Denmark Will Seize Refugees Valuables To Cover Costs Of Settling Them

[RW]

Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.

I asked you a reasonable question.  Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please?  :)

I see a few statements from you. What is your question?

Anything you've posted in this thread has had nothing to do with the op. You try figuring it out on your own. Nobody should have to hold ur hand for you.

This place sure has its share of drama. What's RWs god damned question? I C are you retarded?

Sorry but my questions were pretty darn clear if you went back a page so I wouldn't start painting with the retard brush just yet :)

[cc]

This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >



So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365?

Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.

[Anonymous]

This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >



So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365?

Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.

I wouldn't ceec.

[Anonymous]

I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.

Please then put me on ignore.

What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?

Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.

[RW]

This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >



So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365?

Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.

Pity?  Feelings of obligation to help?  The children?



I think the why is less important after the fact though cc.  The why is moot when they are already there.

[RW]

So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive?  How is that fair?

Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.

When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?

It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.



I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.



Do you think they should receive more?

I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.

I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.



The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled.  It shouldn't be permanent.

[Twenty Dollars]

Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.

I asked you a reasonable question.  Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please?  :)

I see a few statements from you. What is your question?

Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?

I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK?  Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.

[Twenty Dollars]

I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.

Please then put me on ignore.

What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?

Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.

Please...  You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff  of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.

[RW]

Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.

I asked you a reasonable question.  Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please?  :)

I see a few statements from you. What is your question?

Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?

I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK?  Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.

I understand why you feel the way you do about lining them up and shooting them.  If you read through the posts, you will see it's the IDEOLOGY that needs to be shot, not the people.  Okay, some of the people need to be shot but they are Islamist terrorists.  Trust me on this and thank me for saving you A LOT of trouble in advance.



In Denmark, those who get social assistance have to sell their possessions up to a certain amount of worth.  Whether you agree with it or not, that's their current system.  I don't think it's fair to accept people from other countries and give them benefits that exceed that which citizens receive.

[RW]

I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.

Please then put me on ignore.

What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?

Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.

Please...  You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff  of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.

I actually don't see that about him.  He's not afraid to stand up to us "estrogen types" when he feels the need even if us "estrogen types" think it's uncalled for.

[Twenty Dollars]

Well then gas em. I have no answers. You all do. It won't affect me either.

I asked you a reasonable question.  Could you be so kind as to return with a reasonable answer please?  :)

I see a few statements from you. What is your question?

Is it fair for refugees to receive benefits that exceed those that people in said country receive?

I don't know the answer to your question. However, somehow these refugees made it to Denmark. The country allowed them to enter. Unclear of the arrangements that were made to accept them. Are the costs higher than a normal employed Dane citizen? I would say yes. Is it fair for the refugees to receive what ever they receive? I'd say you'd have to go back and look at the original arrangement. Do you honestly think these refugees have a pot to piss in? Now after these folks have settled, picking what's ever left in their pocket is OK?  Now answer my question. Given the circumstances, would it be better to line them up and shoot every last man women and child? Most here silently advocate this. This is no assumption.

I understand why you feel the way you do about lining them up and shooting them.  If you read through the posts, you will see it's the IDEOLOGY that needs to be shot, not the people.  Okay, some of the people need to be shot but they are Islamist terrorists.  Trust me on this and thank me for saving you A LOT of trouble in advance.



In Denmark, those who get social assistance have to sell their possessions up to a certain amount of worth.  Whether you agree with it or not, that's their current system.  I don't think it's fair to accept people from other countries and give them benefits that exceed that which citizens receive.

When you say the IDEOLOGY needs to be shot, are you referring to the situation in their previous country that forced them to leave? Please, when I say shoot them all. It's not my wish, although some here would advocate. Why did Denmark allow them in? Did they not anticipate these problems?

[Anonymous]

So they come to a place where they receive social benefits while sitting on wealth that is higher than what Danish people themselves can receive?  How is that fair?

Then you agree. No one gives a shit. Blow em away. Fuck their only human beings anyway.

When you say sitting on wealth, what does that mean? A few trinkets they brought in their pocket?

It's only "trinkets" that exceed what a Dane would be allowed to have.



I would expect those coming to other countries to receive benefits that do not exceed that which citizens of that country receive themselves.



Do you think they should receive more?

I read what Denmark is doing may be in violation of international agreements that Denmark was a signatory to. Brussels is not pleased with this either.

I think they are going about it in the wrong way when they should just say "no" outright and be done with it rather than taking possessions and (apparently) putting people into camps.



The idea should also be that these people return to Syria once things have settled.  It shouldn't be permanent.

Setting aside for a minute the legality and human rights questions the Danish actions bring up. I have mixed thoughts on whether refugees should be offered a pathway to permanent residency. On the one hand, asylum in theory is supposed to be a temporary measure. The intent is not to offer a backdoor to citizenship.



On the other hand, the host nation has a right to recoup the costs of supporting refugees. That would be done when they are working, paying taxes and having children who will become future taxpayers. Denmark is an aging country.



I don't know. I would have to look at a cost/benefit study to get a clearer picture.

[Twenty Dollars]

Permanent residency is a commitment to them staying. Would not gaurantee citizenship though. To me two different things. Think it would ever be possible for them to return? Seems pretty impossible now.

[Anonymous]

I have seen anything posted here as stupid as TD's nonsensical comments -and grade four insults since EU was here. TD is painful to read.

Please then put me on ignore.

What's the fucking question. Does anyone know?

Maybe you should follow your own advice and put everyone on ignore since you cannot seem to understand their very clearly written posts.

Please...  You appear to be a spineless fool who is gladly led around by the scruff  of your neck by some of the estrogen types here. Try being a man. You might like it.

As opposed to a GED dropout who cannot comprehend any post he pollutes with his stupidity.



Do us all a favour idiot and read this book cover to cover three times before you post again. We'll see you in a couple of years.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bxm5QhZIgAAAWtK.jpg">

[Anonymous]

This side-issue is a distraction from / misses the key point >



So WHY would anyone deliberately bring in an indoctrinated from birth inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... PLUS then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365?

Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.

Pity?  Feelings of obligation to help?  The children?



I think the why is less important after the fact though cc.  The why is moot when they are already there.

These questions would depend. Are they coming from a refugee camp in Lebanon? Is it children or able bodied muslim adults.