Alec Baldwin fired a prop gun on a set in New Mexico on Thursday, accidentally killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.
The incident occurred on the set of "Rust," an independent feature that was filming at the Bonanza Creek Ranch, a popular production location south of Santa Fe.
Hutchins, 42, was transported by helicopter to University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque, where she died. Souza, 48, was taken by ambulance to Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center in Santa Fe, where he is undergoing treatment for his injuries, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff's office.
The Sheriff's office said in a statement that Hutchins and Souza "were shot when a prop firearm was discharged by Alec Baldwin, 68, producer and actor."
https://variety.com/2021/film/news/alec-baldwin-rust-incident-santa-fe-1235094931/
Rest in peace Halyna
			
			
			
				Quote from: "Oliver Clotheshoffe" post_id=424585 time=1634873135 user_id=3349
Alec Baldwin fired a prop gun on a set in New Mexico on Thursday, accidentally killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.
The incident occurred on the set of "Rust," an independent feature that was filming at the Bonanza Creek Ranch, a popular production location south of Santa Fe.
Hutchins, 42, was transported by helicopter to University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque, where she died. Souza, 48, was taken by ambulance to Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center in Santa Fe, where he is undergoing treatment for his injuries, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff's office.
The Sheriff's office said in a statement that Hutchins and Souza "were shot when a prop firearm was discharged by Alec Baldwin, 68, producer and actor."
https://variety.com/2021/film/news/alec-baldwin-rust-incident-santa-fe-1235094931/
Rest in peace Halyna
 :shock:
			 
			
			
				Quote from: "Oliver Clotheshoffe" post_id=424585 time=1634873135 user_id=3349
Alec Baldwin fired a prop gun on a set in New Mexico on Thursday, accidentally killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.
The incident occurred on the set of "Rust," an independent feature that was filming at the Bonanza Creek Ranch, a popular production __cpLocation south of Santa Fe.
Hutchins, 42, was transported by helicopter to University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque, where she died. Souza, 48, was taken by ambulance to Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center in Santa Fe, where he is undergoing treatment for his injuries, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff's office.
The Sheriff's office said in a statement that Hutchins and Souza "were shot when a prop firearm was discharged by Alec Baldwin, 68, producer and actor."
https://variety.com/2021/film/news/alec-baldwin-rust-incident-santa-fe-1235094931/
Rest in peace Halyna
A dang shame it wasn't Baldwin that got shot.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Herman post_id=424589 time=1634873963 user_id=1689
Quote from: "Oliver Clotheshoffe" post_id=424585 time=1634873135 user_id=3349
Alec Baldwin fired a prop gun on a set in New Mexico on Thursday, accidentally killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza.
The incident occurred on the set of "Rust," an independent feature that was filming at the Bonanza Creek Ranch, a popular production __cpLocation south of Santa Fe.
Hutchins, 42, was transported by helicopter to University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque, where she died. Souza, 48, was taken by ambulance to Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center in Santa Fe, where he is undergoing treatment for his injuries, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff's office.
The Sheriff's office said in a statement that Hutchins and Souza "were shot when a prop firearm was discharged by Alec Baldwin, 68, producer and actor."
https://variety.com/2021/film/news/alec-baldwin-rust-incident-santa-fe-1235094931/
Rest in peace Halyna
A dang shame it wasn't Baldwin that got shot.
 :001_rolleyes:
			 
			
			
				Rust man bad
			
			
			
				Reading up on the story, it was a choreographer killed and director clipped with shrapnel. Doesn't appear that it happened as part of a scene and he violated basic firearm safety. Treat every firearm as if loaded and never point it things you don't intend to shoot....regardless if he thought it was just a prop. Always check and if in doubt, check again.
			
			
			
				He will never be charged and the media will be silent after the initial reports.
			
			
			
				Movie prop guns aint supposed to be lethal.
They are meant to be safe when discharged at some1.
			
			
			
				I remember former American Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot someone.......the person didn't die though.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Fashionista post_id=424608 time=1634911054 user_id=3254
I remember former American Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot someone.......the person didn't die though.
Yes. Bird hunting and his shotgun went off accidentally
			 
			
			
				Quote from: kiebers post_id=424601 time=1634902893 user_id=193
He will never be charged and the media will be silent after the initial reports.
Guaranteed.
			 
			
			
				Baldwin is a fucking bloated moron.
But that being said, what kind of "prop gun" was being used? Who the hell uses live ammo on a movie set in today's day and age of CGI? And what kind of imbecile would give a moronic liberal asshat like Alec Baldwin, a loaded gun and leave him unsupervised? Most of those Hollyweird, pieces of shit, aren't even trustworthy or intelligent enough to handle a sharp stick safely let alone a firearm. For most of these Hollywood types a firearm is just another toy they use to further their useless career, so they can line their pockets and spread the social disease of glamorized violence.
			
			
			
				They aint supposed to be lethal.
And they are meant to be discharged right at another actor/actress.
So the general safety rules dont apply.
There is probably some kind of a breaker in the muzzle/barrel and it came off.
Even the normal "blanks" arent safe to discharge at some1.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Renee post_id=424630 time=1634919551 user_id=156
Baldwin is a fucking bloated moron.
Hell yes.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=424631 time=1634920314 user_id=136
They aint supposed to be lethal.
True. According to news just now it was a live round .. a real game changer if true
I had always thought prop guns could not fire live rounds .. wrong again cc
That said, until it's official, it's not yet real
			 
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=424636 time=1634923491 user_id=88
Quote from: Odinson post_id=424631 time=1634920314 user_id=136
They aint supposed to be lethal.
True. According to news just now it was a live round .. a real game changer if true
I had always thought prop guns could not fire live rounds .. wrong again cc
That said, until it's official, it's not yet real
Sometimes they use real firearms for authenticity.
There are different types of blanks and some of them look like live rounds at first glance.
			 
			
			
				https://twitter.com/AlecBaldwln____/status/911425278123048960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E911425278123048960%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fentertainment%2Falec-baldwin-facing-backlash-tweet-questioning-wrongfully-kill-someone
			
			
			
				American + Gun. 
What could possibly go wrong.
 :2lc4sh4_th:
			
			
			
				hmmmm .. We been gettin a lot of Aussie shows of late .. no idea why
But lots o guns & gunfire & bullet riddled bodies 
Anyhowzers, I guess we don't know exactly what happened, but why would he be aiming at staff? 
He is a  jerk / lowlife  of the highest order.. a 10 level .. rotten personality .. nasty nasty person ..  dunno how he got in acting ... mind you personal standards are not high,   always avoid anything he's in  ... Now he's ended a life
It could not be part of movie as he hit staff .. So  why was he  pointing a gun at staff let alone pull the trigger ???
Did he hit 2 people with one shot or did he shoot yet again?
Shoulda stuck to bullying, berating & belittling  his little daughter, although she's likely big enough now to shut him up
			
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=424658 time=1634948220 user_id=88
hmmmm .. We been gettin a lot of Aussie shows of late .. ni idea why
You have my sympathy. Our entertainment industry is utter garbage. Australians generally cannot put together a decent movie, book or TV series albeit with some odd exceptions. Mad Max was OK. Picnic at Hanging Rock was very good (although the director was a Kiwi), Cargo is an excellent horror/sci-fi movie but stars Martin Freeman (Bilbo Baggins). Most of our pop culture is execrable.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=424659 time=1634949032 user_id=1560
Quote from: cc post_id=424658 time=1634948220 user_id=88
hmmmm .. We been gettin a lot of Aussie shows of late .. ni idea why
You have my sympathy. Our entertainment industry is utter garbage. Australians generally cannot put together a decent movie, book or TV series albeit with some odd exceptions. Mad Max was OK. Picnic at Hanging Rock was very good (although the director was a Kiwi), Cargo is an excellent horror/sci-fi movie but stars Martin Freeman (Bilbo Baggins). Most of our pop culture is execrable.
True .. they are not top, but a cpl of series are sort of OK
			 
			
			
				This post fits the Leftist Hypocrisy thread, but it's going to be parked here.
Hours before actor Alec Baldwin unintentionally shot and killed one and injured another at a movie set, union workers had walked off in order to protest working conditions at the low-budget film.
On Friday, the Los Angeles Times reported that just six hours before the fatal shooting a group of camera crew members had walked off to protest working conditions.
The crew had been in a dispute with the film's producers over their pay and travel arrangements. Baldwin was a writer, co-producer, and starred as the lead role in the film entitled "Rust."
On Thursday the camera crew was setting up their equipment when non-union workers came on set to replace them. About half a dozen abandoned the film in protest.
The report quoted a crew member knowledgable about the incident who claimed, "Corners were being cut — and they brought in nonunion people so they could continue shooting."
That person also claimed that there had been two misfires from the prop gun on Saturday and another misfire the week before.
"There was a serious lack of safety meetings on this set," they added.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-union-safety?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202021-10-23&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM
			
			
			
				LOL .. The net is now full of crazy progs saying Trump HAD TO BE  involved 
He set the whole thing up to  get back at this creep wannabe actor who had a horrid case of TDS
 :roll:
			
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=424753 time=1635010918 user_id=88
LOL .. The net is now full of crazy progs saying Trump HAD TO BE  involved .. to get back at this creep wannabe actor
 :roll:
figures
			 
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=424753 time=1635010918 user_id=88
LOL .. The net is now full of crazy progs saying Trump HAD TO BE  involved 
He set the whole thing up to  get back at this creep wannabe actor who had a horrid case of TDS
 :roll:
TDS is a very real mental illness. 
If the liberal scum wasn't in control of academia, the medical industry, and the media, and if they weren't endowed with so much political power, it already would have been classified as such. 
At every turn the progs prove that they are incapable of rational or even remotely intelligent behavior.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=424659 time=1634949032 user_id=1560
Quote from: cc post_id=424658 time=1634948220 user_id=88
hmmmm .. We been gettin a lot of Aussie shows of late .. ni idea why
You have my sympathy. Our entertainment industry is utter garbage. Australians generally cannot put together a decent movie, book or TV series albeit with some odd exceptions. Mad Max was OK. Picnic at Hanging Rock was very good (although the director was a Kiwi), Cargo is an excellent horror/sci-fi movie but stars Martin Freeman (Bilbo Baggins). Most of our pop culture is execrable.
Aussie film and series are typically cringeworthy and full of woke-isms...
			 
			
			
				Hannah Gutierrez-Reed is the name of the armorer..
A beginner.
'
A woman...
			
			
			
				There have been a number of suggestions, from the conservative press as much as elsewhere, that we should go easy on poor Alec Baldwin concerning the terrible "accident" that resulted in a "tragedy" at his New Mexico filming location.
No, we should not.  It was not an accident
There a four primary rules of firearms handling, codified many years ago by firearms expert Jeff Cooper.  Everyone serious about firearms has long ago committed them to memory:
Every gun is always loaded.
Never put your finger on the trigger until you are about to shoot.
Never aim at anything you are not willing to destroy.
Be absolutely certain about what is behind your target.
It seems clear that Baldwin ignored every last one of these.  He didn't bother to check his weapon to see if it was loaded.  He had his finger on the trigger in an insecure situation.  He aimed it at two people.  His director, Joel Souza, was standing behind Halyna Hutchins, who was killed.  Souza was evidently hit by the same round.
Baldwin has long been an outspoken advocate of gun control.  He has generally presented himself as an expert 
Then, — he generally presents himself as an expert on everything that has ever happened since humans first appeared on the Serengeti.
			
			
			
				I can foresee manslaughter charges, given this occurred in the US. 
But don't these movie sets have armourers and firearms safety officers? 
More worrisome...how the hell did a loaded firearm get on the set? Someone either deliberately, or by an effort of negligence hard to believe put a live round in a real gun on a movie set??? How in the hell does a real firearm get on set?
Utter madness. Although I find it difficult to blame the user of the firearm, who should have some faith in the firearms safety system on set. Can't blame the puppet.
			
			
			
				I was listening to Fox News on Sirius in my truck. Old Baldwin was at least part owner of the production company. He is shitting bricks this could break him financially.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=424795 time=1635045108 user_id=1560
I can foresee manslaughter charges, given this occurred in the US. 
But don't these movie sets have armourers and firearms safety officers? 
More worrisome...how the hell did a loaded firearm get on the set? Someone either deliberately, or by an effort of negligence hard to believe put a live round in a real gun on a movie set??? How in the hell does a real firearm get on set?
Utter madness. Although I find it difficult to blame the user of the firearm, who should have some faith in the firearms safety system on set. Can't blame the puppet.
I don't know how this could have happened.
			 
			
			
				Its America... Of course they have live rounds on a movie set.
Maybe they wanted to skip the practical effects/CGI and used live ammo for shooting through a wall or something.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=424812 time=1635081162 user_id=136
Its America... Of course they have live rounds on a movie set.
Maybe they wanted to skip the practical effects/CGI and used live ammo for shooting through a wall or something.
Maybe Alec Baldwin is a hypocritical leftist and wanted to save money by putting employees lives at risk.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: seoulbro post_id=424972 time=1635167988 user_id=114
Quote from: Odinson post_id=424812 time=1635081162 user_id=136
Its America... Of course they have live rounds on a movie set.
Maybe they wanted to skip the practical effects/CGI and used live ammo for shooting through a wall or something.
Maybe Alec Baldwin is a hypocritical leftist and wanted to save money by putting employees lives at risk.
Yes and maybe the production company is responsible for the "accidents" happening on the set.
The workplace safety supervisor, armorer and the director are also responsible.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=425004 time=1635195136 user_id=136
Quote from: seoulbro post_id=424972 time=1635167988 user_id=114
Quote from: Odinson post_id=424812 time=1635081162 user_id=136
Its America... Of course they have live rounds on a movie set.
Maybe they wanted to skip the practical effects/CGI and used live ammo for shooting through a wall or something.
Maybe Alec Baldwin is a hypocritical leftist and wanted to save money by putting employees lives at risk.
Yes and maybe the production company is responsible for the "accidents" happening on the set.
The workplace safety supervisor, armorer and the director are also responsible.
True, but who hired them.
			 
			
			
				I recall seeing that some crew walked off because of safety infractions  .. and were quickly replaced by locals
Still, what kind of person points a gun at a technical crew member off camera .. or at anyone at any time for that matter
			
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=425042 time=1635269750 user_id=88
I recall seeing that some crew walked off because of safety infractions  .. and were quickly replaced by locals
Still, what kind of person points a gun at a technical crew member off camera .. or at anyone at any time for that matter
The first exposes Baldwin's hypocrisy. The second is a criminal act.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: seoulbro post_id=425045 time=1635270352 user_id=114
Quote from: cc post_id=425042 time=1635269750 user_id=88
I recall seeing that some crew walked off because of safety infractions  .. and were quickly replaced by locals
Still, what kind of person points a gun at a technical crew member off camera .. or at anyone at any time for that matter
The first exposes Baldwin's hypocrisy. The second is a criminal act.
Exactly
Now, according to a report from TheWrap, unnamed crew members have stated that the firearm handled by Gutierrez Reed, Halls and Baldwin was used earlier that same day to go "plinking," a hobby in which people shoot at beer cans with live ammunition for fun.
Regardless of whether or not the firearms were improperly in proximity or loaded with live rounds, experts say there are systems in place to ensure prop guns are inspected before they enter an active set. As a result, Gutierrez Reed, Halls and Baldwin could be subject to a myriad of criminal and / or legal ramifications.
			 
			
			
				The armorer.
Who wouldnt hire this person to handle all the guns.
She radiates hardcore professionalism.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1451863147401338882
			
			
			
				Quote from: seoulbro post_id=425040 time=1635269255 user_id=114
Quote from: Odinson post_id=425004 time=1635195136 user_id=136
Quote from: seoulbro post_id=424972 time=1635167988 user_id=114
Quote from: Odinson post_id=424812 time=1635081162 user_id=136
Its America... Of course they have live rounds on a movie set.
Maybe they wanted to skip the practical effects/CGI and used live ammo for shooting through a wall or something.
Maybe Alec Baldwin is a hypocritical leftist and wanted to save money by putting employees lives at risk.
Yes and maybe the production company is responsible for the "accidents" happening on the set.
The workplace safety supervisor, armorer and the director are also responsible.
True, but who hired them.
They are all responsible and the production company has to pay some mighty fines.
The safety supervisor and the armorer are more directly responsible.
Investigation will reveal why the guy thought it was a "cold gun" when he handed it to Baldwin.
He could be the guy who did all the fucking up.
Too early to tell.
			 
			
			
				I hope this ends Alec Baldwin's acting career.
			
			
			
				
Really, it's not. In fact, Alec Baldwin is likely to be held, at least in part, responsible.
"If you're capable of memorizing 120 pages of dialogue, you can memorize four lines of gun safety," special effects and firearms expert Steve Wolf tells The Post.
"If that scene required him to put the gun to his head and pull the trigger, I'm sure he would have taken a look inside the gun. Wouldn't you?"
As a producer on "Rust," Baldwin could be held culpable for the cost-cutting, chaos and eventual hire of a young head armorer with just one stint in said job on her résumé — because, according to Deadline, multiple other armorers turned it down over low pay and high stakes, with too many firearms to manage.
There's no denying Alec Baldwin's role in on-set shooting tragedy
By Maureen Callahan
			
			
			
				A reasonable point of view until I saw the author.
More feminist sexist rage.
			
			
			
				cc can't help being a 1st wave feminist hijacked by 3rd wave feminism consequently purloined by 4th wave puppy cry rooms and geriatric cunt clots which if poked with a stick might reflect the semblance of sanity. 
(Yes, I'm saying she has Stockholm Syndrome and isn't terribly bright enough to realize it when she fires up her spreadsheets and regurgitates State data cat sick on the daily). 
I do appreciate how far she's come like I'm amused by a spider monkey in a circus, changing its clothes between acts without much direction... but she's still a monkey.
			
			
			
				My reputation as an uber-left gender-bender CRT prog follows me everywhere .. and can be seen in every thread I make and / or post in
It's just the way i am
			
			
			
				Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=425098 time=1635330737 user_id=1676
cc can't help being a 1st wave feminist hijacked by 3rd wave feminism consequently purloined by 4th wave puppy cry rooms and geriatric cunt clots which if poked with a stick might reflect the semblance of sanity. 
(Yes, I'm saying she has Stockholm Syndrome and isn't terribly bright enough to realize it when she fires up her spreadsheets and regurgitates State data cat sick on the daily). 
I do appreciate how far she's come like I'm amused by a spider monkey in a circus, changing its clothes between acts without much direction... but she's still a monkey.
I see you don't know cc.
			 
			
			
				Here is an expert.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP1X5L-AufQ
			
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=425937 time=1635905985 user_id=136
Here is an expert.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP1X5L-AufQ
Sue Alec Baldwin's woke ass.
			 
			
			
				SNL should hire Donald Trump to play Alec Baldwin in a sketch about this whole thing
That would make the ratings go up.
			
			
			
				What I never got and what has rarely been mentioned is why would he even point it at the cameraman under any circumstances and further pull the trigger ?????? .. Like DUH
Was it part of movie to aim at camera?
			
			
			
				Baldwin must be charged with manslaughter.
All the malarky about prop managers, armourers and other flunkies having "responsibility" is a smokescreen.
The ultimate responsibility for firing a gun rests with the person with the gun in his hand. You cannot abrogate responsibility for ensuring the firearm is safe by NOT doing your own safety check before and after handling the gun then claiming it's not your problem.
Baldwin is ultimately accountable.
			
			
			
				Obviously it was not a part of movie and was simply Baldwin being his usual jerk self, breaking the law and killing the person whatever the other protocols are.
It should have been considered manslaughter and / or murder without intent from the gitgo (depending on terminology of  local law)... I don't get all the other flack around it as relevant to this despicable, stupid and illegal act of his
			
			
			
				Should he hear a knock on his door at 6.00am and open it to find a couple of hundred cops surrounding his house (which, I understand, is how American law enforcement works) I will not be surprised.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427556 time=1637274626 user_id=1560
Should he hear a knock on his door at 6.00am and open it to find a couple of hundred cops surrounding his house (which, I understand, is how American law enforcement works) I will not be surprised.
Not for progs. That's reserved for their oppponents
He will likely find perfumed detectives in skimpy dresses at his door  .. hopefully but not guaranteed to be female  :wink:
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=427542 time=1637270508 user_id=136
SNL should hire Donald Trump to play Alec Baldwin in a sketch about this whole thing
That would make the ratings go up.
I'd like to see that.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427556 time=1637274626 user_id=1560
Should he hear a knock on his door at 6.00am and open it to find a couple of hundred cops surrounding his house (which, I understand, is how American law enforcement works) I will not be surprised.
To progressive celebrities? Not a chance. OJ Simpson got away with a double premeditated homicide.
			 
			
			
				It does look like the armorer is the main suspect.
Its very difficult to enforce rules when your employer can fire you just because he woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
But she was incharge of the guns.
She was also the prop master.
			
			
			
				But she didn't pull the trigger.
At what point does legal liability and culpability kick in?
			
			
			
				Was the shot part of movie? 
He shot at the camera man if I have it right? ... so his prime culpability centers around was it script ... or not
			
			
			
				There are very firm and rigid rules regarding using a firearm, whether under instruction or direction, or not.
Rule 1. The gun is always loaded.
Rule 2. Never point the firearm at any other person.
Rule 3. When handed a firearm, bear in mind Rule 1 and make sure there are no rounds in the breach or magazine.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=428928 time=1638333575 user_id=1560
There are very firm and rigid rules regarding using a firearm, whether under instruction or direction, or not.
Rule 1. The gun is always loaded.
Rule 2. Never point the firearm at any other person.
Rule 3. When handed a firearm, bear in mind Rule 1 and make sure there are no rounds in the breach or magazine.
Rule 4. Never place your finger on the trigger unless prepared to discharge the firearm.
			 
			
			
				Again, simple question as I don't know the details that matter ... and I do know yer basic 101 gun rules very well
Quote from: cc post_id=428924 time=1638331811 user_id=88
Was the shot part of movie? 
He shot at the camera man if I have it right? ... so his prime culpability centers around was it script ... or not
If part of movie - he's clear & gun handler is in kuku
If not, he was farking around and in deep kuku as is person who put real bullet in and / or gun handler
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=428919 time=1638330792 user_id=136
It does look like the armorer is the main suspect.
Its very difficult to enforce rules when your employer can fire you just because he woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
But she was incharge of the guns.
She was also the prop master.
I agree with Bricktop, it seems Alec Baldwin didn't follow basic firearm safety.
			 
			
			
				Baldwin's employees get thrown under the bus.
			
			
			
				
'I DIDN'T PULL THE TRIGGER': Alec Baldwin gives first in-studio interview following shooting

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Alec-Baldwin-nutz.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/upl%20...%20n-nutz.jpg%22%3Ehttps://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Alec-Baldwin-nutz.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
LOS ANGELES — Alec Baldwin says in an upcoming TV interview that he did not pull the trigger of the gun that fired a live bullet and killed a cinematographer on the set of the movie "Rust," according to an excerpt released on Wednesday.
			 
			
			
				Well, now he's getting silly...and showing even greater signs of culpability.
			
			
			
				Quote from: "iron horse jockey" post_id=428970 time=1638393837 user_id=2015
Baldwin's employees get thrown under the bus.
One got thrown in a grave.
			 
			
			
				Ouch!!!
Harsh, Fash. Harsh!!
			
			
			
				Quote from: cc post_id=428973 time=1638394111 user_id=88
'I DIDN'T PULL THE TRIGGER': Alec Baldwin gives first in-studio interview following shooting

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Alec-Baldwin-nutz.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/upl%20...%20n-nutz.jpg%22%3Ehttps://blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Alec-Baldwin-nutz.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
LOS ANGELES — Alec Baldwin says in an upcoming TV interview that he did not pull the trigger of the gun that fired a live bullet and killed a cinematographer on the set of the movie "Rust," according to an excerpt released on Wednesday.
Alec Baldwin has a punchable face.
			 
			
			
				According to Fox News, Baldwin has breached a number of Actors Equity regulations in regards to gun safety on set...including ALWAYS checking before pulling the trigger, and being present at all times when prop masters and the relevant Assistant Director load the firearm prior to the scene being recorded.
And as mentioned, he said he "did not pull the trigger". The gun fired itself, apparently.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=429043 time=1638413835 user_id=1560
According to Fox News, Baldwin has breached a number of Actors Equity regulations in regards to gun safety on set...including ALWAYS checking before pulling the trigger, and being present at all times when prop masters and the relevant Assistant Director load the firearm prior to the scene being recorded.
And as mentioned, he said he "did not pull the trigger". The gun fired itself, apparently.
He probably feels rules don't apply to him.
			 
			
			
				The whole thing looks like a shitshow.
And Alec Baldwin DID pull the trigger.
The cops can determine if the gun can go off without pulling the trigger.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Bricktop post_id=429043 time=1638413835 user_id=1560
According to Fox News, Baldwin has breached a number of Actors Equity regulations in regards to gun safety on set...including ALWAYS checking before pulling the trigger, and being present at all times when prop masters and the relevant Assistant Director load the firearm prior to the scene being recorded.
And as mentioned, he said he "did not pull the trigger". The gun fired itself, apparently.
Cocking and firing the revolver wasnt in the script.
Alec Baldwin had to cock the hammer for the gun to go off "accidentally".
He cocked it and naturally pulled the trigger.
And now he is trying to save his own ass in the new interview.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=429059 time=1638426678 user_id=136
Cocking and firing the revolver wasnt in the script.
Alec Baldwin had to cock the hammer for the gun to go off "accidentally".
He cocked it and naturally pulled the trigger.
And now he is trying to save his own ass in the new interview.
Didn't think it was, but had to allow the very long chance as I didn't know for certain
If not in the script, he idiotically pointed the gun at and killed the person
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=429059 time=1638426678 user_id=136
Quote from: Bricktop post_id=429043 time=1638413835 user_id=1560
According to Fox News, Baldwin has breached a number of Actors Equity regulations in regards to gun safety on set...including ALWAYS checking before pulling the trigger, and being present at all times when prop masters and the relevant Assistant Director load the firearm prior to the scene being recorded.
And as mentioned, he said he "did not pull the trigger". The gun fired itself, apparently.
Cocking and firing the revolver wasnt in the script.
Alec Baldwin had to cock the hammer for the gun to go off "accidentally".
He cocked it and naturally pulled the trigger.
And now he is trying to save his own ass in the new interview.
I don't know anything about firearms, but this seems very likey what transpired.
			 
			
			
				A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Renee post_id=429087 time=1638467500 user_id=156
A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
			 
			
			
				An interview on Fox appears to corroborate Renee's version. The pistol was a single action revolver with the inherent flaws that particular design contained. If I understand correctly as Renee explains, the hammer on early design single action pistol actually rests on a live cartridge and the gun can discharge accidentally by being dropped, or struck, or mishandled.
The expert on Fox explained that an accidental discharge without pulling the trigger is quite feasible.
Of course, none of that explains the very serious and inexplicable lapses of standard firearm safety answers the questions as to who the fuck would bring live ammunition onto a movie set. That is an act of madness that would be hard to explain as incidental.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=429114 time=1638490394 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429087 time=1638467500 user_id=156
A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Renee post_id=429117 time=1638494526 user_id=156
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429114 time=1638490394 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429087 time=1638467500 user_id=156
A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=429125 time=1638502588 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429117 time=1638494526 user_id=156
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429114 time=1638490394 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429087 time=1638467500 user_id=156
A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
He doesn't want to accept responsibility.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Fashionista post_id=429127 time=1638503953 user_id=3254
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429125 time=1638502588 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429117 time=1638494526 user_id=156
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429114 time=1638490394 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429087 time=1638467500 user_id=156
A lot of armchair experts here...  :laugh3: No offense...The revolver in question was a Colt M1873 single action revolver. Depending upon the year of manufacturer the discharge could have very well been accidental. Before 1999 the Colt M1873 had no safety transfer bar system which means it was dangerous to carry the gun hammer down on live round. Depending upon the condition of the revolver the slightest jar of the hammer could have set off a round.
Before single action revolvers were equipped with transfer bar safeties which block the hammer from comming in contact with a chambered round until it is fully cocked, it was standard practice to carry a single action revolver with the hammer down on an EMPTY chamber, essentially turning a 6-shooter into a 5-shooter. That way you did shoot your foot off while holstering the weapon. Anyone who has seen the original movie "True Grit" should be aware of this.
Depending upon the date of manufacture of the weapon and the maintained condition of the weapon, Baldwin could indeed be telling the truth... I'm pretty sure a prop weapon is probably not the best maintained weapon and dirt and crud from repeated firings could easily have become lodged between the hammer, firing pin and the live round which is an common recipe for an accidental discharge with an older single action Colt... Other manufacturers of single action revolvers such as Ruger, have had transfer bar safeties since the 1980s or earlier.
Now I'm no Alec Baldwin fan as I think he is a complete asshat but in this case he might be right and I will hold judgement until all the facts come out... That being said I still find it disconcerting that live rounds were on the set in the first place and even more troubling is the fact that the supposed film's armorer mistook live rounds for blanks.. :nea: . That's just inexcusable.
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
He doesn't want to accept responsibility.
Not necessarily....There is a mechanical explanation for what Baldwin describes and it makes perfect sense... What he described is a broken "sear". A sear is part of the trigger mechanism that engages the hammer, striker or bolt and prevents the hammer from going forward until the correct amount of pressure is placed on the trigger. 
Now there are a number of ways a sear can fail. usually attributed to age, wear and tear, and improper or neglectful firearms maintenance. OR and this is total speculation,... the firearm was tampered with which along with live bullets being inexplicably on the set, would suggest something nefarious. 
Again I'm not defending Alec Baldwin but what he described can happen and it will be up to firearms experts who are charged with doing the investigation to determine.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: Renee post_id=429133 time=1638541098 user_id=156
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=429127 time=1638503953 user_id=3254
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429125 time=1638502588 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429117 time=1638494526 user_id=156
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429114 time=1638490394 user_id=136
The initial reports say that he was aiming at the camera and then the gun went off.
The gun was in his extended hand and it went off.
What caused the pin to strike the primer?
The local Sheriff says that Alec Baldwins story doesnt add up.
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
He doesn't want to accept responsibility.
Not necessarily....There is a mechanical explanation for what Baldwin describes and it makes perfect sense... What he described is a broken "sear". A sear is part of the trigger mechanism that engages the hammer, striker or bolt and prevents the hammer from going forward until the correct amount of pressure is placed on the trigger. 
Now there are a number of ways a sear can fail. usually attributed to age, wear and tear, and improper or neglectful firearms maintenance. OR and this is total speculation,... the firearm was tampered with which along with live bullets being inexplicably on the set, would suggest something nefarious. 
Again I'm not defending Alec Baldwin but what he described can happen and it will be up to firearms experts who are charged with doing the investigation to determine.
That would explain why the hammer didnt engage at all.
In the interview he says that he pulled the hammer almost to full-cock.
There were live rounds on the set which they used for "plinking".
And the dummy rounds look exactly like live rounds.
Here is the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNrwiRRFblQ&t=848s
			 
			
			
				Does anyone believe Alec Baldwin?
			
			
			
				Quote from: Odinson post_id=429242 time=1638589182 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429133 time=1638541098 user_id=156
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=429127 time=1638503953 user_id=3254
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429125 time=1638502588 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429117 time=1638494526 user_id=156
The local sheriff.... Pleeeease... might as well be the local deputy dog catcher for what it's worth.. :laugh3: 
For all we know his thumb or the web of his hand could have put enough pressure on the hammer to cause an accidental discharge... I have no idea what exactly happened or how the gun was handled, nor does anyone here and it seems those on the scene don't know fuck all about what happened either. 
I'm not saying that is exactly what happened. What I am saying is that under the right circumstances, it can happen. So Alec Baldwin's claim of not touching the trigger is a viable statement.
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
He doesn't want to accept responsibility.
Not necessarily....There is a mechanical explanation for what Baldwin describes and it makes perfect sense... What he described is a broken "sear". A sear is part of the trigger mechanism that engages the hammer, striker or bolt and prevents the hammer from going forward until the correct amount of pressure is placed on the trigger. 
Now there are a number of ways a sear can fail. usually attributed to age, wear and tear, and improper or neglectful firearms maintenance. OR and this is total speculation,... the firearm was tampered with which along with live bullets being inexplicably on the set, would suggest something nefarious. 
Again I'm not defending Alec Baldwin but what he described can happen and it will be up to firearms experts who are charged with doing the investigation to determine.
That would explain why the hammer didnt engage at all.
In the interview he says that he pulled the hammer almost to full-cock.
There were live rounds on the set which they used for "plinking".
And the dummy rounds look exactly like live rounds.
Here is the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNrwiRRFblQ&t=848s
Headstamp confusion is now being blamed which is bullshit.
If you want, we can discuss this more in depth where firearms talk is a welcome subject....
			 
			
			
				When Renee talks about firearms, it's like reading a foreign language to me.
			
			
			
				Quote from: Renee post_id=429282 time=1638635105 user_id=156
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429242 time=1638589182 user_id=136
Quote from: Renee post_id=429133 time=1638541098 user_id=156
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=429127 time=1638503953 user_id=3254
Quote from: Odinson post_id=429125 time=1638502588 user_id=136
This is from the new interview.. Less than an hour ago.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2021/12/02/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-interview-george-stephanopoulos/8839098002/
"I'm holding the gun where she told me to hold it," Baldwin told George Stephanopoulos in an ABC special that aired Thursday night and will stream afterward on Hulu. "In the scene (being rehearsed) I would have cocked the gun, and I said, 'Do you want to see that? And she said yes. So I take the gun and I sort of cock the gun, I'm not going to pull the trigger."
Hutchins told him to "tilt it down a little bit," he said. "I cock the gun and I go, 'Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?' And I let go of the hammer of the gun and the gun goes off."
Another source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/alec-baldwin-give-his-account-fatal-rust-shooting-2021-12-02/
He doesn't want to accept responsibility.
Not necessarily....There is a mechanical explanation for what Baldwin describes and it makes perfect sense... What he described is a broken "sear". A sear is part of the trigger mechanism that engages the hammer, striker or bolt and prevents the hammer from going forward until the correct amount of pressure is placed on the trigger. 
Now there are a number of ways a sear can fail. usually attributed to age, wear and tear, and improper or neglectful firearms maintenance. OR and this is total speculation,... the firearm was tampered with which along with live bullets being inexplicably on the set, would suggest something nefarious. 
Again I'm not defending Alec Baldwin but what he described can happen and it will be up to firearms experts who are charged with doing the investigation to determine.
That would explain why the hammer didnt engage at all.
In the interview he says that he pulled the hammer almost to full-cock.
There were live rounds on the set which they used for "plinking".
And the dummy rounds look exactly like live rounds.
Here is the interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNrwiRRFblQ&t=848s
Headstamp confusion is now being blamed which is bullshit.
If you want, we can discuss this more in depth where firearms talk is a welcome subject....
Confusion... Well otherwise they would be handing out 1st degree murder charges instead of manslaughter charges.  ac_biggrin 
The dummy rounds have punched primers... So they appear to be empty rounds in the cylinder.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: "iron horse jockey" post_id=429246 time=1638590860 user_id=2015
Does anyone believe Alec Baldwin?
I don't.
			 
			
			
				Quote from: "iron horse jockey" post_id=429246 time=1638590860 user_id=2015
Does anyone believe Alec Baldwin?
I believe he's a spineless pussy who handballs the blame for his numerous instances of utter stupidity?