Childless By Choice Cat Ladies

[Shen Li]

I see Democrats dug out an interview with Trump's running mate, JD Vance where he was talking about people like AOC and Harris who chose not to have families. He clearly was not talking about women who are unable to have children, but wanted them.

Vance was spot fucking on. Childless by choice cat ladies are miserable fucks. They made bad choices and have regrets. It's not just childless women either. Look at Apegirl.

They do not have a stake in the future of their country. Why the fuck should they be running the country FFS.

[Shen Li]

I don't support universal suffrage. Voters should be stakeholders, ie employed.

I think those seeking elected office should also be stakeholders, ie they should have families. I'm saying this as an East Asian woman. Rich East Asian countries have the lowest birth rates in the world.

Countries need their citizens to reproduce. Politicians should lead by example. Kids get in the way of a lot of East Asian women's self-indulgent lifestyle choices. Sorry, I would never vote for you. Nobody should.

[DKG]

Vance's comments do not reflect policy on the Trump ticket. He is giving an opinion. Who cares.

[Garraty_47]

Vance was just making a joke.
It wasn't the best joke, obviously, but still just a joke. Not that it matters; the selective literalist interpretation used by his detractors is based on politics, not communication efficacy.

That said, being a breeder alone doesn't magically imbue someone with good qualities or rational priorities or clarity of vision in regard to the future of humanity.

There are millions of possible reasons someone hasn't contributed to population growth. Not all of those reasons involve regret or antipathy toward children/families; those kinds of negative assertions are themselves politically motivated instead of being literally reflective of reality.

This whole thing is just another stupid political game.

Someone says something stupid then his "opponents" put their own stupid twist on it while trying to use it against him. It's a big parade of stupid whose main effect is preventing people from communicating 'across enemy lines' and talking about things that could potentially result in fundamental changes.

Same as it ever was.

[Frood]

I don't trust leaders in general but intentionally not having kids is a big red flag and a possible window into their dead and blackened hearts.

[JOE]

I don't trust leaders in general but intentionally not having kids is a big red flag and a possible window into their dead and blackened hearts.

But Princess Kamala could be yer next President Frood Dinky Frood Sargent SmellyOne Diana!

[Biggie Smiles]

Vance was just making a joke.
It wasn't the best joke, obviously, but still just a joke. Not that it matters; the selective literalist interpretation used by his detractors is based on politics, not communication efficacy.

That said, being a breeder alone doesn't magically imbue someone with good qualities or rational priorities or clarity of vision in regard to the future of humanity.

There are millions of possible reasons someone hasn't contributed to population growth. Not all of those reasons involve regret or antipathy toward children/families; those kinds of negative assertions are themselves politically motivated instead of being literally reflective of reality.

This whole thing is just another stupid political game.

Someone says something stupid then his "opponents" put their own stupid twist on it while trying to use it against him. It's a big parade of stupid whose main effect is preventing people from communicating 'across enemy lines' and talking about things that could potentially result in fundamental changes.

Same as it ever was.

I think the point is not that people with kids have better qualities than those without. Clearly there are millions of examples of people with kids who are absolute scum. Scum to others and scum to the very children they procreated.

The point is that you have a better chance of someone being a better fit for leadership if they have a personally vested interest in subsequent generations thriving in this country because their own blood is a part of those subsequent generations. With a vested interested in the outcomes for those they should love people might have a greater propensity towards making choices that will better achieve a better outcome than those without. It's a guestimate - -nothing more. Much like reading the tea leaves or trying to play the stock market based on certain signals.

But see, for all the times you will hear some dorky libtard use the term "it's nuanced" they prove here they have not the slightest understanding of what nuanced actually means.

As any decent person here who is a parent can tell you -- you have a completely different mindset on the future when you become a parent than you did before.

Again, none of this is hard fast rules... just working the probabilities is all Vance was doing. But that doesn't stop the scum on the left from being the scum on the left though. Because God forbid they could run on anything besides murdering those kids in the womb and the fact that they are not their opponent.

[caskur]

But Princess Kamala could be yer next President Frood Dinky Frood Sargent SmellyOne Diana!

He lives in Australia, along way from Kamala.

Did you know that Joe and Jill Biden don't like Kamala and either does Barak and Michelle Obama.

There was talk about Michelle being President. She would have been better... Mother with Children and a stable marriage..... much more respectable than Harris.

[Garraty_47]

The point is that you have a better chance of someone being a better fit for leadership if they have a personally vested interest in subsequent generations thriving in this country

Looks good on paper but "a personally vested interest in subsequent generations thriving in this country" isn't inextricably bound to being a breeder and that's my point. Any and all sweeping generalizations are impediments to communication, often intentionally, not vehicles for it.

It's why tribalism is so rampant and intractable and destructive.

Funny how all that enmity and division always benefits the ruling classes; a coincidence I'm sure.

[Frood]

He lives in Australia, along way from Kamala.

Did you know that Joe and Jill Biden don't like Kamala and either does Barak and Michelle Obama.

There was talk about Michelle being President. She would have been better... Mother with Children and a stable marriage..... much more respectable than Harris.

Big Mike didn't give birth though....

[Frood]

Looks good on paper but "a personally vested interest in subsequent generations thriving in this country" isn't inextricably bound to being a breeder and that's my point. Any and all sweeping generalizations are impediments to communication, often intentionally, not vehicles for it.

It's why tribalism is so rampant and intractable and destructive.

Funny how all that enmity and division always benefits the ruling classes; a coincidence I'm sure.

No breed, no lead.

[Garraty_47]

No breed, no lead.

Um... what was that?
I couldn't understand you with all that PMC cawk in your mouth...

LoL

Sorry; couldn't resist.
That's how you feel and that's cool.
Just because you're wrong doesn't mean I want you canceled or anything.

[Frood]

Um... what was that?
I couldn't understand you with all that PMC cawk in your mouth...

LoL

Sorry; couldn't resist.
That's how you feel and that's cool.
Just because you're wrong doesn't mean I want you canceled or anything.

All good.

You think socialism isn't retarded, immoral, and it's doable "this time... very soon... this time it won't lead to  democide!"

Enough said.

[formosan]

I think the point is not that people with kids have better qualities than those without. Clearly there are millions of examples of people with kids who are absolute scum. Scum to others and scum to the very children they procreated.

The point is that you have a better chance of someone being a better fit for leadership if they have a personally vested interest in subsequent generations thriving in this country because their own blood is a part of those subsequent generations. With a vested interested in the outcomes for those they should love people might have a greater propensity towards making choices that will better achieve a better outcome than those without. It's a guestimate - -nothing more. Much like reading the tea leaves or trying to play the stock market based on certain signals.

But see, for all the times you will hear some dorky libtard use the term "it's nuanced" they prove here they have not the slightest understanding of what nuanced actually means.

As any decent person here who is a parent can tell you -- you have a completely different mindset on the future when you become a parent than you did before.

Again, none of this is hard fast rules... just working the probabilities is all Vance was doing. But that doesn't stop the scum on the left from being the scum on the left though. Because God forbid they could run on anything besides murdering those kids in the womb and the fact that they are not their opponent.

I know some childless adults....they do think differently than those of us with families..

I agree people with children are likely to care more about future generations for obvious reasons..

This could become a hot button topic moving forward as more young people make the decision not to have children.

[formosan]

I see Democrats dug out an interview with Trump's running mate, JD Vance where he was talking about people like AOC and Harris who chose not to have families. He clearly was not talking about women who are unable to have children, but wanted them.

Vance was spot fucking on. Childless by choice cat ladies are miserable fucks. They made bad choices and have regrets. It's not just childless women either. Look at Apegirl.

They do not have a stake in the future of their country. Why they fuck should they be running the country FFS.

I don't know about miserable, but some of the childless adults I've met are immature imo.