You're not very bright in some areas, are you?
I'm sorry. Is this an issue?
Well he ain't doing it because it aint.
Everything involving bell end is a fucken over reaction and a fucken drama.
So you better go like a good doggy and fix it.
woof woof Tips
Re that biatch ^^
RR 7/10.
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Nice, now they can even purchase and own guns... :oeudC:
Quote from: "Bricktop"
White people in Canada are the same as White people around the rest of the World...
We bend over fucking backwards for any and all. We have to, or we're labelled "racists.'
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
Exactly!
I know there are still some yahoo states in the US that don't require fingerprint ID and only require photo ID but they are states where anyone with a face and a false residence can buy a gun. :negative:
They are the problem states where straw purchases take place and illegal gun trafficking are at it's worst.
I'd like to see how many Muslim women apply for gun licenses in Canada and then their crime statistics. If I'm going to be incensed about something, I'd like an actual reason to be.
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
But the scary part is I dun think Canada requires fingerprints records when applying for a gun license either, on the RCMP gun license application web site they never mentioned anything about fingerprints, but just a photo ID is needed. ac_unsure
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
But the scary part is I dun think Canada requires fingerprints records when applying for a gun license either, on the RCMP gun license application web site they never mentioned anything about fingerprints, but just a photo ID is needed. ac_unsure
I believe you need a criminal background check and that includes fingerprinting.
Quote from: "RW"
Oh I'm sure there are tons..... :laugh3:
You know who apply for gun purchasing permits the most in the US and I'm sure it's the same in Canadar?.....Law abiding people who have absolutely no intention of terrorist or criminal activity.....that's who.
We gotta stop those fuckers..... :laugh3:
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Oh I'm sure there are tons..... :laugh3:
You know who apply for gun purchasing permits the most in the US and I'm sure it's the same in Canadar?.....Law abiding people who have absolutely no intention of terrorist or criminal activity.....that's who.
We gotta stop those fuckers..... :laugh3:
It's true. Law abiding citizens own the majority of guns.
I just can't stand the video posted. It's another freak out over a non-issue. The requirement to get a gun are extremely strict and require a lot of information (including fingerprints - I checked). Not having a picture on your card is minor but yet is being touted as some grave threat to Canadian security.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
But the scary part is I dun think Canada requires fingerprints records when applying for a gun license either, on the RCMP gun license application web site they never mentioned anything about fingerprints, but just a photo ID is needed. ac_unsure
I believe you need a criminal background check and that includes fingerprinting.
That could be one possibility, but iirc I remember my brother mentioned only convicted criminals get their fingerprints records, but then it could be possible if one can't give a photo ID they might use fingerprints as an alternative.
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
But the scary part is I dun think Canada requires fingerprints records when applying for a gun license either, on the RCMP gun license application web site they never mentioned anything about fingerprints, but just a photo ID is needed. ac_unsure
I believe you need a criminal background check and that includes fingerprinting.
That could be one possibility, but iirc I remember my brother mentioned only convicted criminals get their fingerprints records, but then it could be possible if one can't give a photo ID they might use fingerprints as an alternative.
I actually just talked to a person with a firearms license and fingerprints are required to get your card.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Zetsu"
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Giving away a gun licence to someone who's face you cannot see definitely is an issue.
Why?
I guess because to some, facial recognition is so much more reliable than fingerprint ID...... ac_toofunny
Facial recognition is unreliable. Appearances can be changed and do change with the passage of time, fingerprints do not.
All firearms purchases across the board should be based on your individual fingerprint ID and criminal background check.
Who gives a fuck what the person looks like at time of purchase...Is appearance any indication of intent or possible criminal or terrorist activity?......NO.
But the scary part is I dun think Canada requires fingerprints records when applying for a gun license either, on the RCMP gun license application web site they never mentioned anything about fingerprints, but just a photo ID is needed. ac_unsure
I believe you need a criminal background check and that includes fingerprinting.
That could be one possibility, but iirc I remember my brother mentioned only convicted criminals get their fingerprints records, but then it could be possible if one can't give a photo ID they might use fingerprints as an alternative.
I actually just talked to a person with a firearms license and fingerprints are required to get your card.
Lol that was fast. :001_tongue:
I have a great number of people on hand I can ring if I have a question. I actually messaged Keeper because he used to be an avid hunter and owned several guns and he let me know you get fingerprinted. It's been that way for years.
Apparently, not only are Canadians stupid enough to give gun licences to people they cannot see, but they also fail to see the glaringly obvious issue.
Your government is altering its legal requirements to suit a specific religion!!!
THAT is the stupidity.
Why not exempt religions from child bride marriages? Female genital mutilation? Bigamy?
Why should people who believe different fairy tales than you be treated any differently to any other citizen.
Just plain stupid. And then we wonder why our culture is eroded, when it is us pulling it apart.
Our pm is a bigger apologist for Islam than Rohammad.
Well, someone elected him!!
They are your problem.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Your government is altering its legal requirements to suit a specific religion!!!
THAT is the stupidity.
Why not exempt religions from child bride marriages? Female genital mutilation? Bigamy?
Why should people who believe different fairy tales than you be treated any differently to any other citizen.
Just plain stupid. And then we wonder why our culture is eroded, when it is us pulling it apart.
Actually, it's not. It's providing a secondary method of application in accordance to the Canadian Charter but the requirement to get the license remain the same. What appears on that license after the application is the difference.
This is a non-issue wrapped in paranoia.
Quote from: "Shen Li"
This was in place well before Trudeau. See Harper for details.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Your government is altering its legal requirements to suit a specific religion!!!
THAT is the stupidity.
Why not exempt religions from child bride marriages? Female genital mutilation? Bigamy?
Why should people who believe different fairy tales than you be treated any differently to any other citizen.
Just plain stupid. And then we wonder why our culture is eroded, when it is us pulling it apart.
Actually, it's not. It's providing a secondary method of application in accordance to the Canadian Charter but the requirement to get the license remain the same. What appears on that license after the application is the difference.
This is a non-issue wrapped in paranoia.
I'm sorry. Perhaps the video is erroneous. But I definitely saw reference to statutes which explicitly identified religion as a basis for being excluded from the same process as other citizens.
Its a statutory discrimination.
Nothing to do with this "Charter" you so dearly embrace.
And as it relates to concealed faces...how many religions is it referencing do you think?
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Your government is altering its legal requirements to suit a specific religion!!!
THAT is the stupidity.
Why not exempt religions from child bride marriages? Female genital mutilation? Bigamy?
Why should people who believe different fairy tales than you be treated any differently to any other citizen.
Just plain stupid. And then we wonder why our culture is eroded, when it is us pulling it apart.
Actually, it's not. It's providing a secondary method of application in accordance to the Canadian Charter but the requirement to get the license remain the same. What appears on that license after the application is the difference.
This is a non-issue wrapped in paranoia.
I'm sorry. Perhaps the video is erroneous. But I definitely saw reference to statutes which explicitly identified religion as a basis for being excluded from the same process as other citizens.
Its a statutory discrimination.
Nothing to do with this "Charter" you so dearly embrace.
And as it relates to concealed faces...how many religions is it referencing do you think?
So wait a second...
If the process states that you can show ID or follow some other steps, is that deviating from the process? No it's not because it's part of the process, which I might add has to follow the Charter. Having ID on licenses is a relatively new thing altogether, BTW.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
They are your problem.
There is no alternative in this country. We have 3 different flavours of Homo-ero.
Yeah we pretty much do haha
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
They are your problem.
There is no alternative in this country. We have 3 different flavours of Homo-ero.
Integration not exclusion.
It's not a bad thing to have everyone starting on a similar mark.
Quote from: "RW"
I still believe in multiculturalism. I don't hate Muslims.
Guns and cross bows...everyone should own one!
Quote from: "Berry Sweet"
lol
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Your government is altering its legal requirements to suit a specific religion!!!
THAT is the stupidity.
Why not exempt religions from child bride marriages? Female genital mutilation? Bigamy?
Why should people who believe different fairy tales than you be treated any differently to any other citizen.
Just plain stupid. And then we wonder why our culture is eroded, when it is us pulling it apart.
Actually, it's not. It's providing a secondary method of application in accordance to the Canadian Charter but the requirement to get the license remain the same. What appears on that license after the application is the difference.
This is a non-issue wrapped in paranoia.
I'm sorry. Perhaps the video is erroneous. But I definitely saw reference to statutes which explicitly identified religion as a basis for being excluded from the same process as other citizens.
Its a statutory discrimination.
Nothing to do with this "Charter" you so dearly embrace.
And as it relates to concealed faces...how many religions is it referencing do you think?
So wait a second...
If the process states that you can show ID or follow some other steps, is that deviating from the process? No it's not because it's part of the process, which I might add has to follow the Charter. Having ID on licenses is a relatively new thing altogether, BTW.
*sigh*...
:dash1:
The PROCESS has inbuilt religious discrimination.
And for the Idon'tknowhowmanyfuckingtimes THE CONCEALMENT OF THE FACE IS NOT A RELIGIOUS IMPERATIVE!!!!
Jesus fucking wept.
NO religion specifies woman being kept in a fucking tent.