THeBlueCashew

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"He could take a selfie on the beach waving bye bye to the illegal immigrants.

Quote from: "Herman"

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"He could take a selfie on the beach waving bye bye to the illegal immigrants.

Only if they have a baby panda for Justine to pose with.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"You people are nuts.



That asshole should be recalled.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

Quote from: "The Donald"

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

I support a total shutdown of Mooslims entering Australia.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

QuoteTwo Iranian refugees who were transferred to Cambodia under a A$55m ($41m; £29m) deal with Australia have returned to Iran voluntarily.



A spokesman for Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton confirmed the husband and wife had left Cambodia.



Just two of the five refugees transferred by Australia to the Southeast Asian country now remain.



Australia has promised to give Cambodia A$40m in aid and A$15m in resettlement costs to take in its rejected refugees.



This will be paid regardless of the number of people who settle there.

Quote from: "Romero"

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

QuoteTwo Iranian refugees who were transferred to Cambodia under a A$55m ($41m; £29m) deal with Australia have returned to Iran voluntarily.



A spokesman for Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton confirmed the husband and wife had left Cambodia.



Just two of the five refugees transferred by Australia to the Southeast Asian country now remain.



Australia has promised to give Cambodia A$40m in aid and A$15m in resettlement costs to take in its rejected refugees.



This will be paid regardless of the number of people who settle there.

Australia spent $55 million to deal with two refugees?

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"

Quote from: "Romero"

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35751536



This is why we don't have thousands of muslims camped out on our land.



Try it.

QuoteTwo Iranian refugees who were transferred to Cambodia under a A$55m ($41m; £29m) deal with Australia have returned to Iran voluntarily.



A spokesman for Australian Immigration Minister Peter Dutton confirmed the husband and wife had left Cambodia.



Just two of the five refugees transferred by Australia to the Southeast Asian country now remain.



Australia has promised to give Cambodia A$40m in aid and A$15m in resettlement costs to take in its rejected refugees.



This will be paid regardless of the number of people who settle there.

Australia spent $55 million to deal with two refugees?

Nope. We spent 55 million to deal with ALL refugees.



Its an insurance policy. Land on our shores, we take you to Cambodia.



Note that Europe has finally woken up and is adopting a version of Australia's process. Even Mad Merkel has now accepted that her policy has in part caused a massive migration problem for Europe. By giving them a destination, she provided motivation for them to jump on leaky boats which capsize at sea, then gather on Greece's shores en masse before trudnling through OTHER countries ill equipped to deal with them.



Merkel's madness has caused deaths, enormous cost, and social disruption.



Meanwhile, in Oz...Cambodia awaits if you want to roll the dice.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley":thumbup:

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"Both parties have committed to our policy of "FOAD".

Quote from: "Herman"
I would rather spend 55 million getting rid of them than billions bringing them in.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"We admit NO refugees until they are certified as such by the UN.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"The principle is that if they arrive on our soil, they immediately become eligible for aid, including legal.



So, we boot them to a safe place, where they do not have access to our legal system, and assess them there. The lawyers scream, but its them that choke the whole system up.

Quote from: "Mr Crowley"If they arrive on our shores, and are admitted through our border controls, they become eligible for aid in all forms.



BUT, they must be admitted through the immigration service, that in the past issued temporary refugee visas like McDonald's vouchers.



Now, they do not get a visa, but are placed in detention until transported offshore, from where they may make their claim for asylum, or go home. 90% go home. Without a visa of any description, they cannot claim any status or benefit. They are regarded as an illegal alien until a visa is issued, and that status excludes them from assistance.

QuoteThe tomfoolery continues over at Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

It has been one reckless decision after another by the new Trudeau government, which seems to be doing its very best to manipulate the immigration process for partisan gain.

First, it swung open Canada's borders to admit 25,000 Syrians without ever answering tough national security questions.

Then, it blew up the Citizenship Act with a new bill that will give citizenship away to part-time residents after just three years, even if they don't speak French or English.

Now, Immigration Minister John McCallum has announced the government is drastically restructuring the composition of the immigrants we welcome.

It is cutting economic immigration, and instead, will be tripling the number of refugees and increasing "family reuniftcation" by 12,000 spots.

Under the Harper Conservatives, Canada realigned its immigration system towards economic growth.

The government scrapped the old Liberal model that was rotten with fraud and abuse, and began to put Canada's national interest ahead of special interests and immigration lawyers.

Canada accepted more newcomers with the skills and education our economy needed, and aligned our migration policies with labour shortages in the economy.



Meanwhile, it accepted fewer elderly immigrants, who put a strain on our social services without contributing to the tax base.

By selecting younger migrants, and fast-tracking visas for those with tangible skills, Canada's immigration system helped grow our economy and reverse the troubling demographic trend of our aging population.

is economic realignment made Canada the gold standard of Western migration programs.

Now, Justin Trudeau and company are reversing this progress in pursuit of a political agenda.

They are bribing newcomers with our money, and putting our publicly funded health care and retirement funds, specifically Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), at risk in order to win future elections.

McCallum said his plan represents a "signi cant shift in immigration policy towards reuniting more families."

But once again, the Liberals are not being upfront with Canadians about their plan.

When someone receives an economic visa to come to Canada, they can automatically sponsor their immediate family members — a spouse and any dependent children. Family members make up over 60% of all economic immigration.

In order words, our economic category of immigration already encompasses family sponsorship.

e"familyreuni cation"category is di erent. It helps Canadians sponsor a foreign spouse or adult family members.

More than one-third of "family reunification" spots are elderly parents and grandparents.

Before Trudeau took over, parents and grandparents could quickly and easily receive a 10-year multiple entry visa, known as a "super visa".

They could come and go as they pleased, and stay in Canada for up to two years at a time.

The major difference was that, under the "super visa" these elders needed private health insurance, and could not access Canada's social services.

This is only fair, since they didn't work in Canada and did not contribute to our tax base.

The Trudeau government's "shift" is designed to enable elderly parents and grandparents to receive Canadian welfare, health care, OAS, GIS and other social programs as soon as they arrive in Canada.

The Liberals will get more votes, and young taxpayers will get stuck with the bill.

Quote from: "reel"Australia needs a lot of ships to enforce their anti-immigration policy.



 :thumbup:

Quote from: "reel"Australia needs a lot of ships to enforce their anti-immigration policy.



 :thumbup:

Quote from: "Lance Leftardashian"It's time now for Australia to finally fully rid itself of it's racist white's only policy. Don't forget that Australia was founded by criminals.