THeBlueCashew

Quote from: "cc"It was a very dark day for America .. as its  "The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer"  president rubbed its nose in extremely anti-American islamic fundamentalism



and having just before turned 5 terrorists loose to continue their work  .... in trade for a traitor, their son,  who got several American troops killed trying to rescue him

Quote from: "Herman"Boyle was married to Omar Khadr's sister.

Quote from: "cc"Yes. He sure was and what a piece of work she was and still is



I detailed the family briefly a few posts above .. . including the close OBL connection of the ENTIRE family

QuotePrime Minister Justin Trudeau's meeting with Joshua Boyle presents serious security questions and needs to be reviewed, experts have told the Sun.



The initial news that the Boyle family, newly returned from captivity in Afghanistan, had met with Trudeau in December raised red flags with the intelligence community and general public given lingering questions about Joshua Boyle's motivations for travelling to Afghanistan with a pregnant wife, as well as his former marriage to Omar Khadr's sister.



Those concerns greatly increased when earlier this week media discovered Boyle had been arrested and charged with 15 counts that included assault, sexual assault, unlawful confinement and misleading police, though the charges have not been proven in court.



"If the Prime Minister was aware of the investigation into Mr. Boyle and chose to go ahead with the meeting, then he needs to explain why," says Tom Quiggin, a veteran intelligence professional who has worked with the RCMP, Canadian Armed Forces and Privy Council Office. "If he was not aware of the pending charges, then a review is necessary."



Scott Newark, a former Alberta Crown Prosecutor and security adviser to both the Ontario and federal Ministers of Public Safety, has similar concerns.



"Bottom line is that Boyle's history definitely raises national security concerns which the PM should have prioritized and not had the meeting as requested by Boyle," Newark, an author with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, wrote in an email.



Newark also says the public should receive assurances that Trudeau did not agree to give Boyle financial compensation similar to what Khadr received for Canada not having done more to secure his release.



A blunter assessment comes from Joe Varner, who served as director of policy to Conservative cabinet minister Peter MacKay during his time as minister of national defence, justice and attorney general. "The head of government was put at risk," Varner writes over email. "This meeting should not have taken place."



From Varner's perspective, this issue should be examined by the new Parliamentary Committee on National Security, which was formally announced in November. "The head of government was put at risk," Varner says. "In my view this is the first case for review by the committee and the test of whether the committee is real in terms of responsibilities and operations or just lip service."



Quiggin agrees this is an issue for the committee, noting this involves the sharing of information between police forces on national security files. Although Newark, who has written before on the new committee, is less inclined to see it this way: "Should the investigation have been ongoing but the PMO didn't know about it, that's a systemic defect but not related to natsec issues."



The timeline of the investigation into Boyle remains unclear. But court documents reported on by Postmedia show the charges relate to alleged crimes that occurred from Oct. 14 to Dec. 30 — from the time of his return to Canada to his release.



The Prime Minister's Office initially declined to comment on the Boyle meeting when it was first revealed, citing privacy reasons. Following news of Boyle's charges, they declined comment due to the case being before the courts.



"All I can say to this question is that we never comment on any matters relating to the Prime Minister's security," said Cameron Ahmad, manager of media relations for the PMO, in response to a question from the Sun about whether any form of security review was underway.



The whole question of how Boyle wound up in Trudeau's office has left many wondering how security around the PM functions.



"In my day, there was a security official in [the Privy Council Office] who received the PM's schedule," says Norman Spector, who served as chief of staff to former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in the early 1990s. "He was ex-RCMP and would have brought something like that to my attention."



Spector explained that during his time whoever coordinated the PM's schedule was also tasked with checking with head of security concerning such matters.



But even if concerns about Boyle were brought to the attention of Trudeau and his top advisers, the PM can meet with whoever he chooses.



If there is a security review, Quiggin has an idea of how it should unfold: "The review needs to start with the PMO itself, to see if the PM or his Chief of Staff communicated to the RCMP the plan to meet with Boyle," Quiggin says. "If they did communicate this and the RCMP was not aware of the investigation or did not check, then the review needs to look at lines of communication between the police forces of record. Both the safety and reputation of the government are at stake."

http://edmontonsun.com/opinion/columnists/furey-security-review-required-after-boyles-visit-with-the-pm-say-experts/wcm/e30d5ff9-42de-4f0e-beab-7270a7b1cf50

Quote from: "Fashionista"Who are Boyle's sexual assault victims?

Quote from: "Fashionista"Who are Boyle's sexual assault victims?

Quote from: "cc"

Quote from: "Fashionista"Who are Boyle's sexual assault victims?

They rarely release that info early of if young never

Quote from: "cc"No. It all happened in the 2 months he was back here and all in Ottawa. He was held captive (or whatever?) in afghan



"All of the alleged offences occurred in Ottawa between Oct. 14 and Dec. 30, the document says."



and



OTTAWA—Joshua Boyle, the Canadian man who was held hostage with his American wife and children for five years in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has been arrested and charged with assault, unlawful confinement and other offences that are alleged to have occurred in the weeks since his dramatic rescue from captivity in October.

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8033181-joshua-boyle-canadian-hostage-in-afghanistan-charged-with-sex-assault-unlawful-confinement/



Quite a 2 month track record



And pics of our dippy Justin TrueDupe where from  "On Dec. 19, the couple met with Trudeau at his office in Ottawa"

http://nationalpost.com/feature/joshua-boyle

Quote from: "cc"No. It all happened in the 2 months he was back here and all in Ottawa. He was held captive (or whatever?) in afghan



"All of the alleged offences occurred in Ottawa between Oct. 14 and Dec. 30, the document says."



and



OTTAWA—Joshua Boyle, the Canadian man who was held hostage with his American wife and children for five years in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has been arrested and charged with assault, unlawful confinement and other offences that are alleged to have occurred in the weeks since his dramatic rescue from captivity in October.

https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8033181-joshua-boyle-canadian-hostage-in-afghanistan-charged-with-sex-assault-unlawful-confinement/



Quite a 2 month track record



And pics of our dippy Justin TrueDupe where from  "On Dec. 19, the couple met with Trudeau at his office in Ottawa"

http://nationalpost.com/feature/joshua-boyle

QuoteIs Prime Minister Justin Trudeau so blinded by his naive belief that "diversity" and "inclusiveness" are Canada's unique gifts to the world, that he's undermining our safety and security?



Does he understand the nature of evil, that ideologies of hatred exist that no amount of Canadian "niceness" can appease?



New concerns about Trudeau's judgment in these matters were raised by his ill-advised private meeting last month with freed Canadian hostage Joshua Boyle and his family, shortly after they were released from captivity in Afghanistan.



Boyle's bizarre account of his years of incarceration under the Taliban — starting with his explanation he was kidnapped in 2012 while backpacking in Afghanistan with his pregnant wife — made many Canadians suspicious from the start.



Given these circumstances, bad enough Trudeau met privately in his office with Boyle — who was briefly married to Omar Khadr's older sister — which Canadians only found out about when the Boyle family posted pictures of it on social media.



Last week we learned that while Boyle was meeting with Trudeau he was under investigation by Ottawa police, who laid 15 criminal charges against him, including sexual assault, assault, unlawful confinement, public mischief, uttering threats and administering a noxious substance.



Boyle has denounced his Taliban captors and is presumed innocent of the charges.



The relevant issue here is why, of all the Canadians requesting meetings with him, would Trudeau grant a private audience to Boyle?



This given the outstanding questions regarding his years in captivity and regardless of the criminal charges laid after his meeting with the PM.



But it's just the latest controversy calling into question Trudeau's judgment on matters of security, terrorism and global affairs.



Recall Trudeau's recklessly naive tweet last January, amid controversy in the U.S. over President Donald Trump's travel ban, that: "To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada."



It went viral, prompting thousands of would-be asylum seekers to bolt for the Canadian border, illegally entering our country at unmanned crossings, overwhelming border security and our refugee determination process.



Trudeau has stripped Canada of the ability to deport dual citizens convicted of terrorism.



That fulfilled his alarming pre-election boast that, "The Liberal party believes that terrorists should get to keep their Canadian citizenship. Because I do. And I'm willing to take on anyone who disagrees with that" because, "a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian."



As if this was an issue about Trudeau's machismo, as opposed to our security.



Trudeau says Canadians who fight for ISIS overseas can be deprogrammed when they return home, becoming "an extraordinarily powerful voice for preventing radicalization in future generations", a possibility his own public safety minister, Ralph Goodale, describes as "pretty remote."



As Liberal leader, Trudeau called for removing from Canada's citizenship guide that we consider honour killings and female genital mutilation, "barbaric cultural practices", while boasting to The New York Times as prime minister that, "There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada."



Trudeau insulted natural-born Canadians by declaring he's "jealous" of immigrants because, "this is your country more than it is for others because we take it for granted," a divisive twisting of the ideal that we are all equal as Canadians, no matter where we come from.



In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing in April, 2013, which killed three people, including an eight-year-old boy, and wounded 260 others, Trudeau said, before anything about the terrorists was known, that, "there is no question that this happened because there is someone who feels completely excluded, completely at war with innocents, at war with a society."



It's as if Trudeau can't comprehend that evil can exist without provocation, or that billions of people endure injustices without murdering innocents.



Trudeau said he admires China's "basic dictatorship" because it allows its leaders, to "turn their economy around on a dime and say, 'we need to go green, we need to start, you know, investing in solar,'" as if green energy excuses totalitarianism, mass executions and the occupation of Tibet.



Marking the death of Fidel Castro, Trudeau, described the brutal Cuban dictator on behalf of Canadians, including many who suffered under him as, "A larger than life leader... a legendary revolutionary and orator" who, while "controversial" was recognized by "supporters and detractors" for "his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for 'el Comandante.'"



t's one thing for Trudeau to mark the passing of his late father's pal, another to gush over Castro in a way that provoked global mocking for its naiveté.



And further evidence Trudeau doesn't understand the nature of evil.

http://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/trudeau-doesnt-understand-the-nature-of-evil