It is currently December 11th, 2019, 4:15 am

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 510 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: My AR is ready for you
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 7:16 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 7:33 am 

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 10:25 pm
Posts: 41381
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.

I don't know anything about this Blazor?


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 7:38 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.

I don't know anything about this Blazor?


Its in the news. O' Rourke is a politician thinking he can take folks guns. Cain is a politician, saying he can try to take 'em.

Here is the first article that popped up on Joogle....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... to-orourke

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 8:01 am 

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 10:25 pm
Posts: 41381
Blazor wrote:
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.

I don't know anything about this Blazor?


Its in the news. O' Rourke is a politician thinking he can take folks guns. Cain is a politician, saying he can try to take 'em.

Here is the first article that popped up on Joogle....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... to-orourke

I know who Beto O'Rourke is..

Did he say this in Dem debate?

We had our own leadership debate last night without the prime minister.
ac_wot


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 9:05 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.

I don't know anything about this Blazor?


Its in the news. O' Rourke is a politician thinking he can take folks guns. Cain is a politician, saying he can try to take 'em.

Here is the first article that popped up on Joogle....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... to-orourke

I know who Beto O'Rourke is..

Did he say this in Dem debate?

We had our own leadership debate last night without the prime minister.
ac_wot


Yup said at debate.

Wow what a leader lol.

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 9:06 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 9:22 am 

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 10:25 pm
Posts: 41381
Blazor wrote:
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

Didn't the other candidates mention his reversal?


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 10:15 am 
User avatar

Joined: November 17th, 2012, 4:01 pm
Posts: 12687
Blazor wrote:
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

I remember that statement when he was running against Ted Cruz.

_________________
A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers. Friedrich August von Hayek


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 10:19 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

Didn't the other candidates mention his reversal?


Possibly, I dont watch that show, oh whats it called, oh yeah.... Liars on Parade! :laugh:

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 10:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: November 17th, 2012, 4:01 pm
Posts: 12687
Blazor wrote:
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

Didn't the other candidates mention his reversal?


Possibly, I dont watch that show, oh whats it called, oh yeah.... Liars on Parade! :laugh:

O'Rourke is as phony as a three dollar bill.

_________________
A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers. Friedrich August von Hayek


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 11:05 am 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
seoulbro wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Fashionista wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Hes a flip flopping fucker, more of that "not for you but ok for me" crowd.

However, O'Rourke had a much different stance when he was running for Senate. During an interview on "The Chad Hasty Show" in April 2018, the host asked: "I own an AR-15. A lot of our listeners out there own AR-15s. Why should they not have one?"

"To be clear, they should have them," O'Rourke responded. "If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly."

He added later in the same interview: "If you own a gun, keep that gun. Nobody wants to take it away from you — at least I don’t want to do that.”


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beto-o ... ate-ar-15s

Didn't the other candidates mention his reversal?


Possibly, I dont watch that show, oh whats it called, oh yeah.... Liars on Parade! :laugh:

O'Rourke is as phony as a three dollar bill.


:laugh:

Most Dems are. Or as phony as Obama's birth certificate :laugh:

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 11:29 am 
User avatar

Joined: November 17th, 2012, 4:01 pm
Posts: 12687
Or the birther movement itself.

_________________
A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers. Friedrich August von Hayek


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 11:58 am 
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2012, 8:21 pm
Posts: 13275
Fortunately the vote-slut is going nowhere ... a mere irrelevant fart in a windstorm

_________________
Tolerance of Intolerance is Cowardice


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 12:25 pm 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
seoulbro wrote:
Or the birther movement itself.


The one video I seen before, with Photoshop proof, I cant find. But I seen it myself, and its fake. Even Obama's lawyer admitted in court it was forged...

http://www.fedupusa.org/2012/04/obama-l ... a-forgery/

"We've had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document," Vallely said.

In a detailed analysis, a nationally recognized computer expert who has served as contributing author and technical editor for more than 100 books on Adobe and Microsoft software says the Obama long-form birth-certificate image released by the White House is a fake.

"The PDF file released by the White House contains evidence of manipulation suggesting that one or more forgers utilized existing Hawaiian birth certificates to assemble fraudulently for Barack Obama a document the president presented to the world as authentic," Mara Zebest told WND.


http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2011/08 ... ly-be.html

Check this analysis...

https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/ ... _draft.pdf

This video shows some with Illustrator....


_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 3:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 24th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Posts: 24637
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.


I think I can help you here.

One is implying that he intends to take someone's property. It's not clear whether or not he intends to do so lawfully, but given he is a politician we can safely assume he intends to introduce legislation that bans certain firearms, and the possess ion of said firearms without a proper licence will lead to confiscation.

The other replies with a warning that he is prepared to resist that confiscation with his firearm, in other words he is threatening to use that firearms in order to maintain his possession. As it is an AR 15, it can safely be deduced that use that firearm is likely to lead to serious injury or death.

So, you see, one is NOT the same as the other. One is a death threat, the other a political position.

It is an interesting feature of the American mentality that equates the taking of property with the taking of life.

_________________
Just because I don't agree with you, it does not mean I hate you


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 3:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Bricktop wrote:
Blazor wrote:
Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.


I think I can help you here.

One is implying that he intends to take someone's property. It's not clear whether or not he intends to do so lawfully, but given he is a politician we can safely assume he intends to introduce legislation that bans certain firearms, and the possess ion of said firearms without a proper licence will lead to confiscation.

The other replies with a warning that he is prepared to resist that confiscation with his firearm, in other words he is threatening to use that firearms in order to maintain his possession. As it is an AR 15, it can safely be deduced that use that firearm is likely to lead to serious injury or death.

So, you see, one is NOT the same as the other. One is a death threat, the other a political position.

It is an interesting feature of the American mentality that equates the taking of property with the taking of life.


I tell ya what, all those AR-15 totin' fuckers, aint gonna jus say "dur, here ya go". We remember our past, we know tyranny, and we know what is right and wrong. We are not some gun wielding nut job that goes and shoots up children, we are the ones that are first to give our shirts off our back to help out someone, and we dont stand for being shit on. No Brick, we will not all go silently in the night.

As far as "death threat", he made no such thing. He did not say "Im going to shoot you Mr Senator", no, he said you can try and take my property. Shit aint happenin' chief.

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 3:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 24th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Posts: 24637
Would you perhaps help me out here, as I am not privvy to American history.

When did the US as a sovereign nation live under tyranny?

_________________
Just because I don't agree with you, it does not mean I hate you


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 3:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Bricktop wrote:
Would you perhaps help me out here, as I am not privvy to American history.

When did the US as a sovereign nation live under tyranny?


You dont get it, we currently are :sad:

Perhaps this flag I designed several years ago should help. It needs updating again though.

Image

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 4:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 24th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Posts: 24637
Whilst I see your point, that ain't tyranny.

North Korea is tyranny.

Iran is tyranny.

Nazi Germany was tyranny.

Whatever you live under in the US, it ain't tyranny.

_________________
Just because I don't agree with you, it does not mean I hate you


Top
   
Unread postPosted: September 13th, 2019, 4:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: March 16th, 2017, 6:11 pm
Posts: 9089
Bricktop wrote:
Whilst I see your point, that ain't tyranny.

North Korea is tyranny.

Iran is tyranny.

Nazi Germany was tyranny.

Whatever you live under in the US, it ain't tyranny.



Only cause so many sheep comply and accept. We had WAY many more freedoms merely a decade ago.

_________________
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 510 Next

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
phpBB SEO
[ GZIP: On ]