World War III thread

[Herman]

[Herman]

[Herman]

[Lokmar]

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Sunday that the U.K. will allow the U.S. to use British military bases for limited defensive strikes targeting Iranian missile sites, reversing an earlier refusal amid escalating U.S.-Israeli operations against Iran.

Fuck that fucker. The US should bomb Diego Garcia and take it from England.

[Lokmar]

That makes penis micro!

[Herman]

Pelosi: " Obama doesn't need congressional authorization for Libya"
Today: " Trump must ask Congress first"
Same Constitution. Same war powers.
Hold them to the same standard.
Full quote from Nancy Pelosi:
"The President Obama does not need congressional authorization to take military action in Libya... and I think that he has that authority."

[Herman]

[Herman]

The Iranian navy is now preparing to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.

[Herman]

Have the democRATs checked Trump's approval ratings in Iran?
Just curious.

[Herman]

Progs aint off that Trump bombed Iran, they are pissed off that now every person of Iranian descent is voting Republican.

[Lokmar]

Even I begrudgingly credited president niggeR with smoking osama.

[Shen Li]

A reporter asked President Trump who's going to take over now that two Supreme Leaders have been killed in 2 days.

Trump responded, I don't know, I guess the position is open. I'm creating jobs in Iran too.

[Dove]

Of course...... WMD's.... 

 He could have bombed them for fun and id still support it.

 They have murdered 900 some Americans, they fund proxy wars and terror attacks and what they've done to Iranians is beyond evil. Those people deserve thier country back and the US is partly why they are under this regime.

 Just so you know, I would support a holocaust of Islmists. For FUN

 They should be wiped off the earth.

 I have wanted to see this for 20 years.

 

[Dove]

This aint good for Trump.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll that concluded on Sunday revealed that the joint U.S.-Israeli regime-change strikes are unpopular with most Americans.

While Republicans are apparently more supportive of the military campaign than their counterparts, the new poll found that such support is largely conditional and far less than for the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts.

The new polling is consistent with surveys conducted last month, which indicated that Americans were not particularly keen on the prospect of a new series of U.S. military strikes against Iran.

For instance, an SSRS/University of Maryland poll, conducted from Feb. 5 to Feb. 9, found that 21% of respondents favored an attack, 49% were opposed, and 30% were unsure. An Economist/YouGov poll found that 28% of respondents supported and 48% opposed the U.S. taking military action in Iran.

According to the new Reuters/Ipsos poll, 27% of respondents said that they approved of the strikes, 43% signaled disapproval, and 29% said they weren't sure.

Broken down by party affiliation:

55% of Republicans approved of the strikes, 32% said they were unsure or skipped the question, and 13% said they disapproved;
7% of Democrats said they approved, 19% said they were unsure or skipped the question, and 74% said they disapproved; and
19% of individuals in the "other" camp said they approved, 38% said they were unsure or skipped the question, and 44% said they disapproved.

The support for the present conflict pales in comparison to American support for the Iraq war prior to and following the March 20, 2003, invasion.

 It was good for everything that matters.

 Trump cant run again anyway and he knows that.

[Shen Li]

It was good for everything that matters.

 Trump cant run again anyway and he knows that.

Besides, that could change in a minute if this ends quickly and successfully.