Quote from: Rancidmilko post_id=469194 time=1659804178 user_id=2853
Gays in Brazoo are saying the media is homophobic because they keep saying 98% of monkeypoxers are, well, gays.

That is literally just a fact.

Now she will be afraid to post here.

Indeed I do.

Quote from: Lokmar post_id=468836 time=1659676466 user_id=3351

Quote from: Dove post_id=468704 time=1659643055 user_id=3266




 That whole damn group.....including her....negs me. Who fucking cares?



 They need to log off and go connect with nature or something lol

I neg'd the shit out of all them assholes several different times and they ran to BF and cried until he disabled em. I'd like to hope that I'm to blame! LMFAO!

Is that what happened?  I am not surprised.

Relatively to coal or oil, yes, but you will notice the greenie wheelies were even against that.  At least until Russia turned off the taps on the EU and now they are crying.  You can bet the EU now wishes they had not banned franking and made it hard to get drilling permits.  If they had just Mai tanned the same output levels they had in 2000 they wouldn't need Russian imports but they were stupid and now they are paying.  Hell, most of those dumb asses refused to allow LNG port facilities to be made despite the US telling them about their strategic vulnerability for 20+ years.



The Germans even laughed at Trump when he said they were at serious risk to Russian blackmail over natural gas but it turns out Trump was right.

I was referring to low carbon nonfossil fuel power sources.

Quote from: iron horse jockeyHow is wind and solar working out for average Europeans. What a waste of money.

Germany has been a complete joke.  They have installed enough solar and wind to supposedly power 250% of peek electrical demand (in theory) but it turns out Germany is neither very sunny more does it have a lot of wind.  So I stead green tech only produces 8% of their demand and they have to do a lot of lying and green washing to get it that high.  Wind and solar will not work with current tech for about 90% of the world's population.  Nuclear is the only real option with a few exceptions for local geographic exceptions.

I mean if you are fighting on a 3000km front and the front is always moving somewhat then, by necessity,  Armies AR going to have to take advantage of civilian resources that are there.  To do things like take showers, crap in a toilet, charge equipment, use land line telephones, etc...  That goes doubly for HQ detachments.  Unless they are using those buildings as human shields (the way Russia has repeatedly done in this war, see how they fire from right next to nuclear power plants to discourage counter battery fire) then that doesn't even break the Ge ieva or Hangue conventions.



I suspect A.nesty is doing a fair bit of talking out of their ass here just like they usually do.  They are an advocacy group and a very politically motivated one who often throws objectivity or even just factual reality out the window.

Another good interview.