THeBlueCashew

They did not rule in a way that protects Obama from murderous drone strikes on innocent peepoll and lyging to congress, and and starting illegal wars ... and and opening our borders to the criminal cartel but locks evil Orange Man up forever for questioning the election.

Can you believe that? that they didn't doo that?

They are extremists!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-immunity-case-supreme-court-rules-ex-presidents-substantial-protection-prosecution

That little fag Harry Sisson is on Twitter calling for Biden to send in Seal 6 to assassinate Trump

Quote from: Erica Mena on July 01, 2024, 12:43:02 PMThat little fag Harry Sisson is on Twitter calling for Biden to send in Seal 6 to assassinate Trump

I didn't know who he is.....he's a Tik Tok influencer.

Quote from: Erica Mena on July 01, 2024, 12:43:02 PMThat little fag Harry Sisson is on Twitter calling for Biden to send in Seal 6 to assassinate Trump

And a few others.

Quote from: Frood on July 01, 2024, 12:58:25 PMAnd a few others.

Isn't that a criminal act?

Quote from: Erica Mena on July 01, 2024, 12:43:02 PMThat little fag Harry Sisson is on Twitter calling for Biden to send in Seal 6 to assassinate Trump

They want him assassinated in Rikers Island

because that's democracy --

And if we don't stop this dictator now he might do some thing really dictatorish like lock up his opponents on fabricated felony charges that you have to adjust yourself into a pretzel and smoke dope to understand. 

Fat Lily wants all of you to know that you will all regret this ruling as it will benefit a democrat one day.

Quote from: Sloan on July 01, 2024, 01:13:21 PMFat Lily wants all of you to know that you will all regret this ruling as it will benefit a democrat one day.

Tell that stupid bitch this position has benefited every POTUS from our very inception. We only had to get a ruling on it once democRATs abused power.

Quote from: Sloan on July 01, 2024, 01:13:21 PMFat Lily wants all of you to know that you will all regret this ruling as it will benefit a democrat one day.

That behemoth is as stupid as she is obese.

I swear to God she needs to be plunged face first into the nearest ocean and forgotten about.

This ruling benefits democrats right fucking now you utterly stupid sack of shit!


Oh for fucks sake I can't anymore

Or do you think Drone strikes on innocent civilians is not a crime?

Lying to congress under oath?

Starting and Engaging in illegal wars?

Yes, you stupid fat fuck we are very well aware that a consistently applied legal standard may benefit the cockroaches in your party. that's the whole fucking point you clueless dimwit.

Thank you once again for showing us all how low a fucking standard you are willing to subscribe to

Quote from: Sloan on July 01, 2024, 01:13:21 PMFat Lily wants all of you to know that you will all regret this ruling as it will benefit a democrat one day.

Please pass on this coded message to Fat Oak:

"OINK OINK! ***liquid fart*** OINK OINK!"

(It's in pig latin-a)

Quote from: formosan on July 01, 2024, 12:59:42 PMIsn't that a criminal act?

Arbitrarily enforced after a visit or interview.

I keep saying it and they keep proving it.

Trump is the conduit through which they believe they can erode the integrity of the entire legal system

they've already got their idiot lemming followers on board

Look at this

The Democriminal Cartel is already up and arms at the idea of not eeking out a way to use lawfare against Trump but not any of them

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/congressional-dems-blast-ruling-trump-immunity-extreme-right-wing-supreme-court

And the devil is always in the details

Chuck the fuck shoemaker said this

Treason or incitement of an insurrection should not be considered a core constitutional power afforded to a president.


ahhhahahhahaha... couldn't keep the rat bastard in you guys hidden for long eh?

By perjury, murder, theft and willful dereliction of duty are eh?

The supreme court ruling is one less bullshit trial trump will have to deal with before the election.

But but ... with this ruling Trump could Eat Earf and we cant prosecute him for it!

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 01, 2024, 10:26:35 PMBut but ... with this ruling Trump could Eat Earf and we cant prosecute him for it!

What are libtards pissed off about now? Is it the SCOTUS ruling that gave Trump immunity from official acts as prez?

And roberts basically told the three dumb stooges on the court that they should shut the fuck up and go petition the Wizard of Oz for a grip on reality

"As for the dissents, they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today...," Roberts wrote.

Quote from: Shen Li on July 01, 2024, 10:29:47 PMWhat are libtards pissed off about now? Is it the SCOTUS ruling that gave Trump immunity from official acts as prez?

They are pissed off because another one of their "one and done" tools which was crafted specifically to take out a rival from challenging the corpse was dismantled today.

They thought they were slick in saying that Trump used his office to incite an insurrection on Jan 6th and now they are mad because they may have to try him based solely on the facts.

Facts which show a video of him saying "you should make yourselves heard peacefully"

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 01, 2024, 10:32:59 PM"As for the dissents, they strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today...," Roberts wrote.

Get a couple of beers in Roberts and this is what he really meant.

You conniving DEI hire witches waste no time whatsoever exploiting the gross stupidity which is so overwhelmingly rampant in your voting base do you? dumb fucking cunts.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 01, 2024, 10:37:37 PMThey are pissed off because another one of their "one and done" tools which was crafted specifically to take out a rival from challenging the corpse was dismantled today.

They thought they were slick in saying that Trump used his office to incite an insurrection on Jan 6th and now they are mad because they may have to try him based solely on the facts.

Facts which show a video of him saying "you should make yourselves heard peacefully"

I'm not familiar with that one. I watched some Fox news today. They reported about the immunity ruling, but not about any other ruling. At least while I was watching.

What is it about consistently applied principles that irks democrats so much?

Now the tik tok influencer masquerading as a congress woman is talking about impeaching the supreme court justices

this is a sad fucking party -- seriously

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 02, 2024, 10:32:35 AMWhat is it about consistently applied principles that irks democrats so much?

Now the tik tok influencer masquerading as a congress woman is talking about impeaching the supreme court justices

this is a sad fucking party -- seriously

Impeaching justices on the Supreme Court??

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 02, 2024, 10:32:35 AMWhat is it about consistently applied principles that irks democrats so much?

Now the tik tok influencer masquerading as a congress woman is talking about impeaching the supreme court justices

this is a sad fucking party -- seriously

That fucking whore needs tossed into Locustbergs rape dumpster too!!!! Maybe her beta cuck white boyfriend too!

Quote from: formosan on July 02, 2024, 11:01:23 AMImpeaching justices on the Supreme Court??

Its a fucking joke. Our founding fathers warned us against abusing impeachment for political reasons. The wheels are off the clown car now. Civil war and the destruction of America WILL happen now.

What the scum on the left do not realize is that this ruling should have never happened to begin with.

The court sees your abuse of the justice system in its flagrant and varied forms and sees the need to setup guard rails to stop the unelected element of the deep state from acquiring unmitigated power via the immobility of a US president.

think about it for just a second you dumb fucks. An environment where the leader of the free world has to first wonder how, and in what twisted ways, his political opponents will seek to destroy him personally if he acts on matter requiring quick and decisive action.

What are you left with in such a circumstance but a hollowed out puppet of a figurehead which the deep state can totally control via well manufactured circumstances which will then allow them to push the agenda forward through alternative means

but the average stooogy scum on the left are too stupid and shortsighted to see how they are being played like the useful idiots they are

Quote from: Lokmar on July 02, 2024, 11:13:41 AMIts a fucking joke. Our founding fathers warned us against abusing impeachment for political reasons. The wheels are off the clown car now. Civil war and the destruction of America WILL happen now.

I browse Chinese language forums. They are loving what they see. A sitting US president using the justice system to kneecap his opponent's campaign.

The US still lectutes the world about democracy, rule of law and transparency. You can't make this shit up.

If Trump loses this election these cases will just disappea. But, if Trump wins in November, they will fight it tooth and nail.

Quote from: Lokmar on July 02, 2024, 11:13:41 AMIts a fucking joke. Our founding fathers warned us against abusing impeachment for political reasons. The wheels are off the clown car now. Civil war and the destruction of America WILL happen now.

From what little I know, I doubt this is what the founding fathers had in mind for impeachment.

Quote from: formosan on July 03, 2024, 10:53:44 AMFrom what little I know, I doubt this is what the founding fathers had in mind for impeachment.

To democrats impeachment means remove anyone who disagrees with us.

Which is essentially throwing the baby out with the bath water in terms of rule of law. Might as well NOT have law or a court if it can be such an easy process to bend the same in any direction you wish

these people are scum of the lowest kind and will bring the very death to america their stooges are out in the streets chanting

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 03, 2024, 10:57:16 AMTo democrats impeachment means remove anyone who disagrees with us.

This is absolutely correct!!!!

What they ACTUALLY intended was for impeachment to be used to remove someone for dereliction of duty, corruption, banging hookers on the office desk, boy diddling, etc, but sure as fuck not because someone has a simple policy or opinion disagreement.

Quote from: Lokmar on July 03, 2024, 11:10:51 AMThis is absolutely correct!!!!

What they ACTUALLY intended was for impeachment to be used to remove someone for dereliction of duty, corruption, banging hookers on the office desk, boy diddling, etc, but sure as fuck not because someone has a simple policy or opinion disagreement.

Exactly

Myorkas is a perfect example of someone who needs to be impeached and since they are not even entertaining the possibility they need to shut the fuck up as they are nothing more than hypocrites trying to overturn decisions which are not in total alignment with their narrative.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 03, 2024, 11:23:51 AMExactly

Myorkas is a perfect example of someone who needs to be impeached and since they are not even entertaining the possibility they need to shut the fuck up as they are nothing more than hypocrites trying to overturn decisions which are not in total alignment with their narrative.

As many have pointed out, conservatives are mostly worried about principles and liberals solely about winning at any cost.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 03, 2024, 11:23:51 AMExactly

Myorkas is a perfect example of someone who needs to be impeached and since they are not even entertaining the possibility they need to shut the fuck up as they are nothing more than hypocrites trying to overturn decisions which are not in total alignment with their narrative.

Yep. Mayorkas is CLEARLY guilty of dereliction of duty! Moreover, since its at the direction of biden, BOTH should be impeached AND removed from office!

BTW, Mayorkas is a filthy libtarded JOOOOOO! He needs to get tossed into Hitler and Aryans gas chamber!

Quote from: Frood on July 03, 2024, 11:27:23 AMAs many have pointed out, conservatives are mostly worried about principles and liberals solely about winning at any cost.

bingo... which is why they make it difficult to take them seriously on any matter even when they happen to be close to being right. In such an instance I would counter that a broken clock is correct twice a day too.

they have demonstrated conclusively they are all about whatever it takes to make them win. Today they hate the electoral college because it does not consistently 100 out of 100 times produce the outcome they want.

But let Texas and florida become overrun with illegals given the ability to vote go solid blue no matter who and watch how fast they'll love the electoral college

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 01, 2024, 12:16:42 PMThey are extremists!

I'd have to agree with that assessment Biggie Smiles Bigly.

Your USSC is extreme & they're playing favorites to prevent Trump from being prosecuted. A favor I suppose for him appointing them.

But in the process, this Court is selling your Rule of Law down the drain. They've created this 'Fox Guarding the Henhouse' situation where the President is above the law. Given what they ruled, Richard Nixon ought to be totally enoxerated as if Watergate never happened.

Oh and before folk here nail me for being a Democrat sympathizer, I am not since I stated that Joe Biden should step down because of his mental decline. and I also indicated that the Democrats were protecting him.

Bottom line is that Courts shouldn't favor anyone.
and if they do like this court has, then they've stepped over the line and debased the Rule of Law.

Quote from: JOE on July 03, 2024, 05:37:46 PMI'd have to agree with that assessment Biggie Smiles Bigly.

Your USSC is extreme & they're playing favorites to prevent Trump from being prosecuted. A favor I suppose for him appointing them.

But in the process, this Court is selling your Rule of Law down the drain. They've created this 'Fox Guarding the Henhouse' situation where the President is above the law. Given what they ruled, Richard Nixon ought to be totally enoxerated as if Watergate never happened.

Oh and before folk here nail me for being a Democrat sympathizer, I am not since I stated that Joe Biden should step down because of his mental decline. and I also indicated that the Democrats were protecting him.

Bottom line is that Courts shouldn't favor anyone.
and if they do like this court has, then they've stepped over the line and debased the Rule of Law.

No dipshi, no.

I wonder where the outrage is over the recent conditions of Julian Assange's release... namely the requirement that he destroy all the evidence of Hillary Clinton's emails. You remember them... those classified state department communiques she kept on a server in her bathroom that was determined in the end to be a crime that the courts could never prosecute her for... now presumably deleted at the behest of her buddies who will similarly go unpunished for their part in the crime of obstruction of justice and evidence tampering.

Or the outrage over the improper storage of classified documents in a Vice President's garage, similarly not contemplated by the courts (not unlike the outstanding rape allegations against him)  even though they went hell bent for leather on a president who not only enjoyed the declassification powers the VP did not, but also thought to store them in a more secure location under lock and key as recommended to him by the same government agency who would later raid his ass.

Or for that matter the innumerable unprosecuted cases against America's first gay president for constitutional breaches that included warrantless spying on US citizens, not to mention the expansion of war crimes against foreign nationals in a detention center he swore up and down on the campaign trail that he would close.

Or that crossdressing fag who, in between his flights to Rape Island and bombing civilians in the Middle East, successfully managed to distract the courts from his crimes with legendary and riveting drama of unlicensed weenie moistening with oval office interns and sax solos that, quite honestly, ought to have been against the Geneva Convention.

Or the father/son presidential duo who lied the world into two games of Gulf that put enough "climate change"" into the atmosphere to really give your average greenie something to chimp out about. Funny, I don't remember them getting their day in court.

No. I'm supposed to ignore the examples of differential enforcement and go all jazz-hands over it somehow being Trump that's guilty of selling the justice system up Shit Creek.

Joe... you're a fuckwit. Sit down, shut your hole and don't bother opening it again until Thiel is there to jam his cock in it.

But 5 police officers died in that Capitol hill riot.

A paper trail of emails is one thing and so is hush money to pay off a prostitute, but when police officers who were injured or die in the line of duty you can't hide that.

I haven't heard one advocate of January 6 or Trump offer condolences apologies or financial compensation to the families of those officers. Many of them were Republicans too.

And there is no comparison between other presidents because this was a domestic incident where police officers upholding the law died or were severely injured and threatened

Saying Trump wasnt at fault is the equivalent of saying a guy who organizes a block party that ends in the guests destroying a neighborhood isn't at fault and shouldn't be held responsible. Of course he is.

Like Harry Truman once said when a man is President of the USA "The buck stops here." That is the President takes responsibility for his actions and they affect others good or bad

Letting Trump off Scott free like that was a travesty of Justice.

Quote from: JOE on July 04, 2024, 02:41:03 AMBut 5 police officers died in that Capitol hill riot.

Bullshit.

No cops died.

Quote from: JOE on July 04, 2024, 02:41:03 AMBut 5 police officers died in that Capitol hill riot.

That's just a straight-up lie.
A huge, blatant, ridiculous lie.

Which begs the question-
What else are you telling lies about?
Or rather... is there anything you *won't* lie about?

Apparently not.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 03, 2024, 10:57:16 AMTo democrats impeachment means remove anyone who disagrees with us.

Pierre Pollivere said Justin Trudeau's hate speech law is any speech Trudeau hates, and he is correct.

The Dems and the Liberals are two peas in the same authoritarian pod.

Quote from: JOE on July 04, 2024, 02:41:03 AMBut 5 police officers died in that Capitol hill riot.

A paper trail of emails is one thing and so is hush money to pay off a prostitute, but when police officers who were injured or die in the line of duty you can't hide that.

I haven't heard one advocate of January 6 or Trump offer condolences apologies or financial compensation to the families of those officers. Many of them were Republicans too.

And there is no comparison between other presidents because this was a domestic incident where police officers upholding the law died or were severely injured and threatened

Saying Trump wasnt at fault is the equivalent of saying a guy who organizes a block party that ends in the guests destroying a neighborhood isn't at fault and shouldn't be held responsible. Of course he is.

Like Harry Truman once said when a man is President of the USA "The buck stops here." That is the President takes responsibility for his actions and they affect others good or bad

Letting Trump off Scott free like that was a travesty of Justice.

:s_hi:
(https://i.imgur.com/3rXs32Z.png)

Quote from: DKG on July 04, 2024, 10:24:59 AMPierre Pollivere said Justin Trudeau's hate speech law is any speech Trudeau hates, and he is correct.

The Dems and the Liberals are two peas in the same authoritarian pod.

They litteraly wish to turn the court into a mock up prop. A paper tiger. Nothing more.

Don't like a supreme court decision? Impeach them

Want them removed from office? MeeToo them.

Don't like a presidential action? Find a way to connect said action with a crime and convict them in an area of the country you know they are hated.

Why even bother having a system of government with such a circularly counterproductive ideology in play?

Of course, the mooks on the otherside are simply too cognitively deficient to see that. Or perhaps they feel that once they have amassed and consolidated enough power it will magically end and we will experience the great Utopia without the existence of anyone to challenge our beliefs.

Yeah, like we haven't seen them grow hungry in the absence of an enemy and begin to feed on their own.

these people are a threat to civilization. Not just democracy. 

Quote from: JOE on July 04, 2024, 02:41:03 AMBut</snip>

"Butt" nothing. Keep your sweaty-lipped boner buffer zipped until Thiel is there to fuck some sense into it.

Quote from: harper on July 04, 2024, 10:41:38 AM:s_hi:
(https://i.imgur.com/3rXs32Z.png)

But nothing changes the reality of Jan 6.

You're still wrong, hey harper?

Progtards bemoans the high court's most recent decision, extending partial immunity to presidents for official acts. But they don't understand that the court saved the legacies of both Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

here are two people in the world who are very grateful for the high court's decision: Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

If the Supreme Court had ruled the way the left demanded and found that no president is immune from prosecution, do they believe that no Republican administration would seek vengeance on former presidents?

Barack Obama as commander in chief ordered the deaths of U.S. citizens Anwar al-Awlaki, Samir Khan, and 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki in Yemen by drone strike. His administration was sued by the ACLU for violating the Constitution's guarantee against the deprivation of life without due process of law. Obama prevailed.

Obama also oversaw an operation called "Fast and Furious," a scheme to traffic firearms over the border to Mexico directly into the hands of criminals, instructing gun store owners to break the law by selling firearms to suspected criminals.

One of those guns was used to murder U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in 2010.

Biden has allowed the invasion of the United States by illegal immigrants, resulting in the deaths of scores of Americans. He has done little to stem the flow of fentanyl into the country, resulting in the deaths of more than 70,000 people a year since 2021.

And, on August 29, 2021, Biden approved a drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan, killing 10 innocent people, including seven children.

Does the left really want to see Barack Obama or Joe Biden on trial for murder or being an accessory to murder?

Does the left really want to see Biden extradited to the Hague to face trial?

The left bemoans the most recent decision of the Supreme Court, granting partial immunity to presidents for official acts. But the left does not understand that the Supreme Court saved the legacies of both Biden and Obama.

Quote from: Brent on July 08, 2024, 11:54:24 AMProgtards bemoans the high court's most recent decision, extending partial immunity to presidents for official acts. But they don't understand that the court saved the legacies of both Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

here are two people in the world who are very grateful for the high court's decision: Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

If the Supreme Court had ruled the way the left demanded and found that no president is immune from prosecution, do they believe that no Republican administration would seek vengeance on former presidents?

Barack Obama as commander in chief ordered the deaths of U.S. citizens Anwar al-Awlaki, Samir Khan, and 16-year-old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki in Yemen by drone strike. His administration was sued by the ACLU for violating the Constitution's guarantee against the deprivation of life without due process of law. Obama prevailed.

Obama also oversaw an operation called "Fast and Furious," a scheme to traffic firearms over the border to Mexico directly into the hands of criminals, instructing gun store owners to break the law by selling firearms to suspected criminals.

One of those guns was used to murder U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in 2010.

Biden has allowed the invasion of the United States by illegal immigrants, resulting in the deaths of scores of Americans. He has done little to stem the flow of fentanyl into the country, resulting in the deaths of more than 70,000 people a year since 2021.

And, on August 29, 2021, Biden approved a drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan, killing 10 innocent people, including seven children.

Does the left really want to see Barack Obama or Joe Biden on trial for murder or being an accessory to murder?

Does the left really want to see Biden extradited to the Hague to face trial?

The left bemoans the most recent decision of the Supreme Court, granting partial immunity to presidents for official acts. But the left does not understand that the Supreme Court saved the legacies of both Biden and Obama.

I promise you, the left wang media would say "thats different" when applied to democRATs.

Quote from: Lokmar on July 08, 2024, 11:57:29 AMI promise you, the left wang media would say "thats different" when applied to democRATs.

They would, but the Supreme Court did Democrat presidents a favor too.

Quote from: Thiel on July 08, 2024, 01:15:24 PMThey would, but the Supreme Court did Democrat presidents a favor too.

In the werdz of the democRATs: "THATS DIFFERENT!"