I knew Japan and South Korea make it nearly impossible for their countries to be dumping grounds for refugee scammers. :thumbup:
http://observatorial.com/2016/10/27/south-korea-refuses-to-allow-muslim-refugees-we-prefer-to-protect-our-women-from-sexual-assault/
The South Korean government has granted refugee status to only three Syrians since 2014, according to information confirmed by The Korea Observer Thursday.
The Ministry of Justice told the paper that they reject Syrians seeking refugee status who apply based solely on the war in Syria.
Most of the Syrians have sought asylum on the grounds of civil war," the ministry said.
"However, civil war is not sufficient grounds for granting refugee status."
Kim claims that the government is strategically denying visas to asylum seekers to minimize the number of applications received.
Concerns have also been raised of the risk of sexual assaults which would occure should any migrants be allowed in. "Judging by what we see in Europe, we would prefer to protect our women, rather than potentially place them at risk." In addition, the nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s600x600/14906961_1083634078420979_2909551532642508401_n.jpg?oh=727af77b2d5bece395028cf48b99c43d&oe=589D2003%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/%20...%20e=589D2003%22%3Ehttps://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s600x600/14906961_1083634078420979_2909551532642508401_n.jpg?oh=727af77b2d5bece395028cf48b99c43d&oe=589D2003%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
East Asian countries are smart.
Quote from: "Herman"
I knew Japan and South Korea make it nearly impossible for their countries to be dumping grounds for refugee scammers. :thumbup:
http://observatorial.com/2016/10/27/south-korea-refuses-to-allow-muslim-refugees-we-prefer-to-protect-our-women-from-sexual-assault/
The South Korean government has granted refugee status to only three Syrians since 2014, according to information confirmed by The Korea Observer Thursday.
The Ministry of Justice told the paper that they reject Syrians seeking refugee status who apply based solely on the war in Syria.
Most of the Syrians have sought asylum on the grounds of civil war," the ministry said.
"However, civil war is not sufficient grounds for granting refugee status."
Kim claims that the government is strategically denying visas to asylum seekers to minimize the number of applications received.
Concerns have also been raised of the risk of sexual assaults which would occure should any migrants be allowed in. "Judging by what we see in Europe, we would prefer to protect our women, rather than potentially place them at risk." In addition, the nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.
Korea has made remarkable changes in a short period of time. But, as much as things change, as much they stay the same. The idea of one blood deep suspicion of foreigners will be hard to completely escape.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Herman"
I knew Japan and South Korea make it nearly impossible for their countries to be dumping grounds for refugee scammers. :thumbup:
http://observatorial.com/2016/10/27/south-korea-refuses-to-allow-muslim-refugees-we-prefer-to-protect-our-women-from-sexual-assault/
The South Korean government has granted refugee status to only three Syrians since 2014, according to information confirmed by The Korea Observer Thursday.
The Ministry of Justice told the paper that they reject Syrians seeking refugee status who apply based solely on the war in Syria.
Most of the Syrians have sought asylum on the grounds of civil war," the ministry said.
"However, civil war is not sufficient grounds for granting refugee status."
Kim claims that the government is strategically denying visas to asylum seekers to minimize the number of applications received.
Concerns have also been raised of the risk of sexual assaults which would occure should any migrants be allowed in. "Judging by what we see in Europe, we would prefer to protect our women, rather than potentially place them at risk." In addition, the nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.
Korea has made remarkable changes in a short period of time. But, as much as things change, as much they stay the same. The idea of one blood deep suspicion of foreigners will be hard to completely escape.
I have confidence the countries of the East will not copy the suicidal immigration and refugee policies of the West.
Scuse me.
You mean MOST of the West.
These parasites get no charity from Australia.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Scuse me.
You mean MOST of the West.
These parasites get no charity from Australia.
You have Syrian refugees in Australia.
White countries are far to white and it is a reminder of their racist past. The only way to undo this racist legacy of colonialism is to make white people a minority by allowing enough people in from other areas who want to live a better life in the west.
But, but, but Quote
South Korea REFUSES To Allow Muslim 'Refugees" We Prefer To Protect Our Women From Sexual Assault!"
Goddamn white Koreans
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Fash, these 'refugees' are nothing but trouble. The vast majority of them are economic migrants......
Its a shame Europe is guilt tripped so easily into accepting them, when other countries just point blank refuse.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Scuse me.
You mean MOST of the West.
These parasites get no charity from Australia.
You have Syrian refugees in Australia.
They are Christian Syrians, and we have only a few, admitted after their refugee status was approved by the UN.
We don't take in border jumpers.
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Fash, these 'refugees' are nothing but trouble. The vast majority of them are economic migrants......
Its a shame Europe is guilt tripped so easily into accepting them, when other countries just point blank refuse.
That is it, right there. :smiley_thumbs_up_yellow_ani:
Most are not even refugees.
And even if they are, they flee countries that were islamic basket cases because they didn't have the balls to fight for their rights.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Most are not even refugees.
And even if they are, they flee countries that were islamic basket cases because they didn't have the balls to fight for their rights.
Why would anyone believe they will champion Western values here either.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Scuse me.
You mean MOST of the West.
These parasites get no charity from Australia.
You have Syrian refugees in Australia.
They are Christian Syrians, and we have only a few, admitted after their refugee status was approved by the UN.
We don't take in border jumpers.
A few?
Quote
On 9 September 2015, the Australian Government announced that it will make an extra 12,000 humanitarian places available in response to the conflicts in Syria and Iraq. The 12,000 people resettled in Australia as part of this intake will be granted a permanent visa.
These 12,000 places are in addition to Australia's Humanitarian Programme, which totalled 13,750 places for the 2015-16 financial year, and which will increase to 18,750 places in the 2018-19 financial year.
Between 1 July 2015 and 7 October 2016, 14,047 visas have been granted to people displaced by conflict in Syria and Iraq:
-8313 towards the additional 12,000 places (November 2015 – 7 October 2016)
-884 under the 2016–17 Humanitarian Programme to date
-4850 under the 2015–16 Humanitarian Programme
In this time, 10,244 people have arrived in Australia:
-5235 as part of the additional 12,000 places (November 2015 – 7 October 2016)
-1816 arrivals in 2016–17 to date under the annual humanitarian programme
-3193 arrivals in 2015–16 under the annual humanitarian programme
//https://www.border.gov.au/Trav/Refu/response-syrian-humanitarian-crisis
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
Quote from: "Romero"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Scuse me.
You mean MOST of the West.
These parasites get no charity from Australia.
You have Syrian refugees in Australia.
They are Christian Syrians, and we have only a few, admitted after their refugee status was approved by the UN.
We don't take in border jumpers.
A few?
Quote
On 9 September 2015, the Australian Government announced that it will make an extra 12,000 humanitarian places available in response to the conflicts in Syria and Iraq. The 12,000 people resettled in Australia as part of this intake will be granted a permanent visa.
These 12,000 places are in addition to Australia's Humanitarian Programme, which totalled 13,750 places for the 2015-16 financial year, and which will increase to 18,750 places in the 2018-19 financial year.
Between 1 July 2015 and 7 October 2016, 14,047 visas have been granted to people displaced by conflict in Syria and Iraq:
-8313 towards the additional 12,000 places (November 2015 – 7 October 2016)
-884 under the 2016–17 Humanitarian Programme to date
-4850 under the 2015–16 Humanitarian Programme
In this time, 10,244 people have arrived in Australia:
-5235 as part of the additional 12,000 places (November 2015 – 7 October 2016)
-1816 arrivals in 2016–17 to date under the annual humanitarian programme
-3193 arrivals in 2015–16 under the annual humanitarian programme
//https://www.border.gov.au/Trav/Refu/response-syrian-humanitarian-crisis
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
I knew Crow was wrong. Australia is taking less muslims from Syria pretending to be refugees than Canada or Europe, but still far too many.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Following the failed open door refugee policies of countries like Germany is not xenophobia you stupid cow. It's called being responsible and putting your nation's interests first. Something all Western countries, including Canada are not doing anymore.
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Following the failed open door refugee policies of countries like Germany is not xenophobia you stupid cow. It's called being responsible and putting your nation's interests first. Something all Western countries, including Canada are not doing anymore.
Xenophobia does shape refugee policy in East Asia Shen Li, you know that.
Quote from: "Romero"
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/australia-'cherry-picking'-syrian-refugees-says-refugee-council/7289918
Wrong again, Rom.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Romero"
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/australia-'cherry-picking'-syrian-refugees-says-refugee-council/7289918
Wrong again, Rom.
I will read that later Oberon.
One muslim refugee is one too many.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Romero"
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/australia-'cherry-picking'-syrian-refugees-says-refugee-council/7289918
Wrong again, Rom.
I see "accuses".
If there's going to be over 18,000 accepted, they're mostly going to be Muslim.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
One muslim refugee is one too many.
If we are going to take this backwards ideology in, at least send them up to the Arctic in camps. As soon as the civil war is over, they go back. Private money can pay for it too.
Quote from: "Romero"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Romero"
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/australia-'cherry-picking'-syrian-refugees-says-refugee-council/7289918
Wrong again, Rom.
I see "accuses".
If there's going to be over 18,000 accepted, they're mostly going to be Muslim.
Sorry, Rom.
The government has already stated it will only bring in Syrian Christians.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Romero"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "Romero"
They're mostly Muslim Syrian refugees, since most Syrian refugees are Muslim. Australia is not discriminating based on religion.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/australia-'cherry-picking'-syrian-refugees-says-refugee-council/7289918
Wrong again, Rom.
I see "accuses".
If there's going to be over 18,000 accepted, they're mostly going to be Muslim.
Sorry, Rom.
The government has already stated it will only bring in Syrian Christians.
My understanding that xtians get priority(as they should), but muslimes will still be allowed.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-08/christians-to-get-priority-in-syrian-refugee-intake/6757110
Read between the lines.
They will find 18,000 Xtians.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Read between the lines.
They will find 18,000 Xtians.
I hope so for Australia's sake. Muslims from Syria are not real refugees.
Hey, does Australia allow refugees a quickie pathway to citizenship like we foolishly do?
Quote from: "Oberon"
Sorry, Rom.
The government has already stated it will only bring in Syrian Christians.
There has been no official statement on that, and there aren't that many Syrian Christians.
Quote
When former prime minister Tony Abbott first announced Australia would take in 12,000 extra refugees fleeing the conflict in Syria, some members of his party called on him to give Christian refugees priority.
But the Department of Immigration was quick to clarify this would not be the case.
The head of the government's Syrian Refugee Resettlement Task Force, Peter Vardos, told the ABC that Christians would not be given priority to be resettled in Australia.
"There is no selection based purely on religion, as has been suggested in some quarters," Mr Vardos said recently while on a trip to a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan.
"It is a non-discriminatory program across the board. And I am confident that by the end of this process when you look at the make-up of the 12,000 people they will come from a range of ethnicities and religions."
//http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-18/morrison-expects-christians-to-be-focus-of-refugee-program/6952854
Like I said, read between the lines.
I don't read between the lines. I read facts.
There are already a few thousand Syrian refugees in Australia. They're mostly Muslim.
Quote from: "Romero"
There are already a few thousand Syrian refugees in Australia. They're mostly Muslim.
You say that like it's a good thing for Australia. :crazy:
Quote
Australia fifth in list of world's most welcoming refugee destinations, Amnesty International says
The Refugees Welcome Index surveyed 27,000 people to measure public levels of acceptance of refugees in 27 countries.
The index ranked nations on a sliding scale of how willing citizens said they were to welcome refugees into their homes, neighbourhoods, cities, towns or villages and countries.
It found that 71 per cent of Australians believed that the Federal Government should do more to help refugees fleeing war or persecution,
"Australia has a long history of welcoming refugees and the overwhelming approval of the decision to accept 12,000 Syrian refugees is testament to that," Amnesty International refugee coordinator Doctor Graham Thom said.
China, Germany, Britain and Canada were ranked as the world's most welcoming to refugees.
//http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-19/australia-fifth-most-welcoming-to-refugees/7427956
^That is a deeply flawed survey and it says China is the most welcoming for refugees. China has not accepted large numbers of refugees since Vietnam.
Quote
However, there also could be a more mundane reason too: a glitchy translation. The first two questions on the Chinese phone-administered questionnaire specifically mention refugees fleeing "war or persecution." The third doesn't; it merely asks what degree of accommodation the respondent would be willing to offer refugees.
In addition, only in the first question—one about whether refugees should be able to flee to other countries to escape conflict and persecution—does the questioner imply anything about refugees fleeing specifically to other countries.
This last point is significant because the word that GlobeScan, the consultancy who conducted the research, used to in its phone-administered survey, 难民 (nanmin), literally means "person displaced by calamity"—without regard to nationality. So it can mean a person fleeing, say, Syria. Or, just as easily, the word might refer to someone driven out of their home within China (what humanitarians call "internally displaced people," or IDPs). For this reason, Chinese-language media often make the distinction between "international refugees" and "domestic refugees. And thanks to both its size and the tragic frequency of natural disasters, China just happens to have a lot of those latter.
http://qz.com/687518/is-china-really-the-most-welcoming-country-for-refugees/
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Fash, these 'refugees' are nothing but trouble. The vast majority of them are economic migrants......
Its a shame Europe is guilt tripped so easily into accepting them, when other countries just point blank refuse.
This is absolutely true that too many so called refugees are economic migrants.
I am not sure where I stand on this issue. On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Fash, these 'refugees' are nothing but trouble. The vast majority of them are economic migrants......
Its a shame Europe is guilt tripped so easily into accepting them, when other countries just point blank refuse.
This is absolutely true that too many so called refugees are economic migrants.
I am not sure where I stand on this issue. On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Exactly, it is grossly unfair to legit immigrants. They get financial assistance too ffs.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Ex-fucking-zactly!!!
That is the view of MOST people in the West.
Give them shelter and respite, but NOT citizenship. As soon as their country is placated and the government acknowledges it will receive tham back without penalty and persecution, home they go. As happened during the Balkan War with the Kosovos. They were re-patriated as soon as the war concluded.
True, there may be some circumstances whereby their home country never becomes safe for them (by example, North Korea, Cuba, Iran and some African basket case countries) and in that case we are stuck with them, but that's fine.
That's what separates us from the barbarians.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Ex-fucking-zactly!!!
That is the view of MOST people in the West.
Give them shelter and respite, but NOT citizenship. As soon as their country is placated and the government acknowledges it will receive tham back without penalty and persecution, home they go. As happened during the Balkan War with the Kosovos. They were re-patriated as soon as the war concluded.
True, there may be some circumstances whereby their home country never becomes safe for them (by example, North Korea, Cuba, Iran and some African basket case countries) and in that case we are stuck with them, but that's fine.
That's what separates us from the barbarians.
Weren't Kosovars and other former Yugoslavians repatriated after the various Balkans wars? I know some Balkans refugees in my area. Isn't the owner of VF a refugee from that part of Europe? If they went home, I believe it was voluntary.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Celebrating the xenophobic policies of South Korea and Japan Herman..
:001_rolleyes:
Taiwan is xenophobic too.
Fash, these 'refugees' are nothing but trouble. The vast majority of them are economic migrants......
Its a shame Europe is guilt tripped so easily into accepting them, when other countries just point blank refuse.
This is absolutely true that too many so called refugees are economic migrants.
I am not sure where I stand on this issue. On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Exactly, it is grossly unfair to legit immigrants. They get financial assistance too ffs.
Let's face it, we do not have refugees in Canada. What we refer to as refugees are really fast tracked, tax payer helped insufficiently vetted immigrants who would not qualify if they applied as skilled immigrants.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Ex-fucking-zactly!!!
That is the view of MOST people in the West.
Give them shelter and respite, but NOT citizenship. As soon as their country is placated and the government acknowledges it will receive tham back without penalty and persecution, home they go. As happened during the Balkan War with the Kosovos. They were re-patriated as soon as the war concluded.
True, there may be some circumstances whereby their home country never becomes safe for them (by example, North Korea, Cuba, Iran and some African basket case countries) and in that case we are stuck with them, but that's fine.
That's what separates us from the barbarians.
Weren't Kosovars and other former Yugoslavians repatriated after the various Balkans wars? I know some Balkans refugees in my area. Isn't the owner of VF a refugee from that part of Europe? If they went home, I believe it was voluntary.
The Kosovos were largely repatriated after the war. I presume some remained on humanitarian grounds based on health and welfare issues. But most were sent home.
Vesna (the owner of VF) is a Serbian, not a Kosovar. I don't know the circumstances of her relocation to Canada, but I suspect she fled the war. Despite her stated love for Serbia, socialism and the old Soviet system, she chose to live in Canada.
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Ex-fucking-zactly!!!
That is the view of MOST people in the West.
Give them shelter and respite, but NOT citizenship. As soon as their country is placated and the government acknowledges it will receive tham back without penalty and persecution, home they go. As happened during the Balkan War with the Kosovos. They were re-patriated as soon as the war concluded.
True, there may be some circumstances whereby their home country never becomes safe for them (by example, North Korea, Cuba, Iran and some African basket case countries) and in that case we are stuck with them, but that's fine.
That's what separates us from the barbarians.
Weren't Kosovars and other former Yugoslavians repatriated after the various Balkans wars? I know some Balkans refugees in my area. Isn't the owner of VF a refugee from that part of Europe? If they went home, I believe it was voluntary.
The Kosovos were largely repatriated after the war. I presume some remained on humanitarian grounds based on health and welfare issues. But most were sent home.
Vesna (the owner of VF) is a Serbian, not a Kosovar. I don't know the circumstances of her relocation to Canada, but I suspect she fled the war. Despite her stated love for Serbia, socialism and the old Soviet system, she chose to live in Canada.
The owner of VF is nutjob from what I have heard from RW, Renee and Shen Li.
Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Oberon"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
On the one hand, I do not want to deny anyone fleeing for their lives anyone TEMPORARY sanctuary. But, I can certainly understand why there are objections to making them permanent residents and eventually citizens. They should go home and apply like everyone else.
Ex-fucking-zactly!!!
That is the view of MOST people in the West.
Give them shelter and respite, but NOT citizenship. As soon as their country is placated and the government acknowledges it will receive tham back without penalty and persecution, home they go. As happened during the Balkan War with the Kosovos. They were re-patriated as soon as the war concluded.
True, there may be some circumstances whereby their home country never becomes safe for them (by example, North Korea, Cuba, Iran and some African basket case countries) and in that case we are stuck with them, but that's fine.
That's what separates us from the barbarians.
Weren't Kosovars and other former Yugoslavians repatriated after the various Balkans wars? I know some Balkans refugees in my area. Isn't the owner of VF a refugee from that part of Europe? If they went home, I believe it was voluntary.
The Kosovos were largely repatriated after the war. I presume some remained on humanitarian grounds based on health and welfare issues. But most were sent home.
Vesna (the owner of VF) is a Serbian, not a Kosovar. I don't know the circumstances of her relocation to Canada, but I suspect she fled the war. Despite her stated love for Serbia, socialism and the old Soviet system, she chose to live in Canada.
The owner of VF is nutjob from what I have heard from RW, Renee and Shen Li.
She takes her forum very seriously. She probably just needs a break.