Aint no surprise by this poll.
This breaks the narrative the corporate media is telling you
https://www.theblaze.com/news/political-violence-poll-jordan-peterson?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202021-03-13&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM
Following the summer of regular riots in American cities by Black Lives Matter and Antifa members as well as the January storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters, there is debate about which side of the political spectrum embraces violence to achieve their goals. A poll found that white liberals are far more likely to support using violence to advance their political agenda.
The new data was provided by the American National Elections Studies, which was established by the National Science Foundation in 1977. The Time Series Study has been conducted before and after U.S. general elections since 1948. The 2020 ANES Time Series Study was carried out by the University of Michigan and Stanford University.
Participants were asked: "How much do you feel it is justified for people to use violence to pursue their political goals in this country?" Respondents could answer with "Not at all," "A little," "A moderate amount," A lot," and "A great deal." The study has a total of 8,280 interviews that were conducted before the 2020 presidential election.
Bestselling author and University of Toronto psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson shared an eye-opening revelation from the 2020 ANES Time Series Study. On his Twitter page, Peterson shared a graph from the poll showing responses from white American adults across the political spectrum from "very liberal" to "very conservative."
The graph shows each political demographic and the percentage of respondents who answered "Not at all" to the question: "How much do you feel it is justified for people to use violence to pursue their political goals in this country?" The graph shows the percentage of white Americans who would never consider using violence to advance their political goals.
The survey found that 95.8% of "very conservative" white respondents said violence should never be used to pursue a political ambition, which was up from 93.3% in 2016. "Conservative" respondents were nearly identical, with 95% disavowing political violence in 2020 and 93.3% in 2016.
However, on the other end of the political spectrum, leftists are more likely to embrace political violence as a means to an end. According to the poll, only 66.5% of "very liberal" white respondents said it was wrong to use violence to attain their political goals. That means that over a third of "very liberal" Americans would justify using some or a "great deal" of violence to pursue their political goals. In the 2016 survey, the percent of "very liberal" respondents willing to endorse political violence was much higher at 86.9%.
There were 82.8% that identified as "liberals" who were against political violence, down from 88.1% in 2016.
The survey found that 85.8% of "moderates" said political violence should never be used, down one percentage point from four years ago.
https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1370162181967380484?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1370162181967380484%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Fpolitical-violence-poll-jordan-peterson
The 2020 ANES Time Series Study found that Republicans were less accepting of using violence for political gains compared to Democrats and independents. Along racial lines, white Americans were the least to support using violence to pursue political goals compared to Asians, Hispanics, and blacks.
https://twitter.com/electionstudies?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1370044829166489602%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fnews%2Fpolitical-violence-poll-jordan-peterson
Who gives a shit? I certainly don't.
Is It Really Republican Racists Doing This?': Tucker, Ying Ma Take On 'Lie' That Attacks On Asians Are Trump-Inspired
https://dailycaller.com/2021/03/13/tucker-carlson-ying-ma-asian-american-violence/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=g.YwtKhbHgONrA6EK7IF3p.uMK3wE9Jd9abqs19a
Fox News host Tucker Carlson and author Ying Ma discussed the "lie" that "Republican racists" are behind a recent rash of violence against Asian-Americans.
Reports of hate crimes against Asian-Americans have risen significantly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a problem Carlson said President Joe Biden linked to "white supremacy" in a Thursday speech segment he played on Friday night's edition of "Tucker Carlson Tonight."
"So again, Joe Biden is tying these crimes, which are real, to the right," Carlson said. "He is saying anyone who talks about where the virus came from, talks it may have escaped from a lab, is abetting violence against Asian-Americans, that's why they are being attacked. But it's a lie. The attackers don't look like Trump voters, necessarily."
After playing footage of some of the attacks, Carlson accused Biden and Democrats of making them "into political ammunition."
"Is it really Republican racists doing this, as Joe Biden suggested last night and so many other Democrats have told us?" he asked before bringing on his guest, the author of "Chinese Girl In The Ghetto."
While Ying Ma acknowledged that some whites doubtless harbor "hostility or resentment" against Asians because of the virus, she also said that "time and time again" the recent "attackers are not white."
"Like you said, they don't quite look like white supremacists," she told Carlson. "They don't look like white voters or Trump voters. In fact, many of these attacks have occurred in heavily Democratic cities where they did not vote for Trump in 2020 or 2016."
And so what the Democrats or the far left have done, actually quite effectively, in the past year or so, is to libel former President Trump for something that the Democrats themselves actually are very much guilty of, and what is that? That is their silence and their cowardice before black on Asian attacks that often occur in America's urban areas," she continued.
Most of the attacks on East Asians in BC have been committed by Caucasians..
But, in the USA, it's been more evenly divided between various races.
Quote from: "Jim Crow" post_id=405101 time=1615683680
Who gives a shit? I certainly don't.
That's because you have no stake in the economy. You are on a government disability pension eddo. As long as the cheques roll in you will lick the ass of whoever is in power. But, us normal contributing stakeholders don't like being beaten up by woke thugs for expressing our rights.
You don't understand, and I don't expect you to.
Eddie the human zit shouldn't be allowed to vote.
It could be interesting to see a study of politically motivated,
Stay curious, folks. ac_cool
Quote from: Blurt post_id=405173 time=1615751366 user_id=1974
It could be interesting to see a study of politically motivated,
Stay curious, folks. ac_cool
I think we would the results would be the same.
Quote from: Blurt post_id=405173 time=1615751366 user_id=1974
It could be interesting to see a study of politically motivated,
"politically motivated, actual acts of violence", eh?
"Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis & Ferguson each individually assured the end result for perpetuity
The 100s of other BLM / anitifa actors should have stayed home as all they did was unnecessarily add to an insurmountable lead for "actual acts of violence"
They could have stopped at the first, Ferguson, and been guaranteed the win for long after their lifetimes
Naïve Fantasy Talk and insinuations are cheap & easy, ... but Reality can be a Bitch
(Sorry to be harsh, but I'm sick and tired of the too convenient and downright evil bullshit of omission going on with most press who deliberately avoid / hide major BLM & antifa violence from society)
Okay.
Quote from: cc post_id=405175 time=1615752455 user_id=88
Quote from: Blurt post_id=405173 time=1615751366 user_id=1974
It could be interesting to see a study of politically motivated,
"politically motivated, actual acts of violence", eh?
"Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis & Ferguson each individually assured the end result for perpetuity
The 100s of other BLM / anitifa actors should have stayed home as all they did was unnecessarily add to an insurmountable lead for "actual acts of violence"
They could have stopped at the first, Ferguson, and been guaranteed the win for long after their lifetimes
Naïve Fantasy Talk and insinuations are cheap & easy, ... but Reality can be a Bitch
(Sorry to be harsh, but I'm sick and tired of the too convenient and downright evil bullshit of omission going on with most press who deliberately avoid / hide major BLM & antifa violence from society)
The Democratic party couldn't even denounce the violence of Antifa and BLM as they assaulted people and destroyed their property/businesses in cities across the US. Both terrorist organizations are Democrat bases. So, they have become the brown shirts of that party like the IRA was for Sin Fein in Northern Ireland.
The number of anti-Asian whites is so minuscule, it's ridiculous to even suggest it. There are more anti-black whites out there, and that number is silly small.
However, there's a combination of anti-whites, anti-Asian, anti-blacks, anti-Hispanic (or Latino if you're a stickler for ever evolving definitions), and even anti-womens rights, anti-gay or lesbian, anti-science, anti-facts, anti-human that have all come together under a banner of anti-you!
These people don't give a fuck about humanity or themselves. They are deeply bigoted, hateful, and would have traditionally committed suicide, but have been emboldened by their deep state and media handlers to become social suicide bombers of a sort, culturally and similar like.
...and they're cowards for not just doing the deed on themselves only.
Quote from: seoulbro post_id=405245 time=1615803983 user_id=114
Quote from: cc post_id=405175 time=1615752455 user_id=88
Quote from: Blurt post_id=405173 time=1615751366 user_id=1974
It could be interesting to see a study of politically motivated,
"politically motivated, actual acts of violence", eh?
"Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis & Ferguson each individually assured the end result for perpetuity
The 100s of other BLM / anitifa actors should have stayed home as all they did was unnecessarily add to an insurmountable lead for "actual acts of violence"
They could have stopped at the first, Ferguson, and been guaranteed the win for long after their lifetimes
Naïve Fantasy Talk and insinuations are cheap & easy, ... but Reality can be a Bitch
(Sorry to be harsh, but I'm sick and tired of the too convenient and downright evil bullshit of omission going on with most press who deliberately avoid / hide major BLM & antifa violence from society)
The Democratic party couldn't even denounce the violence of Antifa and BLM as they assaulted people and destroyed their property/businesses in cities across the US. Both terrorist organizations are Democrat bases. So, they have become the brown shirts of that party like the IRA was for Sin Fein in Northern Ireland.
Lots of hypocrisy.
Quote from: seoulbro post_id=405245 time=1615803983 user_id=114
The Democratic party couldn't even denounce the violence of Antifa and BLM as they assaulted people and destroyed their property/businesses in cities across the US. Both terrorist organizations are Democrat bases. So, they have become
Nailed it
Antifa and BLM are de facto paramilitary wings of the Democrats.
Jordan Peterson: Why You SHOULDN'T 'Trust the Science' on COVID Lockdowns
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KReiPSXP0s[/media]
Quote from: Herman post_id=421264 time=1632455580 user_id=1689
Jordan Peterson: Why You SHOULDN'T 'Trust the Science' on COVID Lockdowns
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KReiPSXP0s[/media]
The science is in flux.
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=421476 time=1632688871 user_id=3254
The science is in flux.
Yes, this whole thing is new to scientists & they learn only by observing and recording over time
Some mistake logical guesses get corrected as more data rolls in .
but lots of old and later corrected stuff is disingenuously glommed onto and put forward as a tactic by antivaxxers who know what they are quoting is inaccurate ... but they know a few fools might believe it
Most anti's are opportunists .. with no interest in what is accurate
Quote from: cc post_id=421478 time=1632690507 user_id=88
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=421476 time=1632688871 user_id=3254
The science is in flux.
Yes, this whole thing is new to scientists & they learn only by observing and recording over time
Some mistake logical guesses get corrected as more data rolls in .
but lots of old and later corrected stuff is disingenuously glommed onto and put forward as a tactic by antivaxxers who know what they are quoting is inaccurate ... but they know a few fools might believe it
Most anti's are opportunists .. with no interest in what is accurate
It will be a while before we know "the science" surrounding COVID-19.
Science is racist.