I AM NOT FOR THIS

[Thiel]

Dikes want to be with other biological gals. Not some guy named Mike who calls himself Michelle.

You mean Mrs. Obama.

[Biggie Smiles]

I know most of my conservative brethren disagree and that's fine

but this is the narrative that begins to propagate when you show up to work sties and grab some little mexican just going through his day working for pennies on the dollar to support himself.

Again, I speak of the people committing NO crimes other than the one that orignally got them here. Arresting them allows the scum on the left to push this narrative and produce these types of thoughts into people who might otherwise support the process if we confined it to the real criminals

There are plenty criminals to keep us busy for quite some time

[Herman]

Funded by you.

[Renegade Quark]

All illegal immigrants should be deported. To do otherwise spits in the face of legal immigrants and encourages more illegal immigration. I don't care what job they are doing. They have to go. Period.

[Lokmar]

I'd gas all illegals like a bunch of fukin jews and then go out to The Lucky Dill in Tampa for lunch! BITCH!!!

[DKG]

All illegal immigrants should be deported. To do otherwise spits in the face of legal immigrants and encourages more illegal immigration. I don't care what job they are doing. They have to go. Period.

I too believe the law must be enforced. But, those that have lived and worked in the US for many years should have their cases for reentry expedited in their home countries.

[Renegade Quark]

I too believe the law must be enforced. But, those that have lived and worked in the US for many years should have their cases for reentry expedited in their home countries.

Why?

[JOE]

I'd gas all illegals like a bunch of fukin jews and then go out to The Lucky Dill in Tampa for lunch! BITCH!!!

I support amnesty for illegals in America...Lokmar.

You gotta show compassion for those less fortunate than yerself  Bud.

[DKG]

Why?

I think I get what you are saying. They broke the law why should they get preferential treatment.

I should have added if they had kids born in the US or young kids who were raised in the US.

[Lokmar]

I too believe the law must be enforced. But, those that have lived and worked in the US for many years should have their cases for reentry expedited in their home countries.

Why, because they broke the law longer?

[JOE]

Why, because they broke the law longer?

Trump is too rough on illegals ...Lokmar!

[JOE]

Remember what yer fellow Christians asked of St Trump...Lokmar.

...ta show mercy upon them, eh.

Ya gotta follow the good book & what the pastors say

[.]

I think I get what you are saying. They broke the law why should they get preferential treatment.

I should have added if they had kids born in the US or young kids who were raised in the US.

Consider the case of someone like Ilhan Omar, a democrat party representative who, after marrying her own brother to secure citizenship, has found herself in a position to be able to argue for legislation focused more on helping those in her native country of Somalia than the country's peoples she should rightfully be governing for, namely the United States of America. This is a classic case of someone who is all about destroying the society she finds herself in and profiteering, not just for herself, but any and everyone she can shoehorn in from the third world shithole she hails from.

Now imagine that she were born on US soil and because of birthright was eligible for the presidency, able to write executive orders that (among other things) would conceivably flood the US with "gimmedats" from Somalia at the expense of genuine US citizens who would effectively become slaves at that point.

I'll ask that you pause reading at this point before continuing. Give yourself time to let the ramifications truly sink in.

Now consider the anchor babies you invoked above, that they seemingly ought to provide some measure of clemency for the criminal class that broke into the country, took slave wages and drove the cost of labour through the floor and created a measure of relative poverty for the legally recognized citizens of the US. Maybe you can argue the anchor babies have a right to remain in the US and I cannot fault you on a legal footing if you should. They do however represent a ticking timebomb in terms of future generational governance in the country, particularly if they are subject to the kinds of brainwashing their illegally present parents are capable of inculcating in them.

Luckily, kicking out the illegals carries the added bonus of said parents being asked if they wish to take their legal US citizen babies with them. Most of them demand their parental rights and will take themselves and their progeny back to the third world with them. Which, as ugly as the prospect assuredly is for your average bleeding heart liberal wankspasm (hi JoHoMo) is still a better option than handing the future of the US nation to a bunch of impressionable young kiddiewinks who are yet to grow up into the next generation of Ilhan Omars, marrying within their own family for the purposes of genociding the US population out of existence. Something that is an even likelier prospect if people who are steeped in their non-US foreign cultures and who broke into the country with little to no intent of assimilating into the US culture are around to set the bad examples those anchor babies will grow up around.

You are free to disagree of course and I am free to call any arguments you levy in defense of your position ill-thought out and potentially downright dangerous. I would remind you here that I am not arguing against legal immigration here, certainly not multiculturalism. The fact is that both can be beneficial in measured doses. Too much of either can be lethal to an indigent culture and you already know this just by looking outside your own front door.

In sum, if you are in the country without the proper authority to be, you are part of the problem. Looking for reasons to go easy on some illegals and not others invites more problems than it solves, moreover with the sheer amount of human cattle that democrats AND republicans have allowed in and turned a blind eye to since Reagan's amnesty in the eighties you cannot tell me that there are the time and resources to process each on a case by case basis.

How about this; the US enacts new legislation that annuls the citizenship of anchor babies with no legitimate parent that is a recognized US citizen? Perhaps with legal recognisance of a US parent's constitutional rights to raise their children, anchor baby or otherwise, taking precedence over some river-jumper?

We might see some movement in that direction after the midterms. I sure hope so...  for the US's sake. Along with any other nation whose fortunes are dependent on the US remaining functional. Major trading partners (hi Canada) should be screaming for it.

[.]

Remember what yer fellow Christians asked of St Trump...Lokmar.

...ta show mercy upon them, eh.

Ya gotta follow the good book & what the pastors say

Yes, have mercy on the immigrants and kick out the criminals... just like the legal immigrants want us to do.

Bet you and your mealy mouthed child trafficking pastor (allegedly) didn't see that argument coming.... JoHoMo! 

[Oliver the Second]

How about this; the US enacts new legislation that annuls the citizenship of anchor babies with no legitimate parent that is a recognized US citizen? Perhaps with legal recognisance of a US parent's constitutional rights to raise their children, anchor baby or otherwise, taking precedence over some river-jumper?

If a law were passed saying "Ater this date automatic citizenship no longer applies..." then I could accept that. But if that kid is already a citizen then nope, he has the same Constitution rights as the rest of us. Stripping someone of their citizenship just because of who their parents are, that's way too Hitler/Stalin/Orwellian to even think about considering.