At 2:40 Douglas Murray destroys the Muslim they do it too analogy.

Watch her make excuses for islam.

Quote from: Lokmar on April 29, 2026, 02:01:32 PMReally? Because our founding was brought about by shitloads of violence. So was the end of the Civil War. If thats communism and nazi, consider me the extreme of both!

That is not apples to apples.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 11:39:32 AMI don't think the flynns can be out Adminge though. that tard used to spend at least 22 hours a day decaying in the user online list at BF.

Safer times for the children within a 10 mile radius of his trailer park.

My money is on Lily. She will make the flynns and the pedo look like amateurs when it comes to sitting and doing nothing.

Quote from: James Bond on Today at 10:35:00 AMIt has been discovered that Epstein had a budget Lolita express plan and Admin was a regular customer.
Detective Adam Hitler has a suspicion that there are Jews and shared handles on BF.
BF himself has been perched at the window of this thread. He is making threats against anybody that does not bend the knee to him as obediently as Adam Hitler does. You should all be frightened.
The people powering the Flynn handle are on the verge of breaking Lily's record for being logged on the most hours a day for the most consecutive weeks.

I don't think the flynns can be out Adminge though. that tard used to spend at least 22 hours a day decaying in the user online list at BF.

Safer times for the children within a 10 mile radius of his trailer park.

It has been discovered that Epstein had a budget Lolita express plan and Admin was a regular customer.
Detective Adam Hitler has a suspicion that there are Jews and shared handles on BF.
BF himself has been perched at the window of this thread. He is making threats against anybody that does not bend the knee to him as obediently as Adam Hitler does. You should all be frightened.
The people powering the Flynn handle are on the verge of breaking Lily's record for being logged on the most hours a day for the most consecutive weeks.

Quote from: Lokmar on Today at 09:51:03 AMMaybe its a problem for libtards that it doesnt exist.

At any rate, theres plenty of evidence these climate cunts faked and lied about the numbers they spew. They've been caught red handed MULTIPLE times!

It is a problem for the Western left that the doomsday climate models were very misleading.

It was never about changing weather patterns for leftists, it was about control.

Republicans are raising alarms about new vehicle safety requirements that could introduce intrusive monitoring technology — including systems capable of disabling a car against a driver's will.

The mandate stems from a provision in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, made law under President Biden, which requires automakers to install advanced impaired-driving prevention technology in new vehicles by 2027.

Critics argue that the implications go far beyond safety.

"The car dashboard becomes your judge, your jury, and your executioner," said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been one of the most vocal opponents of the measure.

Section 24220 of the law — titled "Advanced Impaired Driving Technology" — directs regulators to require systems designed to prevent drunk-driving fatalities. The technology under consideration includes both passive and active monitoring tools, many powered by artificial intelligence.

These may include infrared cameras that track a driver's eye movements and pupil dilation, as well as "cockpit-embedded sensors" capable of analyzing a driver's breath to estimate blood alcohol levels. Other proposed methods include touch-based sensors that use tissue spectroscopy to detect alcohol through the skin of a finger or palm.

Quote from: DKG on Today at 09:40:11 AMIt was a problem not an existential threat requiring developed countries to destroy their middle class.

Maybe its a problem for libtards that it doesnt exist.

At any rate, theres plenty of evidence these climate cunts faked and lied about the numbers they spew. They've been caught red handed MULTIPLE times!

Quote from: Herman on April 29, 2026, 05:32:43 PMCanada is set to launch its first-ever sovereign wealth fund, branded the "Canada Strong Fund," according to an announcement from Mark Carney.
At face value, the concept aligns with models seen in other nations. However, a closer examination raises fundamental concerns about how such a fund is being structured.

How Sovereign Wealth Funds Typically Work
Globally, sovereign wealth funds are built on surplus capital, not debt. They are designed to invest excess national revenue for long-term stability and growth.
Examples include:
* Norway — financed by oil and gas profits
* Abu Dhabi — built on energy revenues
* Singapore — driven by sustained trade surpluses
These funds exist because those countries generated more revenue than they spent.
Canada's Fiscal Position
Canada's current fiscal situation presents a different picture:
* Annual deficit: approximately $78 billion
* National debt: roughly $1.2 trillion
* A significant portion of this debt has accumulated over the past decade
This raises a central question: Can a sovereign wealth fund function as intended without surplus capital?

A Different Kind of Fund?
Critics argue that without underlying surplus wealth, the Canada Strong Fund risks becoming something fundamentally different from its international counterparts.
Instead of investing excess revenue, it may rely on borrowed capital, which introduces:
* Increased financial risk
* Higher long-term interest obligations
* Greater exposure to market volatility
In that context, some observers are reframing the initiative less as a traditional sovereign wealth fund and more as a state-managed investment vehicle funded by debt.

The Core Debate
At the heart of the issue is a basic economic principle:
Sovereign wealth funds are built on wealth — not liabilities.
Without surplus revenues, the legitimacy and sustainability of such a fund remain open to debate.

Final Note
Norway's fund — widely considered the global benchmark — was never branded with political language. Its credibility came from its structure, not its name.
The "Canada Strong Fund," by contrast, is already facing scrutiny over whether it represents financial innovation — or financial rebranding.

What Carney will implement is a sovereign debt fund not a sovereign wealth fund. Then he he will move the money from the operating budget to his "capital expenditures" budget which includes his new sovereign debt fund to make it look like he's lowering the deficit. And the worse part of all is that his base will buy it and believe he is a financial genius instead of the crooked bookkeeper that he is.