News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 10403
Total votes: : 4

Last post: Today at 07:05:02 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by James Bond

A

What Would Happen if the US and Canada Stopped Producing Oil and Gas Today

Started by Anonymous, October 29, 2021, 02:52:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

Easy answer-OPEC and Russia would produce more and export it to us,

[media]
">
[/media]

Anonymous

Justine's hatred for the prairies is not even hidden anymore. We have to separate from Canada.



Guilbeault as federal environment minister spells doom for Alberta

https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters/gunter-guilbeault-as-federal-environment-minister-spells-doom-for-alberta">https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters ... or-alberta">https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters/gunter-guilbeault-as-federal-environment-minister-spells-doom-for-alberta



Newly appointed federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said Wednesday – his first full day at his new job of crushing Alberta's economy – that he is not going to try to kill oil and gas jobs.



It amounts to him promising not to go out of his way to make tens of thousand of Albertans unemployed. But, ya know, if it happens, it happens.



This is the same man who, as heritage minister in the last Parliament, insisted again and again the only way to save free expression was to regulate use of the internet more harshly than in any other democracy.



Also on Wednesday, when asked if he intends to block new oilsands projects, Guilbeault said the federal government has no jurisdiction over production of oil, gas or coal, only over the emissions produced by those resources.



"We will ensure through legislation or regulation ... that emissions from oil and gas are capped at current levels and diminish over time," he said.



Pardon me, but that's just an evasive way of saying, "Yes, we will use the levers within Ottawa's power to prevent new oilsands projects."



Or as Guilbeault called them during his nearly 30 years as a radical, publicity-stunt environmentalist before he entered politics in 2019, the "tar sands."



Alberta can approve all the oilsands developments it wants, but Guilbeault intends to prevent new projects from operating by denying them federal permission to emit carbon dioxide.



That amounts to the same thing.



So when the same man says he isn't going to "try" to put a 100,000 or more Albertans out of work, he could just as easily mean he doesn't have to try. Massive layoffs will happen naturally as a side effect of the Trudeau government's anti-oil, anti-gas, anti-pipeline agenda.



When he was a climate activist, before being elected to Parliament, Guilbeault famously climbed Toronto's CN Tower to unfurl a banner protesting what he saw as the weakness of federal climate change policy. He also arranged for Greenpeace protestors to climb atop then-premier Ralph Klein's private Calgary home and screw solar panels to the roof.



He has opposed every pipeline sought by Canada's energy industry in the past two decades – Energy East, Northern Gateway, Keystone XL, Lines 3, 5 and 9.



He even opposes Trans Mountain, which the federal government owns.



As the price of his agreeing to run for the Liberals in 2019 (rather than for the NDP or Greens), Guilbeault made Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promise to let him speak out against Trans Mountain, even though other Liberal MPs have been told to support it or be tossed from caucus.



Before he entered politics, and many times since, Guilbeault has repeatedly said energy companies can never be permitted to increase their emissions. Emissions must be capped at current levels and diminish over time.



He scoffs at the industry's success already of significantly reducing emissions per barrel produced.



Guilbeault is an absolutist, so much so that he won't even accept relatively clean natural gas as a transitional fuel source until "green" energy can supply Canada's needs. To him, it is better we all freeze in the dark than burn one more gigajoule of gas.



Imagine if a Conservative prime minister appointed as her Federal-Provincial Affairs minister a unilingual anglophone who believed Canada should be officially English-only, that no province was a distinct society nor should any province be permitted to separate, even if it were to pass a clearly worded independence resolution by an overwhelming majority.



Quebec would be apoplectic. It would be having convulsions on the floor of Confederation.



But that is the equivalent of what Trudeau has done to Alberta by putting Guilbeault on the environment file.

Anonymous

The first post shows how pointless the actions of Steven Guilbeault have been and will be.

Anonymous

Quote from: Herman post_id=425444 time=1635533524 user_id=1689
Easy answer-OPEC and Russia would produce more and export it to us,

[media]
">
[/media]

The progressive chattering classes in North America govern us like we are serfs.

Anonymous

https://twitter.com/CoryBMorgan/status/1453766203579584517">https://twitter.com/CoryBMorgan/status/ ... 3579584517">https://twitter.com/CoryBMorgan/status/1453766203579584517

Gaon

Quote from: Herman post_id=425444 time=1635533524 user_id=1689
Easy answer-OPEC and Russia would produce more and export it to us,

[media]
">
[/media]

Oil and gas has thirty times the energy density of renewables.  :shock:
The Russian Rock It

Anonymous

Quote from: Herman post_id=425445 time=1635534851 user_id=1689
Justine's hatred for the prairies is not even hidden anymore. We have to separate from Canada.



Guilbeault as federal environment minister spells doom for Alberta

https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters/gunter-guilbeault-as-federal-environment-minister-spells-doom-for-alberta">https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters ... or-alberta">https://edmontonsun.com/opinion/letters/gunter-guilbeault-as-federal-environment-minister-spells-doom-for-alberta



Newly appointed federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said Wednesday – his first full day at his new job of crushing Alberta's economy – that he is not going to try to kill oil and gas jobs.



It amounts to him promising not to go out of his way to make tens of thousand of Albertans unemployed. But, ya know, if it happens, it happens.



This is the same man who, as heritage minister in the last Parliament, insisted again and again the only way to save free expression was to regulate use of the internet more harshly than in any other democracy.



Also on Wednesday, when asked if he intends to block new oilsands projects, Guilbeault said the federal government has no jurisdiction over production of oil, gas or coal, only over the emissions produced by those resources.



"We will ensure through legislation or regulation ... that emissions from oil and gas are capped at current levels and diminish over time," he said.



Pardon me, but that's just an evasive way of saying, "Yes, we will use the levers within Ottawa's power to prevent new oilsands projects."



Or as Guilbeault called them during his nearly 30 years as a radical, publicity-stunt environmentalist before he entered politics in 2019, the "tar sands."



Alberta can approve all the oilsands developments it wants, but Guilbeault intends to prevent new projects from operating by denying them federal permission to emit carbon dioxide.



That amounts to the same thing.



So when the same man says he isn't going to "try" to put a 100,000 or more Albertans out of work, he could just as easily mean he doesn't have to try. Massive layoffs will happen naturally as a side effect of the Trudeau government's anti-oil, anti-gas, anti-pipeline agenda.



When he was a climate activist, before being elected to Parliament, Guilbeault famously climbed Toronto's CN Tower to unfurl a banner protesting what he saw as the weakness of federal climate change policy. He also arranged for Greenpeace protestors to climb atop then-premier Ralph Klein's private Calgary home and screw solar panels to the roof.



He has opposed every pipeline sought by Canada's energy industry in the past two decades – Energy East, Northern Gateway, Keystone XL, Lines 3, 5 and 9.



He even opposes Trans Mountain, which the federal government owns.



As the price of his agreeing to run for the Liberals in 2019 (rather than for the NDP or Greens), Guilbeault made Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promise to let him speak out against Trans Mountain, even though other Liberal MPs have been told to support it or be tossed from caucus.



Before he entered politics, and many times since, Guilbeault has repeatedly said energy companies can never be permitted to increase their emissions. Emissions must be capped at current levels and diminish over time.



He scoffs at the industry's success already of significantly reducing emissions per barrel produced.



Guilbeault is an absolutist, so much so that he won't even accept relatively clean natural gas as a transitional fuel source until "green" energy can supply Canada's needs. To him, it is better we all freeze in the dark than burn one more gigajoule of gas.



Imagine if a Conservative prime minister appointed as her Federal-Provincial Affairs minister a unilingual anglophone who believed Canada should be officially English-only, that no province was a distinct society nor should any province be permitted to separate, even if it were to pass a clearly worded independence resolution by an overwhelming majority.



Quebec would be apoplectic. It would be having convulsions on the floor of Confederation.



But that is the equivalent of what Trudeau has done to Alberta by putting Guilbeault on the environment file.

I knew it was only a matter of time until True Dope had AOC wannabes in his cabinet.

Bricktop

No sympathy.



You voted him in three times.



Suffer in your own malaise.

Anonymous

Quote from: Bricktop post_id=425502 time=1635565300 user_id=1560
No sympathy.



You voted him in three times.



Suffer in your own malaise.

thanks

 :sneaky2:

Anonymous

National Post:

"Meanwhile, the new Natural Resources Minister, Jonathan Wilkinson, was telling CBC that as the world faces a near-unprecedented energy crunch, one of his top priorities for the Canadian oil sector is to get to "net zero" emissions. This kind of stuff doesn't really happen in other oil-rich countries. Here, for instance, is a recent interview with Norway's Minister of Petroleum in which she bragged about how the current oil boom is excellent news for Norwegians. "We know how important our oil and gas revenues and oil wealth are for welfare development," Marte Mjos Persen, a member of the country's Labour Party, told Bloomberg News."

Anonymous

Canada's approach to addressing climate change has been a complete disaster and we keep doubling down on all pain and zero gain. Instead of trying to shut down whole industries, throwing tens of thousands of people out of work and artificially raising the cost of everything we should be building pipelines, LNG export facilities, and exporting CCS technology which the IPCC admitted is necessary to keep global temperatures from rising out of control.



Why COP26 leaders should look to Canada for energy solutions

Canada can help reduce emissions while providing reliable, responsible, affordable energy to the world





Global leaders headed to Glasgow for this year's key climate talks should take advantage of Canada's ability to help reduce emissions while providing reliable, responsible, affordable energy to the world. Here's why:

https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/iea-energy-supply-1-550x0-c-default.jpg">

Canadian natural gas can reduce global emissions



Canada has a powerful tool that can make a difference reducing global greenhouse gas emissions – its vast resources of natural gas.



Traded globally as LNG, natural gas is increasingly being used to reduce emissions by replacing high-emitting coal power. Switching power generation from coal to natural gas reduces emissions by 50 per cent on average, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).



Natural gas from Canada could do even more, reducing emissions from power generation in China by as much as 62 per cent, according to a June 2020 study published in the Journal for Cleaner Production.



Just one Canadian LNG project could reduce emissions in China by 60 to 90 megatonnes per year, or more than the 50 megatonnes that Canada's entire natural gas production emitted in 2018, according to federal data.



The emissions from Canada's whole oil and gas production sector are lower than just the top six polluting coal plants in the world, according to a study in the journal Environmental Research Letters, and federal data.



Expertise in CCUS



The IEA has called for a dramatic expansion of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology. Without it, meeting emissions targets will be "virtually impossible," the IEA says.



Canada is recognized as an early leader in CCUS.



Projects have already safely stored more than 41 million tonnes of CO2 deep underground, or the equivalent of taking more than 8 million cars off the road.



Canada is also a hub for CCUS technology development for new industries that utilize the CO2 waste stream to create value-added products.



A key example is the recently completed NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE, where teams in Alberta and Wyoming competed for a total $20 million purse to see who could convert the most CO2 into the highest value products.



The two winners both developed solutions aimed at reducing CO2 emissions from concrete, while finalists also include teams that created products including hand sanitizer, vodka and sunglasses using CO2 that would have otherwise been released to the atmosphere.



Leading in energy cleantech



Oil and gas companies in Canada spend more than any other sector on cleantech research and development. Major companies spent a record $1.6 billion on R&D in 2019, according to the latest ranking by Research Infosource.



That's an increase of about $400 million compared to the previous record, which was set in 2018.



Photo courtesy Cenovus Energy

This investment helps improve the performance of existing operations and advances new low carbon energy systems like wind, solar, CCUS, hydrogen, biofuels, geothermal, and small modular nuclear reactors.



Several major new clean energy projects are advancing, including Western Canada's first-ever facilities to produce liquid hydrogen for road transportation, Canada's first geothermal power facility, and significant CCUS expansion.



Oil sands working harder than others to reduce emissions



Canada has the world's third-largest oil reserves, so there is essentially no end to production potential as global demand continues.



In Canada's oil sands, where two-thirds of the country's oil is produced, companies are working harder than other major global oil producers to reduce emissions, according to research by BMO Capital Markets.



Oil sands average emissions intensity (or emissions per barrel) decreased by 27 per cent since 2013, while at the same time other major oil producers around the world reduced intensity by just 13 per cent, BMO reports.



Put another way, analysts estimate that since 2013 the average oil sands barrel has shaved off more than 22 kilograms of emissions, compared to just five kilograms per barrel for other major global oil producers.



Several oil sands projects now have emissions intensity that is lower than the global average, and major oil sands producers have jointly committed to reach net zero emissions by 2050.



Canada's Friendly Energy



Canada ranks number one across environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators compared to the world's top oil reserve holders, according to BMO Capital Markets.



ESG performance includes measures like GHG emissions, water use, Indigenous participation, diversity and inclusion, safety, and regulatory processes.



When oil and gas comes from Canada, it can help reduce the world's reliance on energy from tyranny states like Russia and Saudi Arabia.

https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/why-cop26-leaders-should-look-to-canada-for-energy-solutions/?fbclid=IwAR3ah-7icI5WfN1awFe1Hj6f2Se0JjAOFOlqdaJiNuoGcB78ha3SHe-ETjk">https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/why ... a3SHe-ETjk">https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/why-cop26-leaders-should-look-to-canada-for-energy-solutions/?fbclid=IwAR3ah-7icI5WfN1awFe1Hj6f2Se0JjAOFOlqdaJiNuoGcB78ha3SHe-ETjk

Anonymous

QuoteCanada's approach to addressing climate change has been a complete disaster and we keep doubling down on all pain and zero gain.



throwing tens of thousands of people out of work and artificially raising the cost of everything

You don't think this is deliberate.

Anonymous

Prog money is making it harder for our pensions to grow too with their insane keep it in the ground for Western countries only.

[media]
">
[/media]

Anonymous

Biden and Trudeau will meet other world leaders in Glasgow to address the "climate crisis." Noticeably absent will be presidents Xi and Putin.

Thiel

"Oil and gas companies in Canada spend more than any other sector on cleantech research and development. Major companies spent a record $1.6 billion on R&D in 2019, according to the latest ranking by Research Infosource.



That's an increase of about $400 million compared to the previous record, which was set in 2018."



That is impressive. Particularly so when you consider their revenues were down in those years.
gay, conservative and proud