https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
We could have king harry and queen meg after all :laugh3:
Quote from: "Guest"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
Who cares.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Guest"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
Who cares.
its serious shit Herman.
And with the condition of your liver given how much barrelwash you consume, you oughta be concerned, Herm.
Have you seen a doctor lately?
I would uf I were you Herm.
Cuz you are in the category of individuals with 'pre-existing conditions', hey Herm.
So, you have promoted Herm to Prince of England
Nice gesture ... but I think it's too late to suck up :wink:
Joe is a raging alcoholic. He is a geriatric virgin living on government handouts and Kraft Dinner. He needs booze to numb the pain.
I think it's inbred stupidity and nastiness ... and refuse to excuse him by blaming it on booze, age or lacking sex because of being unattractive and unlickable ..
I meant unlikable although both work :wink:
Are we talking about Charlie or Joe here?
lol .. we did Chuck in and moved onto Jo ... well, actually Jo slithered himself into it with another dumb and nasty post
Quote from: "cc"
lol .. we did Chuck in and moved onto Jo ... well, actually Jo slithered himself into it with another dumb and nasty post
He likes the misfortune of others.
Boris Johnson has tested positive. He is showing mild sysmptoms.
Well if Prince Charles has it, it VERY serious. Boris doesn't look like a healthy old guy if you ask me.
Look who died in Australia... 72 year old fit and healthy... no symtoms, got sick and died 48 hours later.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/it-doesnt-discriminate-family-of-covid-19-victim-issue-plea-to-aussies/ar-BB11Mnsl?ocid=spartanntp
I'm not a royalty or celeb follower, but came across this
Spain's Princess Maria Teresa becomes first royal to die from coronavirus

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/03/1862/1048/Maria-Teresa-Of-Bourbon-Parma-Getty.jpg?ve=1&tl=1%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.%20...%20?ve=1&tl=1%22%3Ehttps://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/03/1862/1048/Maria-Teresa-Of-Bourbon-Parma-Getty.jpg?ve=1&tl=1%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Princess Maria Teresa's death comes just weeks after King Felipe VI of Spain tested negative for the virus.
She was born on July 28, 1933. Princess Maria Teresa studied in France and became a professor at Paris' Sorbonne as well as a professor of Sociology at Madrid's Complutense University, according to People.
She was known for her outspoken views and activist work, which led to her nickname the "Red Princess."
She is now the dead princess.
Quote from: "caskur"
Well if Prince Charles has it, it VERY serious.
For his rhododendrons maybe. As far as I'm aware he was the only one who ever bothered to talk to them.
I think he'll get by just fine without his mumsy kissing him goodnight for a couple of weeks.
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Well if Prince Charles has it, it VERY serious.
For his rhododendrons maybe. As far as I'm aware he was the only one who ever bothered to talk to them.
I think he'll get by just fine without his mumsy kissing him goodnight for a couple of weeks.
He's into his 70s... it'll be touch and go.
Don't you know ANYTHING? ffs.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Well if Prince Charles has it, it VERY serious.
For his rhododendrons maybe. As far as I'm aware he was the only one who ever bothered to talk to them.
I think he'll get by just fine without his mumsy kissing him goodnight for a couple of weeks.
He's into his 70s... it'll be touch and go.
Don't you know ANYTHING? ffs.
He's nothing to me. Old fart gets to die some time, it's no skin off my dick and I'm surprised to learn it's any off yours.
Don't be so alarmist, I can almost guarantee that he'll have his private stocks of personal ventilators and the best pool cleaning tablets money can buy. The cunt is rich at a level that would bend your mind, he can suck the blood out of baby fetuses if it makes him well and you would never know.
Oh boy... another anachist.
sigh. No doubt you want an invasion from China.
Quote from: "caskur"
Oh boy... another anachist.
sigh. No doubt you want an invasion from China.
Nah, not especially, though I do question your logic. IF I were an anarchist (I'm more of a libertarian and a voluntaryist, but I'm saying "if")... IF I were an anarchist, mind telling me why I'd want to be invaded by a nation run by authoritarian big government?
That shit just wouldn't make sense.
You're just spazzing out because I wouldn't wring my hands over the ills of an inbred rhododendron-botherer. Sucks to be you I suppose, he wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if you started hawking up covid-laced phlegm gems, just sayin.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Guest"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
Who cares.
I don't. He's a cunt.
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
I do dislike the preferential treatment the rich and public people get..
The police has no resources to protect a mother against a violent ex-partner... They can only wait until he kills her and then the cops take him to jail.
But they do have resources to post a 24/7 guard around a dime a dozen cabinet minister or a member of parliament... After they get a threat.
I mean, I understand when the cabinet minister is some1 like Winston Churchill who is actually a vital component in the survival of the nation.
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Guest"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
Who cares.
I don't. He's a cunt.
He sure is.
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Oh boy... another anachist.
sigh. No doubt you want an invasion from China.
Nah, not especially, though I do question your logic. IF I were an anarchist (I'm more of a libertarian and a voluntaryist, but I'm saying "if")... IF I were an anarchist, mind telling me why I'd want to be invaded by a nation run by authoritarian big government?
That shit just wouldn't make sense.
You're just spazzing out because I wouldn't wring my hands over the ills of an inbred rhododendron-botherer. Sucks to be you I suppose, he wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if you started hawking up covid-laced phlegm gems, just sayin.
He'll be the next OWNER of the military dimwit....
I've predicted for a decade, once the Queen dies, China will move on Australia for our 1 st world infrastructure AND OUR MINERALS.
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Guest"
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/prince-charles-coronavirus-test-positive-1.5509194

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/up%20...%2040x400.jpg%22%3Ehttps://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/01/F200123YS66-640x400.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
...if the ultrawealthy & privileged can get it, anybody can.
Who cares.
I don't. He's a cunt.
He sure is.
Wake up dingbat... watch what I write CLOSELY... THEN you might grow a brain.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
A Royalty can work, but the British monarchy definitely needs a downsizing.
They get way too much in annual salaries.
For example the King of Spain and other European Royals receive a much smaller salary and many of their castles are owned by the government as tourist attractions to help pay for social programs.
British monarchy needs to keep up with the times & the financial realities of a cash strapped governments.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
....don't forget Turkey with Erdogan who has reduced the status of women to 2nd class citizens.
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
....don't forget Turkey with Erdogan who has reduced the status of women to 2nd class citizens.
A pox on their heads!!!!!
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
Spain got rid of a despot, returned the monarchy and today is a liberal democracy..
Marxism isn't a replacement for anything.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
Spain got rid of a despot, returned the monarchy and today is a liberal democracy..
Marxism isn't a replacement for anything.
Marxism is just another variant of Social Darwinism.
Its other variants include fascism, hard core capitalism, scientism & eugenics.
When Western Societies decided to adopt Darwinism as their Gospel, they more or less said there was no God or Higher Power. And since then it's been genocide/ mass murder & destruction on a scale never seen before in history. Didn't matter if it was communism, capitalism, fascism or colonialism. They are all guilty of the same thing for the same reason. They all denied the existence of a Higher Being/Spirituality which further eroded & dehumanized humanity itself.
Not saying religion is the answer, but there needs to be a connection to humanity & Nature, not man making himself the God & completely disregarding common sense & Natural Laws.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
Spain got rid of a despot, returned the monarchy and today is a liberal democracy..
Marxism isn't a replacement for anything.
Exactly. If Australia for example, dumped the monarchy, I can confidently say the new republic would not suddenly embrace totalitarianism.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Oh boy... another anachist.
sigh. No doubt you want an invasion from China.
Nah, not especially, though I do question your logic. IF I were an anarchist (I'm more of a libertarian and a voluntaryist, but I'm saying "if")... IF I were an anarchist, mind telling me why I'd want to be invaded by a nation run by authoritarian big government?
That shit just wouldn't make sense.
You're just spazzing out because I wouldn't wring my hands over the ills of an inbred rhododendron-botherer. Sucks to be you I suppose, he wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if you started hawking up covid-laced phlegm gems, just sayin.
He'll be the next OWNER of the military dimwit....
Not if he ain't breathing he won't. They'll just grope about int their own genetic sludge and get someone else. Get a cluepon, redeem it at your local breadline madam, you're making a big deal out of nothing.
Quote from: "caskur"
I've predicted for a decade, once the Queen dies, China will move on Australia for our 1 st world infrastructure AND OUR MINERALS.
Already done. China has your country by the sort and curlies and have shoved their communist authoritarian fist up your government's bunghole to play it like a puppet. They control the WHO, the UN, they weaponize both sides of your House of Representatives against one another to keep you riveted to their squabblings and are priming you for The Way Things Will Be when their Chinese sponsored moles shoehorn the Right Candidate into your Prime Mincer spot to function as a vassal to Beijing and God Emperor Xi Jinping's interests.
They have already engineered you into being prisoners in your own homes while state sponsored troops roam the countryside arresting anything with a pulse and throwing it in a four by three if unable to bribe their way out of it. Your "Lucky Country" capitalistic lifestyle, already seriously compromised through corporate oligarchies is in the process of crashing and burning. Australia, already heavily reliant on the Welfare State model will have little choice but to yield its sovereignty to the Communist State and you can look forward to your menfolk being shipped off into work camps to work until they drop while little yellow men, the cream of China's Social Credit hegemony get to empty their furry little balls into your womanfolk's guts in the name of genocide of all things not Chinee.
At least you can take some solace in that you will not be leaving your own flesh and blood behind to rot in it. I mean that sincerely, the White Australia policy which was abolished back in your childhood has been swept away and you have since been invaded by peoples who march to a different drum and one you are not allowed to participate in. Not that I imagine you should want to, proud Eurocentric that you are. But Britain is a long way from Australia and much of your weakened political muscle has had its trade aspirations pointed towards Asia for some decades now.
So yeah, unload a bunch of "you know nothing John Snow" my way if you must. If nothing else it will make you feel better at least, but it's not going to change the eventuality of the barrel you are staring down at this moment. The way of life you knew and thought was your inheritance to keep you comfy in the winter years of your life is a rug which is currently being ripped from under your feet. You are too old to fight for it, too unfocused and wrapped up in your fast disappearing world to know where to start and ultimately likely to be thrown up against the Jacaranda and summarily shot when your new masters take open ownership of all that your forefathers fought for.
Sorry old girl, but you're fucked. Life sucks like that sometimes.
They control nothing... the Chinese virus is going through them like a shit through a goose.
Australia belongs to the Crown... which means all commonwealth military have to defend it...Because ALL COMMONWEALTH Military belongs to the Crown.
Good luck for China when they try to take our yellow cake... the UK and North America will be all over them like flies over shit.
I'm safe. I own my own properties, have supplies and security and enough room to house relatives. As long as the TV works... we're good to go.
I'm very very impressed with Mark McGowan my state Premier who is an ex navy officer. The Chinese Peril can esad for all I care.
OH, and Prince Charles, the next King survived the Chinese Virus.
So stick that in your pipe and smoked it.
Quote from: "caskur"
They control nothing... the Chinese virus is going through them like a shit through a goose.
Australia belongs to the Crown... which means all commonwealth military have to defend it...Because ALL COMMONWEALTH Military belongs to the Crown.
Good luck for China when they try to take our yellow cake... the UK and North America will be all over them like flies over shit.
I'm safe. I own my own properties, have supplies and security and enough room to house relatives. As long as the TV works... we're good to go.
I'm very very impressed with Mark McGowan my state Premier who is an ex navy officer. The Chinese Peril can esad for all I care.
They're coming first to Darwin and WA's deep ports (mining)... a few EMP's lobbed over our horizon and you've got no power or water... your food spoils...water turns to shit...
... pretty soon, they're marching through your residential streets and dragging out anybody on the internet radar which said more than two peeps against the nation or regime running it... and summarily executing them... those who are left are treated like their Uyghurs.... good for forced labour and compulsory organ donations... while you scrape by eating rice and horse shit dumplings....
...and you may think you and hubby can make a run for it to the bush...but that is bullshit thinking... they'll have so many FLIR sensors attached to aircraft that your head will spin...
..and we're largely disarmed already so we can't even go out with a bang.... thus having to chuck rocks or just lay there in place waiting for the inevitable...
...we're fcked... you just don't want to accept it yet...
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
No YUO
Light plastic machine guns (not a toy) can be handled even by women and 12 year old children. They can't be x-rayed so they escape security in airports.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
No YUO
Light plastic machine guns (not a toy) can be handled even by women and 12 year old children. They can't be x-rayed so they escape security in airports.
ac_lmfao
STFU, stupid biddy...
ac_lmfao
Seriously... just stfu... :laugh3:
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
No YUO
Light plastic machine guns (not a toy) can be handled even by women and 12 year old children. They can't be x-rayed so they escape security in airports.
ac_lmfao
STFU, stupid biddy...
ac_lmfao
Seriously... just stfu... :laugh3:
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
No YUO
Light plastic machine guns (not a toy) can be handled even by women and 12 year old children. They can't be x-rayed so they escape security in airports.
ac_lmfao
STFU, stupid biddy...
ac_lmfao
Seriously... just stfu... :laugh3:
So you never saw the news segment about the plastic machine guns that escape detection in x-ray and can be fired by 12 year old children...
check.
Listen up sniveller, I'm older than you with the memory of an elephant,... you do not know what is out there... I do.
Carry on!~
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
I'd machine gun my fair share...
No worries. I have no worries protecting solid rock, sacred ground.
You wouldn't even know to screw a piezo assembly into a PVC pipe, spray an accelerant, and launch a lemon or spud...
You definitely have never killed anything before...
STFU, please
No YUO
Light plastic machine guns (not a toy) can be handled even by women and 12 year old children. They can't be x-rayed so they escape security in airports.
ac_lmfao
STFU, stupid biddy...
ac_lmfao
Seriously... just stfu... :laugh3:
So you never saw the news segment about the plastic machine guns that escape detection in x-ray and can be fired by 12 year old children...
check.
Listen up sniveller, I'm older than you with the memory of an elephant,... you do not know what is out there... I do.
Carry on!~
My kin own more upper and lower assemblies than you could shop for in 5 years time...
...seriously... SHUT THE FUCK UP...
you're beyond stupid on this and everything else you feel the need to comment on...
OK, arms ex-spurt.. :001_rolleyes:
You're full of a ca ca.
:JC_howdy:
Quote from: "caskur"
OK, arms ex-spurt.. :001_rolleyes:
You're full of a ca ca.
:JC_howdy:
You're so stupid about firearms, I'm not even going there with you...
I wouldn't even trust you to load a breach shotgun chamber and hit a mark with bird shot...
YOU ARE THAT STUPID...
And your hubby is probably that stupid as well.... since he's still with you....
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
OK, arms ex-spurt.. :001_rolleyes:
You're full of a ca ca.
:JC_howdy:
You're so stupid about firearms, I'm not even going there with you...
Well actually I have shot someone before... And I'm very lucky not to have gone to jail.
I bet you haven't shot anything except Australia's wildlife I bet.
NEXT.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza"
Quote from: "caskur"
OK, arms ex-spurt.. :001_rolleyes:
You're full of a ca ca.
:JC_howdy:
You're so stupid about firearms, I'm not even going there with you...
Well actually I have shot someone before... And I'm very lucky not to have gone to jail.
I bet you haven't shot anything except Australia's wildlife I bet.
NEXT.
:JC_howdy: :laugh3: :laugh:
I can dissemble any firearm and reassemble it....then shoot the shit out of any Aussie...
... :thumbup:
delusional drunk!!!
I might go and watch the Tiger King...
He's more entertaining than whacked out USA immigrants.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
July 4. 1776
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
July 4. 1776
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Bingo.
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
July 4. 1776
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
You just replaced a Monarch with despot Presidents you all hate...
:crazy:
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
July 4. 1776
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Bingo.
When we have 1 vote, 1 value then and only then will we have "just powers from the consent of the governed."
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
July 4. 1776
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
You just replaced a Monarch with despot Presidents you all hate...
:crazy:
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Communist Russia and China got rid of their Royalty... Now they have despots in their place...
Show me a society that got rid of their monarchs that thrives better than our Commonwealth countries.
CHINA
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
That hasn't been the case since the Statute of Westminster of 1931.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
That hasn't been the case since the Statute of Westminster of 1931.
That isn't true so I don't know what you been reading but no one can move a soldier anywhere unless the Queen signs for it. That is the actual facts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarations_of_war_by_Great_Britain_and_the_United_Kingdom
Declarations of war by Great Britain and the United Kingdom
A declaration of war is a formal declaration issued by a national government indicating that a state of war exists between that nation and another. In the United Kingdom, only the monarch has the power to declare war and peace, under the royal prerogative.[1] There have been no declarations of war since the Second World War, though British Armed Forces have taken part in armed conflict on numerous occasions nonetheless.
There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).[4] The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 originally included a section that would have required Parliamentary approval for use of the armed forces, but this was dropped from the bill before royal assent.
Read more at the link I provided.
And as I said, the Commonwealth military belong to the Crown and they cannot move unless she agrees and signs.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
That hasn't been the case since the Statute of Westminster of 1931.
That isn't true so I don't know what you been reading but no one can move a soldier anywhere unless the Queen signs for it. That is the actual facts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarations_of_war_by_Great_Britain_and_the_United_Kingdom
Declarations of war by Great Britain and the United Kingdom
A declaration of war is a formal declaration issued by a national government indicating that a state of war exists between that nation and another. In the United Kingdom, only the monarch has the power to declare war and peace, under the royal prerogative.[1] There have been no declarations of war since the Second World War, though British Armed Forces have taken part in armed conflict on numerous occasions nonetheless.
There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).[4] The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 originally included a section that would have required Parliamentary approval for use of the armed forces, but this was dropped from the bill before royal assent.
Read more at the link I provided.
And as I said, the Commonwealth military belong to the Crown and they cannot move unless she agrees and signs.
That is true but she never goes against a parliament
After Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the United Kingdom and France declared war on September 3.[2][3] To assert Canada's independence from the UK, as already established by the Statute of Westminster 1931, Canada's political leaders decided to seek the approval of the federal parliament to declare war.[1][2][4][5] Parliament was not scheduled to return until October 2, but returned to session early on September 7 to consider the declaration of war.[2][3][4][5][6]
On September 9, the House of Commons and Senate approved authorization for a declaration of war. The Cabinet then drafted an Order in Council to that effect. On September 10, Vincent Massey, Canada's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, brought the document to King George VI, at the Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, for his signature,[7][8] whereupon Canada had officially declared war on Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][9] In his capacity as the government's official recorder for the war effort, Leonard Brockington noted][11][12]
Quote from: "seoulbro"
The idea of a family living in taxpayer funded extravagance based only on their DNA is offensive to a lot of people. Rightfully so too I might add.
Damn right.
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
That hasn't been the case since the Statute of Westminster of 1931.
That isn't true so I don't know what you been reading but no one can move a soldier anywhere unless the Queen signs for it. That is the actual facts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarations_of_war_by_Great_Britain_and_the_United_Kingdom
Declarations of war by Great Britain and the United Kingdom
A declaration of war is a formal declaration issued by a national government indicating that a state of war exists between that nation and another. In the United Kingdom, only the monarch has the power to declare war and peace, under the royal prerogative.[1] There have been no declarations of war since the Second World War, though British Armed Forces have taken part in armed conflict on numerous occasions nonetheless.
There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).[4] The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 originally included a section that would have required Parliamentary approval for use of the armed forces, but this was dropped from the bill before royal assent.
Read more at the link I provided.
And as I said, the Commonwealth military belong to the Crown and they cannot move unless she agrees and signs.
That is true but she never goes against a parliament
After Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the United Kingdom and France declared war on September 3.[2][3] To assert Canada's independence from the UK, as already established by the Statute of Westminster 1931, Canada's political leaders decided to seek the approval of the federal parliament to declare war.[1][2][4][5] Parliament was not scheduled to return until October 2, but returned to session early on September 7 to consider the declaration of war.[2][3][4][5][6]
On September 9, the House of Commons and Senate approved authorization for a declaration of war. The Cabinet then drafted an Order in Council to that effect. On September 10, Vincent Massey, Canada's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, brought the document to King George VI, at the Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, for his signature,[7][8] whereupon Canada had officially declared war on Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][9] In his capacity as the government's official recorder for the war effort, Leonard Brockington noted][11][12]
Australia voted to have the Queen as our Head Of State. I don't know anything about Canada's stand with the Monarch and whether you have independence.
The original comment I made was that the Queen owns the military and no one in the Commonwealth can go to war without her signing off on it. That makes her the most powerful person in the world... and she certainly does deny parliament from time to time if you read my last post.
Here it is again, "There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).".
You see, most people want to think of the Monarch as some type decoration when she is anything but a decoration.
She swore to serve her nation/s until her death and she is head of the Church of England.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Oak"
Only about 60% of the country hate the president at any given time. And our presidents have power, the monarch has none.
Absolutely untrue...
NONE of the Commonwealth countries or the UK can go to war UNLESS the Queen signs off on it...
If that isn't power, I don't know what is...
Sad you get your misinformation from the press rather than the actual law.
That hasn't been the case since the Statute of Westminster of 1931.
That isn't true so I don't know what you been reading but no one can move a soldier anywhere unless the Queen signs for it. That is the actual facts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarations_of_war_by_Great_Britain_and_the_United_Kingdom
Declarations of war by Great Britain and the United Kingdom
A declaration of war is a formal declaration issued by a national government indicating that a state of war exists between that nation and another. In the United Kingdom, only the monarch has the power to declare war and peace, under the royal prerogative.[1] There have been no declarations of war since the Second World War, though British Armed Forces have taken part in armed conflict on numerous occasions nonetheless.
There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).[4] The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 originally included a section that would have required Parliamentary approval for use of the armed forces, but this was dropped from the bill before royal assent.
Read more at the link I provided.
And as I said, the Commonwealth military belong to the Crown and they cannot move unless she agrees and signs.
That is true but she never goes against a parliament
After Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the United Kingdom and France declared war on September 3.[2][3] To assert Canada's independence from the UK, as already established by the Statute of Westminster 1931, Canada's political leaders decided to seek the approval of the federal parliament to declare war.[1][2][4][5] Parliament was not scheduled to return until October 2, but returned to session early on September 7 to consider the declaration of war.[2][3][4][5][6]
On September 9, the House of Commons and Senate approved authorization for a declaration of war. The Cabinet then drafted an Order in Council to that effect. On September 10, Vincent Massey, Canada's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, brought the document to King George VI, at the Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, for his signature,[7][8] whereupon Canada had officially declared war on Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][9] In his capacity as the government's official recorder for the war effort, Leonard Brockington noted][11][12]
Australia voted to have the Queen as our Head Of State. I don't know anything about Canada's stand with the Monarch and whether you have independence.
The original comment I made was that the Queen owns the military and no one in the Commonwealth can go to war without her signing off on it. That makes her the most powerful person in the world... and she certainly does deny parliament from time to time if you read my last post.
Here it is again, "There has been a long-running debate[2][3] regarding whether Parliament alone should have the power to declare war and more widely to commit British forces to armed conflict. This was attempted (to the limited extent of possible war against Iraq) in 1999 with the introduction of the Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill. However Queen Elizabeth II, acting upon the advice of her government at the time, refused to grant her consent[4] to allow the bill to be debated in Parliament and so it was dropped (Queen's Consent was needed before debate could take place because the bill affected the royal prerogative).".
You see, most people want to think of the Monarch as some type decoration when she is anything but a decoration.
She swore to serve her nation/s until her death and she is head of the Church of England.
Then she must have signed of Australia's decision to go to war in Vietnam even though the British refused
Our military HMAS belong to the Queen
HMAS, Her Majestys Australian Service. If they petitioned to go, she would have to grant and obviously she did... A token Service compared to the USA men sacrificed.
I met a Scotsman who went to Viet Nam... Plenty of British ex-servicemen volunteered in Aus and NZ to go to Viet Nam. Over 20,000.
Quote from: "caskur"
Our military HMAS belong to the Queen
HMAS, Her Majestys Australian Service. If they petitioned to go, she would have to grant and obviously she did... A token Service compared to the USA men sacrificed.
I met a Scotsman who went to Viet Nam... Plenty of British ex-servicemen volunteered in Aus and NZ to go to Viet Nam. Over 20,000.
More than a million gooks died and the country was impoverished for decades so the Soviets couldn't capitalise on it
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Someone who gets it.
Well done.
ac_drinks
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Someone who gets it.
Well done.
ac_drinks
Why the loyalty to the queen, do you know you are supposed to bow or curtsey in front of her, I wouldn't, I bow to no one
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
She has a ceremonial role in the UK, but not in the commonwealth. Canada did not need nor seek approval from the King to declare war on Germany in 1939. Canada's independence to declare war was established by the Statute of Westminster of 1931. It domestic law in Australia and Canada.
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Someone who gets it.
Well done.
ac_drinks
Why the loyalty to the queen, do you know you are supposed to bow or curtsey in front of her, I wouldn't, I bow to no one
I'm a Royalist. I highly respect the Queen.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Someone who gets it.
Well done.
ac_drinks
Why the loyalty to the queen, do you know you are supposed to bow or curtsey in front of her, I wouldn't, I bow to no one
I'm a Royalist. I highly respect the Queen.
Why? I thought you were German anyway
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
She has a ceremonial role in the UK, but not in the commonwealth. Canada did not need nor seek approval from the King to declare war on Germany in 1939. Canada's independence to declare war was established by the Statute of Westminster of 1931. It domestic law in Australia and Canada.
Aw, so we can declare war on China for this deliberate attack on us on our own.
Oh, right, Juntine XI
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
She has a ceremonial role in the UK, but not in the commonwealth. Canada did not need nor seek approval from the King to declare war on Germany in 1939. Canada's independence to declare war was established by the Statute of Westminster of 1931. It domestic law in Australia and Canada.
Aw, so we can declare war on China for this deliberate attack on us on our own.
Oh, right, Juntine XI
Justin has surrendered unconditionally. Same with Joe Biden.
Maybe in the middle ages the monarch had absolute power but since Oliver Cromwell parliament has absolute power, so the permission from the monarch is cerimonial and they wouldn't dare deny the democratically elected parliament if it wanted to go to war
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Odinson"
The Queen still has a lot of power..
She is the supreme leader of the military.
Its only thought of as ceremonial because she is not using these powers...
But they are not ceremonial on paper..
Someone who gets it.
Well done.
ac_drinks
Why the loyalty to the queen, do you know you are supposed to bow or curtsey in front of her, I wouldn't, I bow to no one
I'm a Royalist. I highly respect the Queen.
Why? I thought you were German anyway
My surname is Austrian from marriage not birth...
But every ancestor came from the UK except one great grandmother's surname was Jose, (Spanish).
Quote from: "Guest"
Maybe in the middle ages the monarch had absolute power but since Oliver Cromwell parliament has absolute power, so the permission from the monarch is cerimonial and they wouldn't dare deny the democratically elected parliament if it wanted to go to war
lol, dream on.
Wasnt the parliament filled with lords... The kings own men..
Pretty sure queen Victoria was in total control over the british empire.
And so was King George.
The parliament was there to add some more bureaucratic gears to the system just so it doesnt seem like they are controlled by one man or woman.
The members of parliament got a little slice of the power cake and it made them happy.
Quote from: "caskur"
Quote from: "Guest"
Maybe in the middle ages the monarch had absolute power but since Oliver Cromwell parliament has absolute power, so the permission from the monarch is cerimonial and they wouldn't dare deny the democratically elected parliament if it wanted to go to war
lol, dream on.
I'm gonna have to side with Caskur on this one. They might give the appearance of being ceremonial, but that particular mask surely slipped when we saw just for quickly the less than pleasant aspects of Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein got swept under the carpet.
Those assholes have clout and the cunts have got teeth. If they wanted to fuck with the legacy of Oliver Cromwell, they'd figure a way to do it and make it stick.