"YouTube shot up by rapping female Iranian vegan animal rights campaigning yoga instructor".
You couldn't make that up!!
ac_lmfao
Quote from: "Bricktop"
You couldn't make that up!!
ac_lmfao
When you put it that way.
:laugh:
In other news...
"Prince Harry, Meghan Markle reveal royal wedding florist".
Quote from: "Bricktop"
"Prince Harry, Meghan Markle reveal royal wedding florist".
That's important.
Headline on the BBC.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
British Bullshit Corporation
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I see.
How dare you!
The BBC creates Doctor Who!!!
Quote from: "Bricktop"
You couldn't make that up!!
ac_lmfao
In other words, a Sanders supporter.
Undoubtedly.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Is there much support in Britain for privatizing the BBC? I want Canada to privatize the CBC which is the mouthpiece of the Liberal Party of Canada.
I cannot speak for the UK...but I have not seen any move to privatise their national carrier. I doubt any serious move would succeed, as the Beeb has been deeply ingrained into British culture by not only its global news reach, but its mass media entertainment and sports coverage (Dr Who, Top Gear, Broadchurch, and many other serials).
In Australia, there is a huge wave of resentment directed at the Government broadcaster, the ABC, which is not only left, but is rapidly becoming FAR left in its content and editorial standards. People are resenting their tax dollars feeding leftist propaganda.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
In Australia, there is a huge wave of resentment directed at the Government broadcaster, the ABC, which is not only left, but is rapidly becoming FAR left in its content and editorial standards. People are resenting their tax dollars feeding leftist propaganda.
But, the ABC will never be privatized just like the CBC never will. That would require a conservative government with cajones. Neither country has such a party.
Not at the moment.
With our so called "conservative" government, the ABC is safe.
For now.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
With our so called "conservative" government, the ABC is safe.
For now.
We had one Conservative leadership candidate, Maxime Bernier who wanted to make the CBC stand on it's own two feet, but he lost the CPC leadership. The $1.1 billion it receives per year in tax payer funding is safe indefinitely.
Same here. But it WILL happen one day.
Not sure if it matters.
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
It's editors, reporters, heads, .. all levels of an entire industry in the tank
Quote from: "cc"
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
That is most definitely true cc. We know who mediamatters and TheTYEE's sugardaddies are. But, I still feel it's unethical that one media corporation receives taxpayer monies.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "cc"
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
That is most definitely true cc. We know who mediamatters and TheTYEE's sugardaddies are. But, I still feel it's unethical that one media corporation receives taxpayer monies.
motherjones, alternet, salon, commondreams, the raw story and snopes to name a few more.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "cc"
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
That is most definitely true cc. We know who mediamatters and TheTYEE's sugardaddies are. But, I still feel it's unethical that one media corporation receives taxpayer monies.
motherjones, alternet, salon, commondreams, the raw story and snopes to name a few more.
These remind me of Romero and Peaches.
ac_smile
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "cc"
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
That is most definitely true cc. We know who mediamatters and TheTYEE's sugardaddies are. But, I still feel it's unethical that one media corporation receives taxpayer monies.
motherjones, alternet, salon, commondreams, the raw story and snopes to name a few more.
These remind me of Romero and Peaches.
ac_smile
Too true :laugh:
BTW. I'm not talking about those. They have always been in the tank for progs ... I'm saying CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, CTV, Sky, Channel 24, etc etc are " in the tank for progs up past their eyeballs ...
not just biased - rather true and
No way CBC, BBC, Aussies ABC etc. would be any better than the above were they to be "freed"
I don't care if they are in the tank for progtards. I value free speech.
I resent PAYING for it.
good point ... although in the tank "outright activist" press is NOT free speech
I'm only saying that freeing them will not change them
No...but I'd love to see them attract a billion dollars PLUS of sponsorship money while spouting leftist propaganda. They will need to make cutbacks.
Likely true and another good point
It is catching up to them. I just saw the numbers for CNN - it is tanking dramatically ... The onetime cable leader of all ... Not one show made top 20 shows all last month
That's the market talking, and that's what will hurt them most.
It took a while - the combo of all of them got O elected ... almost got Hill elected .... but finally the rules of business are coming into play
Which is also the people talking...they aren't watching, they aren't listening.
CNN really has soiled its own nest with its leftist zeal against the duly elected President. They will feel the pain of their prejudice for decades.
I think so .. I hope so
All of them deserve getting hurt bad
How do they compare with FNC?
Quote from: "cc"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "cc"
Commercial (non govt) MSM is in the tank for progs up past its eyeballs ... not just biased - rather true and full time "activists" for prog agenda
That is most definitely true cc. We know who mediamatters and TheTYEE's sugardaddies are. But, I still feel it's unethical that one media corporation receives taxpayer monies.
motherjones, alternet, salon, commondreams, the raw story and snopes to name a few more.
These remind me of Romero and Peaches.
ac_smile
Too true :laugh:
BTW. I'm not talking about those. They have always been in the tank for progs ... I'm saying CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, CTV, Sky, Channel 24, etc etc are " in the tank for progs up past their eyeballs ...
not just biased - rather true and
No way CBC, BBC, Aussies ABC etc. would be any better than the above were they to be "freed"
I like Global Calgary and the CBC for news....sorry.
I get most of my news from Drudge, Rense, and Breitbart though the last two have to be taken with a grain of salt.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
I have not seen numbers in a while so not sure exactly. It appears they are doing well.
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"
ALL news should be taken with a 20kg sack of salt.