SOUTH Africa has targeted the first two farms for unilateral seizure after the owners refused an offer of one-tenth of the land's value.
Local newspaper City Press reports two game farms in the northern province of Limpopo are the first to be targeted for unilateral seizure after negotiations with the owners to purchase the properties stalled.
While the government says it intends to pay, owners Akkerland Boerdery wanted 200 million rand ($18.7 million) for the land — they're being offered just 20 million rand ($1.87 million). (the government offered them 10% of the value)
It comes as the South African government pushes ahead with plans to amend the country's constitution to allow for the expropriation of land without compensation.
The seizures are intended to test the ability of the government to take land under existing laws, which the ruling African National Congress has previously stated is allowable if "in the public interest".
Earlier this month, City Press reported the government had drawn up a list of 139 farms it planned to seize "to test out" section 25 of the constitution.
The newspaper said employees at the department had been ordered to press ahead with the process at the Land Claims Court.
If the seizures go ahead, it would be the first time the state refuses to pay market value for land. Since the end of apartheid in 1994, the ANC has followed a "willing seller, willing buyer" process to redistribute white-owned farms to blacks.
Earlier this month, cattle farmer Jo-an Engelbrecht told the ABC's Foreign Correspondent his farm just outside Johannesburg was now "worth zero".
"We had several auctions in the last two or three weeks cancelled because there was no people interested in buying the land," he said. "Why would you buy a farm to know the government's going to take it?"[/quote]
Africa is for black people and white people should go back to Europe.
Quote from: "Lance Leftardashian"
Africa is for black people and white people should go back to Europe.
As long as the blacks ans especially muslims leave Europe.
And then they´ll have famine because the negro is too stupid to manage a farm.
Pretty soon they´ll be begging for help from the white man... All the while blaming the white man for their misery.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
As long as the blacks ans especially muslims leave Europe.
Quote from: "Odinson"
And then they´ll have famine because the negro is too stupid to manage a farm.
Pretty soon they´ll be begging for help from the white man... All the while blaming the white man for their misery.
I agree with both.
Quote from: "Odinson"
Pretty soon they´ll be begging for help from the white man... All the while blaming the white man for their misery.
I'm sure they already do that there.
Just like our Native Indians... blame the White man with one hand, but happily receive money, help, and infrastructure from him with the other.
If I were a black South African, I would be seizing the land as well.
Some of you kiddies need to inform yourself of how the WHITES got the land in the first place. And why blacks were excluded from land ownership during the apartheid era. Its stolen property and needs to be returned to the rightful owners.
The real issue is that the current owners, who had little to do with apartheid and have been on family farms for decades will receive no compensation. That is the crime here. The South African government should buy them out, and then allow them to leave with the money they receive. But they are simply evicted with no compensation, and even if they DID receive payment, could not take it out of the country.
Western governments should be pressuring South Africa into doing what is right, lest any foreign aid is compromised.
But no...our weak and effete "leaders" fear non-whites far too much to actually make a stand on principle and fairness for white people.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
our weak and effete "leaders" fear non-whites far too much to actually make a stand on principle and fairness for white people.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with this.
It's not the 'non-white' backlash they fear. It's the white backlash they fear, as white people have shown lately that we are our own worst enemy. Look at who the biggest anti-whites are lately... Chances are that anti-white will happen to be whiter than fucking white.
No dispute...in fact its the basis of that fear. They don't care about the blacks...but they care about the votes of people who DO care about people they have no connection with, but just need a cause to make their lives feel important.
I've noticed how South Africa makes it difficult for them to leave, and has controls in place on how they can move their personal wealth. Seems like they hate Whitey, but they sure don't want them to up and leave!
There must be a way for them to get out of there, but I'm sure it would be a difficult process. Just getting your wealth transferred out would require some quasi-legal means at best...
Whites can leave...with about $5 each in their pocket, and very few personal effects.
They ARE permitted to invest in businesses outside of SA, and so those with the means are buying small businesses here and elsewhere, building them up so they are making money, then just walking out of their homes, locking the door, boarding a plane with their possession in suitcases and leaving.
Black South Africans are happy for them to do so.
Quote from: "Berry Sweet"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
As long as the blacks ans especially muslims leave Europe.
Quote from: "Odinson"
And then they´ll have famine because the negro is too stupid to manage a farm.
Pretty soon they´ll be begging for help from the white man... All the while blaming the white man for their misery.
I agree with both.
I don't.
Quote from: "Chuck Bronson"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
our weak and effete "leaders" fear non-whites far too much to actually make a stand on principle and fairness for white people.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with this.
It's not the 'non-white' backlash they fear. It's the white backlash they fear, as white people have shown lately that we are our own worst enemy. Look at who the biggest anti-whites are lately... Chances are that anti-white will happen to be whiter than fucking white.
The craziest anti white instigators are white.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
If I were a black South African, I would be seizing the land as well.
Some of you kiddies need to inform yourself of how the WHITES got the land in the first place. And why blacks were excluded from land ownership during the apartheid era. Its stolen property and needs to be returned to the rightful owners.
The real issue is that the current owners, who had little to do with apartheid and have been on family farms for decades will receive no compensation. That is the crime here. The South African government should buy them out, and then allow them to leave with the money they receive. But they are simply evicted with no compensation, and even if they DID receive payment, could not take it out of the country.
Western governments should be pressuring South Africa into doing what is right, lest any foreign aid is compromised.
But no...our weak and effete "leaders" fear non-whites far too much to actually make a stand on principle and fairness for white people.
Apartheid started in 1948..
Many farms could have been in families before then.
Quote from: "Chuck Bronson"
Quote from: "Odinson"
Pretty soon they´ll be begging for help from the white man... All the while blaming the white man for their misery.
I'm sure they already do that there.
Just like our Native Indians... blame the White man with one hand, but happily receive money, help, and infrastructure from him with the other.
And due to liberalism, we will send them white taxpayers money..
Because its somehow "beneficial for us" to help the c00ns and towelheads.
World would be a really sad place without c00ns and towelheads.
Stage 6 of 8 in genocide
http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/8stagesofgenocide.html
6. PREPARATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is expropriated. They are often segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.
I was reading on VF, some idiotic progtard was saying this is karma. Neither the Boers nor the British expropriated without compensation farms that were bought and paid for by Xhosa, Zulus or any of the African ethnicities who migrated to the South of Africa after Europeans arrived.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
If I were a black South African, I would be seizing the land as well.
Some of you kiddies need to inform yourself of how the WHITES got the land in the first place. And why blacks were excluded from land ownership during the apartheid era. Its stolen property and needs to be returned to the rightful owners.
The real issue is that the current owners, who had little to do with apartheid and have been on family farms for decades will receive no compensation. That is the crime here. The South African government should buy them out, and then allow them to leave with the money they receive. But they are simply evicted with no compensation, and even if they DID receive payment, could not take it out of the country.
Western governments should be pressuring South Africa into doing what is right, lest any foreign aid is compromised.
But no...our weak and effete "leaders" fear non-whites far too much to actually make a stand on principle and fairness for white people.
Apartheid started in 1948..
Many farms could have been in families before then.
Possibly, but "apartheid" merely codified what was already in place; white supremacy. It moved from cultural behaviour to government policy, despite international outcry.
Once black Africans took control of the government, this sort of reclamation was inevitable. But destroying lives out of vengeance is as unjust as apartheid, yet most western countries...especially Europe, which has African blood on its hands...are silent.
Where did the South African Boers come from?
[size=150]Trump Tweet on South African Land Overhauls Draws Government's (and media's) Ire[/size]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-tweet-on-south-african-land-reform-draws-governments-ire-1535017460
here is the tweet
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1032454567152246785?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1032454567152246785&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Ftrump-tweet-on-south-african-land-reform-draws-governments-ire-1535017460
Trump messed it up for them, SA wanted a nice quiet genocide, where nobody noticed what was going on. Now trump may have gone and ruined everything. Damn him!
----
here's a couple of ideas-- bring in South african real refugees instead of economic immigrants from south america and mexico.
Impose sanctions on south africa if they do not offer at least 50% of land value.
I understand there is a legitimate land distribution issue, but the paltry 10% they are offering is probably less than the nazis gave the jews.
Quote from: "Herman"
I was reading on VF, some idiotic progtard was saying this is karma. Neither the Boers nor the British expropriated without compensation farms that were bought and paid for by Xhosa, Zulus or any of the African ethnicities who migrated to the South of Africa after Europeans arrived.
USA is DOA is another Richard Kuklinski handle.
If the whitey-hating S African blacks get their wish and drive the Boers away, the groids will starve, it's that simple.
Should this happen be prepared for the usual suspects starting donation campaigns to feed the starving S African children. :001_rolleyes:
Not to mention a flood of black Africans heading to Europe.
They are already suffering power and water restrictions due to infrastructure collapse.
Zimbabwe, Mark 2.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Not to mention a flood of black Africans heading to Europe.
They are already suffering power and water restrictions due to infrastructure collapse.
Zimbabwe, Mark 2.
And Israel.
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
If the whitey-hating S African blacks get their wish and drive the Boers away, the groids will starve, it's that simple.
And that's why Whitey faces the most restrictive immigration rules compared to any other race...
They know what happens should we leave in droves, and all governments have a pact with the UN to keep Whitey right where they are.
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Not to mention a flood of black Africans heading to Europe.
They are already suffering power and water restrictions due to infrastructure collapse.
Zimbabwe, Mark 2.
And Israel.
How awful! ac_toofunny
Quote from: "Chuck Bronson"
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
If the whitey-hating S African blacks get their wish and drive the Boers away, the groids will starve, it's that simple.
And that's why Whitey faces the most restrictive immigration rules compared to any other race...
They know what happens should we leave in droves, and all governments have a pact with the UN to keep Whitey right where they are.
I think it's only Putin who has offered asylum to S African whites. I thought perhaps at least Trump might offer an olive branch also....
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Chuck Bronson"
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
If the whitey-hating S African blacks get their wish and drive the Boers away, the groids will starve, it's that simple.
And that's why Whitey faces the most restrictive immigration rules compared to any other race...
They know what happens should we leave in droves, and all governments have a pact with the UN to keep Whitey right where they are.
I think it's only Putin who has offered asylum to S African whites. I thought perhaps at least Trump might offer an olive branch also....
Only fifteen thousand.
Imagine if it was blacks being forced out of the country by whites? Hell, we would never hear the last of it and our glorious leaders would probably be inviting millions of them into our nations.....
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Imagine if it was blacks being forced out of the country by whites? Hell, we would never hear the last of it and our glorious leaders would probably be inviting millions of them into our nations.....
I'm sure you're right on that.
To make things all the more ridiculous-- Middle east immigrants coming to Europe and hispanics coming to the US are economic refugees. They are not fleeing persecution because of race or religion. OTOH South Africans whites are fleeing racial persecution. (You can bet the South African government will not be taking any black farms, only white ones.)
but still most of these countries letting in everyone else will not be letting in south african whites.
BTW here's what trump tweeted
"I have asked Secretary of State @SecPompeo to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers. 'South African Government is now seizing land from white farmers.' @TuckerCarlson @FoxNews"
the UNbiased media's so called "fact check" gave this tweet "four pinocchios."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/08/24/president-trumps-false-claim-about-murders-south-african-farms/?utm_term=.03b7635595dd
Where is a fact checker for the fact checker? This is the kind of shitty worthless newsmedia we have in America.
The media barely even noticed the South Africa story till trump tweeted one tweet,. Now the media (and the south african government) have gone batshit crazy
again here. is the tweet for reference

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/381C/production/_103146341_trumpsouthafrica.png%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpspr%20...%20africa.png%22%3Ehttps://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/381C/production/_103146341_trumpsouthafrica.png%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
basically trump says he wants it looked into. And boom! its an instant media progtard, foaming mouthed, shitstorm.
One of many examples out there now--this is from the editorial board of the RACIST New York Times
[size=150]Trump's Vile Ploy on South Africa[/size]
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/23/opinion/trump-south-africa-racist-white-farmers.html
Hmm, now didn't the RACIST New York Times just hire an anti-white racist (sarah Jeong) who called for the elimination of white people?
Does anyone think the RACIST new york times cares at all about the rights of white people?
Time to pick apart the oped from the RACIST new York Times (lots of bullshit-- hipwaders and shovel needed)
Quote
Trust President Trump, following his familiar tactic of deflecting attention from yet another scandal by issuing some outrageous tweet, to come down hard on the wrong side of an issue he knows nothing about,
he didn't come down hard on anything, he said he wanted pompeo to look into it. The obvious implication that he wants to find out more about what is going on.
Quote
His source was a grossly one-sided report by the Fox host Tucker Carlson asserting that the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was seizing land from his citizens because they are the wrong "skin color."
Sorry RACIST New York Times--but *BUZZ* wrong--. the South African government admits they want to take white land and give it to blacks.
Quote
and Mr. Ramaphosa's proposal to change the Constitution to allow expropriation of land without compensation has not yet passed.
YET is the word--because that is exactly what he is trying to gate passed. An amendment to take white land with NO compensation.
Quote
There can be no question that South Africa's black people were long denied fair access to land.
that's true, but the answer to that is not confiscate it with no payment. It would be perfectly reasonable or the government to give them half the value as compensation. that would be a bargain for the government, would it not? Instead what they did just recently is offer only 10% and then say, "take it or you will get nothing." (reminder- this is what the nazis did to the Jews just prior to the holocaust.)
Quote
Mr. Ramaphosa argued in an op-ed article in The Financial Times that his proposal was "no land grab,"
Sure because he would never lie about it, right?
Quote
All that is subject to debate and study, which is now underway.
Which is exactly what trump advocated you retards
Quote
Yet Mr. Trump's tweet, and the Fox show on which it was based, were bereft of any context, sympathy or understanding.
Your editorial is bereft of any context, sympathy or understanding for the right of whites. Not surprising since you just hired a genocidal anti-white racist
Quote
They pounced, instead, on the false narratives of right-wing white South African groups claiming widespread seizures of white-owned land
They have already stated themselves they intend to take white owned land. And they have pushed for an amendment to do so with no compensation., They are testing the waters, Widespread seizure of land is obviously just around the corner.
Quote
and a continuing "white genocide."
the creator of genocide watch says south Africa is well on its way to genocide against whites. They haven't gotten to the extermination part YET. but that is quite probably where they are headed.
Quote
In fact, the number of killings of farmers and farm workers is at a 20-year low, with 47 in the 2017-18 fiscal year, according to AgriSA, a farmers' organization in South Africa. The numbers have been declining steadily since peaking in 1998, when 153 were killed.
Well that is IF the SA government who keeps these statistics can be believed (they cannot) But even if true just because the numbers aren't as high as years ago, does';t mean they are not still way too high. Although now that whites are going to get their land seized those numbers will probably rise again.
Quote
Not surprisingly, South Africa reacted angrily to Mr. Trump's tweet, saying it reflected a "narrow perception which only seeks to divide our nation and reminds us of our colonial past."
So we are to take the worked of those who are preparing to commit genocide? So that they can quietly go about it undisturbed? No I don't think so. I think this needs to be watched very carefully. because even though the RACIST New York Times doesn't care about them. White people have rights too.
Quote
Sadly, it probably reflects even less than that — a clueless grasp at a racially tinged political diversion.
Sorry RACIST New york Times, but its really your editorial that is a clueless diversion. You should be ashamed but you are not capable.
If Israel was seizing Arab owned farms without compensation the New York Times would be tearing Trump apart in editorials to do more than just look into it..
Because the farmers being persecuted are Caucasian, the New York Times gives tacit approval.....shame on them.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
If Israel was seizing Arab owned farms without compensation the New York Times would be tearing Trump apart in editorials to do more than just look into it..
Because the farmers being persecuted are Caucasian, the New York Times gives tacit approval.....shame on them.
Absolutely right. The media believes in collective punishment based on race for whites and no one else. If any other group were being treated like south african whites they would be screaming about it. Instead their answer is shut up and don't talk about it or you're a racist nazi.
Tucker Carlson does a fantastic follow up report--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLnivak8A14
Carlson starts-- Quote
"As land seizures based on skin color shows, South Africa is once again becoming a place where an entire group of people is targeted for discrimination and violence on the basis of their skin color. In the west, we punish only the guilty. We do not punish their descendants, or everyone with the same hair and eye color. Now the people who run our country (especially our media) aren't so sure"
Tucker Carlson is right, but he will be labelled a racist for speaking the truth.
Quote from: "Herman"
Tucker Carlson is right, but he will be labelled a racist for speaking the truth.
No doubt, that is what the progs do. if someone is bothered by whites being denied their rights they are racists.
Everything is racism to a prog except hating whites.
[size=150]White landowner says he will defend his land by force[/size]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6094565/White-farmer-set-game-reserve-seized-South-Africa-calls-theft.html
of course if he does fight back and the SA military comes he won't stand a chance. OTOH south african whites being mowed down to take their property (which I hope doesn't happen) could get the world to notice what's going on--much like the Ruby Ridge Incident backfired immensely against american law enforcement.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://oi64.tinypic.com/5d5st3.jpg%22%3Ehttp://oi64.tinypic.com/5d5st3.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Quote from: "Herman"
Tucker Carlson is right, but he will be labelled a racist for speaking the truth.
Leftard labels are losing their potency. Crying wolf repeatedly has that effect.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22http://oi64.tinypic.com/5d5st3.jpg%22%3Ehttp://oi64.tinypic.com/5d5st3.jpg%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
I know it's only a cartoon, but it's so frightening.