News:

SMF - Just Installed!

The best topic

*

Replies: 12105
Total votes: : 6

Last post: Today at 10:55:27 AM
Re: Forum gossip thread by DKG

A

What's next from the Davos scumbags-climate lockdowns

Started by Anonymous, February 07, 2021, 09:53:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

Were COVID lockdowns across the West a trial for other public health emergencies?


QuoteAre you ready for the climate lockdowns?

It's only a matter of time



As the global climate elite push eating bugs and staying home to save the Earth on the masses, it's worth posing the question: what will be adequate? With the Global Economic Forum in Davos approaching in April, we're going to start hearing terms such 'Climate Equity' and 'Climate Reset' (a play on the WEF's Great Reset) more frequently. We'll probably also start to hear calls for climate lockdowns. I know, right now that sounds completely preposterous, but don't these kooky ideas always find a way to bleed into the mainstream? Fifteen Days to Slow the Sun!



The possibility of climate lockdowns is already being floated by some of our greatest thinkers. They see a confluence of global crises as an opportunity. The perfect storm caused by COVID-19 and the resulting global economic meltdown offers a chance to take what they see as bold and dramatic action to save the planet. The Biden administration will certainly use the consequences of COVID to push through some green legislation, but just as before, it will not be enough in the eyes of progressives. There must always be more.



'Under a "climate lockdown", governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.'



The idea of 'doing capitalism differently' is the driving rhetorical motivation behind the World Economic Forum's Great Reset (another term for the implementation of global Marxism).



Karl Lauterbach, an MP for the German Social Democratic party wrote in Die Welt last December that 'we need measures to deal with climate change that are similar to the restrictions on personal freedom [imposed] to combat the pandemic.' How long before this theory makes its way into news outlets and politicians' speeches here?



Of course this idea will be explained away as simply 'following the science'. The lockdowns which began in spring 2020 contributed to what scientists are calling the largest drop in CO2 emissions in years. The largest reason for this was a decrease of approximately 40 percent in automobile and airplane transport. The World Economic Forum praised this figure in a blog post titled 'Emissions fell during lockdown. Let's keep it that way.'



Climate alarmists like Greta Thunberg and John Kerry will be salivating at the prospect of using the emissions data to enact their ideas of a methane- and airplane-free future. How dare you refute it! If we can all just stay home for two weeks (which would inevitably become four weeks), it's worth it to save the planet. Anyone who questions such proposals will be labeled a science denier and accused of wanting to kill their fellow neighbors (you know, like what you hear if you don't wear a mask for a casual walk around the block).



How would governors and the federal government impose climate lockdowns? Simple: by declaring that climate change is an immediate public health and national security crisis, and using the same authority granted to them by public health departments to implement them under the same guidelines they did for COVID-19. Bernie Sanders and AOC announced a bill suggesting as much yesterday!



This was always the risk with the mass implementation of lockdowns. Once your leaders enforce one under the guise of public health, they will not simply set aside their power to do so again. Don't worry though, they're just following the science.

https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climate-lockdowns-environment/?fbclid=IwAR08T_4Kyf50xugVDdNHLz5VEuOn_gj8nFrj7jKhtTyg6b1rP8I87GZzfbk">https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climat ... 8I87GZzfbk">https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climate-lockdowns-environment/?fbclid=IwAR08T_4Kyf50xugVDdNHLz5VEuOn_gj8nFrj7jKhtTyg6b1rP8I87GZzfbk

Anonymous

I wouldn't be surprised. China is becoming freer than Western countries. It definitely will be in 5 years if it's not now.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Shen Li" post_id=401086 time=1612753381 user_id=56
I wouldn't be surprised. China is becoming freer than Western countries. It definitely will be in 5 years if it's not now.

Ten years ago, I would have laughed at a comment like that.

Anonymous

Lockdowns are the new norm. The rationale will be the climate emergency in the future. Canada is so screwed.



Study: Lockdowns Had Largest Impact in Destroying Economic Activity

https://fee.org/articles/study-lockdowns-had-largest-impact-in-destroying-economic-activity/">https://fee.org/articles/study-lockdown ... -activity/">https://fee.org/articles/study-lockdowns-had-largest-impact-in-destroying-economic-activity/

Anonymous

This thread is depressing..



I have a son who will be sixteen this year and a daughter who will be twenty..



Like all parents, I want my children to have better lives than what I had..



It's like some people are saying, give up.....I won't do that.

Anonymous

Quote from: "iron horse jockey" post_id=401084 time=1612752784 user_id=2015
Were COVID lockdowns across the West a trial for other public health emergencies?


QuoteAre you ready for the climate lockdowns?

It's only a matter of time



As the global climate elite push eating bugs and staying home to save the Earth on the masses, it's worth posing the question: what will be adequate? With the Global Economic Forum in Davos approaching in April, we're going to start hearing terms such 'Climate Equity' and 'Climate Reset' (a play on the WEF's Great Reset) more frequently. We'll probably also start to hear calls for climate lockdowns. I know, right now that sounds completely preposterous, but don't these kooky ideas always find a way to bleed into the mainstream? Fifteen Days to Slow the Sun!



The possibility of climate lockdowns is already being floated by some of our greatest thinkers. They see a confluence of global crises as an opportunity. The perfect storm caused by COVID-19 and the resulting global economic meltdown offers a chance to take what they see as bold and dramatic action to save the planet. The Biden administration will certainly use the consequences of COVID to push through some green legislation, but just as before, it will not be enough in the eyes of progressives. There must always be more.



'Under a "climate lockdown", governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.'



The idea of 'doing capitalism differently' is the driving rhetorical motivation behind the World Economic Forum's Great Reset (another term for the implementation of global Marxism).



Karl Lauterbach, an MP for the German Social Democratic party wrote in Die Welt last December that 'we need measures to deal with climate change that are similar to the restrictions on personal freedom [imposed] to combat the pandemic.' How long before this theory makes its way into news outlets and politicians' speeches here?



Of course this idea will be explained away as simply 'following the science'. The lockdowns which began in spring 2020 contributed to what scientists are calling the largest drop in CO2 emissions in years. The largest reason for this was a decrease of approximately 40 percent in automobile and airplane transport. The World Economic Forum praised this figure in a blog post titled 'Emissions fell during lockdown. Let's keep it that way.'



Climate alarmists like Greta Thunberg and John Kerry will be salivating at the prospect of using the emissions data to enact their ideas of a methane- and airplane-free future. How dare you refute it! If we can all just stay home for two weeks (which would inevitably become four weeks), it's worth it to save the planet. Anyone who questions such proposals will be labeled a science denier and accused of wanting to kill their fellow neighbors (you know, like what you hear if you don't wear a mask for a casual walk around the block).



How would governors and the federal government impose climate lockdowns? Simple: by declaring that climate change is an immediate public health and national security crisis, and using the same authority granted to them by public health departments to implement them under the same guidelines they did for COVID-19. Bernie Sanders and AOC announced a bill suggesting as much yesterday!



This was always the risk with the mass implementation of lockdowns. Once your leaders enforce one under the guise of public health, they will not simply set aside their power to do so again. Don't worry though, they're just following the science.

https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climate-lockdowns-environment/?fbclid=IwAR08T_4Kyf50xugVDdNHLz5VEuOn_gj8nFrj7jKhtTyg6b1rP8I87GZzfbk">https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climat ... 8I87GZzfbk">https://spectator.us/topic/ready-climate-lockdowns-environment/?fbclid=IwAR08T_4Kyf50xugVDdNHLz5VEuOn_gj8nFrj7jKhtTyg6b1rP8I87GZzfbk

Pandemic lockdowns could be a warm up for the "climate emergency."

cc

By  "climate emergency", I'm sure they mean the horrendous pollution we have agreed to allow China to spew for the next 25 years(so that greenies can feel they are doing something)  which makes our pollution and our efforts to curtail it  virtually insignificant



I hesitate to mention it for fear of making our greenies lose that "I'm such a good person" feeling .. but I'm sure they will ignore it so that can live with themselves
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

#7
Quote from: cc post_id=401147 time=1612816848 user_id=88
By  "climate emergency", I'm sure they mean the horrendous pollution we have agreed to allow China to spew for the next 25 years which makes our pollution and our efforts to curtail it  insignificant



I hesitate to mention it for fear of making our greenies lose that "I'm such a good person" feeling .. but I'm sure they will ignore it so that can live with themselves

Logic would dictate that's what they mean, but in reality, they really mean countries like Canada.

cc

Occasionally I cannot stop myself from being facetious about those 2 bit phonies  .. and just blurt out logic aimed at fantasy



A personal failing of mine in today's world .. making myself "cancelable" I'm sure
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Anonymous

Quote from: cc post_id=401151 time=1612817476 user_id=88
Occasionally I cannot stop myself from being facetious about those 2 bit phonies  .. and just blurt out logic aimed at fantasy



A personal failing in today's world  I'm sure

A sense of humour is essential in these crazy times.

Anonymous

Quote from: cc post_id=401147 time=1612816848 user_id=88
By  "climate emergency", I'm sure they mean the horrendous pollution we have agreed to allow China to spew for the next 25 years(so that greenies can feel they are doing something)  which makes our pollution and our efforts to curtail it  virtually insignificant



I hesitate to mention it for fear of making our greenies lose that "I'm such a good person" feeling .. but I'm sure they will ignore it so that can live with themselves

Canadians are punished for driving and heating their homes while China sells us useless solar panels, we don't need.

Anonymous

Quote from: cc post_id=401147 time=1612816848 user_id=88
By  "climate emergency", I'm sure they mean the horrendous pollution we have agreed to allow China to spew for the next 25 years(so that greenies can feel they are doing something)  which makes our pollution and our efforts to curtail it  virtually insignificant



I hesitate to mention it for fear of making our greenies lose that "I'm such a good person" feeling .. but I'm sure they will ignore it so that can live with themselves

China is playing the West perfectly.

Anonymous

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/147690219_10157474171936364_6196060137928332261_o.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=2&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=WEL3ENJ6kKMAX8V5Dvu&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=d4c0748e2be020489f7c697482f5a3ef&oe=60489468">

Anonymous

If humanity did not embrace and exploit fossil fuels back during the industrial revolution an overwhelming majority of us would not be here and generations of our famines would never have existed. The only reason we are alive today is fossil fuels. I doubt these "green energy" asshats realize that.

Anonymous

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/164966268_10158474698844398_982898744584557780_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=aw8mxyQCd7MAX9kEZny&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=3944dbe90af699ad3640bc4896c1eecc&oe=609116F7">