News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 11538
Total votes: : 5

Last post: November 22, 2024, 10:55:48 AM
Re: Forum gossip thread by DKG

avatar_Aryan

Ever wonder why all major companies promote woke politics?

Started by Aryan, April 16, 2022, 03:44:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Aryan

https://i.ibb.co/dPb4XsX/fnkk.jpg">



https://marketbusinessnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ESG.jpg">



Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) is an approach to evaluating the extent to which a corporation works on behalf of social goals that go beyond the role of a corporation to maximize profits on behalf of the corporation's shareholders. Typically, the social goals advocated within an ESG perspective include working to achieve a certain set of environmental goals, as well as a set of goals having to do with supporting certain social movements, and a third set of goals having to do with whether the corporation is governed in a way that is consistent with the goals of the Diversity, equity, and inclusion movement.[1]



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social_and_corporate_governance">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environme ... governance">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social_and_corporate_governance





So in other words, these big corporations and fortune 500 companies are literally paid to enforce diversity and other woke policies, all because some mega rich Jew (EVERY. FUCKING. TIME.) has a fondness of Cultural Marxism.



"Larry Fink has gained so much power he is strong arming the entire finance world to only invest in woke companies."





Any thoughts from the resisent naysayers and serial deniers of the JQ?

Anonymous

Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.

Aryan

I'm not usually the sort to gloat about being right and say I told you so, but in this instance I'm willing to make an exception, mainly due to the amount of shit I received on here over the years for speaking the uncensored truth about Jews.



So, to summarise, like I've said all along, Jews are the ones pushing woke politics (essentially just a rebranded term for Cultural Marxism and also Jewish to the core).



Thankyou and goodbye.



Oh and one last thing, JUDEN RAUS. 14/88



https://i.ibb.co/njZVCK3/yes.jpg">

Anonymous

Politics and free enterprise don't mix..



We're seeing it here in Alberta with small specialty bath and candle companies saying they won't use Alberta oil.....that backfired on them as Albertans boycotted their products..



Things will either return to companies being neutral or companies become an extension of the government as they are in a lot of countries around the world..



In a functioning democracy like Canada or Taiwan, companies and the central government don't mix..



I believe companies will avoid politics again like they did twenty five years ago.

Anonymous

Scouser was never a fan of free market competition anyway. Just like his hero Hitler.



What is happening now, monopolized capitalism that does the state's bidding in exchange for taxpayer largesse was how it worked in nazi Germany, fascist Italy and imperial Japan.



I would think Scouser would be happy. A few very wealthy people benefit at the expense of the masses. That's the fascist/marxist way.

Frood

Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.
Blahhhhhh...

Anonymous

Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.

Frood

Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447012 time=1650125640 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.


True.... but new competitions have arose.... like which company is the most woke with underperforming minority hiring wise.



It's a side hustle now....
Blahhhhhh...

cc

Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447009 time=1650121879 user_id=56
.............

I would think Scouser would be happy. A few very wealthy people benefit at the expense of the masses.



That's the fascist/marxist way.

Of course it is the fascist/marxist way. Both function from the very same socialist concept with a different name



He's not sharp enough to understand that what he follows / worships means being run by an elite and keeps Karl & Karla Durchschnittlich (Joe & Jane Average person) down & under its thumb (or in his case down & under  its jack boot) just as marxism did to it's followers
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447014 time=1650127671 user_id=1676
Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447012 time=1650125640 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.


True.... but new competitions have arose.... like which company is the most woke with underperforming minority hiring wise.



It's a side hustle now....

The real money now is with governments not the marketplace. Companies are trying to please regimes instead of consumers.


Anonymous

I never trusted transnational corporations. We can't trust big governments either.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447014 time=1650127671 user_id=1676
Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447012 time=1650125640 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.


True.... but new competitions have arose.... like which company is the most woke with underperforming minority hiring wise.



It's a side hustle now....

A legitimate enterprise's hiring and promotions are merit based and colour blind. Government race based "inclusivity initiatives are the exact opposite.

Frood

Quote from: seoulbro post_id=447030 time=1650136827 user_id=114
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447014 time=1650127671 user_id=1676
Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447012 time=1650125640 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.


True.... but new competitions have arose.... like which company is the most woke with underperforming minority hiring wise.



It's a side hustle now....

A legitimate enterprise's hiring and promotions are merit based and colour blind. Government race based "inclusivity initiatives are the exact opposite.


There's been little difference in the last 2 decades. Any of the big corporations I've worked for did the same.... often the corporations pioneering first.



I had to sit through meetings and off the cuff situations where accusations of sexism and racism got flung about because the person in question each time was a toxic liar and opportunist.



Performance didn't matter.... their actions and words didn't matter if the 2 witness rule was in place but both people were males...or worse, two white males.



I've seen the most despicable behaviours from both genders and all races....and I've seen sterling behaviour too.... but when performance is questionable or advancement not likely, some minorities will do anything possible to get ahead.
Blahhhhhh...

Anonymous

Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447016 time=1650129235 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447014 time=1650127671 user_id=1676
Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=447012 time=1650125640 user_id=56
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=447011 time=1650123768 user_id=1676
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=446996 time=1650108319 user_id=3254
Big companies, both privately and public traded ones used to avoid anything political..



What's happening now is a fairly recent development.


In the late 80's and 90's, organisations hired more minorities but quickly got rid of them if they didn't perform.



From the 2000's on, performance hasn't necessarily been an issue....just good optics.

Corporations don't need to concern themselves with performance anymore. It's not like competition still exists. No competion, means no consequences for poor performance.


True.... but new competitions have arose.... like which company is the most woke with underperforming minority hiring wise.



It's a side hustle now....

The real money now is with governments not the marketplace. Companies are trying to please regimes instead of consumers.

There's less collusion between the private sector and government in Taiwan than in Canada or the USA.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Is the "D" in Django silent? Yes or No? (must be lower case):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview