multiple fatalities after mass shooting at two mosques in Christchurch New Zealand

[Anonymous]

His views were all over the map, and conflicting with each other



This guy did strange things in strange ways. He spent some time in Pakistan not long ago. Go figure.



I agree that he was simply a deranged psychopath with a big ego and big mouth

Really?

[Anonymous]

Superman is right. Most people would have knocked that egg chucking kid cold.

TWITTER MOB COMES FOR DEAN CAIN OVER EGG ATTACK COMMENTS — HE FIRES BACK IN EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT TO THE DAILY CALLER



"Superman" actor Dean Cain made an offhand comment about what he would do if someone blindsided him with an egg attack, and the Twitter mob came for him.

It all began with the now-viral video of Australian Senator Fraser Anning that circulated on Saturday. Anning was attacked by a teen — who broke an egg over his head from behind — and he turned and slapped the boy.



While many cheered the boy on, citing Anning's "Islamophobic" views and anti-immigration stance, Cain responded to the video by saying simply, "I would have knocked that kid cold."



He was immediately attacked for "defending a Nazi" and for advocating violence against a child — but Cain was quick to explain that neither of those accusations were based in reality.



"You cannot attack someone for their political views, no matter how abhorrent," he said. "Not with an egg, not with fists, not with guns. That's wrong. In the U.S. we have the First Amendment which protects all speech, including unpopular speech, as long as it doesn't call for violence. While I totally disagree with what I've seen of the Senator's positions, is it illegal for him to hold them? Should he be physically attacked because of them?"



Cain also agreed that it was strange that while people have focused their criticism on Anning — for his political views and for hitting the boy who egged him — no one is criticizing those who appear content to perpetuate the idea that a violent attack of any kind is a reasonable response to disagreeable words or ideas.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/exclusive-dean-cain-egg-attack-comments/?utm_medium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/excl ... dium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/exclusive-dean-cain-egg-attack-comments/?utm_medium=email

[Wazzzup]

Superman is right. Most people would have knocked that egg chucking kid cold.

TWITTER MOB COMES FOR DEAN CAIN OVER EGG ATTACK COMMENTS — HE FIRES BACK IN EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT TO THE DAILY CALLER



"Superman" actor Dean Cain made an offhand comment about what he would do if someone blindsided him with an egg attack, and the Twitter mob came for him.

It all began with the now-viral video of Australian Senator Fraser Anning that circulated on Saturday. Anning was attacked by a teen — who broke an egg over his head from behind — and he turned and slapped the boy.



While many cheered the boy on, citing Anning's "Islamophobic" views and anti-immigration stance, Cain responded to the video by saying simply, "I would have knocked that kid cold."



He was immediately attacked for "defending a Nazi" and for advocating violence against a child — but Cain was quick to explain that neither of those accusations were based in reality.



"You cannot attack someone for their political views, no matter how abhorrent," he said. "Not with an egg, not with fists, not with guns. That's wrong. In the U.S. we have the First Amendment which protects all speech, including unpopular speech, as long as it doesn't call for violence. While I totally disagree with what I've seen of the Senator's positions, is it illegal for him to hold them? Should he be physically attacked because of them?"



Cain also agreed that it was strange that while people have focused their criticism on Anning — for his political views and for hitting the boy who egged him — no one is criticizing those who appear content to perpetuate the idea that a violent attack of any kind is a reasonable response to disagreeable words or ideas.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/exclusive-dean-cain-egg-attack-comments/?utm_medium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/excl ... dium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/17/exclusive-dean-cain-egg-attack-comments/?utm_medium=email

Just remember these are the same progtards (more or less) who advocated punching the Covington kids and feeding them into a woodchipper because one of them smiled --



https://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/images/2019/20/06a140e0-6f9f-4519-bcba-e5ffc2248856.png">

https://cloverchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Sarah-Beattie-Covington-Catholic-MAGA-Kid.png">

https://cdn.mrctv.org/files/images/Jack.png">

[Anonymous]

Did that egg kid think there would be no consequences. If he did that to me, he would have got a lot more than a slap. What a little prick.

[Wazzzup]

Did that egg kid think there would be no consequences. If he did that to me, he would have got a lot more than a slap. What a little prick.

The difference is--People with common sense know that an egg to the head can be retaliated against because it is a violent act.  Progtards think speech (or even facial expressions) they don't like entitle them to violence.

[caskur]

Did that egg kid think there would be no consequences. If he did that to me, he would have got a lot more than a slap. What a little prick.

We have a generation of entitled brats.

[caskur]

Anning spoke very well today. People think he doesn't stand a chance being re-elected but he's a very manly man. He's strong They'll vote for him again. He getting PLENTY of free publicity.

[Bricktop]

The BBC propaganda unit is already in full swing, citing this madman's lunacy as evidence of the rise of the alt-right...and of course the usual reference to Donald Trump.



The left will use any and every opportunity to create a monster that does not exist, whilst simultaneously denying their own presence.

[Anonymous]

Did that egg kid think there would be no consequences. If he did that to me, he would have got a lot more than a slap. What a little prick.

He's lucky he did not try that on me. I would have broke something a lot harder and heavier over his head than a frickin egg.

[Frood]

A barrel?

[Anonymous]

A barrel?

Filled with dried concrete.

[Bricktop]

Darn...for a moment there I was thinking "free barrel wash".

[Anonymous]

Darn...for a moment there I was thinking "free barrel wash".

Hell no.

[Gaon]

'Pure Genocide': Over 6,000 Nigerian Christians Slaughtered, Mostly Women and Children

https://www.christianpost.com/news/pure-genocide-over-6000-nigerian-christians-slaughtered-mostly-women-children-225655/?fbclid=IwAR3MdNjcrmj9mVUKd2hA7YAR32ErxpFTrc1DDILCOG3U-xp_C13PcNodBjU">https://www.christianpost.com/news/pure ... 13PcNodBjU">https://www.christianpost.com/news/pure-genocide-over-6000-nigerian-christians-slaughtered-mostly-women-children-225655/?fbclid=IwAR3MdNjcrmj9mVUKd2hA7YAR32ErxpFTrc1DDILCOG3U-xp_C13PcNodBjU



Not a word about this slaughter from the same world leaders who can't stop talking about Christchurch.

[Anonymous]

Liberals have double standard on terrorism

Liberals condemning Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer for not adequately denouncing the terrorist attack on Muslims at prayer in New Zealand by a suspected white supremacist would be more convincing if they weren't so inadequate at denouncing Islamist terrorism themselves.



To be clear, the horrific attack on Muslims praying at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand should be universally condemned and raises global concerns about the increasing incidence of such attacks, including in Canada, by terrorists espousing the same evil ideology.



Scheer is being pilloried because his initial response condemning the attack through a two-part tweet didn't mention the victims were Muslims at prayer in two mosques — an omission for which Environment Minister Catherine McKenna accused him of Islamophobia, or as she put it in a tweet: "I spoke to parents at Ottawa Main Mosque today whose kids are too scared to pray & go to school. In Canada. Meanwhile Andrew Scheer has to be called out before he can call out Islamophobia."



Except Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale didn't mention the attack was on Muslims in his initial tweets on the tragedy either, which were more than eight hours after Scheer's.



To be fair, Goodale did so 43 minutes after his initial tweets, when he identified the victims as Muslims and condemned "right-wing extremism."



Both Scheer and Goodale subsequently made fuller statements condemning the attack and expressing solidarity with Muslims in Canada and globally.



If McKenna thinks Scheer is Islamophobic for initially failing to mention Muslims, is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau anti-Semitic for twice failing to mention that six million Jews died in the Holocaust?



The first time was in his 2016 statement commemorating International Holocaust Remembrance Day, the second at the 2017 dedication of Ottawa's Holocaust Memorial, where the plaque for the inauguration, issued specifically in Trudeau's name, with the PM attending the ceremony, failed to mention Jews or for that matter anti-Semitism.



So what is the Liberals' argument?



That Scheer's failure to identify Muslims as victims of terrorism in his initial tweets is evidence of Islamophobia, while Trudeau twice failing to mention six million Jews died in the Holocaust was an honest mistake? Because that would be hypocrisy.



Back in the real world, equally deplorable to terrorist attacks by white supremacists are attacks by Islamist-inspired terrorists, whether they're on innocent people at prayer, or walking down the street, or running a marathon, or having a meal in a cafe.



In both cases we are dealing with twisted individuals who have abandoned human decency, willing to murder innocents in support of their twisted, hate-filled ideologies.



Why then, is it so easy for Liberals to condemn terror by white supremacists but so hard for them to condemn Islamist or Islamist-inspired terrorism?



Why is their condemnation of terror of the first kind swift and specific, but slow and vague in the second, often attributing it instead to such factors as mental illness or feelings of people being "completely excluded"?



Why this double standard?

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-liberals-have-double-standard-on-terrorism">https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnis ... -terrorism">https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-liberals-have-double-standard-on-terrorism



Expect these kind of labeling from McKenna, Trudeau and their ilk in this year's election.