Here are a few climate-change head scratchers for Canadian voters to ponder

[Anonymous]

A cool article that does not dispute man's contribution to climate change, but dispels some of the Trudeau regime's ridiculous rhetoric.



https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/gwyn-morgan-here-are-a-few-climate-change-head-scratchers-for-canadian-voters-to-ponder?fbclid=IwAR2BYa68CTUgdDe_Rpy88bIjkYXNOgpUf6OeZMgboq8S6w50w_9SbHxQN9A">https://business.financialpost.com/opin ... _9SbHxQN9A">https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/gwyn-morgan-here-are-a-few-climate-change-head-scratchers-for-canadian-voters-to-ponder?fbclid=IwAR2BYa68CTUgdDe_Rpy88bIjkYXNOgpUf6OeZMgboq8S6w50w_9SbHxQN9A

An eclectic list of little-known facts, head-scratching paradoxes and utter hypocrisy



BY GWYN MORGAN



With energy and the environment playing an important role in the fall election, Canadians face starkly different policy positions from political parties, together with a bewildering array of information and disinformation. Here is my rather eclectic list of little-known facts, head-scratching paradoxes and utter hypocrisy.



CLIMATE EMERGENCY

On June 17, the House of Commons passed a motion declaring a National Climate Emergency.



Firstly, there is no such thing as a "national" climate emergency. Climate change is global, not national, and Canada's contribution to global CO2 emissions is a minuscule 1.6 per cent. Here are the answers to some questions that will help you assess whether there's really a "climate emergency."



Apocalyptic projections of rapid sea level rises are driving municipal and provincial governments on both our east and west coasts to implement "sea level rise plans" that include sterilizing waterfront from development, building sea barriers and even buying out and destroying homes that are deemed vulnerable. So just how fast are sea levels rising? Here again the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provides the answer. Despite all the calamitous rhetoric, the NOAA states that sea levels "continue to rise at the rate of about one-eighth of an inch (3.2 mm) per year." At that rate, a house built 10 feet above sea level today would still be 9 feet 7 inches above sea level 40 years from now.



After hundreds of billions of dollars invested, wind and solar contribute just two per cent of global energy supply



   

CLIMATE CHANGE HYPOCRISY

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on. Good luck with that. After hundreds of billions of dollars invested, wind and solar contribute just two per cent of global energy supply. And that's only when the wind is blowing, and the sun is shining.



Joe Oliver: We should prepare for extreme weather, but tying it to climate change is a mistake

Quebec should scrap its cap-and-trade program: It's inefficient and hurting competitiveness

Counterpoint: Why we believe Canada must stop oil expansion, even if world demand is rising

[Anonymous]

Continued



CLIMATE CHANGE MONOVISION

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) would have us believe that fossil fuel emissions are the sole reason for climate change. But what about urbanization and deforestation? A study by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs states that the urban population rose from 750 million in 1950 to 4.2 billion in 2018. We don't need the IPCC's hugely complex computer models to know that cities are hotter. All we have to do is walk from a paved sun-heated street lined with concrete buildings to a grassy park. Rather than reflecting the sun's rays back to outer space, all that concrete and pavement absorbs the sun rays, creating a giant heat sink. Likewise, deforestation is turning vast tracts of cool African and South American jungles into heat-absorbing barrens. The U.S. EPA summarizes the combined effect, "Processes such as deforestation and urbanization ... contribute to changes in climate." Trying to deal with any problem without considering all possible causes is both a foolish and dangerous strategy.



FIRST, DO NO HARM

The Liberal government's proposed "national clean fuel standard" requires increased biofuel content in motor fuels. Government mandated biofuel content requirements in North America and the EU have driven the burning of critically important jungle habitat to make way for palm oil plantations. On the islands of Borneo and Sumatra, over 50,000 Orangutans have died because of palm oil deforestation.



WHO BURNS THE STUFF ANYWAY

Several municipal Councils, including Toronto and Victoria, are looking to sue fossil-fuel producers for causing climate change, but 70 per cent of emissions come from their own constituents. And imagine their outcry if fuel producers failed to deliver!



B.C. GREEN INCOHERENCE

B.C. Premier Horgan, a champion of carbon taxes, called an enquiry to investigate high gasoline prices, but prohibited the enquiry panel from considering the price impact of provincial taxes. He also wants Alberta to build a new refinery to supply his province, but he's against the pipeline that's needed to carry it.



SORRY, ONLY FOREIGN TANKERS ALLOWED

The Trudeau government implemented a tanker ban prohibiting movement of Canadian oil on the northern B.C. coast. Meanwhile, hundreds of tankers churn through the delicate and much more enclosed St. Lawrence estuaries carrying oil from Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Russia, Iraq, Nigeria, Angola and Algeria. And while ship/whale collisions are virtually unheard-of on BC's northern coast, those foreign oil tankers move through waters where a critically endangered Northern Right Whale was killed in a ship collision just last month.



THE GREAT ANTI-OIL INDUSTRY WARRIOR IS BACK

Gerald Butts, former personal secretary to the prime minister, is back to help the Liberals win re-election. Before joining the Prime Minster's Office (PMO), Butts was CEO of World Wildlife Canada (WWF), an organization dedicated to "landlocking" the oilsands by stopping new pipelines. In his role as head honcho of the PMO, he was the mastermind behind policies that could cripple our country's oil industry. Gerald Butts has admitted via his Twitter account to receiving $361,642 from WWF during his first two years at the PMO. He claims it was severance, but how many Canadians have ever received severance for quitting their job?



So there you have it, my list of points to ponder through those long and balmy mid-summer evenings that "we the north" enjoy.

[Anonymous]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

[Gaon]

Climate change action in Vancouver means making life unaffordable for the middle class.

[sasquatch]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

[Anonymous]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

Very interesting sasquatch, welcome.

 ac_smile

[Gaon]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

One of the most unusual things I've found about Canada is how one region of this country can block the exports of another region. That is what countries that are at war do.

[Anonymous]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

Actually, we can solve man's contribution to climate change right now, without re-engineering the entire way we live. But, we don't  really want to do that. Most Canadian politicians want a transfer of wealth from working families to billionaires and corporations that are friendly to them. Remember twelve million to Galen Weston.



https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company">https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company

[sasquatch]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

Actually, we can solve man's contribution to climate change right now, without re-engineering the entire way we live. But, we don't  really want to do that. Most Canadian politicians want a transfer of wealth from working families to billionaires and corporations that are friendly to them. Remember twelve million to Galen Weston.



https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company">https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company

Exactly. Trudeau, mckenna, and these politicians are not interested in solving it because the motivation for them is tax revenue. Brad wall had already pushed for the technology stated in your link, but guess how Trudeau and other money hungry rent seekers reacted with that idea?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/brad-wall-carbon-capture-and-storage-cop21-1.3346968">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/ ... -1.3346968">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/brad-wall-carbon-capture-and-storage-cop21-1.3346968

https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/david-suzuki-brad-wall-is-just-playing-around">https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-n ... ing-around">https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/david-suzuki-brad-wall-is-just-playing-around

Why "solve" a crisis that's going to make them rich?

[Anonymous]

Awesome, thanks for the link sasquatch.

[Anonymous]

South Africa, India, the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and China, all signatories to the Paris climate accord, are building a combined 1,800 new coal-fired power plants. Coal plants emit twice as much CO2 as natural gas plants. Meanwhile, international environmental groups campaign against sending Canadian LNG to those countries. And here at home, the Trudeau Liberals have just introduced a tax specifically designed to discourage the building of new cleaner-burning gas-fired power plants as they continue to pursue the fantasy that wind and solar will keep the lights on.

The best way Canadians could fight climate change is by exporting LNG.

Another way would be to get an oil pipeline to refineries to eastern Canada, get saudi arabian oil out of Canadian refineries, and save us billions of dollars. it is complete BS that Canadian gas prices are beholden to refinery shutdown in the united states or war in the middle east. Hell, while the U.S is getting 60$ per barrel for their oil, our oil actually crashed to as low as 14 dollars per barrel last november, and the Alberta provincial government had to put a production curtailment in place, because the dumbasses refused to curtail drilling and let the glut clear out until we can get new oil pipelines up and going(line 3, TMX, and Keystone xl phase 2).



So why bring up oil production and climate change in the same breath? well, because we still need it for the time being, and I would much rather have up produced with advanced Canadian technology and under Canadian environmental standards, and due to the fact it is completely and utterly stupid to have emission-spewing tankers off-loading foreign oil into Canadian refineries then there shouldn't be a need to. Once green technology gets better, then we can wind it down on our own schedule. The immediate effect of producing it would obviously less tanker traffic on Canada's coasts and their emissions, and as well as free up our railways and lower emissions there as well by not having to lug railcars full of oil with diesel-guzzling locomotives.



As you mentioned, LNG being exported to developing countries will help greatly as well and help them skip coal plants and go straight to natural gas-which produces less GHG. It is a far better plan than a tax ripoff and a tanker ban that condemns natives in that region to poverty(google the eagle spirit pipeline and how c-48 affected that).

Actually, we can solve man's contribution to climate change right now, without re-engineering the entire way we live. But, we don't  really want to do that. Most Canadian politicians want a transfer of wealth from working families to billionaires and corporations that are friendly to them. Remember twelve million to Galen Weston.



https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company">https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/canadian-company-can-solve-man-made-climate-change-carbon-taxes-useless-wind-and-solar-required-t10911.html?hilit=Canadian%20company

Exactly. Trudeau, mckenna, and these politicians are not interested in solving it because the motivation for them is tax revenue. Brad wall had already pushed for the technology stated in your link, but guess how Trudeau and other money hungry rent seekers reacted with that idea?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/brad-wall-carbon-capture-and-storage-cop21-1.3346968">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/ ... -1.3346968">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/brad-wall-carbon-capture-and-storage-cop21-1.3346968

https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/david-suzuki-brad-wall-is-just-playing-around">https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-n ... ing-around">https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/david-suzuki-brad-wall-is-just-playing-around

Why "solve" a crisis that's going to make them rich?

bookmarked