When is a HEADLINE not a HEADLINE ? > When top guns on the left don't like it - and bitch and whine is when
Here is the NYT "Free Press" :oeudC: original that day

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAcfM8d?format=jpg&name=900x900%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAc%20...%20me=900x900%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAcfM8d?format=jpg&name=900x900%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Changed to this after the left didn't like it - and bitched and whined
Note also 180 change to the Sub Headline!!
This is just one of many (now constant) daily atrocities - in most cases, the press gets it right (or rather left) the 1st time
Frankly, the way internet and press are doing all the work for the left, I see no chance for a good future
And it's not just the US - It's REALLY bad here and throughout Euro
The way it's going (now @ hyper speed) the left will soon rule everything everywhere
I think "the West" as a democratic society is over .. Hello Socialism
Quote from: "cc"
When is a HEADLINE not a HEADLINE ? > When top guns on the left don't like it - and bitch and whine is when
Here is the NYT "Free Press" :oeudC: original that day

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAcfM8d?format=jpg&name=900x900%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAc%20...%20me=900x900%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBP7_IOXoAcfM8d?format=jpg&name=900x900%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Changed to this after the left didn't like it - and bitched and whined
Note also 180 change to the Sub Headline!!

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBQJe-iXoAEGeR0?format=jpg&name=900x900%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBQJe-iXoAE%20...%20me=900x900%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/EBQJe-iXoAEGeR0?format=jpg&name=900x900%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Where did you get this?
not sure - is all over the place except heavy leftville
Here's the Post w/o pics I just found with a very appropriate title
[size=120]The New York Times doesn't write headlines anymore – the mob does[/size] (//https)
it ran the unexceptionable headline "TRUMP URGES UNITY VS. RACISM." I say "unexceptionable" because the lead story was about a speech in which the president did, in fact, urge unity against racism.
Nevertheless, a Twitter campaign mounted, with thousands of keyboard warriors riling themselves up with the #CancelNYT hashtag.
So the Times caved and changed the headline to "ASSAILING HATE BUT NOT GUNS." Trump's speech was supposed to assail guns? "Curse you, inanimate objects!"
Here's one with the pics https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/08/06/new-york-times-headline-trump-backlash/
Trump added, "After 3 years, I "almost" got a good headline from the Times!" :laugh: ...
except at a deep level, it's not funny. I find it extremely sad watching democracy die
It does not surprise me one bit. I just wondered where you got it.
I would say unbelievable but they´ve been doing this for years..
Quote from: "Odinson"
I would say unbelievable but they´ve been doing this for years..
Is the Finnish media biased?
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Is the Finnish media biased?
Dunno bout that, but our "Finish-ed" media sure is
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Odinson"
I would say unbelievable but they´ve been doing this for years..
Is the Finnish media biased?
The state owned media "YLE" is occasionally biased.. Depending on the reporter..
One particular old nag doesnt let the True finns party-leader speak in election conversations.
She constantly harasses him... But she doesnt do that to the others..
I aint even watching her shows anymore...
The gossip/fact news medias are hardcore leftists... Shaved head lesbians as reporters..
Even their articles look like they have been written by monkeys... The grammar is off by a mile.
The Helsinki news is a right-wing/conservative oldskool media.. Their news articles always stay professional..
Its probably the most popular media in Finland.
Many of the medias are about as trustworthy as the Die Deutsche Wochenschau.
Quote from: "Odinson"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Odinson"
I would say unbelievable but they´ve been doing this for years..
Is the Finnish media biased?
The state owned media "YLE" is occasionally biased.. Depending on the reporter..
One particular old nag doesnt let the True finns party-leader speak in election conversations.
She constantly harasses him... But she doesnt do that to the others..
I aint even watching her shows anymore...
The gossip/fact news medias are hardcore leftists... Shaved head lesbians as reporters..
Even their articles look like they have been written by monkeys... The grammar is off by a mile.
The Helsinki news is a right-wing/conservative oldskool media.. Their news articles always stay professional..
Its probably the most popular media in Finland.
Most Western media shill for prog billionaires.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Odinson"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Odinson"
I would say unbelievable but they´ve been doing this for years..
Is the Finnish media biased?
The state owned media "YLE" is occasionally biased.. Depending on the reporter..
One particular old nag doesnt let the True finns party-leader speak in election conversations.
She constantly harasses him... But she doesnt do that to the others..
I aint even watching her shows anymore...
The gossip/fact news medias are hardcore leftists... Shaved head lesbians as reporters..
Even their articles look like they have been written by monkeys... The grammar is off by a mile.
The Helsinki news is a right-wing/conservative oldskool media.. Their news articles always stay professional..
Its probably the most popular media in Finland.
Most Western media shill for prog billionaires.
Prog billionaire = An asshole who was born to wealth.
Actually, some of the worse and most effective are our relatively new high tech monopolists + press owners
Far more effective than simply giving money for the cause .. they have the opportunity to control the flow of information .. enhancing what suits them and killing what does not suit them
Quote from: "cc"
Actually, some of the worse and most effective are our relatively new high tech monopolists + press owners
Far more effective than simply giving money for the cause .. they have the opportunity to control the flow of information .. enhancing what suits them and killing what does not suit them
Never have the very wealthy had this much control over our lives.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc"
Actually, some of the worse and most effective are our relatively new high tech monopolists + press owners
Far more effective than simply giving money for the cause .. they have the opportunity to control the flow of information .. enhancing what suits them and killing what does not suit them
Never have the very wealthy had this much control over our lives.
They represent the biggest threat to Western liberty and democracy.
Agreed. .. With the control of news and other platforms all on one side, there is no semblance of democracy anymore .. Democracy is over.+
To Fash: True. Lets keep in mind that it's not just "wealth" now.
Now it's because some hold and control the vehicles of communication after monopolizing each's own specific area ... whether it be internet or TV
Quote from: "cc"
Agreed. .. With the control of news and other platforms all on one side, there is no semblance of democracy anymore .. Democracy is over.+
To Fash: True. Lets keep in mind that it's not just "wealth" now.
Now it's because some hold and control the vehicles of communication after monopolizing each's own specific area ... whether it be internet or TV
The myth is that billionaires want more money. They want CONTROL.
The New York Crimes. I don't a lot about it other than they really hate Trump.
It has since inception been a VERY left rag .... It's just that starting Nov 8 2016 it and all of the left from rags to middle left Jack and Jane have become viciously uber left .. on steroids
.
Here's an interesting read - made especially significant because it is from the NYT who wish him dead
Don't Assume Trump's Approval Rating Can't Climb Higher. It Already Has. (//https)
Donald J. Trump doesn't always seem like a candidate focused on expanding his base of support. He may have done so anyway.
The share of Americans who say they have a favorable view of him has increased significantly since the 2016 election.
Trump's Favorability Rating Is Higher Than in 2016
His personal favorability ratings surged after he won the presidency, and they haven't fallen back. ...............
........................
One common view of the 2020 election, for instance, takes 2016 as a starting point. It notes that Democrats fell just short of victory, and that therefore any number of changes — a better candidate, higher black turnout, and so on — would be enough to win the election in 2020. This way of thinking assumes that the president's support would remain unchanged — that he could do little to match incremental increases in Democratic turnout or support, compared with 2016.
The aggregate national data suggests that Mr. Trump has gained more support than that — if not from Republicans then perhaps from some number of independents or former Democrats.
-------------
there's no reason he's limited to the support or turnout he had in 2016. [end]
Quote from: "cc"
Here's an interesting read - made especially significant because it is from the NYT who wish him dead
Don't Assume Trump's Approval Rating Can't Climb Higher. It Already Has. (//https)
Donald J. Trump doesn't always seem like a candidate focused on expanding his base of support. He may have done so anyway.
The share of Americans who say they have a favorable view of him has increased significantly since the 2016 election.
Trump's Favorability Rating Is Higher Than in 2016
His personal favorability ratings surged after he won the presidency, and they haven't fallen back. ...............
........................
One common view of the 2020 election, for instance, takes 2016 as a starting point. It notes that Democrats fell just short of victory, and that therefore any number of changes — a better candidate, higher black turnout, and so on — would be enough to win the election in 2020. This way of thinking assumes that the president's support would remain unchanged — that he could do little to match incremental increases in Democratic turnout or support, compared with 2016.
The aggregate national data suggests that Mr. Trump has gained more support than that — if not from Republicans then perhaps from some number of independents or former Democrats.
-------------
there's no reason he's limited to the support or turnout he had in 2016. [end]
That appeared in the NYT.
:ohmy:
The prog establishment will hire an assassin if Trump is reelected.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content%20...%2020x258.jpg%22%3Ehttps://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the New York Times, said recently that, after the Mueller report, the paper has to shift the focus of its coverage from the Trump-Russia affair to the president's alleged racism.
"We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well," Baquet said. "Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story."
Baquet made the remarks at an employee town hall Monday. A recording was leaked to Slate, which published a transcript Thursday. (//%3CURL%20url=%22https)
Quote from: "cc"

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content%20...%2020x258.jpg%22%3Ehttps://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
New York Times Chief Outlines Coverage Shift: From Trump-Russia To Trump Racism (//https)
Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the New York Times, said recently that, after the Mueller report, the paper has to shift the focus of its coverage from the Trump-Russia affair to the president's alleged racism.
"We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well," Baquet said. "Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story."
Baquet made the remarks at an employee town hall Monday. A recording was leaked to Slate, which published a transcript Thursday.
What a breath of fresh air the NYT is. Don't you just love unbiased jounalism. :laugh3:

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content%20...%2020x258.jpg%22%3Ehttps://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
The New York Times does have a useful purpose.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "cc"

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content%20...%2020x258.jpg%22%3Ehttps://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/new-york-times-fish-wrap-620x258.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
New York Times Chief Outlines Coverage Shift: From Trump-Russia To Trump Racism (//https)
Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the New York Times, said recently that, after the Mueller report, the paper has to shift the focus of its coverage from the Trump-Russia affair to the president's alleged racism.
"We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well," Baquet said. "Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story."
Baquet made the remarks at an employee town hall Monday. A recording was leaked to Slate, which published a transcript Thursday.
What a breath of fresh air the NYT is. Don't you just love unbiased jounalism. :laugh3:
ac_toofunny
The Atlantic spreads gossip, it does not report.
Biden Megadonor Owns The Atlantic, Reportedly Communicates Often With Journalist Behind Anonymously-Sourced Trump Bombshell
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/04/laurene-powell-jobs-jeffrey-goldberg-democrats/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=0PNyr_AGHxKNtFnCbQJNj4zPPKpF5TuNafFUiuDV
Billionaire philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the majority owner of The Atlantic, has donated over $1.2 million to former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democratic candidates and groups since 2019, Federal Election Commission records show.
Powell Jobs owns a 70% stake in The Atlantic, and she reportedly communicates often with its editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.
Goldberg published an anonymously-sourced story Thursday alleging that President Donald Trump had denigrated fallen American soldiers.