What social media alternative to Twitter was deplatformed due to economic boycott on Apple? I can't remember it's name.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2021, 11:51:44 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2021, 11:51:44 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 03:55:50 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 03:55:50 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 04:32:57 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 04:32:57 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/267028224_10158669419931485_8020828773927191055_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=S5hATnUHkf8AX-2Ns47&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8j2WAeM6iLcasMLjuX6t7G5eZZaSRUr6ow97MdnPHXLQ&oe=61BD9604%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=61BD9604%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/267028224_10158669419931485_8020828773927191055_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=S5hATnUHkf8AX-2Ns47&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8j2WAeM6iLcasMLjuX6t7G5eZZaSRUr6ow97MdnPHXLQ&oe=61BD9604%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
That seems to be true.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 09:46:02 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2021, 09:46:02 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 02, 2022, 09:43:26 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 02, 2022, 09:43:26 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 25, 2022, 07:15:20 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 25, 2022, 07:15:20 PM
Jennie Nguyen Fired After Her Controversial Facebook Posts Resurface
After only one season on The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, Jennie Nguyen has been officially fired from the series after fans discovered a series of controversial posts on her Facebook page. Over the span of about six months in 2020, Nguyen had reposted memes, photos and added her own commentary condemning Black Lives Matter, referring to protesters as "violent gangs" and "BLM thugs."
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on January 26, 2022, 02:55:01 AM
Post by: Bricktop on January 26, 2022, 02:55:01 AM
Nice.
I wonder what would happen in America if it had decent industrial protection laws.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 10:35:16 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 10:35:16 AM
Fired for telling the truth.
Nice.
I wonder what would happen in America if it had decent industrial protection laws.
They don't?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on January 26, 2022, 02:05:59 PM
Post by: cc on January 26, 2022, 02:05:59 PM
...... referring to protesters as "violent gangs" and "BLM thugs."
The only thing missing is antifa
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 02:15:34 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 02:15:34 PM
Fired for telling the truth.
Nice.
I wonder what would happen in America if it had decent industrial protection laws.
They don't?
They do. Railway operating rules are almost identical on either side of the border.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on January 26, 2022, 04:50:59 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 26, 2022, 04:50:59 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 07:08:11 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 26, 2022, 07:08:11 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 10:49:25 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 10:49:25 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Frood on January 27, 2022, 10:53:50 AM
Post by: Frood on January 27, 2022, 10:53:50 AM
Dan Bongino was permanently banned by YouTube on Wednesday.
Big shame too.... he never said anything he couldn't back up.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 11:27:58 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 11:27:58 AM
Dan Bongino was permanently banned by YouTube on Wednesday.
Big shame too.... he never said anything he couldn't back up.
They claim he violated their TOS.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Frood on January 27, 2022, 11:34:31 AM
Post by: Frood on January 27, 2022, 11:34:31 AM
Dan Bongino was permanently banned by YouTube on Wednesday.
Big shame too.... he never said anything he couldn't back up.
They claim he violated their TOS.
Google TOS is a varying mark....
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 03:57:30 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 03:57:30 PM
Dan Bongino was permanently banned by YouTube on Wednesday.
I like Dan Bongino.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on January 27, 2022, 06:06:42 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 27, 2022, 06:06:42 PM
That will create even more problems.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 06:11:17 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 06:11:17 PM
Sooner or later, other social media platforms will appear to challenge the monopolists.
That will create even more problems.
And Apple will pull the plug on them. It has happened already.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on January 27, 2022, 06:31:48 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 27, 2022, 06:31:48 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 09:18:13 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2022, 09:18:13 PM
Sooner or later, other social media platforms will appear to challenge the monopolists.
That will create even more problems.
And Apple will pull the plug on them. It has happened already.
I forget the name of the platform that Apple evicted.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 03, 2022, 08:29:50 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 03, 2022, 08:29:50 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 04, 2022, 01:02:39 AM
Post by: Bricktop on February 04, 2022, 01:02:39 AM
We are at war with this leftist madmen and they will pull all the dirty tricks they can to silence those with whom they disagree.
We think they are wrong...they think we are evil.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2022, 09:43:40 AM
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2022, 09:43:40 AM
Facebook has spent all week banning groups related to the peaceful Canadian Trucker Convoy as well as any groups working to organize the American Convoy. It's interesting that Facebook would ban these groups and yet did nothing to ban the Black Lives Matter groups that organized to burn down our cities a few years ago.
Thousands of people of all races who work for a living came together because they disagree with continued restrictions..
These people are a
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on February 04, 2022, 10:39:21 PM
Post by: Thiel on February 04, 2022, 10:39:21 PM
Facebook has spent all week banning groups related to the peaceful Canadian Trucker Convoy as well as any groups working to organize the American Convoy. It's interesting that Facebook would ban these groups and yet did nothing to ban the Black Lives Matter groups that organized to burn down our cities a few years ago.
Meta shares plunged this week. That is so sad.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2022, 10:50:23 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2022, 10:50:23 PM
Facebook has spent all week banning groups related to the peaceful Canadian Trucker Convoy as well as any groups working to organize the American Convoy. It's interesting that Facebook would ban these groups and yet did nothing to ban the Black Lives Matter groups that organized to burn down our cities a few years ago.
Meta shares plunged this week. That is so sad.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 08, 2022, 04:26:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 08, 2022, 04:26:46 PM
Cooper also told the outlet that his show is "designed to give you a vacation from CNN, you know what I mean? I'm not preaching anything up there, and I'm not knocking anybody.
A number of leftists didn't take kindly to Cooper declaring that rock should be free of politics and ripped him for it on Facebook:
"Alice Cooper can go back to golfing and using music as a nicey nice gothic entertainment moment," one commenter said. "Otherwise we need people who put their money and iZod shirts on the line for all sorts of injustice."
"Art should comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable," another commenter declared. "Clearly this rich septuagenarian is too comfortable."
"Cooper is out of touch," another commenter wrote. "The fact is some of the best songs are influenced by politics."
"Alice is a hardcore conservative Christian, so not at all surprising he said something so ridiculous," another commenter noted.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 08, 2022, 05:18:36 PM
Post by: Bricktop on February 08, 2022, 05:18:36 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 08, 2022, 06:50:53 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 08, 2022, 06:50:53 PM
Rock legend Alice Cooper recently said "I don't think rock 'n' roll and politics belong in the same bed together, but a lot of people think it does — because we have a voice, and we should use our voice. But again, rock 'n' roll should be anti-political, I think."
Cooper also told the outlet that his show is "designed to give you a vacation from CNN, you know what I mean? I'm not preaching anything up there, and I'm not knocking anybody.
A number of leftists didn't take kindly to Cooper declaring that rock should be free of politics and ripped him for it on Facebook:
"Alice Cooper can go back to golfing and using music as a nicey nice gothic entertainment moment," one commenter said. "Otherwise we need people who put their money and iZod shirts on the line for all sorts of injustice."
"Art should comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable," another commenter declared. "Clearly this rich septuagenarian is too comfortable."
"Cooper is out of touch," another commenter wrote. "The fact is some of the best songs are influenced by politics."
"Alice is a hardcore conservative Christian, so not at all surprising he said something so ridiculous," another commenter noted.
Old Alice Cooper is overrated. But, unlike say Neil Young, he don't look down on his fans.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on February 21, 2022, 09:56:31 PM
Post by: cc on February 21, 2022, 09:56:31 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on February 21, 2022, 10:54:02 PM
Post by: Thiel on February 21, 2022, 10:54:02 PM
CPAC This Year Will Feature Democrat Tulsi Gabbardhttps://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1495762134403276801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1495762134403276801%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F479489-cpac-this-year-will-feature-democrat-tulsi-gabbard%2F
She is a maverick within her party.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Frood on February 21, 2022, 11:05:29 PM
Post by: Frood on February 21, 2022, 11:05:29 PM
CPAC This Year Will Feature Democrat Tulsi Gabbardhttps://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1495762134403276801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1495762134403276801%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F479489-cpac-this-year-will-feature-democrat-tulsi-gabbard%2F
She is a maverick within her party.
And was an associate member of the CFR and a Young Global Leader of the WEF...
The jury is out whether she is authentic or controlled opposition.
She does speak some basic truths though.
I distrust her at any rate.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on February 21, 2022, 11:22:55 PM
Post by: Thiel on February 21, 2022, 11:22:55 PM
CPAC This Year Will Feature Democrat Tulsi Gabbardhttps://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1495762134403276801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1495762134403276801%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F479489-cpac-this-year-will-feature-democrat-tulsi-gabbard%2F
She is a maverick within her party.
And was an associate member of the CFR and a Young Global Leader of the WEF...
The jury is out whether she is authentic or controlled opposition.
She does speak some basic truths though.
I distrust her at any rate.
She had no influence over either. And it appears their influence over her has changed too.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Frood on February 21, 2022, 11:27:00 PM
Post by: Frood on February 21, 2022, 11:27:00 PM
CPAC This Year Will Feature Democrat Tulsi Gabbardhttps://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1495762134403276801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1495762134403276801%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F479489-cpac-this-year-will-feature-democrat-tulsi-gabbard%2F
She is a maverick within her party.
And was an associate member of the CFR and a Young Global Leader of the WEF...
The jury is out whether she is authentic or controlled opposition.
She does speak some basic truths though.
I distrust her at any rate.
She had no influence over either. And it appears their influence over her has changed too.
It's still enough to render her a sleeping risk like all the other members in and out of office currently.
Those organisations are downright evil.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 22, 2022, 12:12:08 AM
Post by: Bricktop on February 22, 2022, 12:12:08 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on February 22, 2022, 12:22:50 AM
Post by: cc on February 22, 2022, 12:22:50 AM
The jury is out whether she is authentic or controlled opposition.Quote
I must agree. I tend to lean toward distrust when push come to shove
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on February 22, 2022, 12:23:41 AM
Post by: Thiel on February 22, 2022, 12:23:41 AM
CPAC This Year Will Feature Democrat Tulsi Gabbardhttps://twitter.com/mschlapp/status/1495762134403276801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1495762134403276801%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.weaselzippers.us%2F479489-cpac-this-year-will-feature-democrat-tulsi-gabbard%2F
She is a maverick within her party.
And was an associate member of the CFR and a Young Global Leader of the WEF...
The jury is out whether she is authentic or controlled opposition.
She does speak some basic truths though.
I distrust her at any rate.
She had no influence over either. And it appears their influence over her has changed too.
It's still enough to render her a sleeping risk like all the other members in and out of office currently.
Those organisations are downright evil.
She has been decoupling from her party. She is still too socialist for my own tastes.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 22, 2022, 12:35:43 AM
Post by: Bricktop on February 22, 2022, 12:35:43 AM
They may use different language, and wear different policies...but the spots underneath never change.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 22, 2022, 11:06:03 AM
Post by: Anonymous on February 22, 2022, 11:06:03 AM
Once a socialist, always a socialist.
They may use different language, and wear different policies...but the spots underneath never change.
Who cares. She causes problems for the Dem Party.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 22, 2022, 07:27:19 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 22, 2022, 07:27:19 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 05:48:47 PM
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 05:48:47 PM
It seems Facebook supports Russian barbarianism.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 05:59:33 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 05:59:33 PM
Facebook forbade me posting this image...it breached "community standards".(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://c.ndtvimg.com/2022-02/8ufruokg_hitler-putin-cartoon-650_625x300_24_February_22.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://c.ndtvimg.com/2022-02/8ufruokg_%20...%20ary_22.jpg%22%3Ehttps://c.ndtvimg.com/2022-02/8ufruokg_hitler-putin-cartoon-650_625x300_24_February_22.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
It seems Facebook supports Russian barbarianism.
That's surprising.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cw_ on February 27, 2022, 06:04:00 PM
Post by: cw_ on February 27, 2022, 06:04:00 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 06:07:02 PM
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 06:07:02 PM
That a nasty little geek who had a clever idea can wield influence on that scale is not acceptable. Despicable little twat.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cw_ on February 27, 2022, 06:10:49 PM
Post by: cw_ on February 27, 2022, 06:10:49 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 06:11:36 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 06:11:36 PM
Sooner or later that Zuckerberg is going to come crashing down.
That a nasty little geek who had a clever idea can wield influence on that scale is not acceptable. Despicable little twat.
I aint crazy about Twitter either.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 06:17:46 PM
Post by: Bricktop on February 27, 2022, 06:17:46 PM
I'm always bemused by people who cry foul when Twitter trolls attack them.
It's a bit like stepping into a boxing ring and complaining that the other guy is hitting you.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 07:49:23 PM
Post by: Anonymous on February 27, 2022, 07:49:23 PM
I don't do Twitter.
I'm always bemused by people who cry foul when Twitter trolls attack them.
It's a bit like stepping into a boxing ring and complaining that the other guy is hitting you.
I look at a few twitter handles of anti progs.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2022, 10:08:41 AM
Post by: Anonymous on March 22, 2022, 10:08:41 AM
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon revealed that Twitter had "locked out" the fake news publisher from its official account for alleged "hateful conduct."
According to the notice, Twitter suspended the Babylon Bee for writing: "The Babylon Bee's Man Of The Year Is Rachel Levine."
The tweet included a link to a Babylon Bee article published on Tuesday, which had the same headline as the tweet.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2022, 10:51:13 AM
Post by: Anonymous on March 24, 2022, 10:51:13 AM
Carlson was commenting about the suspension of the Babylon Bee and Charlie Kirk over respective tweets calling Rachel Levine, the assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services, a male. Levine is a biological male but identifies as a transgender female.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2022, 02:22:07 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2022, 02:22:07 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2022, 08:28:17 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 27, 2022, 08:28:17 PM
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1507259709224632344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1507259709224632344%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Felonmusk-twitter-new-platform-reactions
Old Musk has the money. He should do it.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2022, 12:12:35 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2022, 12:12:35 PM
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1507259709224632344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1507259709224632344%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Felonmusk-twitter-new-platform-reactions
Old Musk has the money. He should do it.
Bring it on.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2022, 02:56:09 PM
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2022, 02:56:09 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2022, 10:12:38 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2022, 10:12:38 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2022, 10:47:58 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 01, 2022, 10:47:58 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=624BBA2B%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2022, 12:41:59 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 02, 2022, 12:41:59 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=624BBA2B%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Could happen.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 02, 2022, 12:42:25 PM
Post by: cc on April 02, 2022, 12:42:25 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=624BBA2B%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyqr2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277162321_10159289825795995_8170659625799725562_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=3KG1TlvcbWcAX9S3RQW&_nc_ht=scontent.fyqr2-1.fna&oh=00_AT8g51tU2DI5WjsdHvjgHl9w_6_zl1joiP0nEZDhUJk1Pw&oe=624BBA2B%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
just so y'all can reach me, I was always "Sandpiper" (We lived in a beach town at the time)
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 08:05:43 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 08:05:43 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 05, 2022, 09:58:56 PM
Post by: cc on April 05, 2022, 09:58:56 PM
Go find a safe place for prognazis to work.(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277992825_10159977387996093_3088795407136237538_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=ot6he4VS5LsAX-F191U&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT80q29J6dHk9jrZHdanK9MDRMFkEvGyzIdF6HvfVa2gTw&oe=625175C6%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=625175C6%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/277992825_10159977387996093_3088795407136237538_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=ot6he4VS5LsAX-F191U&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT80q29J6dHk9jrZHdanK9MDRMFkEvGyzIdF6HvfVa2gTw&oe=625175C6%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 05, 2022, 10:17:19 PM
Post by: Thiel on April 05, 2022, 10:17:19 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 10:31:21 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 10:31:21 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 05, 2022, 10:58:16 PM
Post by: cc on April 05, 2022, 10:58:16 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 11:04:37 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 11:04:37 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 11:19:41 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 05, 2022, 11:19:41 PM
I know Elon Musk seems different from the parade of billionaire libtards who want to dictate our lives. However, I still don't trust him.
He made his fortune from government subsidies. Give him the people's money or the planet burns.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 05, 2022, 11:56:53 PM
Post by: Thiel on April 05, 2022, 11:56:53 PM
I know Elon Musk seems different from the parade of billionaire libtards who want to dictate our lives. However, I still don't trust him.
This is good for free speech. I may start using Twitter again.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 12:35:20 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 12:35:20 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 06, 2022, 12:40:38 AM
Post by: Thiel on April 06, 2022, 12:40:38 AM
This may seem like a stupid question, but does Elon Musk have the ability to bring back Donald Trump?
He is the largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares. It's a still a very leftst social media platform. He will meet a lot of opposition if he pushes it.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 09:35:31 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 09:35:31 AM
This may seem like a stupid question, but does Elon Musk have the ability to bring back Donald Trump?
He is the largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares. It's a still a very leftst social media platform. He will meet a lot of opposition if he pushes it.
So, little or no change for Twitter.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 06, 2022, 02:17:19 PM
Post by: cc on April 06, 2022, 02:17:19 PM
I know Elon Musk seems different from the parade of billionaire libtards who want to dictate our lives. However, I still don't trust him.
He made his fortune from government subsidies. Give him the people's money or the planet burns.
True enough. "We'll see how it all winds up" but all the above is true
"We'll see"
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 02:23:18 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 02:23:18 PM
I know Elon Musk seems different from the parade of billionaire libtards who want to dictate our lives. However, I still don't trust him.
He made his fortune from government subsidies. Give him the people's money or the planet burns.
True enough. "We'll see how it all winds up" but all the above is true
"We'll see"
Yep, I like your answer.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 08:29:20 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 08:29:20 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 08:37:53 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2022, 08:37:53 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 07, 2022, 10:13:03 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 07, 2022, 10:13:03 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2022, 03:59:08 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2022, 03:59:08 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2022, 06:37:45 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 08, 2022, 06:37:45 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2022, 01:11:38 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2022, 01:11:38 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2022, 01:23:56 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 09, 2022, 01:23:56 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278096734_4830305010372547_2672918832413133985_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=NCrk_qlXOfoAX_3jmKV&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT9g8xQuDbLpugFaCUlvds40_dhwtUv0rc5ahZZnwb9h7A&oe=62563AA5%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=62563AA5%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278096734_4830305010372547_2672918832413133985_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=NCrk_qlXOfoAX_3jmKV&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT9g8xQuDbLpugFaCUlvds40_dhwtUv0rc5ahZZnwb9h7A&oe=62563AA5%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I hope Elon Musk makes Twitter freer.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 14, 2022, 01:26:29 PM
Post by: cc on April 14, 2022, 01:26:29 PM
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 02:11:27 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 02:11:27 PM
BOLD MOVE with an End in mind> Elon Musk offers to buy 100% of Twitter for $54 a share(//https)
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it."
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
I hope he buys Twitter and transforms into a platform for free speech.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 14, 2022, 03:10:31 PM
Post by: cc on April 14, 2022, 03:10:31 PM
BOLD MOVE with an End in mind> Elon Musk offers to buy 100% of Twitter for $54 a share(//https)
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it."
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
I hope he buys Twitter and transforms into a platform for free speech.
Musk had said the offer would be his "best and final" one.
He declined to elaborate.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 03:56:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 03:56:32 PM
BOLD MOVE with an End in mind> Elon Musk offers to buy 100% of Twitter for $54 a share(//https)
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it."
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
I hope he buys Twitter and transforms into a platform for free speech.
Musk had said the offer would be his "best and final" one.Asked by TED's Chris Anderson if there was a "Plan B" if his current offer were rejected, Musk said, "there is."(//https)
He declined to elaborate.
It won't happen.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 06:16:05 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 06:16:05 PM
BOLD MOVE with an End in mind> Elon Musk offers to buy 100% of Twitter for $54 a share(//news/elon-musk-offers-to-buy-100-of-twitter-for-54-a-share-105023351.html?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_recirculation)
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it."
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
It seems like a good deal for Twitter shareholders.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 09:05:04 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 14, 2022, 09:05:04 PM
BOLD MOVE with an End in mind> Elon Musk offers to buy 100% of Twitter for $54 a share(//https)
Here is what Musk wrote in a letter to Twitter Chairman Bret Taylor, as disclosed in a new SEC filing.
"I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.
However, since making my investment I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form. Twitter needs to be transformed as a private company.
As a result, I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash, a 54% premium over the day before I began investing in Twitter and a 38% premium over the day before my investment was publicly announced. My offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted, I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder.Twitter has extraordinary potential. I will unlock it."
Twitter shares (TWTR) surged 13% in pre-market trading.
Twitter confirmed in a press release that it received Musk's offer and said the board of directors "will carefully review the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interest of the Company and all Twitter stockholders."
"It would be hard for any other bidders/consortium to emerge and the Twitter board will be forced likely to accept this bid and/or run an active process to sell Twitter," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
Fire all the prog senior management after he buys it.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 15, 2022, 07:45:40 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 15, 2022, 07:45:40 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 15, 2022, 09:40:06 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 15, 2022, 09:40:06 PM
"I wonder," Tur added, stammering. "You know in talking about this, you know, it's kinda funny, oh, Elon Musk wants to buy it, but there are massive, life and globe-altering consequences for just letting people run wild on the thing."
Tur also expressed serious concern that Musk might allow former President Donald Trump back on Twitter after he was permanently banned in 2021.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 07:49:06 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 07:49:06 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 12:37:03 PM
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 12:37:03 PM
Tur also expressed serious concern that Musk might allow former President Donald Trump back on Twitter after he was permanently banned in 2021.ac_toofunny
HORRORS
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 02:32:42 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 02:32:42 PM
Tur also expressed serious concern that Musk might allow former President Donald Trump back on Twitter after he was permanently banned in 2021.ac_toofunny
HORRORS:7283gm_th: The world will end
The world is always ending if progs don't get their own way. They are spoiled brats.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 03:09:33 PM
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 03:09:33 PM
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" is the motto of the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post. It may sound like a warning, but more and more it seems like a summary of the left's aspirations to control debate and shut down any opposition.
A recent example of those aspirations appeared in a column by former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Tesla CEO Elon Musk's big buy of Twitter stock. The original headline — changed after widespread mockery — was this: "Elon Musk's vision for the Internet is dangerous nonsense: Musk has long advocated a libertarian vision of an 'uncontrolled' internet. That's also the dream of every dictator, strongman and demagogue."
sigh
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 03:15:08 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 03:15:08 PM
'Censorship is free speech' is the establishment's Orwellian line on Elon Musk's Twitter crusade(//2022/04/14/the-establishments-orwellian-line-on-elon-musks-twitter-crusade/) https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/twitter-triggered.jpg [/img]
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" is the motto of the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post. It may sound like a warning, but more and more it seems like a summary of the left's aspirations to control debate and shut down any opposition.
A recent example of those aspirations appeared in a column by former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Tesla CEO Elon Musk's big buy of Twitter stock. The original headline — changed after widespread mockery — was this: "Elon Musk's vision for the Internet is dangerous nonsense: Musk has long advocated a libertarian vision of an 'uncontrolled' internet. That's also the dream of every dictator, strongman and demagogue."
sigh
Crazy.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 04:19:43 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 04:19:43 PM
'Censorship is free speech' is the establishment's Orwellian line on Elon Musk's Twitter crusade(//2022/04/14/the-establishments-orwellian-line-on-elon-musks-twitter-crusade/) https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/twitter-triggered.jpg [/img]
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" is the motto of the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post. It may sound like a warning, but more and more it seems like a summary of the left's aspirations to control debate and shut down any opposition.
A recent example of those aspirations appeared in a column by former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Tesla CEO Elon Musk's big buy of Twitter stock. The original headline — changed after widespread mockery — was this: "Elon Musk's vision for the Internet is dangerous nonsense: Musk has long advocated a libertarian vision of an 'uncontrolled' internet. That's also the dream of every dictator, strongman and demagogue."
sigh
Robert Reich has an aversion to ideas different from his own.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 16, 2022, 09:51:13 PM
Post by: Thiel on April 16, 2022, 09:51:13 PM
'Censorship is free speech' is the establishment's Orwellian line on Elon Musk's Twitter crusade(//2022/04/14/the-establishments-orwellian-line-on-elon-musks-twitter-crusade/) https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/twitter-triggered.jpg [/img]
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" is the motto of the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post. It may sound like a warning, but more and more it seems like a summary of the left's aspirations to control debate and shut down any opposition.
A recent example of those aspirations appeared in a column by former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Tesla CEO Elon Musk's big buy of Twitter stock. The original headline — changed after widespread mockery — was this: "Elon Musk's vision for the Internet is dangerous nonsense: Musk has long advocated a libertarian vision of an 'uncontrolled' internet. That's also the dream of every dictator, strongman and demagogue."
sigh
A very big sigh. I knew Robert Reich was a closeted Trotskyite when he worked for the Clinton administration.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 10:17:34 PM
Post by: cc on April 16, 2022, 10:17:34 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 10:22:48 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 10:22:48 PM
Exactly. He most definitely was
I don't know a lot about him the way you and old Thiel do. He was the short guy? Like a midget actually.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 10:28:03 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2022, 10:28:03 PM
Exactly. He most definitely was
I don't know a lot about him the way you and old Thiel do. He was the short guy? Like a midget actually.
I looked it up and he is four foot nine or 1.49 metres.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 17, 2022, 01:41:19 PM
Post by: cc on April 17, 2022, 01:41:19 PM
Exactly. He most definitely was
I don't know a lot about him the way you and old Thiel do. He was the short guy? Like a midget actually.
Yes. Very small body
Very large mouth
Very large opinion of himself
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2022, 03:09:59 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2022, 03:09:59 PM
Exactly. He most definitely was
I don't know a lot about him the way you and old Thiel do. He was the short guy? Like a midget actually.
Yes. Very small body
Very large mouth
Very large opinion of himself
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 17, 2022, 04:28:31 PM
Post by: cc on April 17, 2022, 04:28:31 PM
Here's a "slip" that gives it all away
Listen especially close around 30 seconds in
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2022, 04:35:21 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2022, 04:35:21 PM
I meant it to be the TV media tactics thread .. but it's done now
Here's a "slip" that gives it all away
Listen especially close around 30 seconds inhttps://twitter.com/stoolpresidente/status/1515105781560971266?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1515105781560971266%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fblazingcatfur.ca%2Fpage%2F2%2F
Aint that the frickin truth.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2022, 01:22:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2022, 01:22:32 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2022, 11:42:13 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 19, 2022, 11:42:13 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2022, 12:56:59 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2022, 12:56:59 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278770421_368909335261592_8690982631517753000_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p843x403&_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=BC3_RjTVZsIAX_IMP-S&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT95ngJYArqRGPpq8-3HVvM5Pc8LhR36d-XtmLEkDhhdCg&oe=62642FF1%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=62642FF1%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278770421_368909335261592_8690982631517753000_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p843x403&_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=BC3_RjTVZsIAX_IMP-S&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd2-1.fna&oh=00_AT95ngJYArqRGPpq8-3HVvM5Pc8LhR36d-XtmLEkDhhdCg&oe=62642FF1%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
lol
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2022, 01:28:58 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2022, 01:28:58 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2022, 12:09:42 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2022, 12:09:42 PM
Joe Rogan revealed that all of the recent controversies that he has been involved in and the attempts to cancel him have resulted in his Spotify subscriptions to go "up massively."
Prognazi fail.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2022, 06:41:21 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2022, 06:41:21 PM
Reuters reported that Twitter is poised to agree to sell to Musk for what the Tesla and SpaceX CEO called his "best and final" offer of $43 billion.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 05:42:58 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 05:42:58 PM
It looks like Elon Musk will finally own Twitter.
Reuters reported that Twitter is poised to agree to sell to Musk for what the Tesla and SpaceX CEO called his "best and final" offer of $43 billion.
Will it really change?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 26, 2022, 07:14:06 PM
Post by: cc on April 26, 2022, 07:14:06 PM
Will it really change?
With Musk at the helm, yes .. and a lot
Actually, he bought it to change it .. make it "freedom" ... his words, and one thing about him, he follows through on his words in so many areas
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 07:29:05 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 07:29:05 PM
Will it really change?
With Musk at the helm, yes .. and a lot
Actually, he bought it to change it .. make it "freedom" ... his words, and one thing about him, he follows through on his words in so many areas
I suppose we'll see..
Some of his employees are worried he will make it a free speech platform.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 26, 2022, 07:49:15 PM
Post by: cc on April 26, 2022, 07:49:15 PM
It's many prog Twitter employees running around in circles looking for the edge of the world to jump off
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 08:24:38 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 08:24:38 PM
Could be a tiny few of his.
It's many prog Twitter employees running around in circles looking for the edge of the world to jump off
Social media employs the unemployable.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:27:02 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:27:02 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:31:44 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:31:44 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:33:36 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 26, 2022, 09:33:36 PM
Despite the weeping and gnashing of teeth by some employees, Musk has not announced any changes to Twitter.
That's what I was getting at with cc......I don't expect big changes.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on April 26, 2022, 10:21:04 PM
Post by: Thiel on April 26, 2022, 10:21:04 PM
Way to go Elon!!!
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 11:09:14 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 11:09:14 AM
"Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated," Mr. Musk said in a statement announcing the deal. "Twitter has tremendous potential — I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it."
Way to go Elon!!!
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 04:29:34 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 04:29:34 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 10:40:42 PM
Post by: Anonymous on April 27, 2022, 10:40:42 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: cc on April 28, 2022, 04:23:24 PM
Post by: cc on April 28, 2022, 04:23:24 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on April 30, 2022, 07:42:12 AM
Post by: Anonymous on April 30, 2022, 07:42:12 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 15, 2022, 09:31:44 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 15, 2022, 09:31:44 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 16, 2022, 12:56:08 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 16, 2022, 12:56:08 PM
Trump posted on Truth Social indicating his return to social media.
Elon Musk wants him back on Twitter.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on May 18, 2022, 07:50:31 AM
Post by: Breakfall on May 18, 2022, 07:50:31 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 18, 2022, 10:17:16 AM
Post by: Anonymous on May 18, 2022, 10:17:16 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20w&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Most people wish they were an idiot like him.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on May 19, 2022, 04:06:48 AM
Post by: Breakfall on May 19, 2022, 04:06:48 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20w&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Most people wish they were an idiot like him.
Heaven forbid! Once an Afrikaner...always an Afrikaner!
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 19, 2022, 09:30:36 AM
Post by: Anonymous on May 19, 2022, 09:30:36 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20w&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Most people wish they were an idiot like him.
Heaven forbid! Once an Afrikaner...always an Afrikaner!
ac_biggrin (//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKqplPhEeRHxQrkNRNS8TR10wAYHwlw5ZfLA&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20A&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKqplPhEeRHxQrkNRNS8TR10wAYHwlw5ZfLA&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I didn't know Elon Musk had a hair transplant.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on May 20, 2022, 09:32:36 AM
Post by: Breakfall on May 20, 2022, 09:32:36 AM
(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20w&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRers2aHTLndFr7VBSapD0s06JspKwf8uANow&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Most people wish they were an idiot like him.
Heaven forbid! Once an Afrikaner...always an Afrikaner!
ac_biggrin (//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKqplPhEeRHxQrkNRNS8TR10wAYHwlw5ZfLA&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20A&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKqplPhEeRHxQrkNRNS8TR10wAYHwlw5ZfLA&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I didn't know Elon Musk had a hair transplant.
He also dropped out of University the first tim around. Sometimes people can land with their arse in the butter, and with blind luck paving the rest of their way. It also helps being born with a silver spoon in your mouth. I don't rate the bloke...I think he's a bit of a knob.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 20, 2022, 09:33:29 AM
Post by: Anonymous on May 20, 2022, 09:33:29 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on May 20, 2022, 05:07:07 PM
Post by: Anonymous on May 20, 2022, 05:07:07 PM
"Biological men have no place in women's sports," Blackburn wrote in a post shared to her personal Facebook page. It linked to a donation website that encouraged her supporters to "fight back against Big Tech censorship" by adding their names to her campaign email list and making a contribution, Fox News reported.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 17, 2022, 10:28:35 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 17, 2022, 10:28:35 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 07:49:32 AM
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 07:49:32 AM
Dr. Andrew Bostom, with the Brown University Center For Primary Care and Prevention, shared the peer-reviewed study on June 19.
Twitter informed Bostom that the missive violated its policy against "spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19, according to a message reviewed by The Epoch Times. It suspended Bostom's account over the post.
"It seems to fit into the whole pattern of silencing open discussion," Bostom told The Epoch Times.
Twitter did not respond to a request for comment.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 10:26:27 AM
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 10:26:27 AM
Bill Gates dropped out of university too.
Besides the point. First and foremost, Musk is a saffer ...and a Dutchman at that. Not a high point by any means.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 10:29:16 AM
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 10:29:16 AM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 04:20:14 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 04:20:14 PM
Bill Gates dropped out of university too.
Besides the point. First and foremost, Musk is a saffer ...and a Dutchman at that. Not a high point by any means.
My husband is Dutch.....my children are half Dutch.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 04:21:02 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 24, 2022, 04:21:02 PM
What a fucking Dutchman!? Only a mother could love this fertilised egg-head!(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcShgWEKvHkydr7hPhaCtJbIh3LnpR7nT5rKOQ&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20Q&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcShgWEKvHkydr7hPhaCtJbIh3LnpR7nT5rKOQ&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I'm sure his mother isn't his only fan.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 11:23:46 PM
Post by: Breakfall on June 24, 2022, 11:23:46 PM
What a fucking Dutchman!? Only a mother could love this fertilised egg-head!(//%3C/s%3E%20%3CURL%20url=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcShgWEKvHkydr7hPhaCtJbIh3LnpR7nT5rKOQ&usqp=CAU%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag%20...%20Q&usqp=CAU%22%3Ehttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcShgWEKvHkydr7hPhaCtJbIh3LnpR7nT5rKOQ&usqp=CAU%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I'm sure his mother isn't his only fan.
Once a South African Dutchman, always a South African Dutchman. It doesn't matter how long he resided in Cananda.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 30, 2022, 03:47:33 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 30, 2022, 03:47:33 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2022, 06:59:01 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2022, 06:59:01 PM
Twitter banned Jordan Peterson.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on June 30, 2022, 06:59:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 30, 2022, 06:59:32 PM
Twitter banned Jordan Peterson.
:2r4ml1j_th:
That is what I say.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2022, 07:15:09 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2022, 07:15:09 PM
:2r4ml1j_th:
That is what I say.
The sad thing is Jordan Peterson isn't even considered as a right wing by most people, one of my nurse told me he was a true liberal.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 01, 2022, 10:51:17 AM
Post by: Anonymous on July 01, 2022, 10:51:17 AM
That is what I say.
The sad thing is Jordan Peterson isn't even considered as a right wing by most people, one of my nurse told me he was a true liberal.
The definition of liberal has changed.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 01, 2022, 11:38:09 AM
Post by: Zetsu on July 01, 2022, 11:38:09 AM
The sad thing is Jordan Peterson isn't even considered as a right wing by most people, one of my nurse told me he was a true liberal.
The definition of liberal has changed.
The left are out of control when it comes to entitlement.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 01, 2022, 04:11:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 01, 2022, 04:11:46 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 11:03:03 AM
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 11:03:03 AM
Jordan Peterson does not incite violence or hate. He doesn't deserve banning.
I heartfully agree too, sadly the only people that promote hate or violence are the ones that keep barging in and protesting to interrupt his conference. He never hated women, minorities, LGBT, but a really good psychologist that has helped hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions people.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 11:41:18 AM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 11:41:18 AM
Jordan Peterson does not incite violence or hate. He doesn't deserve banning.
I heartfully agree too, sadly the only people that promote hate or violence are the ones that keep barging in and protesting to interrupt his conference.He never hated women, minorities, LGBT, but a really good psychologist that has helped hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions people.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 02:36:39 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 02:36:39 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 03:33:43 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 03:33:43 PM
Jordan Peterson does not incite violence or hate. He doesn't deserve banning.
I heartfully agree too, sadly the only people that promote hate or violence are the ones that keep barging in and protesting to interrupt his conference. He never hated women, minorities, LGBT, but a really good psychologist that has helped hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions people.
He injects common sense into the whole transgender thingy.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:37:13 PM
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:37:13 PM
I heartfully agree too, sadly the only people that promote hate or violence are the ones that keep barging in and protesting to interrupt his conference. He never hated women, minorities, LGBT, but a really good psychologist that has helped hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions people.
He injects common sense into the whole transgender thingy.
Sadly like most people say, these militant entitled crybabies will do anything to spare their brain from even doing the slightest work, it's all about "me" only mentality.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 06:42:48 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 06:42:48 PM
He injects common sense into the whole transgender thingy.
Sadly like most people say, these militant entitled crybabies will do anything to spare their brain from even doing the slightest work, it's all about "me" only mentality.:sdfjh(2):
They cannot stand anybody disagreeing with their crazy bullshit.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:47:01 PM
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:47:01 PM
Sadly like most people say, these militant entitled crybabies will do anything to spare their brain from even doing the slightest work, it's all about "me" only mentality.:sdfjh(2):
They cannot stand anybody disagreeing with their crazy bullshit.
Sadly they're starting to remind me of Nazi Germany, all the ones I've debated with go batsh*t crazy due to my difference in opinions, or super petty factors they're too embarrassed to mention.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:48:18 PM
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 06:48:18 PM
Jordan Peterson on his ban.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=UYfKWQqvFac&feature=emb_logo
I can't believe that's all he said that got him banned. Fk those waste of sh*t snot nose crybabies.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 06:53:32 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 06:53:32 PM
Jordan Peterson on his ban.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=UYfKWQqvFac&feature=emb_logo
I can't believe that's all he said that god him banned. Fk those waste of sh*t snot nose crybabies.
Perhaps the cancel culture will end if Elon Musk eventually takes over.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 08:12:00 PM
Post by: Zetsu on July 02, 2022, 08:12:00 PM
I can't believe that's all he said that god him banned. Fk those waste of sh*t snot nose crybabies.
Perhaps the cancel culture will end if Elon Musk eventually takes over.
Twitter might die once Elon buys it, a lot of the Twit users are woke ppl and will probably just end up leaving.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 08:14:46 PM
Post by: Anonymous on July 02, 2022, 08:14:46 PM
Perhaps the cancel culture will end if Elon Musk eventually takes over.
Twitter might die once Elon buys it, a lot of the Twit users are woke ppl and will probably just end up leaving.
I hope the door hits them on the ass on their way out.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 17, 2022, 09:35:24 PM
Post by: Anonymous on August 17, 2022, 09:35:24 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Anonymous on August 18, 2022, 11:12:42 AM
Post by: Anonymous on August 18, 2022, 11:12:42 AM
Facebook won't consider reinstating former President Trump's accounts until January — even if he declares he's running.
Trump doesn't care what fakebook does.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 15, 2023, 10:00:30 AM
Post by: DKG on June 15, 2023, 10:00:30 AM
Brandon Jackson, a Baltimore, Maryland resident, claimed that Amazon locked him out of his smart devices on May 25. He explained that many of the devices in his home, including his lights, are connected to his Amazon Echo, which he was unable to access for a week.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 17, 2023, 07:11:03 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 17, 2023, 07:11:03 AM
Jordan Peterson on his ban.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=UYfKWQqvFac&feature=emb_logo
I can't believe that's all he said that got him banned.
There goes a Giant of a Man. Not physically, but intellectually and morally. I've a lot of respect for someone who might cogently argue a premise and stick to his guns.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 20, 2023, 05:02:21 PM
Post by: DKG on June 20, 2023, 05:02:21 PM
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Lokmar on June 20, 2023, 06:05:59 PM
Post by: Lokmar on June 20, 2023, 06:05:59 PM
YouTube removes Jordan Peterson's interview with RFK Jr., citing vaccine 'misinformation.'
Yea, I saw that fucking bullshittery. That fucking youtube should be burned down along with fecebook.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Oerdin on June 20, 2023, 09:36:48 PM
Post by: Oerdin on June 20, 2023, 09:36:48 PM
YouTube removes Jordan Peterson's interview with RFK Jr., citing vaccine 'misinformation.'
Theo Von wanted to interview RFK but his rep said anyone giving coverage to RFK and his campaign for the Democrat nomination is getting extra attention for strikes, name, and demonitization. Democrat elites have also launched hit pieces and smears in all the left leaning MSM against RFK. Basically, RFK has them scared that they might lose their grip on power which they use to generate all of their wealth.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 21, 2023, 06:33:38 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 21, 2023, 06:33:38 AM
YouTube removes Jordan Peterson's interview with RFK Jr., citing vaccine 'misinformation.'
Yea, I saw that fucking bullshittery. That fucking youtube should be burned down along with fecebook.
YouTurd could take a flying fuck at a rolling donut if Fecesbook wasn't in the way.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 21, 2023, 12:23:41 PM
Post by: DKG on June 21, 2023, 12:23:41 PM
YouTube removes Jordan Peterson's interview with RFK Jr., citing vaccine 'misinformation.'
Theo Von wanted to interview RFK but his rep said anyone giving coverage to RFK and his campaign for the Democrat nomination is getting extra attention for strikes, name, and demonitization. Democrat elites have also launched hit pieces and smears in all the left leaning MSM against RFK. Basically, RFK has them scared that they might lose their grip on power which they use to generate all of their wealth.
The Dems hate a marketplace of ideas. Starting with stealing the nomination from Sanders in 2016.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 22, 2023, 08:21:46 PM
Post by: Herman on June 22, 2023, 08:21:46 PM
The commissioner says it has received "more complaints about online hate on Twitter in the past 12 months" than any other platform and alleges an "increasing number" of reports of serious online abuse since Musk took over in October 2022.
If Twitter fails to respond to the notice in 28 days, the tech giant will face a maximum fine of $700,000 (US$476,000) per day for "continuing breaches."
"We are seeing a worrying surge in hate online," said Julie Inman Grant in a statement on June 22.
"eSafety research shows that nearly 1 in 5 Australians have experienced some form of online hate. This level of online abuse is already inexcusably high, but if you're a First Nations [Indigenous] Australian, you are disabled or identify as LGBTIQ+, you experience online hate at double the rate of the rest of the population," she said.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 23, 2023, 12:08:24 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 23, 2023, 12:08:24 AM
Tell those pussy-ass snowflakes to drink a bag of cement and harden the fuck up. What kind of fucking wimpy victim bitches are they breeding downunder nowadays anyway?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 23, 2023, 09:43:36 AM
Post by: DKG on June 23, 2023, 09:43:36 AM
Australia's eSafety commissioner has issued Elon Musk's Twitter with a legal notice to explain what it is doing to tackle hate speech on its platform.
The commissioner says it has received "more complaints about online hate on Twitter in the past 12 months" than any other platform and alleges an "increasing number" of reports of serious online abuse since Musk took over in October 2022.
If Twitter fails to respond to the notice in 28 days, the tech giant will face a maximum fine of $700,000 (US$476,000) per day for "continuing breaches."
"We are seeing a worrying surge in hate online," said Julie Inman Grant in a statement on June 22.
"eSafety research shows that nearly 1 in 5 Australians have experienced some form of online hate. This level of online abuse is already inexcusably high, but if you're a First Nations [Indigenous] Australian, you are disabled or identify as LGBTIQ+, you experience online hate at double the rate of the rest of the population," she said.
How does the Australian government define "hate" speech?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 23, 2023, 11:07:35 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 23, 2023, 11:07:35 PM
I can't believe that's all he said that got him banned.
There goes a Giant of a Man. Not physically, but intellectually and morally. I've a lot of respect for someone who might cogently argue a premise and stick to his guns.
As usual I'd hate to agree with the truth, though I'm not much of a fan of guns due to my belief and background... but if I had to choose, I'd rather live in a state that has loose gun laws than force to use some stupid all-in-one washroom.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 23, 2023, 11:14:31 PM
Post by: Herman on June 23, 2023, 11:14:31 PM
Jordan Peterson on his ban.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=UYfKWQqvFac&feature=emb_logo
I can't believe that's all he said that got him banned. Fk those waste of sh*t snot nose crybabies.
That is all you need to do nowadays.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 23, 2023, 11:31:55 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 23, 2023, 11:31:55 PM
I can't believe that's all he said that got him banned. Fk those waste of sh*t snot nose crybabies.
That is all you need to do nowadays.
It's sad to see Canada's democracy in this sorry state, the more they try to shove their ideology down our throats will only breed more hate and disgust.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 24, 2023, 12:07:29 AM
Post by: Herman on June 24, 2023, 12:07:29 AM
That is all you need to do nowadays.
It's sad to see Canada's democracy in this sorry state, the more they try to shove their ideology down our throats will only breed more hate and disgust.
I guess it is like the Seoul brother says.social media is incompatible with democracy.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 24, 2023, 01:55:19 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 24, 2023, 01:55:19 AM
It's sad to see Canada's democracy in this sorry state, the more they try to shove their ideology down our throats will only breed more hate and disgust.
I guess it is like the Seoul brother says.social media is incompatible with democracy.
Or people who conflate popular opinion with "being right".
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 24, 2023, 02:55:19 AM
Post by: caskur on June 24, 2023, 02:55:19 AM
Australia's eSafety commissioner has issued Elon Musk's Twitter with a legal notice to explain what it is doing to tackle hate speech on its platform.
The commissioner says it has received "more complaints about online hate on Twitter in the past 12 months" than any other platform and alleges an "increasing number" of reports of serious online abuse since Musk took over in October 2022.
If Twitter fails to respond to the notice in 28 days, the tech giant will face a maximum fine of $700,000 (US$476,000) per day for "continuing breaches."
"We are seeing a worrying surge in hate online," said Julie Inman Grant in a statement on June 22.
"eSafety research shows that nearly 1 in 5 Australians have experienced some form of online hate. This level of online abuse is already inexcusably high, but if you're a First Nations [Indigenous] Australian, you are disabled or identify as LGBTIQ+, you experience online hate at double the rate of the rest of the population," she said.# https://thebluecashew.net/posting.php?mode=quote&p=504177
How does the Australian government define "hate" speech?
Anything that opposes the left... ANYTHING.
You know they are censoring childrens classsic books, yes?
Taking out evil words like fat....
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 24, 2023, 03:45:25 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 24, 2023, 03:45:25 AM
On a slightly related note, when I was young my father was tasked with the creation of the Canberra College of Advanced Education's language laboratory, as well as some side projects with the Canberra School of Music. More or less how I got started in the recording industry in fact, I was four or five when I saw my first recording studio session, a small orchestra being recorded live to two track, as well as an overwhelming collection of musical instruments that most bands at the time would have given their eye teeth for.
One night my father added a new tape to his collection. The first fifteen minutes of recording was a piece of synth generated "music" that advanced students were being tasked with identifying. A very jarring collection of noise to the average person used to an eight note musical scale, being that it was composed on a five note musical scale, not eight. The remainder of the tape was a recording that had been banned in England and much of Europe some years before... a kind of "sound poetry" piece whose creator (a Swedish ex-fighter pilot) had made concerning the governmental corruption, the brainwashing of the student population and the military actions being waged against rebel forces in Rhodesia.
Needless to say, he was up against some pretty stiff opposition getting it committed to vinyl. Which is kind of a pity because Ian Smith was a warmongering totalitarian cunt wholly unworthy of the meat shielding conducted on his behalf by foreign elites and responsible for eliminating much of the moderate opposition that might have given Rhodesia a better chance than the succession of Utter Fail that ended in that Marxist Robert Mugabe.
For my part, I was fortunate enough to have access to the recorded pastiche at a young age, something that would not have happened had my parents adhered to the wishes of various governments who would sooner have squashed dissenting voices by denying access to them. And there have been a number of times throughout my formative years where the veil of accepted historical account has been lifted from my eyes... say with the constitutional crisis of 1975 for example, or Captain James Cook's diaries for another. Man, the shit that guy ran against the boongs on the north-east coast, I'm not surprised they speared him one.
The things we're not allowed to know...
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 24, 2023, 09:51:31 AM
Post by: DKG on June 24, 2023, 09:51:31 AM
# https://thebluecashew.net/posting.php?mode=quote&p=504177
How does the Australian government define "hate" speech?
Anything that opposes the left... ANYTHING.
You know they are censoring childrens classsic books, yes?
Taking out evil words like fat....:swoon:
The exact same things that are happening in North America.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 24, 2023, 10:41:06 AM
Post by: caskur on June 24, 2023, 10:41:06 AM
Anything that opposes the left... ANYTHING.
You know they are censoring childrens classsic books, yes?
Taking out evil words like fat....:swoon:
The exact same things that are happening in North America.
I was thinking the USA and the UK...
I am sure it has gone on in Australia too and if it is, I don't want to know about it.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 24, 2023, 10:48:27 AM
Post by: DKG on June 24, 2023, 10:48:27 AM
The exact same things that are happening in North America.
I was thinking the USA and the UK...
I am sure it has gone on in Australia too and if it is, I don't want to know about it.
I was asking about Australia specifically, so I thought your answer was about Australia.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:28:25 AM
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:28:25 AM
I was thinking the USA and the UK...
I am sure it has gone on in Australia too and if it is, I don't want to know about it.
I was asking about Australia specifically, so I thought your answer was about Australia.
Well if you are buying new books here then I am sure those books have been modefied but we have thousands of second hand bookshops too so original versions of stories remain. I won't buy new books now. I am not going to encourage property thieves.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:34:25 AM
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:34:25 AM
I was thinking the USA and the UK...
I am sure it has gone on in Australia too and if it is, I don't want to know about it.
I was asking about Australia specifically, so I thought your answer was about Australia.
Well if you are buying new books here then I am sure those books have been modefied but we have thousands of second hand bookshops too so original versions of stories remain. I won't buy new books now. I am not going to encourage property thieves.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:59:24 AM
Post by: caskur on June 25, 2023, 03:59:24 AM
I tried to support anti trans movement and failed, so 20 years from now when they cry about their butchered bodies, I'll voice indifference.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 25, 2023, 12:13:40 PM
Post by: DKG on June 25, 2023, 12:13:40 PM
I was asking about Australia specifically, so I thought your answer was about Australia.
Well if you are buying new books here then I am sure those books have been modefied but we have thousands of second hand bookshops too so original versions of stories remain. I won't buy new books now. I am not going to encourage property thieves.
Got it, thank you.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 25, 2023, 06:33:38 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 25, 2023, 06:33:38 PM
It's sad to see Canada's democracy in this sorry state, the more they try to shove their ideology down our throats will only breed more hate and disgust.
I guess it is like the Seoul brother says.social media is incompatible with democracy.
I agree with you brother, and like Shen would say too, it's a huge insult and disgrace of the West, even China is smart enough to fix or at least censor their own embarrassment.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 25, 2023, 09:45:16 PM
Post by: DKG on June 25, 2023, 09:45:16 PM
I guess it is like the Seoul brother says.social media is incompatible with democracy.
I agree with you brother, and like Shen would say too, it's a huge insult and disgrace of the West, even China is smart enough to fix or at least censor their own embarrassment.ac_umm
Social media is entertainment. Take it with a pinch of salt.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 26, 2023, 02:07:02 AM
Post by: Zetsu on June 26, 2023, 02:07:02 AM
I agree with you brother, and like Shen would say too, it's a huge insult and disgrace of the West, even China is smart enough to fix or at least censor their own embarrassment.ac_umm
Social media is entertainment. Take it with a pinch of salt.
That's true, and a good way to see it. Social media like facebook might be interested at first, but then it gets boring kind of fast due to the content.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 26, 2023, 05:39:22 AM
Post by: caskur on June 26, 2023, 05:39:22 AM
I guess it is like the Seoul brother says.social media is incompatible with democracy.
I agree with you brother, and like Shen would say too, it's a huge insult and disgrace of the West, even China is smart enough to fix or at least censor their own embarrassment.ac_umm
I don't think it's smart to censor embarrassments, I think it is criminal corruption.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 26, 2023, 12:36:38 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 26, 2023, 12:36:38 PM
I agree with you brother, and like Shen would say too, it's a huge insult and disgrace of the West, even China is smart enough to fix or at least censor their own embarrassment.ac_umm
I don't think it's smart to censor embarrassments, I think it is criminal corruption.
I concur too, from building falling over like dominos, fake eggs, gutter oil, fake bus trains prototypes investment scams, fake banks, drivers flying out of a bridge or buildings to the latest fully effective-less fire extinguishers, etc, it's an national embarrassment and sweeping it under the rug like nothing had happen isn't going to improve anything, hence why China can never go to war with the US else it'll just be a clown show.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 26, 2023, 03:11:58 PM
Post by: caskur on June 26, 2023, 03:11:58 PM
I don't think it's smart to censor embarrassments, I think it is criminal corruption.
I concur too, from building falling over like dominos, fake eggs, gutter oil, fake bus trains prototypes investment scams, fake banks, drivers flying out of a bridge or buildings to the latest fully effective-less fire extinguishers, etc, it's an national embarrassment and sweeping it under the rug like nothing had happen isn't going to improve anything, hence why China can never go to war with the US else it'll just be a clown show.
Scary isn't it? It makes me sad.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 26, 2023, 08:12:35 PM
Post by: DKG on June 26, 2023, 08:12:35 PM
I don't think it's smart to censor embarrassments, I think it is criminal corruption.
I concur too, from building falling over like dominos, fake eggs, gutter oil, fake bus trains prototypes investment scams, fake banks, drivers flying out of a bridge or buildings to the latest fully effective-less fire extinguishers, etc, it's an national embarrassment and sweeping it under the rug like nothing had happen isn't going to improve anything, hence why China can never go to war with the US else it'll just be a clown show.
The news still seems to get out in China.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 27, 2023, 10:35:04 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 27, 2023, 10:35:04 PM
I concur too, from building falling over like dominos, fake eggs, gutter oil, fake bus trains prototypes investment scams, fake banks, drivers flying out of a bridge or buildings to the latest fully effective-less fire extinguishers, etc, it's an national embarrassment and sweeping it under the rug like nothing had happen isn't going to improve anything, hence why China can never go to war with the US else it'll just be a clown show.
Scary isn't it? It makes me sad.
When I was a still in school, I always thought Hongkonger's constant anti-mainland bashing was a bit excessive and over the top, but now that every time I think about mainland China, I can kind of understand why HKers are annoyed.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 27, 2023, 10:37:48 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 27, 2023, 10:37:48 PM
I concur too, from building falling over like dominos, fake eggs, gutter oil, fake bus trains prototypes investment scams, fake banks, drivers flying out of a bridge or buildings to the latest fully effective-less fire extinguishers, etc, it's an national embarrassment and sweeping it under the rug like nothing had happen isn't going to improve anything, hence why China can never go to war with the US else it'll just be a clown show.
The news still seems to get out in China.
I guess it can't be help in the smartphone era, China can censor their own news, but not much else they can do.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 28, 2023, 02:22:42 AM
Post by: Herman on June 28, 2023, 02:22:42 AM
The news still seems to get out in China.
I guess it can't be help in the smartphone era, China can censor their own news, but not much else they can do.
The firewall of China is breaking down.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 28, 2023, 05:43:02 AM
Post by: Adolf Oliver Bush on June 28, 2023, 05:43:02 AM
I guess it can't be help in the smartphone era, China can censor their own news, but not much else they can do.
The firewall of China is breaking down.
So is the Great Pacific Firewall. Oh sure, the internet illiterate can fool themselves their government is keeping little Jimmy and little Sally safe, but as a growing number have learned, the best (read "hamfisted") attempts to sanitize internet content can be bypassed for as little as a dollar a month.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 28, 2023, 07:51:41 AM
Post by: caskur on June 28, 2023, 07:51:41 AM
Scary isn't it? It makes me sad.
When I was a still in school, I always thought Hongkonger's constant anti-mainland bashing was a bit excessive and over the top, but now that every time I think about mainland China, I can kind of understand why HKers are annoyed.
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: DKG on June 28, 2023, 08:46:34 AM
Post by: DKG on June 28, 2023, 08:46:34 AM
When I was a still in school, I always thought Hongkonger's constant anti-mainland bashing was a bit excessive and over the top, but now that every time I think about mainland China, I can kind of understand why HKers are annoyed.
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Maybe Shanghai?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 28, 2023, 01:18:44 PM
Post by: caskur on June 28, 2023, 01:18:44 PM
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Maybe Shanghai?
Why there?
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 28, 2023, 06:30:01 PM
Post by: Herman on June 28, 2023, 06:30:01 PM
The firewall of China is breaking down.
So is the Great Pacific Firewall. Oh sure, the internet illiterate can fool themselves their government is keeping little Jimmy and little Sally safe, but as a growing number have learned, the best (read "hamfisted") attempts to sanitize internet content can be bypassed for as little as a dollar a month.
We aint no better than China, with young folks in Canada and the US getting their news from Tik Tok.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:39:56 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:39:56 PM
I guess it can't be help in the smartphone era, China can censor their own news, but not much else they can do.
The firewall of China is breaking down.
As long as it's made in China, it's never meant to last.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 09:44:03 PM
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 09:44:03 PM
The firewall of China is breaking down.
As long as it's made in China, it's never meant to last.:laugh:
8 admit, that wss a funny one Zetsu.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:45:34 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:45:34 PM
When I was a still in school, I always thought Hongkonger's constant anti-mainland bashing was a bit excessive and over the top, but now that every time I think about mainland China, I can kind of understand why HKers are annoyed.
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Shenzhen might be the best city in China from what I've heard, but the affordability of housing is 3x worst than the West.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:50:48 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 09:50:48 PM
As long as it's made in China, it's never meant to last.:laugh:
8 admit, that wss a funny one Zetsu.:laugh:
lol I realized it from seeing those kungfu demonstrations, everything they break or bend all have some kind of common quality/characteristic.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 09:54:27 PM
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 09:54:27 PM
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Shenzhen might be the best city in China from what I've heard, but the affordability of housing is 3x worst than the West.ac_unsure
I wasn't born in SZ, but that's where we lived before we immigrated to Canada. It has an internal border, so it was always for educated professionals, but now it's become a city for elites that even the professional class has been priced out of.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 10:13:28 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 10:13:28 PM
Shenzhen might be the best city in China from what I've heard, but the affordability of housing is 3x worst than the West.ac_unsure
I wasn't born in SZ, but that's where we lived before we immigrated to Canada. It has an internal border, so it was always for educated professionals, but now it's become a city for elites that even the professional class has been priced out of.
Sounds like they're going through the exact same problem as Hong Kong
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 10:16:49 PM
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 10:16:49 PM
I wasn't born in SZ, but that's where we lived before we immigrated to Canada. It has an internal border, so it was always for educated professionals, but now it's become a city for elites that even the professional class has been priced out of.
Sounds like they're going through the exact same problem as Hong Kongac_unsure , taxes might attractively low, due to to this Hongkong's government relies on making their money through controlling all the property prices by selling land slowly to developers. But then HK's government couldn't be anymore worthless and useless.
The HK government are Beijing puppets.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 10:24:50 PM
Post by: Zetsu on June 29, 2023, 10:24:50 PM
Sounds like they're going through the exact same problem as Hong Kongac_unsure , taxes might attractively low, due to to this Hongkong's government relies on making their money through controlling all the property prices by selling land slowly to developers. But then HK's government couldn't be anymore worthless and useless.
The HK government are Beijing puppets.
Yup, Hong Kong's government was once one of the wealthiest in the world, only to be bled dry by using nearly all of it to invest and hiring a lot of mainland contractors and construction business.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 10:40:48 PM
Post by: Shen Li on June 29, 2023, 10:40:48 PM
The HK government are Beijing puppets.
Yup, Hong Kong's government was once one of the wealthiest in the world, only to be bled dry by using nearly all of it to invest and hiring a lot of mainland contractors and construction business.ac_unsure
HK is as corrupt as mainland cities now.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: caskur on June 30, 2023, 02:41:58 AM
Post by: caskur on June 30, 2023, 02:41:58 AM
yep. Imagine living in mainland China 2023.
I wonder where the nicest place to live is?
Shenzhen might be the best city in China from what I've heard, but the affordability of housing is 3x worst than the West.ac_unsure
Imagine trying to teach English to the regular Chinese,.... words like bite, chew, swallow, eat..... and what about learning Chinese sign language? My brain is hurting just thinking about it.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2023, 04:46:14 AM
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2023, 04:46:14 AM
Yup, Hong Kong's government was once one of the wealthiest in the world, only to be bled dry by using nearly all of it to invest and hiring a lot of mainland contractors and construction business.ac_unsure
HK is as corrupt as mainland cities now.
The corruption and burning all the coffers was CCP's goal in order to make HK more dependent on the mainland for help
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2023, 04:54:04 AM
Post by: Zetsu on June 30, 2023, 04:54:04 AM
Shenzhen might be the best city in China from what I've heard, but the affordability of housing is 3x worst than the West.ac_unsure
Imagine trying to teach English to the regular Chinese,.... words like bite, chew, swallow, eat..... and what about learning Chinese sign language? My brain is hurting just thinking about it.
That's a good question, but I don't believe Chinese ppl have sign language, not too sure though since most Chinese folks never care much about anyone including the disabled, I mean we're one of the few race that never had a religion.
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Herman on June 30, 2023, 06:07:14 PM
Post by: Herman on June 30, 2023, 06:07:14 PM
The firewall of China is breaking down.
As long as it's made in China, it's never meant to last.:laugh:
Title: Re: Social Media Censoring Anti-progs
Post by: Thiel on July 29, 2024, 06:57:11 PM
Post by: Thiel on July 29, 2024, 06:57:11 PM
Big Tech search engines appear to be censoring the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, according to reports from multiple users.
The New York Post reported Sunday that Google's "Autocomplete" feature failed to populate results for the deadly July 13 attack. When typing "the assassination attempt of" into the search bar, the autofill did not show results related to Trump, the news outlet stated. Additionally, the Post found that Google did not generate an autogenerated suggestion when typing in "Trump assassination attempt."
Google's search results still feature articles regarding the shooting.
Other Big Tech companies also seemed to be censoring the recent assassination attempt on Trump. Similar to Google, Bing's search engine did not autofill "Trump" when typing in "assassination attempt on." Instead, it generated results including "president," "fdr 1933," "Reagan," "Ronald Reagan," and "George Wallace."
The New York Post reported Sunday that Google's "Autocomplete" feature failed to populate results for the deadly July 13 attack. When typing "the assassination attempt of" into the search bar, the autofill did not show results related to Trump, the news outlet stated. Additionally, the Post found that Google did not generate an autogenerated suggestion when typing in "Trump assassination attempt."
Google's search results still feature articles regarding the shooting.
Other Big Tech companies also seemed to be censoring the recent assassination attempt on Trump. Similar to Google, Bing's search engine did not autofill "Trump" when typing in "assassination attempt on." Instead, it generated results including "president," "fdr 1933," "Reagan," "Ronald Reagan," and "George Wallace."