What's been happening to many people's minds....

[Frood]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/

[Anonymous]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/

I blame Bitchute.

[cc]

I blame Bitchute.

Definitely. They are ruthless .. ruthless I say!!



This one is a great example. When you have no facts, you accuse the other of being insane. We are seeing that copout  all the time

[Bricktop]

How to offer an fraudulent (or is that Freudulent) "academic" perspective to an argument.



1. Create a visual enticing Youtube video.



2. Include a prologue that cites a well known and accepted scientific principle by an acknowledged expert - mass psychosis has been taught in psychology courses for decades, usually citing Hitler's major "superpower" of entrancing vast crowds with his vision of a German utopia...with more recent and profound examples being China and North Korea.



3. Segue from your citation into personal observation and unfounded and unproven scientific claims. Include personal anecdotes and opinions.



4. Overlay the seemingly relevant established scientific principles over your personal observations, ignoring the many glaring misappropriations of fact over fiction.



5. Post it on Youtube.



Then, useful idiots like Freud will grab the headline and go "Aha!!! I was right. This video proves it!!". Unfortunately, in all his misplaced zeal, he failed, AGAIN, to check the source.



"A man by the name of Dr. Robert Malone has recently found fame through alternative media outlets, claiming to be the RNA vaccine inventor and spouting out a mishmash of misleading claims.



Malone is a scientist. In 1989, he co-wrote a paper titled "Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection." While his work on RNA transfection might have been important, his claim to be the "inventor" of RNA vaccines is shaky, to say the least.



In a recent, lengthy interview with the factually dubious Epoch Times, Malone made a number of claims about treatments for COVID-19 as well as COVID-19 vaccines. Many of these claims were misleading rather than downright false; they sometimes have a nugget of truth in them – a perennial conundrum for the fact checker."



https://www.logically.ai/articles/who-is-dr.-robert-malone">//https://www.logically.ai/articles/who-is-dr.-robert-malone



Note that the author of this description also references how charlatans sell their flawed OPINIONS with "nuggets of truth". See my comments re his prologue.



Yet again, Freud fails.

[Frood]

ac_lmfao



So they behave as they're described in the video....  

[Bricktop]

No. They behave in accordance with what they believe is in their best interest. That is quite different.



If you make 1000 people walk in a desert for three days without water, then gather them up and hand out bottles of icy cold water they will ALL grab and guzzle. That is not mass psychosis. They need water to survive.



As usual you compare apples with wheelbarrows.

[Anonymous]

How to offer an fraudulent (or is that Freudulent) "academic" perspective to an argument.



1. Create a visual enticing Youtube video.



2. Include a prologue that cites a well known and accepted scientific principle by an acknowledged expert - mass psychosis has been taught in psychology courses for decades, usually citing Hitler's major "superpower" of entrancing vast crowds with his vision of a German utopia...with more recent and profound examples being China and North Korea.



3. Segue from your citation into personal observation and unfounded and unproven scientific claims. Include personal anecdotes and opinions.



4. Overlay the seemingly relevant established scientific principles over your personal observations, ignoring the many glaring misappropriations of fact over fiction.



5. Post it on Youtube.



Then, useful idiots like Freud will grab the headline and go "Aha!!! I was right. This video proves it!!". Unfortunately, in all his misplaced zeal, he failed, AGAIN, to check the source.



"A man by the name of Dr. Robert Malone has recently found fame through alternative media outlets, claiming to be the RNA vaccine inventor and spouting out a mishmash of misleading claims.



Malone is a scientist. In 1989, he co-wrote a paper titled "Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection." While his work on RNA transfection might have been important, his claim to be the "inventor" of RNA vaccines is shaky, to say the least.



In a recent, lengthy interview with the factually dubious Epoch Times, Malone made a number of claims about treatments for COVID-19 as well as COVID-19 vaccines. Many of these claims were misleading rather than downright false; they sometimes have a nugget of truth in them – a perennial conundrum for the fact checker."



https://www.logically.ai/articles/who-is-dr.-robert-malone">//https://www.logically.ai/articles/who-is-dr.-robert-malone



Note that the author of this description also references how charlatans sell their flawed OPINIONS with "nuggets of truth". See my comments re his prologue.



Yet again, Freud fails.

This retardation seems to appeal to uneducated white Americans.

[Frood]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/

 

[Anonymous]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/wRQfiIGClhVT/

 

He creates misinformation for uneducated white Americans.

[Frood]

ac_lmfao

[Bricktop]

This retardation seems to appeal to uneducated white Americans.

Why did you qualify it with "uneducated"?



The educated ones are the biggest drinkers of the Koolaid!!!