Law Society’s New Policy Compels and Directs Speech, It's 1984

[cc]

Every lawyer gets emails from the Law Society: reminders to file reports, pay fees, or use assistance programs to cut back on the booze. But a recent message almost made me choke on my sandwich. "New obligations for 2017" was its subject line, "Actions you need to take."



All lawyers, it said, must prepare and submit a personal "Statement of Principles" attesting that we value and promote equality, diversity and inclusion.



According to the advisory, "The intention of the statement of principles is to demonstrate a personal valuing of equality, diversity, and inclusion with respect to the employment of others, or in professional dealings with other licensees or any other person."



My first instinct was to check my passport. Was I still in Canada, or had someone whisked me away to North Korea, where people must say what officials want to hear?



Forced speech is the most egregious violation of freedom of expression, protected by section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In free countries, law governs actions rather than expressions of beliefs. People can be required to obey the speed limit and pay taxes, but they may not be compelled to declare that the speed limits are properly set or that taxes are a good thing.



The Supreme Court of Canada has said that forcing someone to express opinions that they do not have "is totalitarian and as such alien to the tradition of free nations like Canada, even for the repression of the most serious crimes."



http://nationalpost.com/opinion/bruce-pardy-law-societys-new-policy-compels-speech-crossing-line-that-must-not-be-crossed">Bruce Pardy Continues Here



At the core of free speech is the liberty to criticize the content of the law. For no one is this more important than lawyers

[Anonymous]

Every lawyer gets emails from the Law Society: reminders to file reports, pay fees, or use assistance programs to cut back on the booze. But a recent message almost made me choke on my sandwich. "New obligations for 2017" was its subject line, "Actions you need to take."



All lawyers, it said, must prepare and submit a personal "Statement of Principles" attesting that we value and promote equality, diversity and inclusion.



According to the advisory, "The intention of the statement of principles is to demonstrate a personal valuing of equality, diversity, and inclusion with respect to the employment of others, or in professional dealings with other licensees or any other person."



My first instinct was to check my passport. Was I still in Canada, or had someone whisked me away to North Korea, where people must say what officials want to hear?



Forced speech is the most egregious violation of freedom of expression, protected by section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In free countries, law governs actions rather than expressions of beliefs. People can be required to obey the speed limit and pay taxes, but they may not be compelled to declare that the speed limits are properly set or that taxes are a good thing.



The Supreme Court of Canada has said that forcing someone to express opinions that they do not have "is totalitarian and as such alien to the tradition of free nations like Canada, even for the repression of the most serious crimes."



http://nationalpost.com/opinion/bruce-pardy-law-societys-new-policy-compels-speech-crossing-line-that-must-not-be-crossed">Bruce Pardy Continues Here



At the core of free speech is the liberty to criticize the content of the law. For no one is this more important than lawyers