Interesting and balanced interview

[Anonymous]

Freud needs to learn about the virtue of credibility. It's one thing to quote a source...but do a little homework first.

Not only was his theory easily debunked it was plagiarized by someone using it against MMR.

[Anonymous]

Dr Offit says if you have a vaccine that results in high levels of neutralizing antibodies, that's not a way to create variants,"

I understand his argument & it's theory, not fact based. The stuff is in no way like an antibiotic structurally



Yes, contrary to the initial claimant, what causes likelihood of variants is the infection spread. Each infection increases the chances of variants developing. The more cases the more likelihood.



Or put the other way, the less infections the less opportunity for variants



Most variants have  developed in high population / high case rate areas of the world .. this is logical & supports the above sentence 1 (India, S Africa for examples) and 2. the exceptions to that are  other areas (UK) when case rate is very high



keywords > "high local infection rates" > high changes of variants developing.



(Simply  look at from where and from when in time known variants developed)

I'll read more about his theory tonight.

My views on vaccines are not set in stone. But, videos will not influence my opinions. They are entertainment, usually of the fictional variety. Scouse got his education from fringe videos and he too never questions the words of the 'experts' who make them.

[Frood]

Freud needs to learn about the virtue of credibility. It's one thing to quote a source...but do a little homework first.

Not only was his theory easily debunked it was plagiarized by someone using it against MMR.

Would you like some more Koolaid to go with that window?

[Bricktop]

Once again your source of information is utterly discredited.



It's not us that is drinking deep of the Koolaid.

[Frood]

Yeah....OK, Boomers....

[Bricktop]

Fiendish disputant!!!



What a comeback.

[Frood]

Until people decide to watch the original video posted instead of seek to character assassinate sight unseen, nothing more is deserved...

[Bricktop]

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

[cc]

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

Par for the course /  modus operandi  for conspiracists



No surprise here

[Frood]

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.

[Bricktop]

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.

Not at all. Comment is entirely valid when you cite a dubious source.

[Frood]

Yet nobody is willing to view the source material but still feel justified in discounting it.

[cc]

... when you cite a dubious source.

This is how conspiracists operate .. their  modus operandi is the same no matter the cause .. dubious source

[Frood]

:001_rolleyes:





Go away, Branch Covidian....

[Anonymous]

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.

Not at all. Comment is entirely valid when you cite a dubious source.

Those are the only sources he ever cites. Fash and ceec always pick these video wankers apart, but that doesn't stop him from believing vaccines will kill him faster than cigarettes.