To The Horror of Warm Mongers, Global Cooling Is Here

[Odinson]

The antarctica is getting bigger.

If you take a look what these tin-foil hatted coocoos have said in the past, you would realize that human kind would have been decimated decades ago.



You have to realize that these fools get a living of researching.



Like when our health research department promoted the vaccine against swine-flu... They were funded by the medical-factory which produced this so called cure.



Swine flu onlý kills the very old people.



And the vaccine caused Narcolepsy among young kids.



Swine flu is not that dangerous. Just keep yourself hydrated.



The global warming is basically the same thing... Keeping people in fear.

[Romero]

For some reason, many climate change warriors seem disappointed that things aren't quite as bad as they thought. If so, they probably won't want to hear about the Arctic ice cap either.



Satellite images show that it grew 60% this year compared to August 2012

August 2012 Arctic ice was a record low. It was no big surprise there was 60% more ice this year. It has occurred from time to time and it will happen in the future. There have always been increases and decreases but measurements show Arctic ice is decreasing overall.



Deniers see one 60% increase and believe the ice is somehow 60% more than ever. Yet it's simply an increase compared to the lowest extent ever recorded. August 2013 Arctic ice was actually the sixth lowest on record, which clearly indicates it's still one of the lowest extents and the trend over the many years is less ice.





http://oi42.tinypic.com/27x1p8g.jpg">





There's no disappointment that "things aren't quite as bad". The reality hasn't changed or magically disappeared. Global temperatures over the years and decades have been continually rising and Arctic ice has indeed decreased.



It's right there on record. There is much less Arctic ice now than there was years and decades ago.

[Romero]

If you take a look what these tin-foil hatted coocoos have said in the past, you would realize that human kind would have been decimated decades ago.

Air pollution causes millions of deaths worldwide every year.

Water pollution harms humans and kills fish.

Lead has harmed humans and has killed thousands upon thousands of animals.

Acid rain seriously impacts the environment.

CFCs have depleted the ozone layer.

PCBs are dangerously toxic.

Overhunting, poaching and loss of habitat have driven thousands of animal species into extinction.

Overfishing has seriously depleted fish stocks.

DDT nearly caused the demise of the bald eagle.

Clearcutting can cause landslides and degradation.

Parkland and refuges are necessary to protect our most cherished environments.



What have environmentalists been wrong about yet?

[Obvious Li]

If you take a look what these tin-foil hatted coocoos have said in the past, you would realize that human kind would have been decimated decades ago.

Air pollution causes millions of deaths worldwide every year.

Water pollution harms humans and kills fish.

Lead has harmed humans and has killed thousands upon thousands of animals.

Acid rain seriously impacts the environment.

CFCs have depleted the ozone layer.

PCBs are dangerously toxic.

Overhunting, poaching and loss of habitat have driven thousands of animal species into extinction.

Overfishing has seriously depleted fish stocks.

DDT nearly caused the demise of the bald eagle.

Clearcutting can cause landslides and degradation.

Parkland and refuges are necessary to protect our most cherished environments.



What have environmentalists been wrong about yet?

[/b]



everyone can agree it is a good thing to have a clean environment, not put toxic chemicals into the environment, not kill off species, etc etc.....what people like me  (the majority) object too, is some radical, brain dead, lefty occutard trying to transfer money from my pocket to some shithole third world dictator under the guise of saving the planet from "man made" global warming.....a phenomenon that is currently unproven  and a science that has been debunked as being bunk by serious scientists the world over.....the planet is not warming at an alarming degree and will not go to hell in a handbasket any time soon as the climates wailers and teeth nashers would have us believe...the world has now wasted billions if not trillions of dollars to try and solve a problem that does not exist.....so you ask..when have environmentalists been wrong ??.....not sure, but these climate gloom and doomer nuts have always been wrong

[Anonymous]

http://storage.canoe.ca/v1/dynamic_resize/sws_path/suns-prod-images/1297472165966_COMICS.jpg?quality=80&stmp=1380304319826&size=430x">

[Odinson]

If you take a look what these tin-foil hatted coocoos have said in the past, you would realize that human kind would have been decimated decades ago.

Air pollution causes millions of deaths worldwide every year.

Water pollution harms humans and kills fish.

Lead has harmed humans and has killed thousands upon thousands of animals.

Acid rain seriously impacts the environment.

CFCs have depleted the ozone layer.

PCBs are dangerously toxic.

Overhunting, poaching and loss of habitat have driven thousands of animal species into extinction.

Overfishing has seriously depleted fish stocks.

DDT nearly caused the demise of the bald eagle.

Clearcutting can cause landslides and degradation.

Parkland and refuges are necessary to protect our most cherished environments.



What have environmentalists been wrong about yet?

You use such strong words like depleted... That´s the word which german high command used in the end of the war.... "the reserves are depleted".

[Anonymous]

You would think people would be happy to finally know that there is no catastrophic disaster looming. However, the climate change industry is huge and the big corporations, big governments and big NGO's that have pilfered the pockets of working people in the West see it a threat to their greed.

Back in 1997 when global warming was just becoming the hysterical scientific fad it has been for the past decade-and-a-half, John Christy was sure he could put an end to the alarmism by showing his findings to an international conference of climatologists.



Christy was then the director of NASA's eight weather satellites. The octet of satellites are in stationary orbit around the planet and take over 300,000 precise temperature readings each day. Their big advantage over earthbound thermometers is that they take their readings on mountaintops, in the middle of vast oceans and at hundreds of remote locations as well as from the same sites as land- and ship-based surface readings.



And what Christy's "birds" had found was that there had been little, if any warming in the middle and upper atmosphere since the 1970s. Since the global warming theory had always held (and still does) that they upper layers of the atmosphere should warm first (because that is where the buildup of carbon dioxide should have the greatest impact), Christy thought his findings would be welcomed as good news.



They were not. Most other climate scientists scoffed. Some were angry. And one even came up to him after his address and said, "Your observations cannot be correct because they disagree with my models."



Since computer models that forecast the future effects of carbon are merely predictions -- sophisticated predictions, but predictions nonetheless -- the modellers statement to Christy was the equivalent of a gambler saying "the scores in the paper on Monday cannot be correct because they aren't the same as the bets I placed on Saturday."



Still, that is the prejudice in favour of climate hysteria that scientists who disagree with the orthodoxy have long encountered. They are encountering it still.



On Friday, the UN's climate body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its fifth mammoth report on the state of Earth's climate. Despite admitting that global warming in the past 60 years has been only half what it had claimed in its first four mega-reports, the IPCC is still insisting humans are to blame for climate change.



But since the warming they have seen to date is well with "natural variability" -- i.e. normal, naturally occurring climate fluctuations -- and since the IPCC now admits for the first time that there has been no significant warming since 1998, the question has to be: What climate change?



For instance, the IPCC now admits the temperature increase seen in the past six decades has been just 0.12 degrees per decade, not the 0.2 or more degrees it previous claimed. Since there have been plenty of periods in Earth's past, long before industrialization and manmade CO2 emissions, in which temperature has risen by similar amounts per decade, how is it still possible for the IPCC to insist it knows the recent rise is manmade and dangerous?



As an aside: If they're now admitting they were wrong about the observable past, how can we have any faith in their predictions for 100 years from now? Recording the past is easier than predicting the future.



But the key admission in the IPCC report is "there is a lack of agreement" on just how sensitive the climate is to carbon dioxide. Since the entire climate-alarm hysteria has been based on the belief that the climate is very sensitive -- multiplying the effects of CO2 by two- or three- or even six-fold — this amounts to an admission by the IPCC that, contrary to their assurances over the past 20 years, the science on climate change is far from "settled."



There is no longer a consensus on whether the planet is warming or why.

http://www.edmontonsun.com/2013/09/28/gunter-no-consensus-on-climate-change">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2013/09/28/g ... ate-change">http://www.edmontonsun.com/2013/09/28/gunter-no-consensus-on-climate-change

[Odinson]

I say this again.. The polar icecap melting causes alot of sweetwater to be released in the saltwater. This will stop the golf-current causing the north to freeze yet again.



Enough time has passed from the last ice-age and the next one is coming.



That´s just another theory.



I have heard them all. Global dimming saying the earth should pitch black by now. The sun seems to emitt almost pure white light.



If you look at the history, there´s always some kind of big bad threat to keep the people inline. Keeping people in fear.