This video nails it.
Anyone care to rebut??
The deliberate division of human civilisation is a political strategy, now spearheaded by rampant feminism.
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
Quote from: "Bricktop"
This video nails it.
Anyone care to rebut??
The deliberate division of human civilisation is a political strategy, now spearheaded by rampant feminism.
I watched it up to the guys clothes thing. That was enough.
Quote from: "RW"
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
In your OPINION, it is untrue.
Others might disagree.
It's a biased political opinion Bricktop.
ALL political opinions are biased, Fash.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
In your OPINION, it is untrue.
Others might disagree.
Um no. What the video claimed is legally untrue. I read the law.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
ALL political opinions are biased, Fash.
Pragmatism does seem to be in short supply these days.
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
In your OPINION, it is untrue.
Others might disagree.
Um no. What the video claimed is legally untrue. I read the law.
Oh, well.
Law always is TRUTH, innit?
No, ittint.
But, when someone is talking as though they are aware of the law when in fact they aren't, they are then not telling the truth.
This kind of sophomoric dodge is beneath you, Leo.
Instead of insults, address the discussion!!!
No!
I have nothing to say about the identity politics surrounding gender that I haven't already said here.
I have better things to do.
Like paint my toenails.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
In your OPINION, it is untrue.
Others might disagree.
Um no. What the video claimed is legally untrue. I read the law.
Oh, well.
Law always is TRUTH, innit?
Allow me to address the issue.
I went and read the applicable addition in the Human Rights Code. I then compared it to what was said in your video. They didn't match. Being that the law is the authority on the issue and Fox News isn't, I am going to say Fox's reporting was untrue.
Not only that, but the vid Leo claims "nailed it" is a badly edited collection of sound bites, unworthy of consideration.
Show me someone with a sustained, sound, and valid reasoning and I'll accept debate.
I don't respond to amateurish propaganda pieces, whatever their source.
Quote from: "Blurt"
No!
I have nothing to say about the identity politics surrounding gender that I haven't already said here.
I have better things to do.
Like paint my toenails.
and some bleaching ac_lmfao
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Quote from: "RW"
I agree with the boy thing.
The gender identity thing is BS (as in untrue).
In your OPINION, it is untrue.
Others might disagree.
Um no. What the video claimed is legally untrue. I read the law.
Oh, well.
Law always is TRUTH, innit?
Allow me to address the issue.
I went and read the applicable addition in the Human Rights Code. I then compared it to what was said in your video. They didn't match. Being that the law is the authority on the issue and Fox News isn't, I am going to say Fox's reporting was untrue.
whadda you mean addition ?
quote the relevant sections of all Codes and Gov't Acts in future or you will be abstained from commenting.
Here, let me help you, putz (the ADDITION is highlighted in red):
From the Canadian Human Rights Act:
PART I
Proscribed Discrimination
General
Marginal note: Prohibited grounds of discrimination
3 (1) For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered.
you quote the Act RW quotes the Code.
2 different animals.
Quote from: "GORDY GAMBINO"
you quote the Act RW quotes the Code.
2 different animals.
No normal contributing member of society gives a fuck. This is why Blurt does.
start on the law cuntys ya better have ya shit sorted
A Govt Act is quite distinct from Code.
Now go fuck yerself with a nigger dildo.
[size=150]Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) Section 319[/size]
319 (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Willful promotion of hatred
(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Defences
(3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)
(a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
(b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
(c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
(d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.
Forfeiture
(4) Where a person is convicted of an offence under section 318 or subsection (1) or (2) of this section, anything by means of or in relation to which the offence was committed, on such conviction, may, in addition to any other punishment imposed, be ordered by the presiding provincial court judge or judge to be forfeited to Her Majesty in right of the province in which that person is convicted, for disposal as the Attorney General may direct.
Exemption from seizure of communication facilities
(5) Subsections 199(6) and (7) apply with such modifications as the circumstances require to section 318 or subsection (1) or (2) of this section.
Consent
(6) No proceeding for an offence under subsection (2) shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.
Definitions
(7) In this section,
communicating includes communicating by telephone, broadcasting or other audible or visible means; (communiquer)
identifiable group has the same meaning as in section 318; (groupe identifiable)
public place includes any place to which the public have access as of right or by invitation, express or implied; (endroit public)
statements includes words spoken or written or recorded electronically or electro-magnetically or otherwise, and gestures, signs or other visible representations. (déclarations)
[size=150]Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) Section 318[/size]
Advocating genocide
318 (1) Every one who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Definition of genocide
(2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,
(a) killing members of the group; or
(b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.
Consent
(3) No proceeding for an offence under this section shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.
Definition of identifiable group
(4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.
Happy, Gordo?
That's just the Criminal Code so you again are not following.
I will take It out on your ass Pattaya style and breach every part of the fucken Code....fuck the Act and fuck you ya fucken Nancy boi but fuck your pins !!!
gender identity or expression
On seeing Blurts new government expense '' well fuck me !!!!!! and hello Mrs. Cunt I PRESUME !!!
Okay, so forget the Human Rights Act.
Forget the federal Criminal Code.
Here's something you'll understand.
^ fUCKEN FANTASTIC....hows that bit where he falls down the trees...fuck I laughed but Im smoking kronic.
Blow me.
;)
What is the disagreement here again?
Gordy says he's sober.
Nobody believes him.
Quote from: "Blurt"
Gordy says he's sober.
Nobody believes him.
:laugh: :laugh:
Quote from: "Blurt"
Gordy says he's sober.
Nobody believes him.
Ah, I see.
I don't drink but I am drugged off me face 24/7/365
I live like tony Montana
kronic fucks me right over
heyyyyyyyy
man
You mean "meng," don't you?
meng ? YA FUCKEN FROG MONG talk engrish
Whatta fucken minda
Quote from: "GORDY GAMBINO"
meng ? YA FUCKEN FROG MONG talk engrish
Whatta fucken minda
Calm down sweetie.
Quote from: "GORDY GAMBINO"
meng ? YA FUCKEN FROG MONG talk engrish
Whatta fucken minda
You don't know the word "meng," Gordy?
Then you've never seen Scarface and you have no clue who Tony Montana is.
His wif gave me a half a mongrel