THeBlueCashew

That's a win for the Republicans. Vance: 1 Walz: 0

Thanks Joe...  :read:

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 01:55:28 AM

Vance did what he wanted to do at the debate.

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 08:20:08 AMVance did what he wanted to do at the debate.

I laughed at the commentator's words, "Vance looked presidential, while Walz looked like a deer in headlights."

He was spot-on! Lol

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 08:29:45 AMI laughed at the commentator's words, "Vance looked presidential, while Walz looked like a deer in headlights."

He was spot-on! Lol

That describes exactly the performances of Walz and Vance.

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 08:32:04 AMThat describes exactly the performances of Walz and Vance.

And yet...

Vance still has difficulty connecting with people  DKG DKG

Even his own party doesn't like him

Vance is a bright man but he is too remote

Quote from: JOE on October 06, 2024, 08:41:40 AMAnd yet...

Vance still has difficulty connecting with people  DKG DKG

Even his own party doesn't like him

Vance is a bright man but he is too remote

Stop talking shit Joe! Haven't you got some gold bars in the making?

Hey seventy year old boring troll, I told you to ignore my posts.

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 08:45:58 AMStop talking shit Joe! Haven't you got some gold bars in the making?

Precisely. He has his attention seeking threads. But, he wants to troll our discussions.

Forums have evolved, but he cannot. Even Dilf stuck to his own threads, but Joe doesn't.

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 08:45:58 AMStop talking shit Joe! Haven't you got some gold bars in the making?

 :crampe:

Here's how the Economist publication summarizes the election Lab Flaker Lab Flaker:

(https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=834,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20241005_USD001.jpg)

Crypto Bros vs Childless Cat Ladies

There we are. Joe is just going to keep trolling our threads because he is seventy and thinks it is still 2006.

I wish we had an ignore feature. Everybody except Thiel would have Joe on ignore.

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 09:07:11 AMThere we are. Joe is just going to keep trolling our threads because he is seventy and thinks it is still 2006.

I wish we had an ignore feature. Everybody except Thiel would have Joe on ignore.

Joe still doesn't realise that Vance won the debate and his popularity has surged. He's going to be unbearable when Trump wins the election and makes America great again. Lol

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 09:11:57 AMJoe still doesn't realise that Vance won the debate and his popularity has surged. He's going to be unbearable when Trump wins the election and makes America great again. Lol

He doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now. Besides, we don't have an ignore function.

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 09:42:56 AMHe doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now. Besides, we don't have an ignore function.

We do have an ignore function

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 06, 2024, 10:00:50 AMWe do have an ignore function

Can you post a screenshot?

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 10:02:13 AMCan you post a screenshot?

Go into your profile ---> forum profile and click on "buddy/ignore list" and choose "edit ignore list" and then type the member name into the field provided

(https://thebluecashew.net/gallery/3214_06_10_24_10_07_31.jpeg)

Quote from: Lab Flaker on October 06, 2024, 09:11:57 AMJoe still doesn't realise that Vance won the debate and his popularity has surged. He's going to be unbearable when Trump wins the election and makes America great again. Lol

According to this poll Vance has a favorable rating of 35% and an unfavorable rating of 45%:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/jd-vance/

...but as you've indicated his favorable rating has increased since the debate Lab Flaker Lab Flaker

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 09:42:56 AMHe doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now. Besides, we don't have an ignore function.

Ya know DKG DKG, in a way that's true.

As a Canadian who can't contribute financially to either party or can't vote I try to remain neutral/impartial when analyzing their political situation.

As I stated earlier I thought Vance won the debate but not overwhelmingly. And the debate registered more like a discussion of America's problems than a fight where either running mate avoided making personal attacks on each other.

Anyway as a financial analyst I hope you try to remain neutral as the election outcome has a bearing on investments & the economy no matter who wins.

That's the way I look at it DKG. I'm interested in pouring some money into the markets but I'm currently sitting on the sidelines waiting until after the US elections.

2025 is a better year to invest because it will give a better indication where the economy and the markets are headed eh DKG?

Quote from: DKG on October 06, 2024, 09:42:56 AMHe doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now.

One hundred percent.

Here's how typical voters saw the debate:

https://www.formstack.com/admin/submission/report/49506547?share=BKhSZcZmic&view=charts

Most thought Vance won but still a large number thought Walz did.

Even if Vance won, Walz was up against someone perhaps way out of his league in the debating arena. But he held his own reasonably well considering. He was somewhat respectable. At least he didn't look like Sarah Palin and engage in complete buffoonery

Vance is a seasoned lawyer with a degree from Yale & was editor of their law review. So...even another lawyer would have a challenge debating Vance.

Quote from: JOE on October 06, 2024, 03:19:04 PMHere's how typical voters saw the debate:

https://www.formstack.com/admin/submission/report/49506547?share=BKhSZcZmic&view=charts

Most thought Vance won but still a large number thought Walz did.

Even if Vance won, Walz was up against someone perhaps way out of his league in the debating arena. But he held his own reasonably well considering. He was somewhat respectable. At least he didn't look like Sarah Palin and engage in complete buffoonery

Vance is a seasoned lawyer with a degree from Yale & was editor of their law review. So...even another lawyer would have a challenge debating Vance.

Jo Jo, you like JD Vance's full head of hair.

Tim Walz will never become the Democrat party nominee if Harris wins or loses. JD Vance stands a very good chance of becoming president before the next election in 2028 if Trump wins.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 06, 2024, 10:10:04 AMGo into your profile ---> forum profile and click on "buddy/ignore list" and choose "edit ignore list" and then type the member name into the field provided

(https://thebluecashew.net/gallery/3214_06_10_24_10_07_31.jpeg)

I got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention. :drunk2:

Quote from: Herman on October 06, 2024, 08:57:26 PMI got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention. :drunk2:

Now that Biggie showed me how to do it, Joe is on ignore. I suggest everybody do the same.

Quote from: Herman on October 06, 2024, 08:57:26 PMI got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention. :drunk2:

1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

Quote from: JOE on October 07, 2024, 01:19:43 PM1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

Correction.

Harris + 2 biased Moderators succeeded in needling Trump

that's not a ""win"" -- that is a childish gimmick and demonstrative of a desperate campaign.

She will not be afforded such a ""win"" on the world stage with foreign leaders, many of whom, are adversaries

Look at Joe desperately trying to get DKG to take his boring troll bait. How pathetic.

Quote from: JOE on October 07, 2024, 01:19:43 PM1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

Sugarbunz, you know DKG did not agree or disagree with you about the debate between Trump and Harris.

Unlike me, he does not enjoy your trolling. He does not find you cute like I do. If only you would post a picture of your adorable little bald spot, people would appreciate your trolling.