THeBlueCashew

General Discussion => The Flea Trap => Topic started by: RW on April 20, 2015, 07:31:24 AM

Title: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 07:31:24 AM
It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: keeper on April 20, 2015, 07:55:53 AM
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

im game  ac_drinks
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 08:47:02 AM
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

It would be fun RW.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 20, 2015, 09:41:24 AM
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?


Yes....yes you are. ac_biggrin



But your idea sounds like it might be interesting.  ac_umm
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: keeper on April 20, 2015, 05:20:18 PM
So how do we start?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 07:30:14 PM
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Problem with any issue is most minds are made up long before opening arguments are presented.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 07:31:15 PM
Yes but it would be interesting to see how the "jury" feels on a very specific issue.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 07:35:51 PM
Quote from: "RW"Yes but it would be interesting to see how the "jury" feels on a very specific issue.

It's not a bad idea. I think we all know where most of us stand on most issues. There is the occasional surprise, but we've known each others views for quite some time now.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Frost on April 20, 2015, 07:41:34 PM
Do we vote the looser off the island in a cardboard box ?  ac_toofunny
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 07:48:16 PM
Quote from: "Frost"Do we vote the looser off the island in a cardboard box ?  ac_toofunny

Depends who the loser is Frosty.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Frost on April 20, 2015, 07:51:49 PM
Well being a court someone needs punishment.

Shen, how about if you get to punish them, would that be good  ac_biggrin
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Annie on April 20, 2015, 07:53:35 PM
And for extra added punishment, they don't get an invite to any naked hot tubs!   ac_biggrin
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Frost on April 20, 2015, 07:56:12 PM
Hey, my doctor says I need a good hot tub, Ill get a note so I can be exempt from that punishment  ac_dance
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 07:58:53 PM
Quote from: "Frost"Well being a court someone needs punishment.

Shen, how about if you get to punish them, would that be good  ac_biggrin

Who wants discipline? ac_beating
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Frost on April 20, 2015, 08:01:02 PM
My guess most of us might not turn any down. Don't spoil Keeper with it. ac_toofunny
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 08:05:50 PM
Quote from: "Frost"My guess most of us might not turn any down. Don't spoil Keeper with it. ac_toofunny

I'll save it for his next naked hot tub party. ac_dance
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 20, 2015, 10:00:53 PM
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Legal nerdiness is good. How about a topic?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 10:04:06 PM
Quote from: "easter bunny"
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Legal nerdiness is good. How about a topic?

Since it is the day some people celebrate marijuana usage, may I suggest legalization?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 20, 2015, 10:26:54 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "easter bunny"
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Legal nerdiness is good. How about a topic?

Since it is the day some people celebrate marijuana usage, may I suggest legalization?

I've always believed that the more you tell rebellious kids that something is forbidden the more they will want to do it, so when it comes to drugs I favor legalization along with education.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 10:33:05 PM
Quote from: "easter bunny"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "easter bunny"
Legal nerdiness is good. How about a topic?

Since it is the day some people celebrate marijuana usage, may I suggest legalization?

I've always believed that the more you tell rebellious kids that something is forbidden the more they will want to do it, so when it comes to drugs I favor legalization along with education.

I cannot seem to get past that people are killing brain cells..



My preference would be to see alcohol taxed more punitively and regulated much more than it is now..



I know I am most likely the only one here who feels this way though easter bunny.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 20, 2015, 11:03:11 PM
I think drug and alcohol abuse are just symptoms of a much bigger problem. We need to focus on the cause more. The symptoms will take care of themselves.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 11:07:29 PM
Quote from: "easter bunny"I think drug and alcohol abuse are just symptoms of a much bigger problem. We need to focus on the cause more. The symptoms will take care of themselves.

I have met people in my church that have taken drugs or abused alcohol in their lives..



Most of the ones that we have talked to said any other problems took care of themselves when they stopped drinking and substance abuse.

 ac_dunno
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 11:11:12 PM
So what I was thinking is the presentation of a scenario.  Two people debate the issue and after say 3 posts, we decide which argument is the most compelling.  I will provide a scenario for consideration (it doesn't have to be real):



You die.  You are reincarnated as a newborn child but you have retained all of your memories and knowledge from your previous (current) life.  In your life, you had a spouse and kids, friends, family.



Do you:



a) Stay with your new family and start a new life from scratch reaping all the benefits of your existing knowledge



or



b) Seek out your spouse, children and family, explain what has happened and try to be a part of your previous life




Who wants to argue a and who wants to argue b?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 20, 2015, 11:20:18 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "easter bunny"I think drug and alcohol abuse are just symptoms of a much bigger problem. We need to focus on the cause more. The symptoms will take care of themselves.

I have met people in my church that have taken drugs or abused alcohol in their lives..



Most of the ones that we have talked to said any other problems took care of themselves when they stopped drinking and substance abuse.

 ac_dunno

Most of the people I know of who drank or did drugs were self medicating.  ac_dunno
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 11:21:52 PM
Quote from: "RW"So what I was thinking is the presentation of a scenario.  Two people debate the issue and after say 3 posts, we decide which argument is the most compelling.  I will provide a scenario for consideration (it doesn't have to be real):



You die.  You are reincarnated as a newborn child but you have retained all of your memories and knowledge from your previous (current) life.  In your life, you had a husband and kids, friends, family.



Do you:



a) Stay with your new family and start a new life from scratch reaping all the benefits of your existing knowledge



or



b) Seek out your spouse, children and family, explain what has happened and try to be a part of your previous life




Who wants to argue a and who wants to argue b?

Since I do not believe in reincarnation, I cannot argue for either side RW.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 20, 2015, 11:29:09 PM
Quote from: "RW"So what I was thinking is the presentation of a scenario.  Two people debate the issue and after say 3 posts, we decide which argument is the most compelling.  I will provide a scenario for consideration (it doesn't have to be real):



You die.  You are reincarnated as a newborn child but you have retained all of your memories and knowledge from your previous (current) life.  In your life, you had a husband and kids, friends, family.



Do you:



a) Stay with your new family and start a new life from scratch reaping all the benefits of your existing knowledge



or



b) Seek out your spouse, children and family, explain what has happened and try to be a part of your previous life




Who wants to argue a and who wants to argue b?

There would have to be a very compelling reason to leave my new family and mess around with destiny. I'd be inclined to think it was meant to be so, and then try to figure out what I'm supposed to do with my knowledge. So my choice would be a.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 11:32:28 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "RW"So what I was thinking is the presentation of a scenario.  Two people debate the issue and after say 3 posts, we decide which argument is the most compelling.  I will provide a scenario for consideration (it doesn't have to be real):



You die.  You are reincarnated as a newborn child but you have retained all of your memories and knowledge from your previous (current) life.  In your life, you had a husband and kids, friends, family.



Do you:



a) Stay with your new family and start a new life from scratch reaping all the benefits of your existing knowledge



or



b) Seek out your spouse, children and family, explain what has happened and try to be a part of your previous life




Who wants to argue a and who wants to argue b?

Since I do not believe in reincarnation, I cannot argue for either side RW.

You need to think of it on a moral level.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 11:49:04 PM
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "RW"So what I was thinking is the presentation of a scenario.  Two people debate the issue and after say 3 posts, we decide which argument is the most compelling.  I will provide a scenario for consideration (it doesn't have to be real):



You die.  You are reincarnated as a newborn child but you have retained all of your memories and knowledge from your previous (current) life.  In your life, you had a husband and kids, friends, family.



Do you:



a) Stay with your new family and start a new life from scratch reaping all the benefits of your existing knowledge



or



b) Seek out your spouse, children and family, explain what has happened and try to be a part of your previous life




Who wants to argue a and who wants to argue b?

Since I do not believe in reincarnation, I cannot argue for either side RW.

You need to think of it on a moral level.

Sorry, but I cannot ground morality in a secular way..



This is a very interesting choice though RW.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 11:51:24 PM
Sorry, I meant philosophical more than moral.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 20, 2015, 11:54:34 PM
I'll argue b for example.



I would seek out my family, if nothing more than to inform my husband I still exist.  If we could do nothing by communicate via electronic means, I would accept that fate.  Same with my children.  I would contact my original parents and siblings as well.  My relationship with them would be less complicated as I knew them since I was a child.  I think it would give my loved ones peace to know I still live in their world.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 20, 2015, 11:56:49 PM
Quote from: "RW"Sorry, I meant philosophical more than moral.

Then I too would choose a RW..



You were placed in a new life and you cannot go back home again..



All memories have passed and your family has grieved your loss.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Annie on April 20, 2015, 11:59:47 PM
I agree Fash, alcohol should be monitored more. It's more dangerous than marijuana.  Although I don't think people should operate equipment or drive while stoned either.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 21, 2015, 12:13:02 AM
Quote from: "RW"I'll argue b for example.



I would seek out my family, if nothing more than to inform my husband I still exist.  If we could do nothing by communicate via electronic means, I would accept that fate.  Same with my children.  I would contact my original parents and siblings as well.  My relationship with them would be less complicated as I knew them since I was a child. I think it would give my loved ones peace to know I still live in their world.

It would be greatly comforting for them. I'm not sure what I would do. I think I would just let my conscience guide me. Maybe trying to strike a balance that would work for everyone would be the best way to go.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 21, 2015, 12:18:20 AM
Quote from: "Annie"I agree Fash, alcohol should be monitored more. It's more dangerous than marijuana.  Although I don't think people should operate equipment or drive while stoned either.

I would hope they don't Annie.

 ac_wot
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 21, 2015, 12:20:04 AM
Quote from: "RW"I'll argue b for example.



I would seek out my family, if nothing more than to inform my husband I still exist.  If we could do nothing by communicate via electronic means, I would accept that fate.  Same with my children.  I would contact my original parents and siblings as well.  My relationship with them would be less complicated as I knew them since I was a child.  I think it would give my loved ones peace to know I still live in their world.

Or it might complicate their lives if they have accepted the loss and moved on.

 ac_umm
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 21, 2015, 03:04:50 AM
Honestly I think the only choice is "A". After being reborn; by the time you are old enough to make contact with your previous family you are probably already attached and part of your new family. At that point why would you go through the effort and emotional pain of contacting a bunch of people who in all likelihood would be very troubled at your entry into their lives. Your previous family probably wouldn't believe you and would think of your story as a cruel prank. There is a high probability your previous family would think of you as a disturbed stalker. Who needs that noise?



Besides IMHO, the purpose of reincarnation (if it exists) is to move on through a new life experience and not to dwell in the past. The past is over and done, leave it where it belongs.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 21, 2015, 11:00:39 AM
Quote from: "Renee"Honestly I think the only choice is "A". After being reborn; by the time you are old enough to make contact with your previous family you are probably already attached and part of your new family. At that point why would you go through the effort and emotional pain of contacting a bunch of people who in all likelihood would be very troubled at your entry into their lives. Your previous family probably wouldn't believe you and would think of your story as a cruel prank. There is a high probability your previous family would think of you as a disturbed stalker. Who needs that noise?



Besides IMHO, the purpose of reincarnation (if it exists) is to move on through a new life experience and not to dwell in the past. The past is over and done, leave it where it belongs.

You stole my answer Renee. By the time a baby is old enough to find them, I would assume she has the same attachment to her new home. Her former husband could be married if he's still alive. Nothing good good come out of the second one.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 21, 2015, 11:10:19 AM
What about family - parents/siblings, etc?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 21, 2015, 11:41:20 AM
Quote from: "RW"What about family - parents/siblings, etc?

They have buried their daughter/sister. Do they really want to dig her up?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 22, 2015, 03:05:37 AM
Quote from: "easter bunny"Most of the people I know of who drank or did drugs were self medicating.  ac_dunno

They were self-medicating a genetic predisposition for substance abuse.



Contrary to "old school" thought, people are genetically wired to abstain, to use, or to abuse.



We try to find a "fix" with meds, but current meds don't work.  They cannot "re-wire" a brain.  They cannot "fix" personality flaws.



Substance abuse isn't typically the outcome of a terrible environment.  It is the outcome of shitty genes.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 22, 2015, 03:40:57 AM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "easter bunny"Most of the people I know of who drank or did drugs were self medicating.  ac_dunno

They were self-medicating a genetic predisposition for substance abuse.



Contrary to "old school" thought, people are genetically wired to abstain, to use, or to abuse.



We try to find a "fix" with meds, but current meds don't work.  They cannot "re-wire" a brain.  They cannot "fix" personality flaws.



Substance abuse isn't typically the outcome of a terrible environment.  It is the outcome of shitty genes.

I have heard genes influence whether one is more likely to abuse substances Mel Gibson.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 22, 2015, 03:48:06 AM
It is true.  Newer pharmaceuticals are trying to address this, but they simply just block the receptors.  IE, you can drink, but you don't get "drunk," per se...



Newer drugs are showing some promise, especially in Europe.  However, it is still a band-aid fix.



We need to find a way to re-wire the brain.  I know some may equate this as doing "God's Work," but the fact is that Meds cannot cure what ails society.  Understand that killers, rapists, drunks, drug addicts, etc. are no different from each other...  Their brain simply doesn't work properly.  Of course, this is a wide spectrum to incorporate, but nonetheless the answer is the same...  They all do what they do, not because of how they were raised, but moreso are simply genetically predisposed to do so...  A faulty brain.  Or, at least faulty when compared to societal norms and expectations!
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 23, 2015, 01:39:06 AM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "easter bunny"Most of the people I know of who drank or did drugs were self medicating.  ac_dunno

They were self-medicating a genetic predisposition for substance abuse.



Contrary to "old school" thought, people are genetically wired to abstain, to use, or to abuse.



We try to find a "fix" with meds, but current meds don't work.  They cannot "re-wire" a brain.  They cannot "fix" personality flaws.



Substance abuse isn't typically the outcome of a terrible environment.  It is the outcome of shitty genes.

Sorry but I don't buy that. I'm living proof that it's BS.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 23, 2015, 01:41:35 AM
They say alcoholism is genetic.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 23, 2015, 01:54:14 AM
Quote from: "RW"They say alcoholism is genetic.

I'd better start drinking then.  ac_wot
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 23, 2015, 01:59:48 AM
No everyone has the gene eh?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: easter bunny on April 23, 2015, 02:05:54 AM
I think most people self-medicate to deal with anxiety and/or depression. If you take those away then you're just left with the addiction.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2015, 03:41:28 AM
Quote from: "RW"They say alcoholism is genetic.

Some people should avoid alcoholic beverages more than others.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 23, 2015, 03:50:32 AM
Only about 40-50% of people with addiction issues have the gene that puts them at risk for substance abuse and even if they do, environmental factors still play a huge part. People using genetics as an excuse to get fucked up are just avoiding personal responsibility. Sorry Mel, but that is the simple truth.

Unfortunately many of us are looking for some kind of crutch to enable our inner demons. One of the unfortunate personal and social side effects of our mapping of the human genome has been the convenient excuse that genetics can now be used to explain many of our personal character flaws. While it is true that genetics does provide the frame work for many of our bad habits it is only one piece of the puzzle. As with everything in life it is our acceptance of personal responsibility that truly controls our behavior and the life decisions that we make.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 23, 2015, 03:56:45 AM
Quote from: "Renee"Only about 40-50% of people with addiction issues have the gene that puts them at risk for substance abuse and even if they do, environmental factors still play a huge part. People using genetics as an excuse to get fucked up are just avoiding personal responsibility. Sorry Mel, but that is the simple truth.

Unfortunately many of us are looking for some kind of crutch to enable our inner demons. One of the unfortunate personal and social side effects of our mapping of the human genome has been the convenient excuse that genetics can now be used to explain many of our personal character flaws. While it is true that genetics does provide the frame work for many of our bad habits it is only one piece of the puzzle. As with everything in life it is our acceptance of personal responsibility that truly controls our behavior and the life decisions that we make.

Renee, if one knows that genetically they are more likely to have a problem with alcohol, don't you think those individuals should avoid it more than people that do not.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 23, 2015, 06:45:44 AM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Renee"Only about 40-50% of people with addiction issues have the gene that puts them at risk for substance abuse and even if they do, environmental factors still play a huge part. People using genetics as an excuse to get fucked up are just avoiding personal responsibility. Sorry Mel, but that is the simple truth.

Unfortunately many of us are looking for some kind of crutch to enable our inner demons. One of the unfortunate personal and social side effects of our mapping of the human genome has been the convenient excuse that genetics can now be used to explain many of our personal character flaws. While it is true that genetics does provide the frame work for many of our bad habits it is only one piece of the puzzle. As with everything in life it is our acceptance of personal responsibility that truly controls our behavior and the life decisions that we make.

Renee, if one knows that genetically they are more likely to have a problem with alcohol, don't you think those individuals should avoid it more than people that do not.


I say it depends on the individual. For those that cannot control themselves and limit their alcohol intake, it's probably a good idea to stay away from the booze. But when are we as human beings ever been good at doing what is good for us? In general we are a pretty self-destructive lot....... And I say that in all honesty as contemplate shoving another heart attack sized cheeseburger down my throat.  ac_dunno
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: keeper on April 23, 2015, 04:06:55 PM
Quote from: "RW"They say alcoholism is genetic.


100% agree RW, im over 10 years sober.  ac_cool
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on April 23, 2015, 08:50:21 PM
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Problem with any issue is most minds are made up long before opening arguments are presented.

Exactly. Someone like me for instance already has my mind made up.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 01:10:16 PM
Quote from: "Azhya Aryola"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "RW"It would be cool, IMHO, to have a thread or section where you have a couple posts each to present an argument and folks vote like a jury.  



Am I too legally nerdy or could this be fun?

Problem with any issue is most minds are made up long before opening arguments are presented.

Exactly. Someone like me for instance already has my mind made up.

I'm the same way on most issues/topics/questions.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:21:14 PM
Quote from: "RW"They say alcoholism is genetic.

It is.



My family is a good example of this.  It can be traced through the generations as far back as anyone can remember.



Many people that start drinking can stop after a few.  We cannot, unfortunately.



There has never been an issue with any drugs, either legal or illegal.  Just alcohol.  Somehow the brain in certain individuals like it.



This is not due to environmental issues (i.e. childhood).  It is simply how the brain is wired.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:25:13 PM
Most psychiatrists are starting to see that environment doesn't really play as much of a role as they once thought...



This is the same reason why gays are gay, why pedophiles will always be pedophiles, why serial killers will always kill, etc.  These aren't "learned" behaviours...  These are genetic predispositions, and are essentially impossible to "fix."



Sure, environment can contribute, but I don't believe it contributes as much as many people think...
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 01:25:56 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "RW"They say alcoholism is genetic.

It is.



My family is a good example of this.  It can be traced through the generations as far back as anyone can remember.



Many people that start drinking can stop after a few.  We cannot, unfortunately.



There has never been an issue with any drugs, either legal or illegal.  Just alcohol.  Somehow the brain in certain individuals like it.



This is not due to environmental issues (i.e. childhood).  It is simply how the brain is wired.

I do not doubt that some people are genetically weaker when it comes to drinking responsibly. However, the people that abuse it that I know all too often have negative lifestyle issues.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:27:08 PM
Quote from: "Shen Li"I do not doubt that some people are genetically weaker when it comes to drinking responsibly. However, the people that abuse it that I know all too often have negative lifestyle issues.


Their negative lifestyle issues are more likely to be created by their excessive drinking, than some childhood "trauma."
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 01:29:34 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "Shen Li"I do not doubt that some people are genetically weaker when it comes to drinking responsibly. However, the people that abuse it that I know all too often have negative lifestyle issues.


Their negative lifestyle issues are more likely to be created by their excessive drinking, than some childhood "trauma."
is

This a chicken and egg argument. I have never studied causation and frankly I don't care. What I am saying is that with very few exceptions, the people that I have seen who abuse alcohol have lifestyles conducive to their self-destruction.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:33:09 PM
That is quite often the end result of excessive substance abuse.



Some can "manage" better than others, or for longer than others, but I can guarantee you this...  These people will have family members that are, or were, in the same boat.



In fact, I am willing to bet my life savings on this fact.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:36:34 PM
One of the biggest untruths that we have been led to believe, is that "all people are created equal."  This is pure and utter bullshit.  Anyone with a brain can see that this is untrue.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 01:41:59 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"One of the biggest untruths that we have been led to believe, is that "all people are created equal."  This is pure and utter bullshit.  Anyone with a brain can see that this is untrue.

Well duh, obviously. This is why universal suffrage is such an archaic ideal.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 01:48:21 PM
We all know that some people are just plain dumber than others...  ac_biggrin



On an alcohol related topic, you Asians may be lucky, since many of you cannot really drink like the other races can to begin with, due to genetics... And since the mutation is a genetic issue, there is no cure for this alcohol "flush reaction."
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 02:15:48 PM
Most people that "abuse" substances have a genetic predisposition to do as such.



For example, I will not consume alcohol at all before dinner, and stay away from hard alcohol.  In fact, I typically don't even stock hard alcohol, unless a guest may desire some.  The reason being, once I start to drink, it is difficult to stop.



The brain likes it so much, that it is actually quite uncomfortable to have a few, and then stop.  Many people do not have this issue.  It is not an issue of "willpower," per se.  The brain reacts differently to alcohol, gaining much more pleasure from it, it seems.  It also reacts differently when alcohol is no longer consumed.  It is hard to explain, but it is actually uncomfortable to just stop.



Hence, my rule that I implemented long ago.  Those that can drink a couple socially, I congratulate you for having the ability to do so.  For those, it may be hard to understand why some people that start drinking, will continue to do so, often until passing out.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 02:28:39 PM
I have no doubt that these genes play a role in other addictions as well...  Excessive gambling, excessive eating, excessive drug use, etc.  I believe they are all closely related.



To an obese person, to just "stop eating" may have a similar result as telling a boozer to just "stop drinking" or the gambler to just "stop gambling."
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 02:34:03 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"We all know that some people are just plain dumber than others...  ac_biggrin



On an alcohol related topic, you Asians may be lucky, since many of you cannot really drink like the other races can to begin with, due to genetics... And since the mutation is a genetic issue, there is no cure for this alcohol "flush reaction."

Do other races get flush or is only East Asians?



Sorry for my ignorance.

 ac_blush
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 02:39:33 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"I have no doubt that these genes play a role in other addictions as well...  Excessive gambling, excessive eating, excessive drug use, etc.  I believe they are all closely related.



To an obese person, to just "stop eating" may have a similar result as telling a boozer to just "stop drinking" or the gambler to just "stop gambling."


Genetics does not force the alcohol or the food into your body, Mel.



A genetic predisposition makes it easier for an individual to become addicted but the actual act of facilitating the addiction starts with a conscience decision to drink, take drugs, or over eat. Genetics is only one part of the problem and it's actually a secondary problem. How a person responds to his or her environment and emotions are the main catalyst factors. If genetics was the main determining factor in addiction then getting sober, becoming drug free or losing weight would be all but impossible. Since we both know that's bullshit it kinda makes your argument bullshit as well.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 02:49:52 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"Do other races get flush or is only East Asians?



Sorry for my ignorance.

 ac_blush

Seems to have originated with the Han Chinese, so it would have started with that particular race, and then passed on genetically to their offspring.  So, I suppose it wouldn't be impossible to find this in non-Asians, but realistically it is an Asian genetic mutation, for all intents and purposes...
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 02:55:35 PM
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"I have no doubt that these genes play a role in other addictions as well...  Excessive gambling, excessive eating, excessive drug use, etc.  I believe they are all closely related.



To an obese person, to just "stop eating" may have a similar result as telling a boozer to just "stop drinking" or the gambler to just "stop gambling."


Genetics does not force the alcohol or the food into your body, Mel.



A genetic predisposition makes it easier for an individual to become addicted but the actual act of facilitating the addiction starts with a conscience decision to drink, take drugs, or over eat. Genetics is only one part of the problem and it's actually a secondary problem. How a person responds to his or her environment and emotions are the main catalyst factors. If genetics was the main determining factor in addiction then getting sober, becoming drug free or losing weight would be all but impossible. Since we both know that's bullshit it kinda makes your argument bullshit as well.

I don't doubt anything in your post Renee..



But I still think some of what Mel Gibson has said is true..



If a person  knows that alcoholism runs in their family would it not be wise to avoid alcohol entirely?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 02:57:03 PM
Quote from: "Renee"A genetic predisposition makes it easier for an individual to become addicted but the actual act of facilitating the addiction starts with a conscience decision to drink, take drugs, or over eat. Genetics is only one part of the problem and it's actually a secondary problem. How a person responds to his or her environment and emotions are the main catalyst factors. If genetics was the main determining factor in addiction then getting sober, becoming drug free or losing weight would be all but impossible. Since we both know that's bullshit it kinda makes your argument bullshit as well.

Here is where I disagree.  People don't "become" addicted.  These people are addicted, per se, from birth.



Again, I believe genetics plays more of a factor than environment, and many Shrinks are now starting to accept this fact as well...



And for many, becoming drug free, or losing weight, is all but impossible.  We may see some success stories, but for those, there are many more failures.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2015, 03:02:01 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "Renee"A genetic predisposition makes it easier for an individual to become addicted but the actual act of facilitating the addiction starts with a conscience decision to drink, take drugs, or over eat. Genetics is only one part of the problem and it's actually a secondary problem. How a person responds to his or her environment and emotions are the main catalyst factors. If genetics was the main determining factor in addiction then getting sober, becoming drug free or losing weight would be all but impossible. Since we both know that's bullshit it kinda makes your argument bullshit as well.

Here is where I disagree.  People don't "become" addicted.  These people are addicted, per se, from birth.



Again, I believe genetics plays more of a factor than environment, and many Shrinks are now starting to accept this fact as well...



And for many, becoming drug free, or losing weight, is all but impossible.  We may see some success stories, but for those, there are many more failures.

I feel you are right Mel Gibson, but so is Renee.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 03:03:00 PM
The problem is, current limits with Psychology...  We try to modify behaviour, but this often cannot be done.  A serial killer does not like to spend life in solitary confinement once caught, but he must be there since his behaviour cannot be stopped.  This is a similar.



We cannot "fix" his behaviour.  This is where Psychology is limited.  Ideally, we would want to "fix" his genetic profile, so that he no longer desires to kill.  Kind of a strange example, but nonetheless it is relevant...
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 03:15:16 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "Renee"A genetic predisposition makes it easier for an individual to become addicted but the actual act of facilitating the addiction starts with a conscience decision to drink, take drugs, or over eat. Genetics is only one part of the problem and it's actually a secondary problem. How a person responds to his or her environment and emotions are the main catalyst factors. If genetics was the main determining factor in addiction then getting sober, becoming drug free or losing weight would be all but impossible. Since we both know that's bullshit it kinda makes your argument bullshit as well.

Here is where I disagree.  People don't "become" addicted.  These people are addicted, per se, from birth.



Again, I believe genetics plays more of a factor than environment, and many Shrinks are now starting to accept this fact as well...



And for many, becoming drug free, or losing weight, is all but impossible.  We may see some success stories, but for those, there are many more failures.


Many Shrinks might agree with you but I'm pretty sure the majority don't.

In any event most doctors don't see it as you do. Genetics only provides an easier pathway to addiction; the individual still makes the decision to become addicted. Control is up to us and I know this all too well because I as well as many members of may family have a predisposition toward morbid obesity. Those of us who don't want to end up as scooter bound monsters are able to control the situation through making a conscious effort to eat healthily, limit our caloric intake and exercise on a daily basis. Granted it probably takes more willpower to do so than the average but it can be done despite our genetics.



Genetics is used all too often as a convenient excuse to not make positive changes in your life. Self-improvement takes work; sometimes A LOT of work, it doesn't happen by itself.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 03:26:15 PM
Look into the "Minnesota Twin Study."



Very interesting study.



The Shrinks that disagreed, and even others that agreed with it, have a vested interest to sweep it under the rug.  The reason being?  They have a vested interest in a roster of current and new clients.  It pays their bills.



No conspiracy.  Simply put, Shrinks really don't want the public to know how limited their abilities really are.  They earn money 'fixing' people.  The truth is, many people cannot be 'fixed.'



This study shows that environment isn't as important as genetics are in determining what people 'become.'
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 03:28:17 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"Look into the "Minnesota Twin Study."



Very interesting study.



The Shrinks that disagreed, and even others that agreed with it, have a vested interest to sweep it under the rug.  The reason being?  They have a vested interest in a roster of current and new clients.  It pays their bills.



No conspiracy.  Simply put, Shrinks really don't want the public to know how limited their abilities really are.  They earn money 'fixing' people.  The truth is, many people cannot be 'fixed.'


Sounds like you are about ready for a membership in the Church of Scientology.  ac_toofunny



The truth of the matter is we are never going to agree on this because our real world experiences are completely different and our out looks on life are polar opposites. You're looking for a reason to throw in the towel and I'm still in the ring slugging it out.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 03:29:34 PM
Quote from: "Renee"Sounds like you are about ready for a membership in the Church of Scientology.  ac_toofunny

Read the study.  It wasn't some fly-by-night study.  It was conducted over many years.  Have you even heard of it?  It is well known in Shrink circles.



And I'm an Atheist.  No religions or cults for me!
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 03:49:03 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"
Quote from: "Renee"Sounds like you are about ready for a membership in the Church of Scientology.  ac_toofunny

Read the study.  It wasn't some fly-by-night study.  It was conducted over many years.  Have you even heard of it?  It is well known in Shrink circles.



And I'm an Atheist.  No religions or cults for me!


I've seen the study it's been around a long time and as it applies to addiction, it is flawed. In no was shape or form does genetics create a situation where the individual has NO choice but to become an addict. Sorry, that argument is ludicrous.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 04:08:27 PM
I've never said there isn't a choice, ultimately.  The debate here at this point is what is genetic, and what is environmental.  There is a big difference...
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 04:24:51 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"I've never said there isn't a choice, ultimately.  The debate here at this point is what is genetic, and what is environmental.  There is a big difference...


Sure there is a difference but which one is the determining factor in addiction. You seem to think genetics has destined you to be a raging drunk. I say that's a steaming pile.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Mel Gibson on April 24, 2015, 04:28:48 PM
This discussion is certainly not about me.  It is all-encompassing...
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 24, 2015, 04:40:22 PM
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"This discussion is certainly not about me.  It is all-encompassing...


Even so it still applies.
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2015, 03:07:58 AM
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "Mel Gibson"I've never said there isn't a choice, ultimately.  The debate here at this point is what is genetic, and what is environmental.  There is a big difference...


Sure there is a difference but which one is the determining factor in addiction. You seem to think genetics has destined you to be a raging drunk. I say that's a steaming pile.

I agree, but isn't a possible with someone with alcoholic genes should avoid all alcohol?
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: RW on April 25, 2015, 04:33:25 AM
Is this hair awesome or not?



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-co%20...%204__605.jpg%22%3Ehttp://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: keeper on April 25, 2015, 04:35:39 AM
ac_toofunny holy shit
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Renee on April 25, 2015, 04:55:33 AM
Quote from: "RW"Is this hair awesome or not?



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-co%20...%204__605.jpg%22%3Ehttp://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)


Stop thread bombing. ac_biggrin
Title: Re: Kangaroo Court
Post by: Anonymous on April 25, 2015, 11:05:22 AM
Quote from: "RW"Is this hair awesome or not?



(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-co%20...%204__605.jpg%22%3Ehttp://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/pastel-hair-trend-4__605.jpg%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)

no comment