The best topic

*

Replies: 12081
Total votes: : 6

Last post: Today at 01:40:41 AM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Blazor

How a 1990s book predicted 2020 - "The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy "

Started by cc, July 04, 2020, 03:32:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Thiel

Quote from: cc post_id=369795 time=1593891140 user_id=88
BY THE SAME AUTHOR

Why the rich are revolting



Revolt of the Elites comprises 13 essays on America's "democratic malaise" — he liked that word — divided into three parts, the "intensification of social divisions" in America, the decline of public discourse and finally the spiritual core of the country's crisis, headlined "The Dark Night of the Soul".



Throughout the book runs Lasch's moral core, his support for the average man, something which inspired his hostility to the dominant ideologies of Left and Right. He strongly opposed economic inequality because it was corrupting; highly unequal societies tend to bring with them graft, extremism, violence and outside interference, eliminating Republican virtue. Lasch lamented that in America, the top tenth owned more than half the country's wealth, a warning that now seems as quaint as newspapers in the placid 1950s worried about Teddy Boys. The decline of pensions and savings, and the rise of what we now call zero-contract hours, would lead to the collapse of the middle class and with it the decline of the nation.



Lasch also saw that the eroding of a common culture, values and standards, which was the major legacy of 60s cultural radicalism, ended up creating a gulf between social classes. If there were no common values to hold people together, what was to stop the rich and powerful trampling over the rest of society, cloaking their self-interest in furious self-righteousness?



And so it has come to pass, with the rise of woke capital, an amoral business model in which CEOs make thousands of times more than their lowest earners, all the while distracting attention with support for therapeutic but increasingly extreme politics.



It was Lasch who saw more clearly than anyone that the New Left had a symbiotic relationship with the culture of modern corporate capitalism — emphasising choice, therapy, self-actualisation, narcissism and the rejection of limits, not just physical but financial and moral.





Lasch also saw meritocracy as a sham, or at least "a parody of democracy", because neither social nor geographic mobility were adequate substitutes for real social justice. "Social mobility does not undermine the influence of elites," he wrote: "if anything, it helps to solidify their influence by supporting the illusion that it rests solely on merit. It merely strengthens the likelihood that elites will exercise power irresponsibly, precisely because they recognise so few obligations to their predecessors of to the communities they profess to lead."



.. Although not a Marxist, Lasch saw politics through the prism of class, arguing that elites of both Left and Right had the same economic interests. "Even when they disagree about everything else," he argued, they "have a common stake in suppressing a politics of class."





... Indeed, the fashionable social causes of the 21st century not only ignore class, but actually further increase hostility to the poor. Evidence suggests that thinking about "white privilege" reduces sympathy for people struggling in poverty, while the association of bigotry with the non-college educated has normalised snobbery to an almost pre-modern degree. People once might have sneered at less educated people, but they would have done so privately at least; now comedy routinely makes the less educated and less geographically connected its punchline.



"The culture wars that have convulsed America since the sixties are best understood as a form of class warfare," he wrote: "in which an enlightened elite (as it thinks of itself) seeks not so much to impose its values on the majority (a majority perceived as incorrigibly racist, sexist, provincial, and xenophobic), much less to persuade the majority by means of rational public debate."



....  This weekend, Michael Gove cited Lasch as one of the thinkers who foresaw the failures of meritocracy, the great divide between the city and the town, and the mutual alienation it would bring. A quarter of a century after his prophetic book, we're all living in Lasch's world now.

It is probably a book that would be hard to put down once you pick it up. The author appears to be a socialist, so I would have to hold my nose a little.
gay, conservative and proud

Anonymous

Quote from: Thiel post_id=370135 time=1594085407 user_id=1688
It is probably a book that would be hard to put down once you pick it up. The author appears to be a socialist, so I would have to hold my nose a little.

Give me old school socialists any day over progs.

cc

Good point. Progs are a destructive breed of their own and make socialists almost tolerable
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

Quote from: Herman post_id=370166 time=1594096095 user_id=1689
Quote from: Thiel post_id=370135 time=1594085407 user_id=1688
It is probably a book that would be hard to put down once you pick it up. The author appears to be a socialist, so I would have to hold my nose a little.

Give me old school socialists any day over progs.

iron horse jockey considers himself a traditional socialist.

Anonymous

Quote from: Fashionista post_id=370217 time=1594121878 user_id=3254
Quote from: Herman post_id=370166 time=1594096095 user_id=1689
Quote from: Thiel post_id=370135 time=1594085407 user_id=1688
It is probably a book that would be hard to put down once you pick it up. The author appears to be a socialist, so I would have to hold my nose a little.

Give me old school socialists any day over progs.

iron horse jockey considers himself a traditional socialist.

Yes, I am. Progs and real socialists are oil and water.