Assange's arrest drew sharp reactions from his supporters and those who oppose him. (//https)
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was charged Thursday with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for aiding Chelsea Manning in the cracking of a password to a classified U.S. government computer in 2010, the U.S. Justice Department announced hours after Assange's arrest in London.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2.gif%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/%20...%20aker-2.gif%22%3Ehttps://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2.gif%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Cracking a code....lol
What was the law back then when he did that?
Quote
[size=150]WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization which Assange founded and for which he published multiple secret U.S. military cables regarding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, condemned the Ecuadorean and British governments for arresting Assange.[/size]
I thought it was the New York Times that published the leaks.
I didn't know Assange was a media mogul....lol
Quote from: "cc"
Assange's arrest drew sharp reactions from his supporters and those who oppose him. (//https)
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was charged Thursday with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for aiding Chelsea Manning in the cracking of a password to a classified U.S. government computer in 2010, the U.S. Justice Department announced hours after Assange's arrest in London.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2.gif%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/%20...%20aker-2.gif%22%3Ehttps://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2.gif%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
What are your thoughts about this cc?
If the UK approves extradition, a lot of my English friends and family are going to hear about it!!!
They are extraditing Santa Claus.
I hope they don't sleigh him.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I hope they don't sleigh him.
semi funny
or as seoul would say "Not quite up to par"
I read Assange was smearing his feces on the embassy walls. :2r4ml1j_th:
Quote from: "Gaon"
What are your thoughts about this cc?
Without getting into my opinion as to did he do wrong, there are 2 problems with prosecuting him.
1. UK will take a while and may never happen especially as Brexit basically failed to become significant. The EU still has the say and there's not a chance in hell that their court would release him to the US.
2. The 1st amendment - In law, he did not steal the data, he revealed / exposed what was stolen .. and would likely be protected by that law
This quote sums it up:
"What Assange did here was not to steal a secret, but to reveal a secret and that act of revelation, in that case numerous acts of revelation, is absolutely protected in the first amendment pursuant to the very now-well known and highly regarded case called the Pentagon Papers Case,"
""The people that are furious at Assange should be furious at two people: Chelsea Manning and Barack Obama," Judge Napolitano added. "Chelsea Manning is the thief. Prosecuted, tried, convicted, sentenced to a long jail term- (and then President Obama commuted the sentence for whatever reason.)
That's where those who say American lives were put in danger, that where their anger should be focused, not on a journalist who exposed it.""
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
I read Assange was smearing his feces on the embassy walls. :2r4ml1j_th:
Did he have a breakdown?
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "Gaon"
What are your thoughts about this cc?
Without getting into my opinion as to did he do wrong, there are 2 problems with prosecuting him.
1. UK will take a while and may never happen especially as Brexit basically failed to become significant. The EU still has the say and there's not a chance in hell that their court would release him to the US.
2. The 1st amendment - In law, he did not steal the data, he revealed / exposed what was stolen .. and would likely be protected by that law
This quote sums it up:
"What Assange did here was not to steal a secret, but to reveal a secret and that act of revelation, in that case numerous acts of revelation, is absolutely protected in the first amendment pursuant to the very now-well known and highly regarded case called the Pentagon Papers Case,"
""The people that are furious at Assange should be furious at two people: Chelsea Manning and Barack Obama," Judge Napolitano added. "Chelsea Manning is the thief. Prosecuted, tried, convicted, sentenced to a long jail term- (and then President Obama commuted the sentence for whatever reason.)
That's where those who say American lives were put in danger, that where their anger should be focused, not on a journalist who exposed it.""
Your argument is tainted by a faith that the American legal system is just and fair.
There is ample recent evidence to establish that that is far from the case.
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "Gaon"
What are your thoughts about this cc?
Without getting into my opinion as to did he do wrong, there are 2 problems with prosecuting him.
1. UK will take a while and may never happen especially as Brexit basically failed to become significant. The EU still has the say and there's not a chance in hell that their court would release him to the US.
2. The 1st amendment - In law, he did not steal the data, he revealed / exposed what was stolen .. and would likely be protected by that law
This quote sums it up:
"What Assange did here was not to steal a secret, but to reveal a secret and that act of revelation, in that case numerous acts of revelation, is absolutely protected in the first amendment pursuant to the very now-well known and highly regarded case called the Pentagon Papers Case,"
""The people that are furious at Assange should be furious at two people: Chelsea Manning and Barack Obama," Judge Napolitano added. "Chelsea Manning is the thief. Prosecuted, tried, convicted, sentenced to a long jail term- (and then President Obama commuted the sentence for whatever reason.)
That's where those who say American lives were put in danger, that where their anger should be focused, not on a journalist who exposed it.""
You and I are on the same page. Assange revealed something the powers that be did not want revealed. He is a whistle blower.
Actually he is not a "whistle blower" .. technically a "whistle blower" follows a legal protocol under the law to point out what they consider to be serious problems or govt maleficence
This guy published info gained by a spy / thief who also was not a "whistle blower" ... which in itself may be legal
Hold the phone!! .. DOJ is charging that this Aussie egomaniacal flake helped Manning crack the passwords that got into systems - in which case it becomes a whole other thang than publishing stolen info ... it would legally make him a partner in serious crime
Quote from: "cc"
Actually he is not a "whistle blower" .. technically a "whistle blower" follows a legal protocol under the law to point out what they consider to be serious problems or govt maleficence
This guy published info gained by a spy / thief who also was not a "whistle blower" ... which in itself may be legal
Hold the phone!! .. DOJ is charging that this Aussie egomaniacal flake helped Manning crack the passwords that got into systems - in which case it becomes a whole other thang than publishing stolen info ... it would legally make him a partner in serious crime
I thought a whistle blower is a snitch.
ac_dunno
In colloquial terms, it is. In US legal terms, it is a formal process detailed in law
The process is designed to allow people to "snitch if you will" formally, their message considered properly and moved up the line to higher levels and agencies when warranted. They are protected from retaliation .. and actual bad stuff is to be made corrected and what can be made public.
In contrast, this rogue duo just stole all they could and published it. Included were operational details and names and addresses of service personnel etc. ... several things they released put many people at great risk and compromised several important strategies of diplomacy and war
If the Aussie actually helped crack passwords as charged, he's no longer just a publisher of info, he's committed very serious crime and is in for very serious consequences.
That said, getting him into a US court is a difficult political process
I have a question.
The person who "stole" the data has been tried, convicted...and then pardoned.
Thus, at law, Assange cannot be accused of the theft.
He simply used the data on his website. Now, I tend to agree that to do so in the manner described was reckless and endangering. But that is not a crime, especially when the act was committed outside of the US, and its jurisdiction.
Based on those allegations, the UK could not possibly approve extradition if the Court is satisfied that no crime was committed. To obtain extradition, the complainant must establish a bona fide case to answer (not proof of guilt).
So where's the crime?
Again, regardless of Miss Manning's conviction - "If the Aussie actually helped crack passwords as charged, he's no longer just a publisher of info, he's committed very serious crime and is in for very serious consequences. "
Good luck proving that.
They grasping at straws since they would have to prosecute every media outlet who also published the revelations. So they pretend it's about hacking instead.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I have a question.
The person who "stole" the data has been tried, convicted...and then pardoned.
Thus, at law, Assange cannot be accused of the theft.
He simply used the data on his website. Now, I tend to agree that to do so in the manner described was reckless and endangering. But that is not a crime, especially when the act was committed outside of the US, and its jurisdiction.
Based on those allegations, the UK could not possibly approve extradition if the Court is satisfied that no crime was committed. To obtain extradition, the complainant must establish a bona fide case to answer (not proof of guilt).
So where's the crime?
They haven't seen the Julian Assange movie....lol
^^^ Hahahahahahahaa....
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio.
Well, it has to be true, then.
He was just a petty journo who get handed a bag of gold from a twisted private in the US army (and who was strangely exonerated by a US President).
American outrage is hypocrisy at it's finest. This is, after all, the nation that deifies journalists for uncovering Government conspiracies and corruption.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
The US justice system's purpose is to protect the criminal Clintons.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
A number of orgs had info to corroborate possibly? Can't remember exactly why, but Wikileaks never endangered with their efforts. Other orgs weren't as meticulous about redacting, accidental or not.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
A number of orgs had info to corroborate possibly? Can't remember exactly why, but Wikileaks never endangered with their efforts. Other orgs weren't as meticulous about redacting, accidental or not.
I forget the details around Wikileaks and Assange.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
Then the Guardian along with other media outlets are culpible for releasing secret documents.
It's absolute rubbish to go after Assange when it was the papers that released the documents to the whole world.
And the rape allegations against Assange are bogus too...
Assange should not have hidden in that embassy imo. As far as I'm concerned, he should have just gone through the process and faced the music. The only thing I can think of why he didn't was because he truly feared for his life. Americans are nutters who kill people covertly. My guess is he thought he'd disappear once the Americans got him...
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
Then the Guardian along with other media outlets are culpible for releasing secret documents.
It's absolute rubbish to go after Assange when it was the papers that released the documents to the whole world.
And the rape allegations against Assange are bogus too...
Assange should not have hidden in that embassy imo. As far as I'm concerned, he should have just gone through the process and faced the music. The only thing I can think of why he didn't was because he truly feared for his life. Americans are nutters who kill people covertly. My guess is he thought he'd disappear once the Americans got him...
The timing of the rape allegations looked suspicious.
Quote from: "caskur"
Assange should not have hidden in that embassy imo. As far as I'm concerned, he should have just gone through the process and faced the music. The only thing I can think of why he didn't was because he truly feared for his life. Americans are nutters who kill people covertly. My guess is he thought he'd disappear once the Americans got him...
Meanwhile, our spineless Government just sits back and allows one of its citizens to be persecuted.
As usual.
Quote from: "Gaon"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I heard a reliable source on the radio say he was a whistle blower of sorts, but also endangered people by releasing classified info.
His biggest crime, of course, was doing things Hillary didn't like.
I believe it was the Guardian and others who didn't check details before releasing, not Wikileaks.
The Guardian released information that Julian Assange was accused of releasing?
Then the Guardian along with other media outlets are culpible for releasing secret documents.
It's absolute rubbish to go after Assange when it was the papers that released the documents to the whole world.
And the rape allegations against Assange are bogus too...
Assange should not have hidden in that embassy imo. As far as I'm concerned, he should have just gone through the process and faced the music. The only thing I can think of why he didn't was because he truly feared for his life. Americans are nutters who kill people covertly. My guess is he thought he'd disappear once the Americans got him...
The timing of the rape allegations looked suspicious.
Well the woman involved willingly had sex with him but wanted to use a condom. He didn't want to. She went to the police and questioned the law. She did NOT want to charge him of rape. The police did or want to rather. The Swedish police want to charge him.
Anyway, the yanks are always looking for a boogy man to lock up or fry on the electrical chair..... I really don't see any difference between how America acts and how radical Islam acts.
I'm so glad I live in free Australia.
Which is why Assange should be brought home to Australia.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "caskur"
Assange should not have hidden in that embassy imo. As far as I'm concerned, he should have just gone through the process and faced the music. The only thing I can think of why he didn't was because he truly feared for his life. Americans are nutters who kill people covertly. My guess is he thought he'd disappear once the Americans got him...
Meanwhile, our spineless Government just sits back and allows one of its citizens to be persecuted.
As usual.
Our government only care about flying under radars until they do their time and once retired from politics, collect their 6 figure per year pensions for the rest of their lives.
but always remember this saying because it's a truism,... honest money goes further.
Did you see the story of the single mother fighting Hodgkin lymphoma and centrelink hasseling her about looking for a job? That is the sort of story that gets my blood boiling.
Bureaucracy in Australia is out of control.
I'm never quite sure what to think of Wikileaks...but there are some revelations in this video I was previously unaware of.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugHEXYMQ1uk
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I'm never quite sure what to think of Wikileaks...but there are some revelations in this video I was previously unaware of.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugHEXYMQ1uk
Interesting video Bricktop.
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Timing of some leaks for one thing.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Timing of some leaks for one thing.
They time them to inflict the biggest blow possible against those who hate transparency.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Timing of some leaks for one thing.
They time them to inflict the biggest blow possible against those who hate transparency.
I gathered that..
Is Wikileaks completely unbiased?
Do they receive funds from one person or organization to leak information about their rivals?
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Timing of some leaks for one thing.
They time them to inflict the biggest blow possible against those who hate transparency.
I gathered that..
Is Wikileaks completely unbiased?
Do they receive funds from one person or organization to leak information about their rivals?
I'd say they're pretty unbiased. They can't create leaks out of thin air so only the timing could possibly be called into question.
They've in the past relied on crowdfunding and donations although most of the major payment processors have banned transactions to them as payback for leaks...
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I take wikileaks releases with a pinch of salt.
I don't believe any of their leaks are in dispute. Maybe you mean that what you take with a grain of salt is type of subject matter and when exactly leaked?
Timing of some leaks for one thing.
They time them to inflict the biggest blow possible against those who hate transparency.
I gathered that..
Is Wikileaks completely unbiased?
Do they receive funds from one person or organization to leak information about their rivals?
I'd say they're pretty unbiased. They can't create leaks out of thin air so only the timing could possibly be called into question.
They've in the past relied on crowdfunding and donations although most of the major payment processors have banned transactions to them as payback for leaks...
I see, thanks.