Quote
A Canadian soldier in Iraq has killed an ISIS militant from more than two miles away, shattering the world record for a confirmed sniper kill in military history.
According to Toronto's Globe and Mail newspaper, the gun specialist from the elite Joint Task Force 2 achieved the feat with a shot from a high-rise during an operation within the past 30 days.
"The shot in question actually disrupted a Daesh [Islamic State] attack on Iraqi security forces," a military source — who requested anonymity because the unit's operations are classified — told the paper. "Instead of dropping a bomb that could potentially kill civilians in the area, it is a very precise application of force and because it was so far way, the bad guys didn't have a clue what was happening."
The 3,450-meter shot, which took about 10 seconds to reach its target, was independently verified by a video camera and other data, the source said.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://www.gannett-cdn.com/usatoday/editorial/graphics/2017/06/062217-sniper-record_Online.png%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://www.gannett-cdn.com/usatoday/ed%20...%20Online.png%22%3Ehttps://www.gannett-cdn.com/usatoday/editorial/graphics/2017/06/062217-sniper-record_Online.png%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
//https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/06/22/report-canadian-sniper-kills-isis-fighter-2-miles-away/418889001/
Forget ordering new jet fighters. Just send in our snipers!
What are Canadian soldiers doing in Iraq?
Quote
Operation IMPACT is the Canadian Armed Forces' (CAF) support to the Global Coalition against Daesh in Iraq and Syria. Under this mission, the CAF:
conducts air operations
provides training and assistance to the Iraqi security forces
helps regional forces build their capacity
provides medical services to Coalition forces
supports the Coalition with highly-skilled CAF members
Joint Task Force-Iraq is responsible for:
national command and control of Operation IMPACT personnel and operations
coordinating operations with the Coalition headquarters
The CAF operates an all-source intelligence centre as part of Joint Task Force-Iraq. It gathers information from a variety of sources. It is responsible for collecting, synthesizing, and analyzing this information.
This intelligence is then used for operational planning. It ultimately helps to:
protect Coalition forces
determine how to conduct Coalition operations
CAF members serve in key positions in Coalition headquarters around the Middle East. They have high-demand skills in planning and carrying out military operations. These skills support and enable the Coalition and Iraqi security forces. The CAF members are experts in areas such as:
intelligence operations
targeting
command and control
JTF-I Detachment Erbil is made up of some 30 CAF members. It is known as Camp Érable. It is host to and directly supports:
the Tactical Aviation Detachment
the Canadian-led Coalition Role 2 medical facility
The CAF commands a Role 2 medical facility in northern Iraq. It has a mandate to provide lifesaving medical and surgical care to Coalition forces. Approximately 50 CAF members serve at this facility in roles that include:
senior leadership
physicians
nurses
medical technicians
laboratory and diagnostic imaging technicians
a dental team
support staff
Medical facility capabilities include:
resuscitation
damage control surgery
intensive care support
dental care
diagnostic imaging
a medical lab
The CAF also provides medical equipment and supplies for the facility.
//http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/operations-abroad-current/op-impact.page
I approve of Operation IMPACT. It's a very focused way of fighting terrorism.
I think a large number of people in this country are unaware of this mission.
We should not spend one taxpayer dollar nor put one Canadian soldier's life in jeopardy for that armpit of the world.
I think its well understood that in order to eliminate ISIS's influence globally, the nest has to be destroyed.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I think its well understood that in order to eliminate ISIS's influence globally, the nest has to be destroyed.
Destroying ISIS will do nothing to stop the cancer of Islam from spreading. The weekly jihadi attacks will not end. Islam is much bigger than ISIS.
I would say that you are both right. I.S. needs killin in Syria / Iraq ..... but that's not the end of it
it has spread many places and will continue to be a problem
plus other groups and individuals of course will continue to do their thing ... that's how islam was planned to function initially .. that's how it operates today .. and of course tomorrow
As to OP, what a shot ... since release of info it has been front and centre on most networks
ICB.
A shot over that distance is virtually impossible.
Quote from: "cc"
I would say that you are both right. I.S. needs killin in Syria / Iraq ..... but that's not the end of it
it has spread many places and will continue to be a problem
plus other groups and individuals of course will continue to do their thing ... that's how islam was planned to function initially .. that's how it operates today .. and of course tomorrow
As to OP, what a shot ... since release of info it has been front and centre on most networks
I support smashing IS in Syria and Iraq too. But, like you said that is not the end of it. Not even close.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
ICB.
A shot over that distance is virtually impossible.
I question the distance as well.
I find it odd that all the other record inducing shots were between 2,500 and 2,750 yards...this one jumps out to over 3,600 yards . ac_unsure ....something doesn't smell right.
I'm mean if you are going to go ahead and make shit up....at least make it believable.
Typical of they way reporting is done now, they give the distance in feet for the biggest number. But 3,450 meters is indeed an awfully long shot.
Quote from: "kiebers"
Typical of they way reporting is done now, they give the distance in feet for the biggest number. But 3,450 meters is indeed an awfully long shot.
I believe the numbers in the op are in feet.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "kiebers"
Typical of they way reporting is done now, they give the distance in feet for the biggest number. But 3,450 meters is indeed an awfully long shot.
I believe the numbers in the op are in feet.
That's where it gets confusing and misleading...When using imperial units, shooting range distances are always measured in yards....not feet.
It's odd that something like this would be expressed in feet. Even the American military uses metric measurements for range distances and has been doing so since the Vietnam era.
Quote from: "Renee"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "kiebers"
Typical of they way reporting is done now, they give the distance in feet for the biggest number. But 3,450 meters is indeed an awfully long shot.
I believe the numbers in the op are in feet.
That's where it gets confusing and misleading...When using imperial units, shooting range distances are always measured in yards....not feet.
It's odd that something like this would be expressed in feet. Even the American military uses metric measurements for range distances and has been doing so since the Vietnam era.
In that case, it is strange.
Quote from: "Renee"
That's where it gets confusing and misleading...When using imperial units, shooting range distances are always measured in yards....not feet.
It's odd that something like this would be expressed in feet. Even the American military uses metric measurements for range distances and has been doing so since the Vietnam era.
Obviously an American media outlet would convert it to imperial. You've never seen that before? Happens all the time. Just like how a Canadian media outlet would convert imperial to metric.
It happened. Can't just make that up. The effective range of the TAC-50 is indeed 3,450m/3,770 yd.
Quote
A Canadian sniper set what appears to be a record, picking off an ISIS fighter from some 2.2 miles away, and disrupting a potentially deadly operation by the terror group in Iraq.
Shooting experts say the fatal shot at a world-record distance of 11,316 feet underscores how stunningly sophisticated military snipers are becoming.
//http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/22/canadian-sniper-sets-world-record-with-2-1-mile-pickoff-isis-fighter.html
Experts aren't disputing it.
Quote from: "Romero"
Quote from: "Renee"
That's where it gets confusing and misleading...When using imperial units, shooting range distances are always measured in yards....not feet.
It's odd that something like this would be expressed in feet. Even the American military uses metric measurements for range distances and has been doing so since the Vietnam era.
Obviously an American media outlet would convert it to imperial. You've never seen that before? Happens all the time. Just like how a Canadian media outlet would convert imperial to metric.
It happened. Can't just make that up. The effective range of the TAC-50 is indeed 3,450m/3,770 yd.
Quote
A Canadian sniper set what appears to be a record, picking off an ISIS fighter from some 2.2 miles away, and disrupting a potentially deadly operation by the terror group in Iraq.
Shooting experts say the fatal shot at a world-record distance of 11,316 feet underscores how stunningly sophisticated military snipers are becoming.
//http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/06/22/canadian-sniper-sets-world-record-with-2-1-mile-pickoff-isis-fighter.html
Experts aren't disputing it.
I've never seen range distances expressed in "feet". It's always yards or meters.
I'm pretty sure I've been on more ranges private or military (Fort Dix) than you so you can shove your condescending bullshit, you snippy little shit.
I guess it can be chalked up to the ignorance and penchant for the sensational that most journalists have regarding firearms and shooting.
Quote
I'm pretty sure I've been on more ranges private or military (Fort Dix) than you
No doubt you have.
Quote from: "Renee"
I've never seen range distances expressed in "feet". It's always yards or meters.
Quote
AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
April 3, 2014
British Sniper Sets Longest Sniper Shot Record – 8,120 Feet
Here is something that has been in the news recently and is worth bringing up again. In 2009 a British Army soldier by the name of Corporal Craig Harrison, of the Household Cavalry, set a new record for the longest shot in combat. Twice. Cpl. Harrison fired two shots at Taliban machine gunners in Afghanistan.
They were confirmed via GPS to be 8,120 feet from Cpl. Harrison's position.
That is 1.54 miles. More than a mile and a half. To make it even more astounding, the range was almost 3,000 feet beyond what is considered the effective range of the weapon. At that range the bullet takes around 3 seconds to reach the target.
The previous record was set in 2002 for a sniper kill at 7,972 ft. That shot was made by Canadian Corporal Rob Furlong, of Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry, who was using a .50BMG McMillan TAC-50 rifle.
//https://www.ammoland.com/2014/04/british-sniper-sets-new-long-distance-kill-shot-record-8120-feet/#axzz4kr8YcBSK
:001_rolleyes:
It's pretty odd that you're trying to argue a unit of measure isn't supposed to be used for measuring distance. :laugh:
You really must stop using such sites as Fox and Ammoland (above)
Your well established prog "loaded" lame news reputation is in serious jeopardy
Typically, when speaking of firearms and their effective ranges, yards and meters are used in the shooting community. I have been shooting now for almost 60 years and I have never spoke of, or heard of, feet being used as measurement in shooting distances. Those that don't shoot or those that want the most bang for their buck in a headline or story may opt to use the term "feet" so it sounds more dramatic, a tactic you are very familiar with.
It was a helluva shot to be sure.
The bullet would take around 10 seconds to reach its target, which presumably remains ABSOLUTELY stationary during that time.
ICB.