As a TRUE small business owner...

[Angry White Male]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

[Angry White Male]

I'm going to bed now...  It gets dumb here at night, just as it does in the day.



Besides, I have work to do, building new condos for Chinks that are pouring in here faster than you could ever imagine!



Welcome to Hongcouver!

[Anonymous]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

[Anonymous]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

[kiebers]

What is a FALSE small business owner as opposed to a TRUE small business owner?

Still confused......

[cc]

It's easy.



A "TRUE" small business owner has  ONE truck as total corporate assets and ONLY SELF as employee



A "FALSE"  small business owner is anyone else

[Berry Sweet]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

Seems to affect his brain...on top of the booze.  Dirt is a big deal.

[Anonymous]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

Seems to affect his brain...on top of the booze.  Dirt is a big deal.

Herman or AGW? They both drink too much. But, my question eas for Herman. He owns a farm and I heard they will be affected.

[Berry Sweet]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

Seems to affect his brain...on top of the booze.  Dirt is a big deal.

Herman or AGW? They both drink too much. But, my question eas for Herman. He owns a farm and I heard they will be affected.

Angry white moron.  Altho I do hear farmers are going to get it up the ass.  I personally feel they should leave farmers alone.  Farming is not an easy job and the upkeep and standards are neverending...they keep harrassing them.  Ive seen so many documentaties and know of some farmers who are constantly harrassed...these people grow food for you to eat...they are also taking a chance on their crops....leave them alone.

[Anonymous]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

Seems to affect his brain...on top of the booze.  Dirt is a big deal.

Herman or AGW? They both drink too much. But, my question eas for Herman. He owns a farm and I heard they will be affected.

Angry white moron.  Altho I do hear farmers are going to get it up the ass.  I personally feel they should leave farmers alone.  Farming is not an easy job and the upkeep and standards are neverending...they keep harrassing them.  Ive seen so many documentaties and know of some farmers who are constantly harrassed...these people grow food for you to eat...they are also taking a chance on their crops....leave them alone.

I thought it was for AGW.

[Anonymous]

And my parents owned a Chinese bakery.

I don't fucking care!



Unless you run a LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION right now in Canada, YOU ARE NOT AFFECTED AT ALL!



Do you fucking understand?

You stop it you whining little faggot I've owned corporations when you were being canned from every Sikh owned gravel hauling crap outifit on the West Coast. I grew up in an entrepreneurial farm family. My old man had an incorporated heavy equipment corp in addition to the farm. A one truck operation is nothing to be bragging about. Try running a real cprp with real assets and employees and then we'll see if you know what you're talking about. And of course you don't. Just, a crybaby little faggot and nothing more.

Do these changes.affect you?

Not my wellsite consulting business, but my farm yes.

[Anonymous]

Good article  here by Lorne Gunter.

Last week, P.E.I. Liberal MP Wayne Easter let it be known he was opposed to his own government's proposed small business tax changes. Or if not opposed, at least concerned.



This was significant, I thought. Surely it was a sign the federal government was listening to all the complaints from small business owners who stand to see their personal taxes rise substantially if tax changes proposed by Finance Minister Bill Morneau this summer are implemented.



Easter is well regarded in the Liberal caucus, a former cabinet minister and, most significantly, the current chairman of the Commons standing committee on finance.



Easter's concerns might hint at some amendments coming. Otherwise, the proposals would make it much harder for small business owners to save for their retirements, fund expansion of their businesses, hire new employees, pay for maternity leaves, share their income with their children and pass on their businesses.



But anyone who took Easter's remarks as a ray of hope was wrong.



When Parliament reconvened on Monday, Morneau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were, if anything, even more determined to ram through their tax hikes, which seek to squeeze at least $3 billion more out of small business owners every year.



Their class-envy rhetoric – pitting middle-class Canadians against "the wealthy" – was doubled during the first question period of Parliament's fall sitting.



Trudeau insisted his government was only proposing the changes to ensure "the wealthy" – whom he seems to despise, but whom he steadfastly refuses to define – pay their 'fair share" of taxes. He insisted this was about social justice and ensuring "the wealthy" pay the same rate of income tax as everyone else.



But this is based on a misinformed and twisted view of the "rich." (And, undoubtedly, a Liberal desire to woo NDP voters for the 2019 election.)



The top 1% of income earners in Canada kicks in at about $212,000 and already pays nearly 22% of all income tax paid to federal and provincial governments. The top 10% kicks in at around $80,000 and (including the one per centers) pays nearly 55% of all income tax.



The bottom 50% of earners pay just 4% of all income tax collected by Ottawa and the provinces.



The idea that most, or even just many, of Canada's "wealthy" get away without paying any taxes because they can employ clever accountants and sneaky lawyers to cheat the system is quite simply an urban myth.



This week a loose group of activist and lefty doctors wrote a letter to Morneau supporting his tax proposals. They wanted the government to know that while thousands of doctors and the Canadian Medical Association oppose the changes, there are some doctors who like the idea of being charged more tax.



"We need adequate tax revenues to fund social programs ...," the letter states. "These programs directly impact the health of our patients, and we believe it is important for us to contribute to their sustainability through an adequate tax base."



The fallacy in that argument is that governments don't already have enough revenue, so taxes must rise.



But no major government in Canada has a revenue problem. Instead, they almost all have spending problems.



In just the last 10 years, personal income tax revenue for Ottawa alone has risen nearly 20 per cent. Even after adjusting for inflation and population growth, it has risen 9.4 per cent.



And now Morneau and Trudeau and the rebel docs want you to believe taxes have to go higher still. Not only that, they can go higher solely on the backs of the evil, mean, greedy "wealthy," while your taxes remain the same.



But the small business tax hike IS a middle-class tax hike.

http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeaus-tax-pitch-is-based-on-myths-and-class-envy">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/t ... class-envy">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeaus-tax-pitch-is-based-on-myths-and-class-envy

[Anonymous]

Good article  here by Lorne Gunter.

Last week, P.E.I. Liberal MP Wayne Easter let it be known he was opposed to his own government's proposed small business tax changes. Or if not opposed, at least concerned.



This was significant, I thought. Surely it was a sign the federal government was listening to all the complaints from small business owners who stand to see their personal taxes rise substantially if tax changes proposed by Finance Minister Bill Morneau this summer are implemented.



Easter is well regarded in the Liberal caucus, a former cabinet minister and, most significantly, the current chairman of the Commons standing committee on finance.



Easter's concerns might hint at some amendments coming. Otherwise, the proposals would make it much harder for small business owners to save for their retirements, fund expansion of their businesses, hire new employees, pay for maternity leaves, share their income with their children and pass on their businesses.



But anyone who took Easter's remarks as a ray of hope was wrong.



When Parliament reconvened on Monday, Morneau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were, if anything, even more determined to ram through their tax hikes, which seek to squeeze at least $3 billion more out of small business owners every year.



Their class-envy rhetoric – pitting middle-class Canadians against "the wealthy" – was doubled during the first question period of Parliament's fall sitting.



Trudeau insisted his government was only proposing the changes to ensure "the wealthy" – whom he seems to despise, but whom he steadfastly refuses to define – pay their 'fair share" of taxes. He insisted this was about social justice and ensuring "the wealthy" pay the same rate of income tax as everyone else.



But this is based on a misinformed and twisted view of the "rich." (And, undoubtedly, a Liberal desire to woo NDP voters for the 2019 election.)



The top 1% of income earners in Canada kicks in at about $212,000 and already pays nearly 22% of all income tax paid to federal and provincial governments. The top 10% kicks in at around $80,000 and (including the one per centers) pays nearly 55% of all income tax.



The bottom 50% of earners pay just 4% of all income tax collected by Ottawa and the provinces.



The idea that most, or even just many, of Canada's "wealthy" get away without paying any taxes because they can employ clever accountants and sneaky lawyers to cheat the system is quite simply an urban myth.



This week a loose group of activist and lefty doctors wrote a letter to Morneau supporting his tax proposals. They wanted the government to know that while thousands of doctors and the Canadian Medical Association oppose the changes, there are some doctors who like the idea of being charged more tax.



"We need adequate tax revenues to fund social programs ...," the letter states. "These programs directly impact the health of our patients, and we believe it is important for us to contribute to their sustainability through an adequate tax base."



The fallacy in that argument is that governments don't already have enough revenue, so taxes must rise.



But no major government in Canada has a revenue problem. Instead, they almost all have spending problems.



In just the last 10 years, personal income tax revenue for Ottawa alone has risen nearly 20 per cent. Even after adjusting for inflation and population growth, it has risen 9.4 per cent.



And now Morneau and Trudeau and the rebel docs want you to believe taxes have to go higher still. Not only that, they can go higher solely on the backs of the evil, mean, greedy "wealthy," while your taxes remain the same.



But the small business tax hike IS a middle-class tax hike.

http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeaus-tax-pitch-is-based-on-myths-and-class-envy">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/t ... class-envy">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeaus-tax-pitch-is-based-on-myths-and-class-envy

That is an interesting statistic.

[Anonymous]

^^Ottawa has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

[Anonymous]

True Dope is such a fucking hypotwat.

If Tory leader Andrew Scheer was beginning to think he was flogging a dead horse when it comes to attacking Justin Trudeau's plans to close tax loopholes for those "wealthy" tax-cheaters in small business, the pony just neighed.



It's not quite ready for the glue factory



Hypocrisy can be a real leveler, of course, especially when it comes in the form of a gift horse.



Why, for example, would our prime minister, a trust-fund baby from the get-go, have three registered businesses — the one for his speaking engagements now apparently defunct — if it were not for the tax advantages that such private corporations offer?



It begs an answer.



Did he incorporate to limit his liability for business risk? Was it to save tax or defer paying tax to a later date because the small-business corporate tax rate for the first half-million earned is around 13%, as compared to a top personal tax rate of about 44%?



Was it because private corporations don't have withholding taxes, CPP or EI deducted by companies that hire its services?



These are all questions that Scheer should put to Justin Trudeau the next time he deems to show up for Question Period.



This may take a while, seeing as how he headed off to the United Nations' big meeting of world leaders this week to discuss, among other pressing issues, how to rein in North Korea's Kim Jung Un.



But he will return.



News of Trudeau's three private corporations was buried deep in a Huffington Post story earlier this week on how the Liberals plan to use the procedural tool of "time allocation" to ram through legislation.



When asked about this rather odd factoid in light of Trudeau's assault on small business, the response from the Prime Minister's Office was that Trudeau doesn't consider any of his three corporations to be a "small business," and that he "never used any of the tax advantages he is now looking to end."



This is all well and good, of course, but prove it.



Surely the prime minister had reasons to incorporate three distinct businesses, otherwise he would not have done it.



Or are we to take him as a fool prone to needlessly flushing money down the toilet?



One Toronto law firm calling itself "Ontario's No. 1 Incorporation Services" offers "fast and reliable all-inclusive pricing" of $599, plus HST, to incorporate a business federally, and $699, plus HST, to incorporate strictly as an Ontario small business.



So, there is a price to pay. Maybe not a lot, but a price.



What, then, are Justin Trudeau's reasons? Certainly, members of the opposition, as well as various MPs in Trudeau's own caucus, would like to know what possessed him to incorporate, not once but three times.



It is not as if the Trudeau Liberals have not heard dissent over their proposed tax changes to small business.



"Every MP is hearing loud and clear across the country that this is what people are literally freaking out about," Tory House leader Candice Bergen told the HuffPost. "This is a serious blow to local businesses, and the fact that Trudeau is doubling down, and being incredibly tone-deaf and stubborn on this, is only making it worse.



"People are really, really scared."



It is time, therefore, to put the question to Justin Trudeau.



The horse he rode in on could use a little more flogging.

http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeau-hypocrisy-wakens-a-dead-horse-for-more-flogging">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/t ... e-flogging">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2017/09/19/trudeau-hypocrisy-wakens-a-dead-horse-for-more-flogging