Title: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 12:20:23 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 12:20:23 AM
With regards to self defense, I believe I've found something a little more solid in this snip, that pertains to Canadian law...
Short of sifting through hour after hour of case law, I'm pretty sure that this snip would be the basis of a truly successful trial for an individual:
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Anonymous on June 14, 2016, 12:49:52 AM
Post by: Anonymous on June 14, 2016, 12:49:52 AM
I know we were talking about case law and whatnot, in another thread.Quote from: "smell the glove"
With regards to self defense, I believe I've found something a little more solid in this snip, that pertains to Canadian law...
Short of sifting through hour after hour of case law, I'm pretty sure that this snip would be the basis of a truly successful trial for an individual:(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://i68.tinypic.com/rsbeva.png%22%3Ehttp://i68.tinypic.com/rsbeva.png%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Thanks for posting this smell the glove.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 12:57:40 AM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 12:57:40 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 02:51:37 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 02:51:37 AM
I'm familiar with all posted case law in your clip. None provides a defense for illegally storing a firearm.Quote from: "RW"
That ruling I will attempt to find... But not now...
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 02:54:57 AM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 02:54:57 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 02:58:50 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 02:58:50 AM
So what were you trying to get at with this thread?Quote from: "RW"
You stated that Canadians were not allowed to defend themselves, using whatever method necessary, in another one of your posts...
You called my claim "lies."
You like to argue about law, and what you know... I like to also... For that, I like ya!
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:03:28 AM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:03:28 AM
In terms of legal defense, you've posted pretty much what the law follows. You can defend yourself with force that meets the threat. As the case law shows, if you have other means of defense that doesn't involve force, you lose your right to use force.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:11:45 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:11:45 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:16:59 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:16:59 AM
As the case law shows, if you have other means of defense that doesn't involve force, you lose your right to use force.Quote from: "RW"
What personal means of defense doesn't involve force?
Look, I explained this to my ex, when we were still married...
I bought her a can of dog spray (Mace, to the Yanks)... I said that you will use this, if you are threatened. She asked me if it was allowed to be used in such fashion.
I said no... However, you will be fine in the court of law, should you use this to defend yourself from, say, a rapist.
Case law... Criminal Code of Canada... Two different things!
Plus, I can hire good lawyers! LOLZA!
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:38:48 AM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:38:48 AM
As the case law shows, if you have other means of defense that doesn't involve force, you lose your right to use force.Quote from: "RW"
What personal means of defense doesn't involve force?
Look, I explained this to my ex, when we were still married...
I bought her a can of dog spray (Mace, to the Yanks)... I said that you will use this, if you are threatened. She asked me if it was allowed to be used in such fashion.
I said no... However, you will be fine in the court of law, should you use this to defend yourself from, say, a rapist.
Case law... Criminal Code of Canada... Two different things!
Plus, I can hire good lawyers! LOLZA!
You seriously should not give legal advice.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:41:48 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 03:41:48 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 04:43:28 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 14, 2016, 04:43:28 AM
Thanks for posting this smell the glove.Quote from: "Fashionista"
No problem...
It clarifies Canadian law, regarding the use of lethal self defense.
RW is just an argumentative bitter hag, that's losing her marbles. She's no different than the DV crew, that are losing their marbles at the same pace...
It's sad to see, and I have offered my help to them.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Renee on June 14, 2016, 07:40:53 AM
Post by: Renee on June 14, 2016, 07:40:53 AM
As the case law shows, if you have other means of defense that doesn't involve force, you lose your right to use force.Quote from: "RW"
What personal means of defense doesn't involve force?
Calling the police........How are your response times?
Retreating to the furtherst point of your property.
Locking yourself in a room away from the intruder....cowering in a closet.
Fleeing your home.....giving your personal hard earned sanctuary over to the intruder.....etc, etc.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 12:11:29 PM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 12:11:29 PM
I have said nothing in this thread to warrant your attack nor is this the place for hurling such abuse. If you keep this up, I won't spank your ass on legal matters any more.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: cc on June 14, 2016, 01:59:06 PM
Post by: cc on June 14, 2016, 01:59:06 PM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 02:00:07 PM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 02:00:07 PM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: cc on June 14, 2016, 02:01:38 PM
Post by: cc on June 14, 2016, 02:01:38 PM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Anonymous on June 14, 2016, 03:29:26 PM
Post by: Anonymous on June 14, 2016, 03:29:26 PM
Mel > "Everyone in the world is crazy but me hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ..."Quote from: "cc la femme"
Apparently alcohol prevents mental craziness.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:57:47 PM
Post by: RW on June 14, 2016, 03:57:47 PM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: smell the glove on June 15, 2016, 03:54:10 AM
Post by: smell the glove on June 15, 2016, 03:54:10 AM
I have said nothing in this thread to warrant your attack nor is this the place for hurling such abuse. If you keep this up, I won't spank your ass on legal matters any more.Quote from: "RW"
I know... I apologize.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 17, 2016, 09:05:28 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 17, 2016, 09:05:28 AM
I know... I apologize.
You envelope yourself in anus...then engulf yourself in arse, pulling the lips around you snugly.
I'm looking forward to lancing you...like the pus-filled arse_grape that you are!
LULZA!
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 17, 2016, 11:20:02 AM
Post by: RW on June 17, 2016, 11:20:02 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: cc on June 17, 2016, 11:56:46 AM
Post by: cc on June 17, 2016, 11:56:46 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 17, 2016, 12:11:21 PM
Post by: RW on June 17, 2016, 12:11:21 PM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 09:57:08 PM
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 09:57:08 PM
That's disgusting.Quote from: "RW"
Hahahahaaa...sorry RW, I should've just called him an irritating haemorrhoid.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 18, 2016, 11:40:47 PM
Post by: RW on June 18, 2016, 11:40:47 PM
That's disgusting.Quote from: "RW"
Hahahahaaa...sorry RW, I should've just called him an irritating haemorrhoid.:coffeebath:
Funny Gallium, I've heard you're much the same.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:45:15 PM
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:45:15 PM
That's disgusting.Quote from: "RW"
Hahahahaaa...sorry RW, I should've just called him an irritating haemorrhoid.:coffeebath:
Funny Gallium, I've heard you're much the same.
Right back at ya RW!
'Roid Rage...
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 18, 2016, 11:52:47 PM
Post by: RW on June 18, 2016, 11:52:47 PM
You know the "'roid" in "'roid rage" doesn't stand for hemorrhoids right?
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:56:43 PM
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:56:43 PM
Is it true you harass forum people IRL?Quote from: "RW"
Totally false. Although I am compiling a resume' on Scouse_Nazi for the way he conducts himself online.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:58:24 PM
Post by: Gallium on June 18, 2016, 11:58:24 PM
You know the "'roid" in "'roid rage" doesn't stand for hemorrhoids right?Quote from: "RW"
Duh! It's called Inyoendyo
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:02:19 AM
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:02:19 AM
Is it true you harass forum people IRL?Quote from: "RW"
Totally false. Although I am compiling a resume' on Scouse_Nazi for the way he conducts himself online.
So you're putting together online info about Scouse? For what purpose?
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:05:01 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:05:01 AM
Is it true you harass forum people IRL?Quote from: "RW"
Totally false. Although I am compiling a resume' on Scouse_Nazifor the way he conducts himself online.
So you're putting together online info about Scouse? For what purpose?
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:06:32 AM
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:06:32 AM
Once you compile said info, what are you going to do with it?
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:09:30 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:09:30 AM
Sorry I'm not being clear.Quote from: "RW"
Once you compile said info, what are you going to do with it?
That's none of your business.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:16:02 AM
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:16:02 AM
I'll make any offline harassment of TBC membership my business.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:28:48 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:28:48 AM
Well I've heard you have an issue with gathering online info about people then using it to affect them in real life. I heard you are are a combination of smelly Mel and SMP. I heard it's just a matter of time before you go off your rocker.Quote from: "RW"
I'll make any offline harassment of TBC membership my business.
You've been misinformed.
I make it my business to draw attention to a particular group of trolls who think that they can spread false allegations about particular members online without repercussions or formal inquiry. Especially with regard to heinous crimes against children.
Thank you RW.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:36:50 AM
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:36:50 AM
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:47:47 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 12:47:47 AM
I'm not buying it Gal. This is a discussion forum, not some tool for your online vigilantism.Quote from: "RW"
I don't intend to use this forum as such, especially since Scouse_Nazi has already been banned from BC. But since we're discussing...how do you feel about mel bringing in the same issues?
At the end of the day RW, I detest any violence or sexual attack on both women and children, and will not tolerate trolls making a mockery of it all just to provoke a reaction.
Thank you RW.
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:55:24 AM
Post by: RW on June 19, 2016, 12:55:24 AM
I'm not buying it Gal. This is a discussion forum, not some tool for your online vigilantism.Quote from: "RW"
I don't intend to use this forum as such, especially since Scouse_Nazi has already been banned from BC. But since we're discussing...how do you feel about mel bringing in the same issues?
At the end of the day RW, I detest any violence or sexual attack on both women and children, and will not tolerate trolls making a mockery of it all just to provoke a reaction.
Thank you RW.
:howdy:
And what are you going to do about it Gallium? Post harsh words back on said forum? Turn this place into your personal hub for online revenge? "Troll the trolls"?
YAWN
Title: Re: ATTN: RW
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 01:03:31 AM
Post by: Gallium on June 19, 2016, 01:03:31 AM
I'm not buying it Gal. This is a discussion forum, not some tool for your online vigilantism.Quote from: "RW"
I don't intend to use this forum as such, especially since Scouse_Nazi has already been banned from BC. But since we're discussing...how do you feel about mel bringing in the same issues?
At the end of the day RW, I detest any violence or sexual attack on both women and children, and will not tolerate trolls making a mockery of it all just to provoke a reaction.
Thank you RW.
:howdy:
And what are you going to do about it Gallium? Post harsh words back on said forum? Turn this place into your personal hub for online revenge? "Troll the trolls"?
YAWN
I intend to partake in discussions and contribute wherever possible.
Thank you RW.