Title: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 03, 2017, 02:02:44 PM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 03, 2017, 02:02:44 PM
Then after the last Ice Age man settled for good roughly 13,000 years ago .
So are the Britons indigenous ?
Whats ya Views ...........
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:39:12 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:39:12 PM
Man first came to Briton 800,000 years ago . ( Flint Tools carbon dated proves this )Quote from: "IRISH KAM"
Then after the last Ice Age man settled for good roughly 13,000 years ago .
So are the Britons indigenous ?
Whats ya Views ...........
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: kiebers on December 03, 2017, 03:49:21 PM
Post by: kiebers on December 03, 2017, 03:49:21 PM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:50:25 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:50:25 PM
What does it matter at this point?Quote from: "kiebers"Is someone trying to say otherwise?
I don't know about that either.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: kiebers on December 03, 2017, 03:52:21 PM
Post by: kiebers on December 03, 2017, 03:52:21 PM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:54:29 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 03, 2017, 03:54:29 PM
Yep, with no context given it's kind of tough to weigh in.Quote from: "kiebers"
Yes, it's lacking.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 09:42:04 AM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 09:42:04 AM
What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?Quote from: "kiebers"
Yeah Feller . The UN . ( UNITED NATIONS )
The UN desperately doesnt want ' Britons ' to be classed as indigenous .
Cos then Mass 3RD World immigration would have to STOP .
Under the UNs own Charter , Its a Breach of the ' Indigenous ' peoples Human Rights , if :
' Indigenous ' peoples Identity / Culture / Way of Life / Political Beliefs Ect are being wiped out by Mass Immigration .
Britons are being wiped out in their own Country , thru Mass 3RD World immigration .
WHITE Britons have been settled in EIRE / SCOTLAND / WALES / ENGLAND for 10s of 1000s of years .
Yet the UN says were NOT indigenous ?
Then the UN signed into law , that Maoris are Indigenous ?????
Even tho NZ and surrounding isles were settled ONLY 700 years ago !
UN says :
BRITONS ( 18,000 years ) NOT indigenous .
MAORIS ( 700 years ) ARE indigenous .
Work that one out ?
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: kiebers on December 04, 2017, 10:06:16 AM
Post by: kiebers on December 04, 2017, 10:06:16 AM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:05:28 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:05:28 AM
What does it matter at this point? Is someone trying to say otherwise?Quote from: "kiebers"
Yeah Feller . The UN . ( UNITED NATIONS )
The UN desperately doesnt want ' Britons ' to be classed as indigenous .
Cos then Mass 3RD World immigration would have to STOP .
Under the UNs own Charter , Its a Breach of the ' Indigenous ' peoples Human Rights , if :
' Indigenous ' peoples Identity / Culture / Way of Life / Political Beliefs Ect are being wiped out by Mass Immigration .
Britons are being wiped out in their own Country , thru Mass 3RD World immigration .
WHITE Britons have been settled in EIRE / SCOTLAND / WALES / ENGLAND for 10s of 1000s of years .
Yet the UN says were NOT indigenous ?
Then the UN signed into law , that Maoris are Indigenous ?????
Even tho NZ and surrounding isles were settled ONLY 700 years ago !
UN says :
BRITONS ( 18,000 years ) NOT indigenous .
MAORIS ( 700 years ) ARE indigenous .
Work that one out ?
The UN has an agenda.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 11:29:14 AM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 11:29:14 AM
Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:32:46 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:32:46 AM
From wikipediaQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 11:38:48 AM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 11:38:48 AM
From wikipediaQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.
True their language is not at risk. But their land is somewhat at risk, their culture is at risk, and their religion is definitely at risk.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:51:04 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 11:51:04 AM
From wikipediaQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.
True their language is not at risk. But their land is somewhat at risk, their culture is at risk, and their religion is definitely at risk.
They have voluntarily abandoned their religions..
Is their culture at risk or is it changing?
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 12:10:55 PM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 12:10:55 PM
From wikipediaQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.
European languages are at risk and have been for the last 20 years .
As 3RD World immigrants come to Europe and REFUSE to learn English .
There is 100s of immigrant dominated areas where English is not even a 2nd / 3rd / 4th language .
In london alone there is dozens of schools that have children using upto 41 different languages .
The Govt make it worst by NOT enforcing the learning of English by the adults .
If i get a letter from the Govt , its written in Dozens of languages .
So a one page letter turns into over 10 pages .
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 12:43:13 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 12:43:13 PM
It's not in danger.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 01:20:41 PM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 04, 2017, 01:20:41 PM
FACT : In the last Census , there are more NON - WHITES living in london than WHITES .
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 01:33:32 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 01:33:32 PM
From wikipediaQuote from: "Wazzzup"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_rights Indigenous rightsare those rights that exist in recognition of the specific condition of the indigenous peoples. This includes not only the most basic human rights of physical survival and integrity, but also the preservation of their land, language, religion, and other elements of cultural heritage that are a part of their existence as a people.
Kam is right about the UN using double standards. To them, whites can't be indigenous (even though they are) and certainly don't deserve indigenous rights.
So, that would rule out Europeans since their languages are not at risk.
True their language is not at risk. But their land is somewhat at risk, their culture is at risk, and their religion is definitely at risk.
They have voluntarily abandoned their religions..
Is their culture at risk or is it changing?
If anybody were to stand up publically and say "London isn't majority white anymore and I don't like that ,maybe we should chill with the immigration" they would probably be fined or imprisoned, fired from their job and socially ostracizied and defamed as a nazi racist supremacist.
Those Britons who disgaree with their indigenous culture being destroyed (according to the UN's standards)are effectively not allowed to speak.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 01:39:05 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 04, 2017, 01:39:05 PM
English is a second language in London .Quote from: "IRISH KAM"
FACT : In the last Census , there are more NON - WHITES living in london than WHITES .
And that is the capital of Britains indigenous white population. And they also have a Muslim mayor, who by all appearances is a radical Islamist.
(under the UN's guidelines) This is cultural genocide of an indigeonous people. Just because some stupid white Britons are okay with it, does not mean it isn't.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 03:35:27 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 03:35:27 PM
English is the world's second language..Quote from: "Fashionista"
It's not in danger.
English is not at risk, but what about other European countries. What about the Netherlands or Sweden? Will their languages survive the islamic invasion?
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 08:57:15 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 08:57:15 PM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 10:31:02 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2017, 10:31:02 PM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 05, 2017, 12:43:29 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 05, 2017, 12:43:29 AM
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Angry White Male on December 05, 2017, 12:50:16 AM
Post by: Angry White Male on December 05, 2017, 12:50:16 AM
Hell, our Indians descended from the Asians.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 05, 2017, 12:57:55 AM
Post by: Anonymous on December 05, 2017, 12:57:55 AM
Ethnic Japanese are not indigenous to Japan. The Ainu are.Quote from: "Shen Li"
I don't think there aren't many pure Ainu left.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 12:28:39 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 12:28:39 PM
and it seems to have worked in London and in California in the US.
These should provide good laboratories for what will happen to other large geographical areas should they become non white majorities as well. If they succeed then people can point and say "see don't worry about it", if they fail then people can say that's not a route we should go (although anybody saying that, no matter how true, will probably be forcibly silenced
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 09, 2017, 12:41:24 PM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 09, 2017, 12:41:24 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
and it seems to have worked in London and in California in the US.
These should provide good laboratories for what will happen to other large geographical areas should they become non white majorities as well. If they succeed then people can point and say "see don't worry about it", if they fail then people can say that's not a route we should go (although anybody saying that, no matter how true, will probably be forcibly silenced:sad: )
The Whole of Europe will explode into Civil War in the next Decade .
Eastern European states wont as they REFUSE to take backward 3RD World Muslims .
No matter how much the EU Parliament threatens them .
Civil War will start because of Liberalism and the Loony Left , that claim everyone thats proud to be White is a Fascist .
Yet the Loony Left cant work out that they themselves are Fascist .
" Todays Anti - Fascists , will be Tomorrows Fascists " : WINSTON CHURCHILL .
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 12:56:54 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 12:56:54 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
and it seems to have worked in London and in California in the US.
These should provide good laboratories for what will happen to other large geographical areas should they become non white majorities as well. If they succeed then people can point and say "see don't worry about it", if they fail then people can say that's not a route we should go (although anybody saying that, no matter how true, will probably be forcibly silenced:sad: )
I like the diversity in my neighbourhood.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 02:46:06 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 02:46:06 PM
(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%22%3Ehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmlxnZpWAAAhrLE.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
and it seems to have worked in London and in California in the US.
These should provide good laboratories for what will happen to other large geographical areas should they become non white majorities as well. If they succeed then people can point and say "see don't worry about it", if they fail then people can say that's not a route we should go (although anybody saying that, no matter how true, will probably be forcibly silenced:sad: )
I like the diversity in my neighbourhood.
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
Diversity is fine if its people of racial and ethnic variety with more or less the same values, assimilated into a common culture.
If its a bunch of racial double standards and a covert attack on whites and/or western civilzation then its nothing but supremacy politics played in reverse. and a bunch of bullshit.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 02:50:47 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 02:50:47 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't like their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 03:15:10 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 03:15:10 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
Harassment is a crime. Having an opinion SHOULD NEVER BE a crime. people should be allowed to have opinions on immigration without having to go to jail or be fined or have their lives ruined. Anything less is fascist bullshit.
But I have to say Much of the antiwhite antiwestern sentiment is exactly what you describe, narrow minded minority assholes playing supremacy in reverse with the help of retarded virtue signalling whites. I support their right to that opinion but I am not going to be silent on it either.--
what religion do you think you can get away with criticizing in public easer? Islam or Christianity? What race of people are the only people who are allowed to be criticized without having your life ruined? white people.
narrow minded assholes who don't like other people Gods, food, costumes or holiday traditions is exactly right. You're just wrong about which is usually which these days.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 03:16:44 PM
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 03:16:44 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:35:19 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:35:19 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Than have lots of babies. Otherwise, STFU.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:46:09 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:46:09 PM
Harassment is a crime. Having an opinion SHOULD NEVER BE a crime. people should be allowed to have opinions on immigration without having to go to jail or be fined or have their lives ruined. Anything less is fascist bullshit.
But I have to say Much of the antiwhite antiwestern sentiment is exactly what you describe, narrow minded minority assholes playing supremacy in reverse with the help of retarded virtue signalling whites. I support their right to that opinion but I am not going to be silent on it either.--
what religion do you think you can get away with criticizing in public easer? Islam or Christianity? What race of people are the only people who are allowed to be criticized without having your life ruined? white people.
narrow minded assholes who don't like other people Gods, food, costumes or holiday traditions is exactly right. You're just wrong about which is usually which these days.
If you are posting images posting images encouraging ethnic divide like the one you posted on announcement boards in a racially mixed neighbourhood I consider that harassment and inciting problems. Even, if it isn't, it's bad taste.
If the complexion of the area bothers one that much, move. Don't stay and make it a bad place for people like Fash who appreciate the diversity.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 03:54:39 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 03:54:39 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Than have lots of babies. Otherwise, STFU.
or we could just close the doors to our prosperous countries and you can stay home instead.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:59:08 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 03:59:08 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Than have lots of babies. Otherwise, STFU.
or we could just close the doors to our prosperous countries and you can stay home instead.
If we did that, we wouldn't be prosperous much longer.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 04:12:46 PM
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 04:12:46 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Than have lots of babies. Otherwise, STFU.
or we could just close the doors to our prosperous countries and you can stay home instead.
That's the problem, they don't want to stay home, for obvious reasons, so we have to put up with the vast array of border jumpers, economic migrants and benefit spongers, all in the name of multiculturalism.
They should try the open borders thing in their own countries if they like diversity so much....
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 04:17:52 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 04:17:52 PM
Harassment is a crime. Having an opinion SHOULD NEVER BE a crime. people should be allowed to have opinions on immigration without having to go to jail or be fined or have their lives ruined. Anything less is fascist bullshit.
But I have to say Much of the antiwhite antiwestern sentiment is exactly what you describe, narrow minded minority assholes playing supremacy in reverse with the help of retarded virtue signalling whites. I support their right to that opinion but I am not going to be silent on it either.--
what religion do you think you can get away with criticizing in public easer? Islam or Christianity? What race of people are the only people who are allowed to be criticized without having your life ruined? white people.
narrow minded assholes who don't like other people Gods, food, costumes or holiday traditions is exactly right. You're just wrong about which is usually which these days.
If you are posting images posting images encouraging ethnic divide like the one you posted on announcement boards in a racially mixed neighbourhood I consider that harassment and inciting problems. Even, if it isn't, it's bad taste.
I posted on an announcement board encouraging ethnic divide in a mixed neighborhood? What are you talking about?
If the complexion of the area bothers one that much, move. Don't stay and make it a bad place for people like Fash who appreciate the diversity.Quote from: "seoulbro"
Well that "leave if you don't like it thing" works both ways SB--Maybe if you don't like a white majority country, as you've said many times you are infavor of the west becoming a non white majority, Maybe, YOU should go live somewhere where whites aren't a majority?
BTW I didn't say complexion bothers me. I said if "diversity" means a variety of different people assimilating and sharing the same values and culture then that is fine--( Either you didn't read that or you are deliberately distorting my opinion with a strawman). If it means immigrants imposing their culture on everyone else and trying to take control then they can stay in their own damned country and do that.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 04:29:50 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 09, 2017, 04:29:50 PM
Good thing you do, because that is the only permissable view, all others are verboten.
As it should be. People should not feel harassed into leaving a neighbourhood because narrow minded assholes don't their God,food, costumes or holiday traditions.
We've already established that you wouldn't give a toss if whites are completely overrun in their homelands, so don't be surprised if hardly anyone cares what you have to say on this matter.
Than have lots of babies. Otherwise, STFU.
or we could just close the doors to our prosperous countries and you can stay home instead.
If we did that, we wouldn't be prosperous much longer.
Dunno Bro, 9 out of 10 of the best countries to live in are white majority and they have been doing well and been white majority for a long time. if you don't think they can make it without you, you and others are always welcome to try and make it at home instead, and punish us with your absence.
FTR I'm glad to let a moderately small number people from most any background in (except Muslims)who want to assimilate, and can priovide for themselves and obey the law. But for those immigrants who want to impose your way of life on us, please stay home and live that life there, we don't need you.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 04:36:39 PM
Post by: Aryan on December 09, 2017, 04:36:39 PM
Dunno Bro, 9 out of 10 of the best countries to live in are white majority and they have been doing well and been white majority for a long time. if you don't think they can make it without you, you and others are always welcome to try and make it at home instead,[size=150]and punish us with your absence.[/size]
I don't think that was meant to be funny but it still made me
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 06:17:57 PM
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2017, 06:17:57 PM
Dunno Bro, 9 out of 10 of the best countries to live in are white majority and they have been doing well and been white majority for a long time. if you don't think they can make it without you, you and others are always welcome to try and make it at home instead, and punish us with your absence.
FTR I'm glad to let a moderately small number people from most any background in (except Muslims)who want to assimilate, and can priovide for themselves and obey the law. But for those immigrants who want to impose your way of life on us, please stay home and live that life there, we don't need you.
Oh, immigration is new?
The demographic decline of Caucasians and East Asians is their own fault. Western governments have written a lot of big ticket IOU's. Unfortunately, they have more people collecting and fewer people working to pay for them.
It's really simple for anyone except Scouse and IHJ. Who will pay for all the services and entitlements that more people are using for longer periods of time if fewer young working aged people are paying for them? Why immigrants of course. I have asked both of those xenophobes if they are prepared to accept lower living standards in exchange for fewer immigrants and neither would answer it.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Wazzzup on December 11, 2017, 12:15:43 PM
Post by: Wazzzup on December 11, 2017, 12:15:43 PM
Dunno Bro, 9 out of 10 of the best countries to live in are white majority and they have been doing well and been white majority for a long time. if you don't think they can make it without you, you and others are always welcome to try and make it at home instead, and punish us with your absence.
FTR I'm glad to let a moderately small number people from most any background in (except Muslims)who want to assimilate, and can priovide for themselves and obey the law. But for those immigrants who want to impose your way of life on us, please stay home and live that life there, we don't need you.
Oh, immigration is new?:001_rolleyes:
The demographic decline of Caucasians and East Asians is their own fault. Western governments have written a lot of big locomotive IOU's. Unfortunately, they have more people collecting and fewer people working to pay for them.
It's really simple for anyone except Scouse and IHJ. Who will pay for all the services and entitlements that more people are using for longer periods of time if fewer young working aged people are paying for them? Why immigrants of course. I have asked both of those xenophobes if they are prepared to accept lower living standards in exchange for fewer immigrants and neither would answer it.
Its a theory, but is it true? Like I posted before-- in the US 50% of immigrants are on some form of welfare. Its going to be hard for them to support anyone while
Also there are other considerations, Here's a big one-- the democrat party is using immigration as a political weapon to divide people and get more votes. the eventual goal being a virtual monopoly on power in the US. As long as the democrats want to use immigration as a political weapon I am going to be, at the least, very Skeptical of immigration schemes that help them in their quest for that monopoly on power.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: Frood on December 11, 2017, 02:51:03 PM
Post by: Frood on December 11, 2017, 02:51:03 PM
Now refugees stage protests if they can't get others to pay for their first, second, or third choice destination nations.
Two separate groups of people in my book.
Title: Re: Should the UN class BRITONS as INDIGENOUS ?
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 12, 2017, 08:50:41 PM
Post by: IRISH KAM on December 12, 2017, 08:50:41 PM