https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgHtBxOs4qw
https://youtu.be/3GwjfUFyY6M
Was that old Jew the most liberal judge on the supreme court?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTCv4xJ6mRo
https://youtu.be/Gs069dndIYk
Quote from: Herman post_id=382493 time=1600484311 user_id=1689
Was that old Jew the most liberal judge on the supreme court?
Yep.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si-XimXQ4S0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17lkdqoLt44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEmg5GaAHbk
https://youtu.be/Py8Uhm0DE_A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZSe6N_BXs
https://youtu.be/PBsjggc5jHM
https://youtu.be/Pij8XUy3oyc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgvGjAhvIw
https://youtu.be/PobrSpMwKk4

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://i.ibb.co/ypPPYHg/received-325595661995754.jpg%22%3Ehttps://i.ibb.co/ypPPYHg/received-325595661995754.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
IT'S A FUCKING PARTY!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XMvPTFzgVU
https://youtu.be/yUZeZNxiD-M
Quote from: Dove post_id=382511 time=1600485006 user_id=3266

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://i.ibb.co/ypPPYHg/received-325595661995754.jpg%22%3Ehttps://i.ibb.co/ypPPYHg/received-325595661995754.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
FOR HE WIN!!!!!! ac_lmfao :roll: ac_dance ac_dance
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382512 time=1600485024 user_id=3214
IT'S A FUCKING PARTY!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XMvPTFzgVU
I love this song ac_wub
Perfect!
https://youtu.be/9EcjWd-O4jI

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://i.ibb.co/Np42Bs1/received-325422642009394.jpg%22%3Ehttps://i.ibb.co/Np42Bs1/received-325422642009394.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3qQtSRmHxo
https://youtu.be/FGBhQbmPwH8
https://youtu.be/HCfPhZQz2CE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vj092UgKwQ
https://youtu.be/imYJpr09IgQ
https://youtu.be/aobIboK_z34
https://youtu.be/UypeE3zTwBs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sqE6P3XyiQ
https://youtu.be/Yhy2eLp_Ap8
https://youtu.be/3Wjm4MlKvu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55btGpGsuDo
:yahoo: https://youtu.be/PIb6AZdTr-A
I have so much love for all of you right now. Omg.
Big quick....grab my ass
https://youtu.be/Ma24wmAjRGo
https://youtu.be/llyiQ4I-mcQ
https://youtu.be/WMPM1q_Uyxc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqqAnjY2Rmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B6TKClPFQA
https://youtu.be/0hiUuL5uTKc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYwqVEEMmPk
https://youtu.be/LaTGrV58wec
https://youtu.be/ILWSp0m9G2U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m47EQtAMzI
https://youtu.be/_-0sUuGufmw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fowldx4hRtI
https://youtu.be/phOW-CZJWT0
https://youtu.be/0m3X9MLDRKw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5Y11hwjMNs
https://youtu.be/wUifbTXT0uY
https://youtu.be/129kuDCQtHs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r57J0jPyZRs
https://youtu.be/Ayyy-03ITDg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5TqIdff_DQ
https://youtu.be/32wDFCM7iSI
https://youtu.be/tJxOXzE5A8w
https://youtu.be/I57hkclh3kk
Hit the road RUTH
and dont you come back no more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8Tiz6INF7I
https://youtu.be/Ukh1zoiV304
https://youtu.be/R89kJJ4OeEA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMYAEHE2GrM
https://youtu.be/pAgnJDJN4VA
https://youtu.be/ikFFVfObwss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrTz5xjmso4
https://youtu.be/etAIpkdhU9Q
https://youtu.be/eeqGuaAl6Ic
https://youtu.be/tH2w6Oxx0kQ
Go ruthy it's your dirt day....
You could find her in a box smelling like a dirty crotch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qm8PH4xAss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPQ3o14ksaM
https://youtu.be/kSRNrVjISRQ
Let's get this outta the way
https://youtu.be/rY0WxgSXdEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5m4GVcryT4
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=382584 time=1600487950 user_id=1676
https://youtu.be/kSRNrVjISRQ
Yeeessss ac_drinks
Everyone in my house is sloppy drunk right now and happy as fuck ac_dance
https://youtu.be/7Vl9qO0nLnU
For the Walkaways 🙌
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aarg7gVC0TU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xBBW4xRlpA
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382588 time=1600488075 user_id=3214
Everyone in my house is sloppy drunk right now and happy as fuck ac_dance
I broke out my Aldi wine :thumbup:
https://youtu.be/0HWxFeqUxms
https://youtu.be/--AvCsh48bk
Quote from: Dove post_id=382592 time=1600488192 user_id=3266
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382588 time=1600488075 user_id=3214
Everyone in my house is sloppy drunk right now and happy as fuck ac_dance
I broke out my Aldi wine :thumbup:
Got to pick up my wife from work in hour but after that, it's on! ac_drinks :evilthoughts2:
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=382596 time=1600488299 user_id=1676
Quote from: Dove post_id=382592 time=1600488192 user_id=3266
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382588 time=1600488075 user_id=3214
Everyone in my house is sloppy drunk right now and happy as fuck ac_dance
I broke out my Aldi wine :thumbup:
Got to pick up my wife from work in hour but after that, it's on! ac_drinks :evilthoughts2:
I'll be lit in an hour ac_wub
Who? What?
America is a better place today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5BL4RNFr58
Ruth Bader finally kicked.
https://youtu.be/JoolQUDWq-k
Hey Ruth, feeling a bit hot down there right now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZD8HKVKneI
YOU DAMN RIGHT I'M EXCITED !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz6hTuK9yBo
https://youtu.be/_88L-CU7PD4
https://youtu.be/dz9a_KuuD8g
https://youtu.be/82cJgPXU-ik
Ruth died on a Friday too
God's way of saying "you should be dancing"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSVSbdmrT0U
words cannot express how fucking elated I am right now.
https://youtu.be/cAQSZhazYk8
https://youtu.be/iPUmE-tne5U
Bye ruth!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kl1LP81eSKY
https://youtu.be/E1fzJ_AYajA
https://youtu.be/nqAvFx3NxUM
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=382615 time=1600489215 user_id=1676
https://youtu.be/E1fzJ_AYajA
Ahahahaha I forgot this existed :laugh3:
https://youtu.be/XhzpxjuwZy0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5P-TXxoWTSE
https://youtu.be/l-f77qqc_9g
Not relapsing.....just happy 😂
https://youtu.be/JhulBGMA7G4
Quote from: Dove post_id=382617 time=1600489282 user_id=3266
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=382615 time=1600489215 user_id=1676
https://youtu.be/E1fzJ_AYajA
Ahahahaha I forgot this existed :laugh3:
Ha! I've been listening to that for the last few days :punk:
Quote from: Herman post_id=382493 time=1600484311 user_id=1689
Was that old Jew the most liberal judge on the supreme court?
im not sad that ugly old jewess is dead
I hope someone destroyed the head and burned the body... ac_unsure
No sense in taking a chance of that thing getting up and biting somebody.
Quote from: Renee post_id=382696 time=1600530546 user_id=156
I hope someone destroyed the head and burned the body... ac_unsure
No sense in taking a chance of that thing getting up and biting somebody.
ac_lmfao
Quote from: Renee post_id=382696 time=1600530546 user_id=156
I hope someone destroyed the head and burned the body... ac_unsure
No sense in taking a chance of that thing getting up and biting somebody.
ac_lmfao ac_lmfao
Now if only sottamayor would die in Trumps 2nd term
This will be interesting.
Trump to Nominate a Woman Next Week to Fill Ginsburg's Vacancy
President Donald Trump said Saturday that he will nominate a female next week to fill late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's vacancy.
"I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman," he said during a rally on Saturday night in North Carolina.
It confirmed what the president told reporters when he left the White House for the rally.
He also said the process will be started "extremely soon" and will move very quickly.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) warned that there will be a constitutional crisis if Republicans fail to do this.
"We cannot have Election Day come and go with a four-four court," Cruz said during an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity. "A four-four court that is equally divided cannot decide anything. And I think we risk a constitutional crisis if we do not have a nine-justice Supreme Court, particularly when there is such a risk of a contested election."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-to-nominate-a-female-next-week-to-fill-ginsburgs-vacancy_3506634.html?ref=brief_News&utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb
They need to get the new judge confirmed immediately.
Fuck the dems and their whining about Garland. THey want people to play fair with them while they burning down cities? Fuck every last one of them
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382897 time=1600619424 user_id=3214
They need to get the new judge confirmed immediately.
Fuck the dems and their whining about Garland. THey want people to play fair with them while they burning down cities? Fuck every last one of them
With the Dems unwilling to accept electoral college results under any circumstances, and with a four to four split on the supreme court, a replacement justice must be on the supreme court.
Quote from: seoulbro post_id=382904 time=1600622562 user_id=114
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382897 time=1600619424 user_id=3214
They need to get the new judge confirmed immediately.
Fuck the dems and their whining about Garland. THey want people to play fair with them while they burning down cities? Fuck every last one of them
With the Dems unwilling to accept electoral college results under any circumstances, and with a four to four split on the supreme court, a replacement justice must be on the supreme court.
It will not matter. Even if Trump is able to get a nominee confirmed and if a Trump win in November comes down to a SCOTUS decision, it will be seen as a decision from a Trump/conservative stacked court and no democrap will attach legitimacy to the election results. When it comes to the democrats, we are not dealing with a healthy political system and the welfare of the country is on the back burner, regardless of the ridiculous lip service they give to the constitutional process. TDS and partisan politics rule the day on the left.
Besides the democraps have no desire to let this election go down to a SCOTUS decision. It is going to come down to the "harvested" ballots found in closets, car trunks and under beds. All these "found" ballots will be miraculously cast for Harris/Biden in every voting district too close to call. They got away with it in the 2018 midterms in Califorinia, expect the same shit in November. It's become their favorite and most successful fall back tactic to date and the reason why they gained control of the House. In blue states where democrap governors are forcing the mail-in ballet initiatives, expect democrap ballot harvesting to be rampant.
Quote
It will not matter. Even if Trump is able to get a nominee confirmed and if a Trump win in November comes down to a SCOTUS decision, it will be seen as a decision from a Trump/conservative stacked court and no democrap will attach legitimacy to the election results. When it comes to the democrats, we are not dealing with a healthy political system and the welfare of the country is on the back burner, regardless of the ridiculous lip service they give to the constitutional process. TDS and partisan politics rule the day on the left.
I know the Democrats will only accept results if they win.
Quote
Besides the democraps have no desire to let this election go down to a SCOTUS decision. It is going to come down to the "harvested" ballots found in closets, car trunks and under beds. All these "found" ballots will be miraculously cast for Harris/Biden in every voting district too close to call. They got away with it in the 2018 midterms in Califorinia, expect the same shit in November. It's become their favorite and most successful fall back tactic to date and the reason why they gained control of the House. In blue states where democrap governors are forcing the mail-in ballet initiatives, expect democrap ballot harvesting to be rampant
The Democratic Party is corrupt and cheating is in it's DNA.
Easy Historical Precedent': Marc Short Pushes Back On Jake Tapper Over Senate SCOTUS Confirmation
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/20/marc-short-jake-tapper-supreme-court-confirmation-senate/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=0rlqpegDGg_N0KWiY4WlyJk48YPIX1tLMQ0KQCx1
Marc Short, Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff, cited "historical precedent" to push back on CNN anchor Jake Tapper during a Sunday morning "State of the Union" debate about the battle over the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's open Supreme Court seat.
"It's a pretty easy historical precedent," Short responded. "Of those 29 I laid out for you, there are 19 of those vacancies that happened when the majority party was the same party of the president. Of those 19, nine out of 10 were confirmed before election day, and another eight out of nine after election day in the lame duck period, including John Marshall."
"Take the separate scenario in which the party in control in the Senate is a different party than the president," he continued. "There are 10 such vacancies. Only one out of 10 was filled before election day, and you have to go back to the 1880's to find that example under Grover Cleveland's presidency. So actually the historical precedent is pretty clear. When you have a party in power in the Senate whose job it is to advise and consent and confirm the president's nominee, it continually has shown historically that that is the job of the Senate to confirm the president's nomination, and history shows it's the president's obligation to make a nomination."
Short drew a contrast to when the Senate and White House are controlled by opposite parties, noting "those nominations have not moved."
"That's exactly what leader McConnell did in 2016," he said.
"Jake, I reject the notion as hypocrisy," Short replied. "Historical precedent is when your party's in power, and consistently going back to George Washington, the party has continued to confirm those nominees."
I heard the body let of a stench when it farted during the post mortem
There is precedent(Dem administration) to put another judge in place. It might be necessary depending on how many ballots are found in the trunks of cars in Dem areas.
Quote from: "Biggie Smiles" post_id=382897 time=1600619424 user_id=3214
They need to get the new judge confirmed immediately.
Fuck the dems and their whining about Garland. THey want people to play fair with them while they burning down cities? Fuck every last one of them
The comparison fails miserably - it is not legit
Situation A - 0 had presidency but not the senate = a no go = no obligation for senate to proceed when end result would be a fail
Situation B - T has presidency + support of Senate = he & senate are obligated by constitution to do it
and they will
Period .. end of story
Seems as of today, Sasse & Romney (he read the speaker's polling increase, lol) are on board = a go
Unfuckingreal
Just saw a "I' am Jo and I approve this message" .. using the loss of his son to the hilt / front & center in an ad to get elected
I have lost kids and find that unimaginable - These people are pure evil
Quote from: cc post_id=383604 time=1600805820 user_id=88
Unfuckingreal
Just saw a "I' am Jo and I approve this message" .. using the loss of his son to the hilt / front & center
I have lost kids and find that unimaginable - These people are pure evil
People are actually going to vote for that inept low life.
Jim Crow Joe won't release a list of SCOTUS nominees.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/21/466-million-joe-biden-ads-flip-iowa-georgia/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=mLYzufxUDB2N3jLBVZhNkDTbmTHJTzy3uX_32db1
RBG disagreed with Democrats' floated idea of expanding the number justices on the supreme court.
Democrats Want to Change the Number of Supreme Court Justices Against Ginsburg's Advice
Republican Senate Conference Chairman John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) supports immediately nominating a Supreme Court justice to replace Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, saying that if Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Democrats gain control in 2021, they will "change the rules."
The Wyoming senator told Fox News: "If the Democrats win the White House and the Senate and have the House, they will change the rules, they will blow up the Senate, they have an entire war room working on this."
"They will expand the number of members of the Supreme Court, regardless of what the Republicans and President Trump do. ... This is a pure power grab and then they want to stack the Senate as well by expanding the number of states to include DC statehood, with two new Democrat senators," Barrasso added.
When addressing the topic of expanding the number of Supreme Court justices during an NPR interview in 2019, Ginsburg said they shouldn't expand the court as it would make it too political.
"Nine seems to be a good number. It's been that way for a long time," she told NPR. "I have heard that there are some people on the Democratic side who would like to increase the number of judges. I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court," Ginsburg said.
Ginsburg said she was not in favor of such a change.
"If anything would make the court look partisan," she told NPR. "It would be that—one side saying, 'When we're in power, we're going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who would vote the way we want them to.'"
https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrats-want-to-change-the-number-of-supreme-court-justices-against-ginsburgs-advise-sen-barrasso_3508464.html?ref=brief_BreakingNews&utm_source=morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb
Rest in Piss Ruth
And may the souls of all those innocent babies you helped slaughter fan the flames of hell that will consume you for all eternity
Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at US Supreme Court steps
Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at US Supreme Court stepsClose
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is lying in repose at the steps of the US Supreme Court for two days.
Mourners are flocking there to pay their respects to the late justice, who died last Friday at the age of 87.
Her body will lie in state at the US Capitol on Friday
The stench must be awful those liberal and feminist baby killers should be made to kiss her decaying jewish ass
Democrats Can't Stop Senate Confirmation of Ginsburg Successor; Only Republicans Can
Senate Democrats have virtually no chance of stopping Republicans in the chamber from confirming a sixth conservative justice on the nation's highest court before the Nov. 3 election, Senate experts on both sides of the aisle tell The Epoch Times.
There are parliamentary delaying tactics that will slow things temporarily such as quorum calls and repeatedly demanding time-consuming on-the-record votes, but most of the advantages are with the 53 Republicans who control the Senate, as long as they stay united.
Plus, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is considered a master of Senate procedures, a fact that has often frustrated the Senate's 45 Democrats and two independents who typically vote with them.
"The fact is that for just about everything the Democrats can dream up, McConnell's got a response," Democratic strategist Jim Manley told The Epoch Times on Sept. 21.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrats-cant-stop-senate-confirmation-of-a-ginsburg-successor-only-republicans-can_3509980.html?ref=brief_News&utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb
Sasse & Romney on board ..
Murkowsky just did a 180 and said she will go along with it after Sasse and Romney said do it - She had a change of heart - prolly after seeing polls? :sneaky2:
Only Collins says no
So while Dems will use every tactic, weep, cry, threaten, stall, seems it will end up a done deal in short order with a comfortable margin
Despite what democRATs say.
Trump Says He'll Concede If SCOTUS Rules For Biden After Election
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/24/trump-biden-2020-election-concede/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2680&pnespid=m_9voqIFWAKNO0JJ5HxO9n628FBjDDuTZ.FW1sGn
President Donald Trump will respect the result of the November Election if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Joe Biden, he told Fox News on Thursday.
Quote from: Herman post_id=384088 time=1600992302 user_id=1689
Despite what democRATs say.
Trump Says He'll Concede If SCOTUS Rules For Biden After Election
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/24/trump-biden-2020-election-concede/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2680&pnespid=m_9voqIFWAKNO0JJ5HxO9n628FBjDDuTZ.FW1sGn
President Donald Trump will respect the result of the November Election if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Joe Biden, he told Fox News on Thursday.
Democraps and liberals of every strip have whipped themselves into foaming frenzy over Trump. It clouds their real world point of view and their judgement on just about everything they do and say. TDS is a very real thing and it is life altering for emotionally driven left wing wigglers. It's gotten to the point where many of them cannot function without their hate for Trump.
I have studied this phenomenon for the past 4 years and what started out as being mildly amusing has grown to the point of being frightening.
And speaking of TDS sufferers.
House GOP Leader Threatens to Oust Pelosi If She Attempts Impeachment
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Sept. 23 threatened to introduce a motion to oust House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) if she attempts to impeach President Donald Trump or Attorney General William Barr to delay the Senate in confirming Trump's Supreme Court pick.
Pelosi on Sept. 20 was asked on ABC News about whether impeachment could be used as an option to prevent the Supreme Court nomination. She replied: "We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I'm not about to discuss right now."
McCarthy made mention of Pelosi's comment, saying Trump is correct in moving forward with a new Supreme Court justice nomination, which came after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death on Sept. 18.
"The president is supposed to move forward, and they will. The Senate is supposed to take the action, and they will—it's their constitutional right and they are following through," he told reporters in Washington.
"I will make you this one promise, listening to the speaker on television this weekend, if she tries to move for an impeachment based upon the president following the Constitution, I think there will be a move on the floor to have her no longer, or the question of her being speaker. She may think she has a quiver. We do, too."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/house-gop-leader-threatens-to-oust-pelosi-if-she-attempts-impeachment_3511580.html?ref=brief_BreakingNews&utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb
Quote from: Renee post_id=384091 time=1600992940 user_id=156
Democraps and liberals of every strip have whipped themselves into foaming frenzy over Trump. It clouds their real world point of view and their judgement on just about everything they do and say. TDS is a very real thing and it is life altering for emotionally driven left wing wigglers. It's gotten to the point where many of them cannot function without their hate for Trump.
I have studied this phenomenon for the past 4 years and what started out as being mildly amusing has grown to the point of being frightening.
I have to agree with almost every word of that
It started before midnight election night (Eastern) when the dominos they counted on began to fall ... then we witnessed media people literally crying as it became apparent that "she" was going down in flames ...
The only thing I feel differently about is that I saw it as immediate .. well, ok, after they slowed the crying so they could speak
Raw Hate can be a huge driver for those predisposed .. they best be carefull .. the overall situation is not very different than it was 4 years ago at this point in time .. except far more are induced to fib to the pollsters than last time .. and then there's the enthusiasm factor ... and I don't know how people showing up to vote against someone holds up against those enthusiastically voting for a person and his ideas
JoJo has little platform .. He's running "against T" instead of "for himself" .. which almost has to backfire on him
Quote from: cc post_id=384093 time=1600993967 user_id=88
Quote from: Renee post_id=384091 time=1600992940 user_id=156
Democraps and liberals of every strip have whipped themselves into foaming frenzy over Trump. It clouds their real world point of view and their judgement on just about everything they do and say. TDS is a very real thing and it is life altering for emotionally driven left wing wigglers. It's gotten to the point where many of them cannot function without their hate for Trump.
I have studied this phenomenon for the past 4 years and what started out as being mildly amusing has grown to the point of being frightening.
I have to agree with almost every word of that
It started before midnight election night (Eastern) when things they counted on began to fall ... then we witnessed media people literally crying as it became apparent that "she" was going down in flames ...The only thing I feel differently is that I saw it as immediate .. well, ok, after they slowed the crying so they could speak
Raw Hate can be a huge driver for those predisposed .. they best be carefull .. the overall situation is not very different than it was 4 years ago at this point in time
JoJo has little platform .. He's running "against T" instead of "for himself" .. which almost has to backfire on him
Biden works a couple of hours a day if that while Trump works his ass off. Biden won't give interviews unless the press is friendly and he has questions in advance so his team can answer them for him. But, despite the lack of effort and a campaign, he is all but guaranteed victory.
I never outright "predicted" last go round despite having considerable confidence in the ending .. .while everyone was saying what you are now
and I'm not "predicting" now
That said, comparatively speaking I'm even more confident / optimistic now than I was last time .. I like that same energy vs. yawn
A twist - Now they are virtually threatening violence if T wins ... that won't work well for them .. They are so desperate that they are doing many self-destuctive things
Hate causes people to do irational things
Quote from: cc post_id=384099 time=1600995371 user_id=88
I never outright "predicted" last go round despite having considerable confidence in the ending .. .while everyone was saying what you are now
and I'm not "predicting" now
That said, comparatively speaking I'm even more confident / optimistic now than I was last time .. I like that same energy vs. yawn
A twist - Now they are virtually threatening violence if T wins ... that won't work well for them .. They are so desperate that they are doing many self-destuctive things
Hate causes people to do irational things
Trump wasn't being blamed for the coronavirus pandemic last time. There will be fraud with mail in ballots and it will work in Biden's favour. I don't see how Trump can win again.
The mail fraud in is the scariest thing ... It ethically sucks but exists
While TDS'ers blame him, I wonder how many unrepresented-by-press people out there actually feel that way??
President Donald Trump is expected to announce Saturday that he is nominating Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court as he aims to put a historic conservative stamp on the high court just weeks before the election.
Quote from: cc post_id=384102 time=1600996437 user_id=88
The mail fraud in is the scariest thing ... It ethically sucks but exists
While TDS'ers blame him, I wonder how many unrepresented-by-press people out there actually feel that way??
I'm hoping he gets 57-58% of the popular vote or whatever is needed beyond just the Electoral so this BS ends....and it looks very possible.
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=384206 time=1601088652 user_id=1676
Quote from: cc post_id=384102 time=1600996437 user_id=88
The mail fraud in is the scariest thing ... It ethically sucks but exists
While TDS'ers blame him, I wonder how many unrepresented-by-press people out there actually feel that way??
I'm hoping he gets 57-58% of the popular vote or whatever is needed beyond just the Electoral so this BS ends....and it looks very possible.
There are a few issues I disagree with the Trump administration. But, there is nothing on which I agree with that empty shell Biden. From the economy to pandering to domestic terror to trade to international organizations, everything he supports is bad for Americans.
2 Democrats Who Voted for Barrett in 2017 Oppose Her for SCOTUS Nominee
Two of the three Democrats who backed Judge Amy Coney Barrett for a federal appeals court in 2017 plan to not support her nomination to the Supreme Court vacancy left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg if the confirmation vote occurs before Election Day.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/three-democrats-voted-for-barrett-in-2017-none-support-her-as-scotus-nominee_3516874.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2020-09-28
Here's Why Republicans Have To Get This Supreme Court Confirmation Done Early
https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/02/senate-republicans-supreme-court-confirmation-presidential-election-arizona-mail-in-ballots/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=gu93o.RbBlaNT2IFo.gxeZaNL5JsJk6QeMbTX4uw
Trump told a group of Republican state attorneys general in September that he wants a nine-member Supreme Court as soon as possible in case the presidential election is litigated in the courts, USA Today reported.
"I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine Justices," Trump reportedly said. "I think having a 4-4 situation is not a good situation."
The 2000 presidential election was ultimately decided after the Supreme Court ruled that a Florida recount could not proceed. Confirming Barrett to the Supreme Court before November's election would allow a full bench to make a decision if the results are contested in the federal judiciary.
Yup. For that reason alone ^ they HAVE to get it done
And they will .. even if by electronics
By Hugh Hewitt
Watch out for desperate hits by Democrats on Amy Barrett
I expect Democrats to launch torpedoes at ACB, as Barrett is already being called, from two directions. After joining University of Notre Dame Law School faculty in 2002 and eventually gaining tenure, Barrett would have had a vote on every other candidate for tenure. Expect Senate Democrats to find a disappointed tenure-seeker who blames Barrett and is willing to testify against her.
Similarly, Barrett served for many years on the law school's Appointments Committee, and for a couple of years as its chair. No doubt, Democrats are scouring academia for anyone who failed to land a job teaching at ND Law and bears a grudge against Barrett.
I'm familiar with the workings of appointments and tenure committees from a quarter-century on the faculty of Chapman University's Fowler School of Law (I am on leave this academic year). Committee members try to be diligent and fair with every applicant for hiring or promotion. But these undertakings are not for the faint of heart. You disappoint vastly more people than you are able to please.
As a professor, Barrett will also almost certainly have had student evaluations filed every semester. Even for the best teachers, these evaluations, as with all large-enough samples, fall into a bell curve. Always. There is 10 percent of every class that most adores your style of teaching and a 10 percent that finds it least appealing or even loathes it. Expect to hear from some of Barrett's former students over the past 18 years who fell in the latter category. The former student with the deepest grievance has probably already contacted Senate Democrats.
Whether the Judiciary Committee hears that student — or the disappointed tenure-seeker, or the frustrated job applicant - is not inevitable. Graham needs to be fair, but he need not be a sucker for the sort of tactics that smeared Kavanaugh and Thomas with late-arriving allegations.
An open and fair process — with a beginning, an end and a vote — is what's needed. The same for the debate that will follow on the Senate floor. That final vote should occur before the Nov. 3 election. (As a practical matter, GOP Senate candidates risk getting wiped out if there is no vote before the election. Their base will stay home in disgust.)
I hope this possibly pessimistic preview of how Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee will behave turns out to be wrong. I hope senators and witnesses stay on the law and within the schedule. I hope Barrett adheres to the famed "Ginsburg rule," established during Ruth Bader Ginsburg's 1993 confirmation hearings.
As former U.S. attorney general Edwin Meese wrote in a 2005 essay about the "Ginsburg rule," the ground rules devised by the Judiciary Committee's then-chairman, Joe Biden, D-Del., "stipulated that she had no obligation to answer questions about her personal views or on issues that might come before the Court."
That approach has since served other nominees, and the court, and the country, and it should serve again. Graham ought to see to it.
Voters Increasingly Support Amy Coney Barrett For Supreme Court, Poll Shows
https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/07/poll-voters-support-amy-coney-barrett/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=h_xzqepABleNPpql71Cu8HdYS6cf6MbwnCBoS01M
Almost half, 46%, of voters polled by Morning Consult/Politico between Oct. 2 – 4 said that the Senate should confirm Barrett, the poll found. These numbers were up 9 percentage points since Trump first announced he was nominating Barrett on Sept. 26, according to the poll.
The percentage of Republican voters who back Barrett's confirmation rose six points from the previous month to 77%, the poll found, and the number of independent voters who said Barrett should be confirmed rose by eight percentage points to 36%.
The number of Democratic voters who agree Barrett should be confirmed rose by 10 percentage points to 24%, the poll found.
The confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett began this morning.