Putting it to a vote...

[RW]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

[Anonymous]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

The second one and it will have no impact on my posting.

[Bricktop]

Its a simple principle; do these apes bring a benefit to the board?



If not, then why are we enduring their detrimental impact, when a permaban will make them go elsewhere.

[RW]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

The second one and it will have no impact on my posting.

If they go will it impact your posting?

[Bricktop]

If they go, no impact.



If they stay they will continue to irritate or annoy.

[Anonymous]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

The second one and it will have no impact on my posting.

If they go will it impact your posting?

no

[Bricktop]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

The second one and it will have no impact on my posting.

Please explain why you think they should be allowed to remain.



What do they contribute to the forum?

[Anonymous]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

The second one and it will have no impact on my posting.

Please explain why you think they should be allowed to remain.



What do they contribute to the forum?

The reason we have reject rodeo is for them.

[Bricktop]

That was not answering my question.

[Anonymous]

That was not answering my question.

You may have to settle for an answer that you feel is not an answer at all..



I have given my vote.

[Anonymous]

It's only two people that use it now that GP is history. Keep Mel and put him on mod only, but get rid of that short, effeminate, unemployed, gossiping, no-life shrimpdick oddstain.

[Bricktop]

That was not answering my question.

You may have to settle for an answer that you feel is not an answer at all..



I have given my vote.

So, to be clear, you determine that allowing these clowns to post here is permissible, despite their inanity and abuse, but you respect the rest of the tribe so little that you will not explain why?



Are you being counselled by Vesna, by any chance.

[Anonymous]

That was not answering my question.

You may have to settle for an answer that you feel is not an answer at all..



I have given my vote.

So, to be clear, you determine that allowing these clowns to post here is permissible, despite their inanity and abuse, but you respect the rest of the tribe so little that you will not explain why?



Are you being counselled by Vesna, by any chance.

I gave my vote, this is reject rodeo, but if others disagree I will abide by the results and it won't impact my posting..



And there's no chance that anyone has counselled me.

[Anonymous]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

I am fine with anything you decide. Odinson is a bullshitter and the other one is too hot and cold. I don't know what I would vote for. But, this subforum is divisive.

[Anonymous]

There are some posters on our board restricted to RR so they do not disrupt the board.  What course of action should we take with them?



Should we:



1. Unrestricted them.



2. Leave them in RR to do as they please unmoderated?



3. Leave them in RR but moderate them?



4.  Approval only posting?



5. Permaban them?



6. Something else?



Why should they stay or why should they go?



What does it say if they stay?



What does it mean if they go?



What impact will your choice have on your posting?

I am fine with anything you decide. Odinson is a bullshitter and the other one is too hot and cold. I don't know what I would vote for. But, this subforum is divisive.

We can't decide what to do with the people who use it..



I thought we had it settled, but apparently I was wrong.