THeBlueCashew

General Discussion => The Flea Trap => Topic started by: J0E on August 21, 2015, 02:03:54 PM

Title: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: J0E on August 21, 2015, 02:03:54 PM
Assuming that you are the chief moderator of this forum?



....recently I made a comment about political leadership and its relationship to investments and I was censored for that and my comments removed. Yet the OP of that thread explicitly stated that the election of an NDP government would affect the performance of voters' investments, mutual funds, etc.  I merely remarked how there are other factos and issues which affect voter intention. While financial investments certainly are an important factor, they are not the only one. In addition, by linking the NDP to the outcome of investor fortunes, that it was a somewhat politically loaded thread to begin with.



I do not feel that my remarks an attempt to troll. Rather it's to point out how a leader's ability to appeal and reach out to the voters impacts a party's fortunes and yes, even their financial investments. If for example, Harper was as popular a leader as another conservative, Brad Wall, y'all wouldn't be fretting about your investments so much.



Incidentally, I am not a registered card carrying New Democrat, and at this point am not intending to vote for them in this election. I classify myself as an Independent voter, as I've voted Liberal, Conservative, NDP, independents and for other parties in previous election. I try to support the best man or woman for the job as opposed to label. I ignore the pundits whatever their political persuasion. Ask what will they do for me? What will they do for my community as opposed to a bank or a labor union. Politics of democracy and hope as opposed to fear.



Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could lay out the rules as to waht constitutes trolling and what does not.

If you could define the rules of engagement better to avoid clashing with other members.



I don't intend to disrupt threads. I just say waht I think.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please engage the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 02:12:50 PM
Quote from: "Frank"Assuming that you are the chief moderator of this forum?



....recently I made a comment about political leadership and its relationship to investments and I was censored for that and my comments removed. Yet the OP of that thread explicitly stated that the election of an NDP government would affect the performance of voters' investments, mutual funds, etc.  I merely remarked how there are other factos and issues which affect voter intention. While financial investments certainly are an important factor, they are not the only one. In addition, by linking the NDP to the outcome of investor fortunes, that it was a somewhat politically loaded thread to begin with.



I do not feel that my remarks an attempt to troll. Rather it's to point out how a leader's ability to appeal and reach out to the voters impacts a party's fortunes and yes, even their financial investments. If for example, Harper was as popular a leader as another conservative, Brad Wall, y'all wouldn't be fretting about your investments so much.



Incidentally, I am not a registered card carrying New Democrat, and at this point am not intending to vote for them in this election. I classify myself as an Independent voter, as I've voted Liberal, Conservative, NDP, independents and for other parties in previous election. I try to support the best man or woman for the job as opposed to label. I ignore the pundits whatever their political persuasion. Ask what will they do for me? What will they do for my community as opposed to a bank or a labor union. Politics of democracy and hope as opposed to fear.



Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could lay out the rules as to waht constitutes trolling and what does not.

If you could define the rules of engagement better to avoid clashing with other members.



I don't intend to disrupt threads. I just say waht I think.

Hello Frank, I appreciate your comments..



It seems you would like very clear set in stone rules..



We are not that black and white like Vancouver Forum is..



I thought I was being reasonable when I asked that you that you stick to investing in the investing thread..



My hope is that it becomes a sticky thread like laughter or the pulse..



We don't post anything but jokes and songs there and I do not want anything but investment related posts in investing thread..



I would ask you again to respect my request..



Also, please feel free to post what you are invested in..



We can all learn from each other..



Lastly, I hope you have a lovely weekend.

 ac_smile
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please engage the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 02:20:00 PM
^You're feeding the troll again. He's pulling the same troll thread shit here that he does on the fag forum. You warned him, he defied you, posts a crybaby thread. Fucking sickening. No need to explain anything to shit disturbing trolls.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please engage the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: J0E on August 21, 2015, 02:35:00 PM
Well, I'll do my best.

I don't attempt to attack others or insult them, which I think IS trolling.

I just state an opinion.



Tell you what, I will from now on source my statementsfrom credible sources, recognized publications.

Ie - the Economist, the BBC, or a recognized American news network or publication. Then the merits of whatever I post can be evaluated on fact. Is that a fair deal?



Just because someone disagrees with someone else, or their views run counter to someone else doesn't mean they are trolling.



Anyways, I'd like to read your respnse on that.


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Frank"Assuming that you are the chief moderator of this forum?



....recently I made a comment about political leadership and its relationship to investments and I was censored for that and my comments removed. Yet the OP of that thread explicitly stated that the election of an NDP government would affect the performance of voters' investments, mutual funds, etc.  I merely remarked how there are other factos and issues which affect voter intention. While financial investments certainly are an important factor, they are not the only one. In addition, by linking the NDP to the outcome of investor fortunes, that it was a somewhat politically loaded thread to begin with.



I do not feel that my remarks an attempt to troll. Rather it's to point out how a leader's ability to appeal and reach out to the voters impacts a party's fortunes and yes, even their financial investments. If for example, Harper was as popular a leader as another conservative, Brad Wall, y'all wouldn't be fretting about your investments so much.



Incidentally, I am not a registered card carrying New Democrat, and at this point am not intending to vote for them in this election. I classify myself as an Independent voter, as I've voted Liberal, Conservative, NDP, independents and for other parties in previous election. I try to support the best man or woman for the job as opposed to label. I ignore the pundits whatever their political persuasion. Ask what will they do for me? What will they do for my community as opposed to a bank or a labor union. Politics of democracy and hope as opposed to fear.



Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could lay out the rules as to waht constitutes trolling and what does not.

If you could define the rules of engagement better to avoid clashing with other members.



I don't intend to disrupt threads. I just say waht I think.

Hello Frank, I appreciate your comments..



It seems you would like very clear set in stone rules..



We are not that black and white like Vancouver Forum is..



I thought I was being reasonable when I asked that you that you stick to investing in the investing thread..



My hope is that it becomes a sticky thread like laughter or the pulse..



We don't post anything but jokes and songs there and I do not want anything but investment related posts in investing thread..



I would ask you again to respect my request..



Also, please feel free to post what you are invested in..



We can all learn from each other..



Lastly, I hope you have a lovely weekend.

 ac_smile
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please engage the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 02:40:15 PM
That's all we can ask Frank..



I don't care what anyone posts, but when we start our new stickied investing thread, I ask posters write only investment related posts in that thread..



I don't think I am asking too much from anyone..



You can live with that, can't you Frank?

 ac_smile
Quote from: "Frank"Well, I'll do my best.

I don't attempt to attack others or insult them, which I think IS trolling.

I just state an opinion.



Tell you what, I will from now on source my statementsfrom credible sources, recognized publications.

Ie - the Economist, the BBC, or a recognized American news network or publication. Then the merits of whatever I post can be evaluated on fact. Is that a fair deal?



Just because someone disagrees with someone else, or their views run counter to someone else doesn't mean they are trolling.



Anyways, I'd like to read your respnse on that.


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Frank"Assuming that you are the chief moderator of this forum?



....recently I made a comment about political leadership and its relationship to investments and I was censored for that and my comments removed. Yet the OP of that thread explicitly stated that the election of an NDP government would affect the performance of voters' investments, mutual funds, etc.  I merely remarked how there are other factos and issues which affect voter intention. While financial investments certainly are an important factor, they are not the only one. In addition, by linking the NDP to the outcome of investor fortunes, that it was a somewhat politically loaded thread to begin with.



I do not feel that my remarks an attempt to troll. Rather it's to point out how a leader's ability to appeal and reach out to the voters impacts a party's fortunes and yes, even their financial investments. If for example, Harper was as popular a leader as another conservative, Brad Wall, y'all wouldn't be fretting about your investments so much.



Incidentally, I am not a registered card carrying New Democrat, and at this point am not intending to vote for them in this election. I classify myself as an Independent voter, as I've voted Liberal, Conservative, NDP, independents and for other parties in previous election. I try to support the best man or woman for the job as opposed to label. I ignore the pundits whatever their political persuasion. Ask what will they do for me? What will they do for my community as opposed to a bank or a labor union. Politics of democracy and hope as opposed to fear.



Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could lay out the rules as to waht constitutes trolling and what does not.

If you could define the rules of engagement better to avoid clashing with other members.



I don't intend to disrupt threads. I just say waht I think.

Hello Frank, I appreciate your comments..



It seems you would like very clear set in stone rules..



We are not that black and white like Vancouver Forum is..



I thought I was being reasonable when I asked that you that you stick to investing in the investing thread..



My hope is that it becomes a sticky thread like laughter or the pulse..



We don't post anything but jokes and songs there and I do not want anything but investment related posts in investing thread..



I would ask you again to respect my request..



Also, please feel free to post what you are invested in..



We can all learn from each other..



Lastly, I hope you have a lovely weekend.

 ac_smile
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please engage the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 08:37:41 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Frank"Assuming that you are the chief moderator of this forum?



....recently I made a comment about political leadership and its relationship to investments and I was censored for that and my comments removed. Yet the OP of that thread explicitly stated that the election of an NDP government would affect the performance of voters' investments, mutual funds, etc.  I merely remarked how there are other factos and issues which affect voter intention. While financial investments certainly are an important factor, they are not the only one. In addition, by linking the NDP to the outcome of investor fortunes, that it was a somewhat politically loaded thread to begin with.



I do not feel that my remarks an attempt to troll. Rather it's to point out how a leader's ability to appeal and reach out to the voters impacts a party's fortunes and yes, even their financial investments. If for example, Harper was as popular a leader as another conservative, Brad Wall, y'all wouldn't be fretting about your investments so much.



Incidentally, I am not a registered card carrying New Democrat, and at this point am not intending to vote for them in this election. I classify myself as an Independent voter, as I've voted Liberal, Conservative, NDP, independents and for other parties in previous election. I try to support the best man or woman for the job as opposed to label. I ignore the pundits whatever their political persuasion. Ask what will they do for me? What will they do for my community as opposed to a bank or a labor union. Politics of democracy and hope as opposed to fear.



Anyways, I'd appreciate it if you could lay out the rules as to waht constitutes trolling and what does not.

If you could define the rules of engagement better to avoid clashing with other members.



I don't intend to disrupt threads. I just say waht I think.

Hello Frank, I appreciate your comments..



It seems you would like very clear set in stone rules..



We are not that black and white like Vancouver Forum is..



I thought I was being reasonable when I asked that you that you stick to investing in the investing thread..



My hope is that it becomes a sticky thread like laughter or the pulse..



We don't post anything but jokes and songs there and I do not want anything but investment related posts in investing thread..



I would ask you again to respect my request..



Also, please feel free to post what you are invested in..



We can all learn from each other..



Lastly, I hope you have a lovely weekend.

 ac_smile

You don't owe anyone an explanation.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 21, 2015, 09:56:43 PM
QuoteYou don't owe anyone an explanation.
Eggs Actly ^^^
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 09:59:01 PM
Quote from: "cc la femme"
QuoteYou don't owe anyone an explanation.
Eggs Actly ^^^

Frank is free to ask though..



And he does have a point..



We are not guided by written rules like what he is used to on Vancouver Forum.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 21, 2015, 10:25:29 PM
Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 10:29:11 PM
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 21, 2015, 10:40:05 PM
Yes. Maybe I didn't express it well, but that was my point



And thanks for having that thread and for keeping it on track. This site is great and just keeps getting better



Another cherry top of  a beautiful cake
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 10:49:05 PM
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes. Maybe I didn't express it well, but that was my point



And thanks for having that thread and for keeping it on track. This site is great and just keeps getting better



Another cherry top of  a beautiful cake

You likely expressed it very well cc la femme..

 ac_smile

English is my third language..



I need better comprehension.

 ac_blush
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 21, 2015, 11:03:57 PM
Actually, .. You do great and need apologize to NO ONE!!
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 21, 2015, 11:29:41 PM
Quote from: "cc la femme"Actually, .. You do great and need apologize to NO ONE!!

 acc_hugz
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 22, 2015, 02:38:59 AM
I calls em like I sees em, gal ac_smile
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Frood on August 22, 2015, 02:53:30 AM
Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 22, 2015, 10:57:55 AM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.

Hello Dinky Diana, my languages are in order...

Taiwanese

Mandarin

English

Japanese

Dutch



I also briefly studied Spanish, but I gave up within one month.

 ac_blush
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Wulf on August 22, 2015, 11:32:11 AM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: cc on August 22, 2015, 11:55:33 AM
I don't see a problem with discussing venues and all investment options, and changes in desirability of options due to changes in world events etc.



I'm sure no one will give any indication as to amounts etc.



Maybe you are not fully aware that BC is  not "yer regular" internet group,  rather La Crème de la Crème  of internet folk, eh? ac_smile

There are many here with considerable financial smarts and experience ...



.... people with Interests (other than for bonds, lol)  in things light years beyond "What is for your breakfast?".. "I spent my day with an alcoholic", ... "I'm going to bed early." ... "Real life zombie escape room", .... " Movie sequels starring certain posters"  ... "Are you tired of being fat and ugly? " etc. etc.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: @realAzhyaAryola on August 22, 2015, 12:15:29 PM
Quote from: "Wulf"


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?




Of course not.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 22, 2015, 12:27:12 PM
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:

With the exception of Romero who will rely totally on OAS/CPP, we all put money aside for our futures. The idea is to share what we know has worked and what to avoid. Nobody is going to be giving the pw to their online investments ffs. Relax old man, we're not trying to steal your marine pension cheque and invest in  the markets.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: RW on August 22, 2015, 01:50:10 PM
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:

That's how I feel about it.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: RW on August 22, 2015, 01:51:41 PM
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:

With the exception of Romero who will rely totally on OAS/CPP, we all put money aside for our futures. The idea is to share what we know has worked and what to avoid. Nobody is going to be giving the pw to their online investments ffs. Relax old man, we're not trying to steal your marine pension cheque and invest in  the markets.

This is how I feel about it as well :D
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Wulf on August 22, 2015, 03:04:55 PM
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:

With the exception of Romero who will rely totally on OAS/CPP, we all put money aside for our futures. The idea is to share what we know has worked and what to avoid. Nobody is going to be giving the pw to their online investments ffs. Relax old man, we're not trying to steal your marine pension cheque and invest in  the markets.


No worries Gook, I'm not the one I'm concerned about.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: J0E on August 22, 2015, 08:12:19 PM
Fashionista is obviously very bright.

She mustve studied hard, been a bright student when she was younger.



I only know one language, English.

The only other tongue which I've been able to retain remotely in my head is Spanish.

I tried others like French and Japanese, but had  no luck.

They were too difficult to retain for me & the sentence structure too unfamiliar.

So...I'll probably take another 'stab' at learning Spanish.

Since Italian is close to Spanish, I'll try that. one too.

I like the sound of Italian and Spanish.

Italian is like music to the ears.



Btw, Fashionista, is the Taiwanese language the aboriginal tongue of Taiwan?

Or is it just another dialect or variant of Chinese?


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.

Hello Dinky Diana, my languages are in order...

Taiwanese

Mandarin

English

Japanese

Dutch



I also briefly studied Spanish, but I gave up within one month.

 ac_blush
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 23, 2015, 12:59:08 PM
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Wulf"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "cc la femme"Yes, and I like that.



If he understood what he did wrong I would have more confidence. His comeback indicated that he did not understand at all.

If I recall it correctly he actually still thought he  had met the criterion.

I don't care what Frank posts..



But, and in my opinion, the money sense thread is the most important thread we have..



I want helpful advice there, not partisan bickering.


Not to stir up shit but is anyone here actually qualified to give that kind of "helpful advice"?



 I sincerely hope you people are not dumb enough to start discussing financial matters of a personal nature on a venue like this. :nea:

With the exception of Romero who will rely totally on OAS/CPP, we all put money aside for our futures. The idea is to share what we know has worked and what to avoid. Nobody is going to be giving the pw to their online investments ffs. Relax old man, we're not trying to steal your marine pension cheque and invest in  the markets.


No worries Gook, I'm not the one I'm concerned about.

 :001_tongue:
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 23, 2015, 09:05:07 PM
Quote from: "Frank"Fashionista is obviously very bright.

She mustve studied hard, been a bright student when she was younger.



I only know one language, English.

The only other tongue which I've been able to retain remotely in my head is Spanish.

I tried others like French and Japanese, but had  no luck.

They were too difficult to retain for me & the sentence structure too unfamiliar.

So...I'll probably take another 'stab' at learning Spanish.

Since Italian is close to Spanish, I'll try that. one too.

I like the sound of Italian and Spanish.

Italian is like music to the ears.



Btw, Fashionista, is the Taiwanese language the aboriginal tongue of Taiwan?

Or is it just another dialect or variant of Chinese?


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.

Hello Dinky Diana, my languages are in order...

Taiwanese

Mandarin

English

Japanese

Dutch



I also briefly studied Spanish, but I gave up within one month.

 ac_blush

Oh thank you Frank, but I am nothing extraordinary..



Taiwanese or Hoklo comes from Southern Fujian province in China..



That is where my ancestors came from..



It has been nativized with borrowed words from Japanese and Aboriginal languages.
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Frood on August 24, 2015, 01:32:50 PM
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Frank"Fashionista is obviously very bright.

She mustve studied hard, been a bright student when she was younger.



I only know one language, English.

The only other tongue which I've been able to retain remotely in my head is Spanish.

I tried others like French and Japanese, but had  no luck.

They were too difficult to retain for me & the sentence structure too unfamiliar.

So...I'll probably take another 'stab' at learning Spanish.

Since Italian is close to Spanish, I'll try that. one too.

I like the sound of Italian and Spanish.

Italian is like music to the ears.



Btw, Fashionista, is the Taiwanese language the aboriginal tongue of Taiwan?

Or is it just another dialect or variant of Chinese?


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.

Hello Dinky Diana, my languages are in order...

Taiwanese

Mandarin

English

Japanese

Dutch



I also briefly studied Spanish, but I gave up within one month.

 ac_blush

Oh thank you Frank, but I am nothing extraordinary..



Taiwanese or Hoklo comes from Southern Fujian province in China..



That is where my ancestors came from..



It has been nativized with borrowed words from Japanese and Aboriginal languages.


Have you ever played around with Duolingo and what are your thoughts on that company?
Title: Re: Fashionista, could you please explain the Rules of Engagement in this forum?
Post by: Anonymous on August 25, 2015, 05:08:53 AM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Frank"Fashionista is obviously very bright.

She mustve studied hard, been a bright student when she was younger.



I only know one language, English.

The only other tongue which I've been able to retain remotely in my head is Spanish.

I tried others like French and Japanese, but had  no luck.

They were too difficult to retain for me & the sentence structure too unfamiliar.

So...I'll probably take another 'stab' at learning Spanish.

Since Italian is close to Spanish, I'll try that. one too.

I like the sound of Italian and Spanish.

Italian is like music to the ears.



Btw, Fashionista, is the Taiwanese language the aboriginal tongue of Taiwan?

Or is it just another dialect or variant of Chinese?


Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"Fash,



Not to get off track but how many languages do you speak and how well? I'm always amazed by people who can fluently converse in multiple languages.

Hello Dinky Diana, my languages are in order...

Taiwanese

Mandarin

English

Japanese

Dutch



I also briefly studied Spanish, but I gave up within one month.

 ac_blush

Oh thank you Frank, but I am nothing extraordinary..



Taiwanese or Hoklo comes from Southern Fujian province in China..



That is where my ancestors came from..



It has been nativized with borrowed words from Japanese and Aboriginal languages.


Have you ever played around with Duolingo and what are your thoughts on that company?

No, I have never used anything from that company Dinky Diana.