News:

R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk!

Recent posts

#11
avatar_Brent
The Flea Trap / Re: Forum gossip thread
Last post by Brent - Today at 12:48:19 PM
Quote from: DKG on Today at 12:11:43 PMI can see where my post could be misinterpreted. Even though I replied to you I was speaking in a generalization.

Seamoron brings up appearance on an anon message all the time because he is incapable of posting a cogent thought. The only other poster that falls  back on that as his go to position is Aryan.

Sorry add Lotusbud to that. She cannot support her positions on any issue so by the third post it is racial slurs.

It's not about sensitivities. It just does not fit this medium.
What do you expect. Aryan is Seadunce's kid. The retarded crybaby apple didn't fall far from it's cognitively impaired tree.
#12
Quote from: DKG on December 20, 2025, 09:41:23 PMWhat Ron Desantis did was brilliant.

Don't forget Greg Abbott.  He started the whole ship them to sanctuary cities thing.  All time genius move.
#13
avatar_Prof Emeritus at Fawk U
The Flea Trap / Re: Enter Muy Exotica
Last post by Prof Emeritus at Fawk U - Today at 12:45:22 PM
I feel sorry for the tattoo artist.
#14
The jigaboos need to be smacked upside their heads.
#15
avatar_Prof Emeritus at Fawk U
The Flea Trap / Re: It's a conspiracy!
Last post by Prof Emeritus at Fawk U - Today at 12:40:31 PM
Quote from: Oliver the Second on December 20, 2025, 12:57:11 PMOkay this is getting weird...

Went shopping this morning. While standing in the checkout line I grab a package of this lip balm -




About an hour and half later I log into YouTube and get the "Help YouTube by answering one question" thing...

This was the question -





"I believe in coincidences. But I don't trust coincidences." - Garak, Star Trek DS9

George Orwell would call it a "mere happenstance".
#16
Once the SCOTUS gets involved in this, it'll be a slam dunk for Trump.
#17
It will be a great tipping point when Greta shuts the fuck up.
#18
Keep on making the libtards cry, Mr. President!   :yeahhh:  :good:
#19
avatar_sicknote
The Flea Trap / Re: Forum gossip thread
Last post by sicknote - Today at 12:27:26 PM
Quote from: DKG on Today at 12:11:43 PMI can see where my post could be misinterpreted. Even though I replied to you I was speaking in a generalization.

Seamoron brings up appearance on an anon message all the time because he is incapable of posting a cogent thought. The only other poster that falls  back on that as his go to position is Aryan.

Sorry add Lotusbud to that. She cannot support her positions on any issue so by the third post it is racial slurs.


It's not about sensitivities. It just does not fit this medium.

Yes that was not clear, it read as if directed solely at me.

What relevance does pointing this out, unless you are insinuating I'm of a similar calibre... I only said in my recollection that Marvin was not bald.   :dontknow:

But i wasn't trying to insult anyone only using a descriptive word to describe something.

 :popcorn:
#20
avatar_DKG
The Guest Nest / Re: Trump Versus Conman Carney
Last post by DKG - Today at 12:23:58 PM
The would get the revenue from a pipeline to the West Coast instead of Canada. There is little wonder as to why the average American is now sixty percent richer than the average Canadian.

This editorial first appeared in Post Media.

How's this for a win-win deal? Alberta lets Premier David Eby, his B.C. NDP government and radical, anti-development First Nations group live in their little "green" bubble west of the Rockies while Alberta finds an investor or investors to build a pipeline to the West Coast through Montana, Idaho and Washington state.

Earlier this week, that's what Alberta Premier Danielle Smith suggested could happen if B.C. and First Nations insist on blocking a second oil pipeline from Alberta to the coast.

Alberta would prefer to ship to northern B.C. You know, national pride and all that. Plus the route is shorter, so therefore cheaper.

But if Alberta can get its oil to the West Coast, and from there on to the booming markets of Asia, what does it matter if that oil is loaded onto tankers in Prince Rupert, B.C., Longview, Wash., or some other Pacific Northwest terminal?

Eby has been adamantly against a second pipeline. He has insisted he will do what he can to stop a line to northern B.C. and he will stand in the way of any attempt to lift the Trudeau-era ban on seagoing tanker shipments along B.C.'s northern coast.

Eby has allowed that a second pipeline to the existing tanker terminal in Burnaby might be possible. He'll think about it.

But let's save him the trouble of racking his brain over such a compromise. Let's tell him right now he can have his little eco-Xanadu on the Left Coast, with slowed development and no added resource income. Alberta will find a route through less hostile territory.

Indeed, B.C.'s hostility to resource transportation is why Nutrien, the giant Saskatchewan potash exporter, decided to build a new $1-billion export terminal along the Columbia River in Washington rather than bang their heads against the wall trying to please Eby, his government and a consortium of First Nations that call themselves the Coastal First Nations.

Coastal First Nations are actually an anti-oil lobby group, funded by lefty American foundations, like the Tides Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies, whose stated goal is to landlock Canadian oil.

When he was attorney general of B.C. back in 2018, Eby instructed provincial prosecutors not to bring charges against scores of people who were squatting illegally on land belonging to Trans Mountain and blockading construction of the pipeline's tanker terminal in Burnaby.

By why not rescue the committed eco-warrior from his pipeline dilemma and just say, "Fine, a pipeline and all the jobs, economic activity and government revenues it will generate are too upsetting to you, we'll save you those sleepless nights and ask our southern neighbours for permission to construct a line across their territory."

When Nutrien announced in November that it would build its new potash terminal in development-friendly Washington state, Eby and federal Transport Minister Steve MacKinnon described the move as a betrayal of the national interest.

But the national interest cuts both ways. It is just as much in the national interest, perhaps more so, to get large-scale projects built that advance the country's economy, lessen our dependence on the U.S. and bring in billions to government coffers for hospital, schools, social and recreational services.

The premier of one province and a First Nations lobby group can't just declare what is and isn't in the national interest and decide for the whole country that a megaproject can't go ahead.