This is a good way to disincentivize economic migrants and Islamo sympathizers seeking easy entry into Europe with few costs. :thumbup:
Quote
COPENHAGEN – Danish lawmakers voted Tuesday to let police seize valuables worth more than US $1,500 from asylum seekers to help cover their housing and food costs while their cases were being processed.
After more than three hours of debate, the minority Liberal Party government's bill was adopted in a 81-27 vote, with the support of the opposition Social Democrats and the anti-immigration Danish People's Party – Denmark's two largest parties. One lawmaker abstained and 70 others were absent.
mendments were made, including raising the value of items the asylum seekers can keep from 3,000 kroner (US $440) to 10,000 kroner (US $1,500). That brings it in line with welfare rules for Danes, who must sell assets worth more than 10,000 kroner before they can receive social benefits.
Denmark received about 20,000 asylum seekers last year while its neighbours Germany got 1.1 million and Sweden 163,000.
"We are talking about a real exodus," said Martin Henriksen, immigration spokesman for the populist Danish People's Party. "More needs to be done: we need more border controls. We need tighter immigration rules."
Opponents criticized the government for tightening Denmark's immigration laws and called for a common European solution to the continent's immigration crisis.
"This is a symbolic move to scare people away" from seeking asylum in Denmark, said Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen of the opposition left Red-Green Alliance that opposed the law.
Denmark is not the only country taking such action. Some German states do take fund from refugees and Switzerland requires asylum seekers to hand over cash of more than 1,000 francs ($996).
The bill was part of a raft of measures that included extending from one year to three the period that family members must wait before they can join a refugee in Denmark. Denmark already tightened its immigration laws last year, reducing benefits for asylum seekers, shortening temporary residence permits and stepping up efforts to deport those whose applications are rejected.
http://globalnews.ca/news/2477922/denmark-clears-the-way-to-seize-valuable-from-refugees/
Quote from: "Shen Li"
This is a good way to disincentivize economic migrants and Islamo sympathizers seeking easy entry into Europe with few costs. :thumbup:
Quote
COPENHAGEN – Danish lawmakers voted Tuesday to let police seize valuables worth more than US $1,500 from asylum seekers to help cover their housing and food costs while their cases were being processed.
After more than three hours of debate, the minority Liberal Party government's bill was adopted in a 81-27 vote, with the support of the opposition Social Democrats and the anti-immigration Danish People's Party – Denmark's two largest parties. One lawmaker abstained and 70 others were absent.
mendments were made, including raising the value of items the asylum seekers can keep from 3,000 kroner (US $440) to 10,000 kroner (US $1,500). That brings it in line with welfare rules for Danes, who must sell assets worth more than 10,000 kroner before they can receive social benefits.
Denmark received about 20,000 asylum seekers last year while its neighbours Germany got 1.1 million and Sweden 163,000.
"We are talking about a real exodus," said Martin Henriksen, immigration spokesman for the populist Danish People's Party. "More needs to be done: we need more border controls. We need tighter immigration rules."
Opponents criticized the government for tightening Denmark's immigration laws and called for a common European solution to the continent's immigration crisis.
"This is a symbolic move to scare people away" from seeking asylum in Denmark, said Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen of the opposition left Red-Green Alliance that opposed the law.
Denmark is not the only country taking such action. Some German states do take fund from refugees and Switzerland requires asylum seekers to hand over cash of more than 1,000 francs ($996).
The bill was part of a raft of measures that included extending from one year to three the period that family members must wait before they can join a refugee in Denmark. Denmark already tightened its immigration laws last year, reducing benefits for asylum seekers, shortening temporary residence permits and stepping up efforts to deport those whose applications are rejected.
http://globalnews.ca/news/2477922/denmark-clears-the-way-to-seize-valuable-from-refugees/
The idea is to discourage refugees?
I don't like it.
Seems like these people become refugees. Risk their lives to get somewhere. Then what ever valuables they might have are taken from them. Why not line em up and shoot them. What about it Dede, Iron Chink? Sometimes I think they'd be better off? No one really cares anyway.
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Do you have a learning disability? She asked how is it fair that some migrants are sitting on wealth while collecting social welfare benefits? If they have the means to cover all or part of their own costs, why should Danish taxpayers be forced to pick up the tab for people that can pay for themselves. If they are broke, they don't have to worry about the new rules.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Do you have a learning disability? She asked how is it fair that some migrants are sitting on wealth while collecting social welfare benefits? If they have the means to cover all or part of their own costs, why should Danish taxpayers be forced to pick up the tab for people that can pay for themselves. If they are broke, they don't have to worry about the new rules.
Yeah, this ^^^^
Is this Twenty Dollars guy somehow related to Romero?
ac_umm :laugh:
Twenty seems to write his own opinions where Romero posts his from Huffington Post.
Quote from: "Renee"
Is this Twenty Dollars guy somehow related to Romero?
ac_umm :laugh:
Romero is a copy/pasta hypocrite and TD is just not very bright.
I'm still giving Twenty a shake.
Quote from: "RW"
I'm still giving Twenty a shake.
I give both him and Romero a shake. I'd take a dozen of each over one fucking oddstain.
I don't agree with the action being taken by Denmark.
They should be seizing their assets and then telling them to fuck off!!!
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Hey, Twenty...if anyone SHOULD give a shit, it is the gulf states, Malaysia, Indonesia and Sudan.
These are muslim nations.
So, in accordance with muslim doctrine, a muslim cannot turn away another muslim in need, and must welcome them into their homes, feed and water them and give them shelter.
Oddly, I don't see these muslims crowding the beaches of these nations, where they are surely to be welcomed in accordance with their faith. I don't see Malaysian or Indonesian aircraft flying into Europe to collect their brethren and take them to an islamic safe haven. Perhaps they know something we don't.
They seem to think that Europe is a better option. Now, a cynic may suggest that they are using their region's ongoing mayhem and warfare as an excuse to jump queues, push pass fences and insist on being welcomed in countries with which they have no cultural or religious connection, merely to improve their quality of life that is denied them in their various islamic havens.
Why is the fact that they have failed utterly to develop, mature and evolve as western countries OUR problem?
Quote from: "Mr Crowley"
I don't agree with the action being taken by Denmark.
They should be seizing their assets and then telling them to fuck off!!!
:001_rolleyes:
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
Quote from: "Mr Crowley"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Hey, Twenty...if anyone SHOULD give a shit, it is the gulf states, Malaysia, Indonesia and Sudan.
These are muslim nations.
So, in accordance with muslim doctrine, a muslim cannot turn away another muslim in need, and must welcome them into their homes, feed and water them and give them shelter.
Oddly, I don't see these muslims crowding the beaches of these nations, where they are surely to be welcomed in accordance with their faith. I don't see Malaysian or Indonesian aircraft flying into Europe to collect their brethren and take them to an islamic safe haven. Perhaps they know something we don't.
They seem to think that Europe is a better option. Now, a cynic may suggest that they are using their region's ongoing mayhem and warfare as an excuse to jump queues, push pass fences and insist on being welcomed in countries with which they have no cultural or religious connection, merely to improve their quality of life that is denied them in their various islamic havens.
Why is the fact that they have failed utterly to develop, mature and evolve as western countries OUR problem?
Couldn't agree more. It just didn't happen. So where from here?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
Requiring refugees that can afford it to pay a portion of their own cost to Danes is the same as sending Jews to Auschwitz? WTH
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "Mr Crowley"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
Hey, Twenty...if anyone SHOULD give a shit, it is the gulf states, Malaysia, Indonesia and Sudan.
These are muslim nations.
So, in accordance with muslim doctrine, a muslim cannot turn away another muslim in need, and must welcome them into their homes, feed and water them and give them shelter.
Oddly, I don't see these muslims crowding the beaches of these nations, where they are surely to be welcomed in accordance with their faith. I don't see Malaysian or Indonesian aircraft flying into Europe to collect their brethren and take them to an islamic safe haven. Perhaps they know something we don't.
They seem to think that Europe is a better option. Now, a cynic may suggest that they are using their region's ongoing mayhem and warfare as an excuse to jump queues, push pass fences and insist on being welcomed in countries with which they have no cultural or religious connection, merely to improve their quality of life that is denied them in their various islamic havens.
Why is the fact that they have failed utterly to develop, mature and evolve as western countries OUR problem?
Couldn't agree more. It just didn't happen. So where from here?
Anywhere but here.
Not my problem.
Would you open the door to homeless people?
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Anything you've posted in this thread has had nothing to do with the op. You try figuring it out on your own. Nobody should have to hold ur hand for you.
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Anything you've posted in this thread has had nothing to do with the op. You try figuring it out on your own. Nobody should have to hold ur hand for you.
This place sure has its share of drama. What's RWs god damned question? I C are you retarded?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Anything you've posted in this thread has had nothing to do with the op. You try figuring it out on your own. Nobody should have to hold ur hand for you.
This place sure has its share of drama. What's RWs god damned question? I C are you retarded?
You are the only one here that doesn't know the question or even what this thread is about and everyone else is retarded because of it. :crazy:
Come on Gomer, put that special ed diploma to work.
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Everyone knows.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Anything you've posted in this thread has had nothing to do with the op. You try figuring it out on your own. Nobody should have to hold ur hand for you.
This place sure has its share of drama. What's RWs god damned question? I C are you retarded?
Sorry but my questions were pretty darn clear if you went back a page so I wouldn't start painting with the retard brush just yet :)
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
Quote from: "cc la femme"
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
I wouldn't ceec.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.
Quote from: "cc la femme"
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
Pity? Feelings of obligation to help? The children?
I think the why is less important after the fact though cc. The why is moot when they are already there.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.
The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled. It shouldn't be permanent.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.
Please... You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
I understand why you feel the way you do about lining them up and shooting them. If you read through the posts, you will see it's the IDEOLOGY that needs to be shot, not the people. Okay, some of the people need to be shot but they are Islamist terrorists. Trust me on this and thank me for saving you A LOT of trouble in advance.
In Denmark, those who get social assistance have to sell their possessions up to a certain amount of worth. Whether you agree with it or not, that's their current system. I don't think it's fair to accept people from other countries and give them benefits that exceed that which citizens receive.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.
Please... You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.
I actually don't see that about him. He's not afraid to stand up to us "estrogen types" when he feels the need even if us "estrogen types" think it's uncalled for.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
I understand why you feel the way you do about lining them up and shooting them. If you read through the posts, you will see it's the IDEOLOGY that needs to be shot, not the people. Okay, some of the people need to be shot but they are Islamist terrorists. Trust me on this and thank me for saving you A LOT of trouble in advance.
In Denmark, those who get social assistance have to sell their possessions up to a certain amount of worth. Whether you agree with it or not, that's their current system. I don't think it's fair to accept people from other countries and give them benefits that exceed that which citizens receive.
When you say the IDEOLOGY needs to be shot, are you referring to the situation in their previous country that forced them to leave? Please, when I say shoot them all. It's not my wish, although some here would advocate. Why did Denmark allow them in? Did they not anticipate these problems?
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.
The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled. It shouldn't be permanent.
Setting aside for a minute the legality and human rights questions the Danish actions bring up. I have mixed thoughts on whether refugees should be offered a pathway to permanent residency. On the one hand, asylum in theory is supposed to be a temporary measure. The intent is not to offer a backdoor to citizenship.
On the other hand, the host nation has a right to recoup the costs of supporting refugees. That would be done when they are working, paying taxes and having children who will become future taxpayers. Denmark is an aging country.
I don't know. I would have to look at a cost/benefit study to get a clearer picture.
Permanent residency is a commitment to them staying. Would not gaurantee citizenship though. To me two different things. Think it would ever be possible for them to return? Seems pretty impossible now.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.
Please... You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.
As opposed to a GED dropout who cannot comprehend any post he pollutes with his stupidity.
Do us all a favour idiot and read this book cover to cover three times before you post again. We'll see you in a couple of years.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bxm5QhZIgAAAWtK.jpg%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bxm5QhZIgAAAWtK.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "cc la femme"
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
Pity? Feelings of obligation to help? The children?
I think the why is less important after the fact though cc. The why is moot when they are already there.
These questions would depend. Are they coming from a refugee camp in Lebanon? Is it children or able bodied muslim adults.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.
Please then put me on ignore.
What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?
Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.
Please... You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.
As opposed to a GED dropout who cannot comprehend any post he pollutes with his stupidity.
Do us all a favour idiot and read this book cover to cover three times before you post again. We'll see you in a couple of years.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bxm5QhZIgAAAWtK.jpg%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bxm5QhZIgAAAWtK.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Cute when you assume.
^^assume. :laugh: How many threads have you responded to this week alone that you assumed because you were too thick to understand what it was about?
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "cc la femme"
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
Pity? Feelings of obligation to help? The children?
I think the why is less important after the fact though cc. The why is moot when they are already there.
These questions would depend. Are they coming from a refugee camp in Lebanon? Is it children or able bodied muslim adults.
Actually, I'm referring to ALL those of an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY since day one and especially for the future
Most people have no idea how few if any change this thinking ... except to show us what we "want" to see.
Soon as a fiery imam speaks it's same old shit and almost NONE do a thing to boot him
Why we allow that here speaks more about us ... they are totally predictable ..... islam is ALWAYS first for most all believers
"Canada,ya nice place to practice islam" and that's it for most
Quote from: "cc la femme"
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "cc la femme"
This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >
So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.
Pity? Feelings of obligation to help? The children?
I think the why is less important after the fact though cc. The why is moot when they are already there.
These questions would depend. Are they coming from a refugee camp in Lebanon? Is it children or able bodied muslim adults.
Actually, I'm referring to ALL those of an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY since day one and especially for the future
Most have no idea how few if any change this thinking ... except to show us what we want to see
Love to hear you answer to repair this situation. I don't know the answer. I ask because it includes women and chrildren. Seems like this situation needs some attention.
Yes it does. Nice spot we are heading for, eh?
EU is basically at that spot now ..... got any ideas to stop the coming calamity? Your 20 Baht worth?
I don't have any idea now that we allowed it to happen other than to watch the slow motion inevitable train wreck
Just a side note: Today - 2 Parisians arrested entering Disneyland with suitcase full of guns, ammo and Kranny ... couple of other goodies too today .. .so many one can't keep track anymore, eh?
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
Man, every time I read you, the value of your dollar diminishes. You're down to $5 and still falling.
The Danes are not taking their shit just to piss idiots like you off.
They are taking it to fund the welfare that DENMARK will have to fork out to ensure these cockroaches have a roof and three squares.
Fuck. Who know Romero had a twin?
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.
The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled. It shouldn't be permanent.
Setting aside for a minute the legality and human rights questions the Danish actions bring up. I have mixed thoughts on whether refugees should be offered a pathway to permanent residency. On the one hand, asylum in theory is supposed to be a temporary measure. The intent is not to offer a backdoor to citizenship.
On the other hand, the host nation has a right to recoup the costs of supporting refugees. That would be done when they are working, paying taxes and having children who will become future taxpayers. Denmark is an aging country.
I don't know. I would have to look at a cost/benefit study to get a clearer picture.
I think Denmark, as an aging country, should be able to decide when the time comes what their immigration needs are and fill them appropriately. Those who are there as refugees should go back and re-populate their own country after all is said and done with war. Someone will need to do it.
Quote from: "Mr Crowley"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
Man, every time I read you, the value of your dollar diminishes. You're down to $5 and still falling.
The Danes are not taking their shit just to piss idiots like you off.
They are taking it to fund the welfare that DENMARK will have to fork out to ensure these cockroaches have a roof and three squares.
Fuck. Who know Romero had a twin?
What's the answer tough guy? Shoot em?
Well, you're now down to $2 and change.
Denmark is housing and feeding them, you moron. Under the same conditions as it does its own citizens.
But, seeing as how you asked...ship them either back to their rat hole, or to a MUSLIM nation.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.
The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled. It shouldn't be permanent.
Setting aside for a minute the legality and human rights questions the Danish actions bring up. I have mixed thoughts on whether refugees should be offered a pathway to permanent residency. On the one hand, asylum in theory is supposed to be a temporary measure. The intent is not to offer a backdoor to citizenship.
On the other hand, the host nation has a right to recoup the costs of supporting refugees. That would be done when they are working, paying taxes and having children who will become future taxpayers. Denmark is an aging country.
I don't know. I would have to look at a cost/benefit study to get a clearer picture.
I think Denmark, as an aging country, should be able to decide when the time comes what their immigration needs are and fill them appropriately. Those who are there as refugees should go back and re-populate their own country after all is said and done with war. Someone will need to do it.
So Danes Euros down the drain.
Quote from: "cc la femme"
Yes it does. Nice spot we are heading for, eh?
EU is basically at that spot now ..... got any ideas to stop the coming calamity? Your 20 Baht worth?
I don't have any idea now that we allowed it to happen other than to watch the slow motion inevitable train wreck
Just a side note: Today - 2 Parisians arrested entering Disneyland with suitcase full of guns, ammo and Kranny ... couple of other goodies too today .. .so many one can't keep track anymore, eh?
Disneyland????!!!??????
I'm going to be sick.
Its not going to stop.
Being sick won't help.
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.
I asked you a reasonable question. Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please? :)
I see a few statements from you. What is your question?
Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?
I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK? Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.
I understand why you feel the way you do about lining them up and shooting them. If you read through the posts, you will see it's the IDEOLOGY that needs to be shot, not the people. Okay, some of the people need to be shot but they are Islamist terrorists. Trust me on this and thank me for saving you A LOT of trouble in advance.
In Denmark, those who get social assistance have to sell their possessions up to a certain amount of worth. Whether you agree with it or not, that's their current system. I don't think it's fair to accept people from other countries and give them benefits that exceed that which citizens receive.
When you say the IDEOLOGY needs to be shot, are you referring to the situation in their previous country that forced them to leave? Please, when I say shoot them all. It's not my wish, although some here would advocate. Why did Denmark allow them in? Did they not anticipate these problems?
Yep! I don't think anyone anticipates such problems and don't truly understand them until looking back on them.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Twenty Dollars"
Quote from: "RW"
So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive? How is that fair?
Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.
When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?
It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.
I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.
Do you think they should receive more?
I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.
I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.
The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled. It shouldn't be permanent.
Setting aside for a minute the legality and human rights questions the Danish actions bring up. I have mixed thoughts on whether refugees should be offered a pathway to permanent residency. On the one hand, asylum in theory is supposed to be a temporary measure. The intent is not to offer a backdoor to citizenship.
On the other hand, the host nation has a right to recoup the costs of supporting refugees. That would be done when they are working, paying taxes and having children who will become future taxpayers. Denmark is an aging country.
I don't know. I would have to look at a cost/benefit study to get a clearer picture.
I think Denmark, as an aging country, should be able to decide when the time comes what their immigration needs are and fill them appropriately. Those who are there as refugees should go back and re-populate their own country after all is said and done with war. Someone will need to do it.
So Danes Euros down the drain.
If I was the Danish government, I would want to know they are going to go back as soon as it's safe to do so.
^I prefer Hungary's approach....hey muslimes, don't even think of bringing your dark ages madness into our country.
I don't k ow why we are so accommodating. They wouldn't be so accepting of our wicked Western ways in their countries.
Nor are they accepting of our wicked Western ways in Western countries. That's where the entire concept of importation FAILs
That's how always intolerant islam works and that's why this whole idea never had a chance to end well once numbers reached a certain level
and it won't end well
Here's a micro peek into t what is happening overall ... this time one tough German frau beats the crap out of a woman-harasser
Then, when he continued to mouth off she "purse"ued him and took him down again
Quote from: "RW"
I don't k ow why we are so accommodating. They wouldn't be so accepting of our wicked Western ways in their countries.
You got that RW. I lived in the middle East for years. Tolerance of anything different is unknown there.
... So you support the rising tide of xenophobia in Denmark?
Is a fear irrational if you are a woman and there have been numerous cases of rape in your city/country by migrants?
See, xenophobia is an irrational fear not a legitimate one.
Quote from: "cc la femme"
Nor are they accepting of our wicked Western ways in Western countries. That's where the entire concept of importation FAILs
That's how always intolerant islam works and that's why this whole idea never had a chance to end well once numbers reached a certain level
and it won't end well
Here's a micro peek into t what is happening overall ... this time one tough German frau beats the crap out of a woman-harasser
Then, when he continued to mouth off she "purse"ued him and took him down again
That wasn't real.
My sentiments exactly.