News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 12080
Total votes: : 6

Last post: December 22, 2024, 11:54:50 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by Reggie Essent

avatar_Frood

Interesting and balanced interview

Started by Frood, November 18, 2021, 10:01:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427691 time=1637376814 user_id=1560
Freud needs to learn about the virtue of credibility. It's one thing to quote a source...but do a little homework first.

Not only was his theory easily debunked it was plagiarized by someone using it against MMR.

Anonymous

Quote from: Fashionista post_id=427635 time=1637348363 user_id=3254
Quote from: cc post_id=427630 time=1637343468 user_id=88
Quote from: Fashionista post_id=427610 time=1637320323 user_id=3254
Dr Offit says if you have a vaccine that results in high levels of neutralizing antibodies, that's not a way to create variants,"

I understand his argument & it's theory, not fact based. The stuff is in no way like an antibiotic structurally



Yes, contrary to the initial claimant, what causes likelihood of variants is the infection spread. Each infection increases the chances of variants developing. The more cases the more likelihood.



Or put the other way, the less infections the less opportunity for variants



Most variants have  developed in high population / high case rate areas of the world .. this is logical & supports the above sentence 1 (India, S Africa for examples) and 2. the exceptions to that are  other areas (UK) when case rate is very high



keywords > "high local infection rates" > high changes of variants developing.



(Simply  look at from where and from when in time known variants developed)

I'll read more about his theory tonight.

My views on vaccines are not set in stone. But, videos will not influence my opinions. They are entertainment, usually of the fictional variety. Scouse got his education from fringe videos and he too never questions the words of the 'experts' who make them.

Frood

Quote from: Fashionista post_id=427705 time=1637402735 user_id=3254
Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427691 time=1637376814 user_id=1560
Freud needs to learn about the virtue of credibility. It's one thing to quote a source...but do a little homework first.

Not only was his theory easily debunked it was plagiarized by someone using it against MMR.


Would you like some more Koolaid to go with that window?
Blahhhhhh...

Bricktop

Once again your source of information is utterly discredited.



It's not us that is drinking deep of the Koolaid.

Frood

Blahhhhhh...

Bricktop


Frood

Until people decide to watch the original video posted instead of seek to character assassinate sight unseen, nothing more is deserved...
Blahhhhhh...

Bricktop

You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

cc

Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427747 time=1637449616 user_id=1560
You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...

Par for the course /  modus operandi  for conspiracists



No surprise here
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Frood

Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427747 time=1637449616 user_id=1560
You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...




Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.
Blahhhhhh...

Bricktop

Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=427751 time=1637450034 user_id=1676
Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427747 time=1637449616 user_id=1560
You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...




Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.


Not at all. Comment is entirely valid when you cite a dubious source.

Frood

Yet nobody is willing to view the source material but still feel justified in discounting it.
Blahhhhhh...

cc

#42
Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427754 time=1637450134 user_id=1560 ... when you cite a dubious source.

This is how conspiracists operate .. their  modus operandi is the same no matter the cause .. dubious source
I really tried to warn y\'all in 49  .. G. Orwell

Frood

:001_rolleyes:





Go away, Branch Covidian....
Blahhhhhh...

Anonymous

Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427754 time=1637450134 user_id=1560
Quote from: "Dinky Dazza" post_id=427751 time=1637450034 user_id=1676
Quote from: Bricktop post_id=427747 time=1637449616 user_id=1560
You are asking people to spend over an hour of their time to watch a video featuring a known and declared disinterest in fact.



Come on...




Then refrain from commenting if you're not willing to do the hard yards and watch something a thread is started about.


Not at all. Comment is entirely valid when you cite a dubious source.

Those are the only sources he ever cites. Fash and ceec always pick these video wankers apart, but that doesn't stop him from believing vaccines will kill him faster than cigarettes.