News:
R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk! ~ R.I.P to our friend Caskur!
- Welcome to THeBlueCashew.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 12:24:50 PMQuote from: Frood on Today at 12:13:03 PMSo a statute of limitations then? 20 years ?
Hard to say. We could have someone here for 20 years and 18 of them were spent living off the taxpayer, still doesn't speak English and has made next to no position contributions to our society
that would NOT be someone I advocate for
but on the flip side, you may have someone who's here 10 years and has an amazing track record to reflect their character. I would advocate for that person.
He/she would need to go through the official process to make their presence legal but I would ensure their ability to remain were not tethered to their financial ability to support the greed of an utterly broken system
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 12:20:14 PMQuote from: Brent on Today at 11:56:30 AMI don't think they make that distinction in Poland between long term illegal and recent. Maybe they do.
All I know is that I like their asylum and immmigration laws and especially their enforcement. Which is why Poland is one of the safest countries in Europe.
If they adopted this policy as a longstanding measure and applied it consistently then logically they would not be deporting people who fall into the cross section I advocate for. And THAT I can support.
What I cannot support is some scum bag leftist administration encouraging desperate people to come here and allowing them to stay just to siphon their vote or contribution to the census count and then YEARS later, after they have built a life and have demonstrated they are honest, hardworking and morally upright members of the community telling them they now have to go back to a land they do not know because they violated some imaginary line on a map.
So their sacrifices mean nothing? The sweat of their hands which many of us have leveraged at one point or another in our lives to our own financial gain are worthless? They are simply expendable objects?
I can never support that. Ever. No matter how many apples to oranges scenarios you place before me. I applaud Poland and support their policies but I'm sure to date, Poland has handled this situation a lot better than we have and therefor have far less nuance. these are human lives we are talking about and that alone calls for some level of reverence when evaluating the unique physiology of each situation. This is a case by case situation and needs to be evaluated as such
Now that's not to say I don't support strong immigration policy. I do. Better to have a solid immigration prevention policy in place which allows NONE of them in to begin with.and A solid plan to deport the human waste that has infiltrated in the past.
But to say that every last one of them must go no matter how positive a contribution to this nation they have made, no matter how many sacrifices they have made .. at the end of it all they are nothing more than a criminal deserving of what amounts to a death sentence demonstrates we accept NO responsibility for our own shortcomings and the role WE PLAYED in this human tragedy and THAT is something I will never get behind. I'd rather sit out an election and encourage others to do the same and watch as leftists burn this country to the ground than support that.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 12:13:03 PMQuote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 09:52:02 AMthat is exactly the ones I am referring to and the ONLY ones I am referring to.
The people I am advocating for make up 1% of the illegal population. If that.
They are hardworking, law abiding (aside from the initial crime), morally upright, community building people of faith and moral compass. A very small contingent worthy of mercy due to a demonstrated history of being a better human beings than 99% of the current left.
Why this is so difficult for my side to understand I'll just never know. We cannot get out of our own way it seems and with these hardline attitudes we are destined to lose this war...
I completely understand the frustration with the current state of affairs and I counter with "part of the reason the scum on the left created this problem in the first place IS so that you have this reaction" this is the left trolling us on the right and we are taking the bait hook line and sinker.. as you will never get a reasonably minded person who sits on the fence to vote in favor of throwing away good people like they were garbage .People can get on board when you are bouncing some societal leech, scam artist, violent criminal or pedophile.
but to grab a person who's been a hardworking person of moral character for decades and exile them to what pretty much amounts to a death sentence? Nah, no decent human being is going to get on board with that.. and to be frank here, if this is what my party has become I might just sit out the next election as I want no part of that. And I am about as right wing as you can possibly get .... so just imagine the mind of the independent fence sitter.
So a statute of limitations then? 20 years ?
Posted by Brent
- Today at 11:56:30 AMQuote from: Biggie Smiles on January 12, 2026, 12:39:59 PMthat I can support as 72 hours is a whole lot different a dynamic that 7 or 15 years. 72 hours affords the opportunity for re-assimilation into the country of origin. A 15 year hiatus from the country of origin is tantamount to a death sentence -- or at a minimum, the HOV lane to a life of poverty and despair. We all know that, so let's at least be honest about what it is.I don't think they make that distinction in Poland between long term illegal and recent. Maybe they do.
it's essentially our gov fault this migrant was allowed in. our gov fault he stayed so long and our gov fault the court system and parasitical leeches that orbit it a.k.a attorneys are so utterly broken and corrupt. As American citizens WE cannot, more often than not, navigate this nebulous den of thievery and we're expecting someone who does not know our ways, the nuances of our culture and our language to do it? C'mon.
So when we see a guy here for 15 years who has NEVER broken a law. NEVER availed himself of public assistance. Contributed positively to our economy in the form of hard labor, and in some instances even contributed to a social safety net he can never benefit from we cannot provision for him an expedited path to legal citizenship while holding him accountable for his past infraction in the form of a fine? that's not possible for a few thousand people at most?
Seriously? when we allow presidents to lie to us about weapons of mass destruction, yoke our bravest with unreasonable rules of engagement which get them killed in lands they couldn't find on a map, divide us along racial lines, rob the treasury, enrich our enemies and a litany of other high crimes too lengthy to list out here?
you're telling me, that when the possibility exists, that some scumbag attorney fleeced them for their last dime selling them dreams, the court system wore them down with bloated bureaucracy and the process led nowhere every time they tried you still cannot find it within yourself to show a little compassion ? You're just going to destroy a human being? Because they crossed an imaginary line on a map 20 years ago and happened to visit the wrong attorney? Got stuck with some bullshit judge or could no longer sustain the financial drainage this entire conglomerate of parasites is famous for repeating time after time after fucking time?
again, I am advocating for a very small cross section of this population who's continuance in this country wouldn't harm a soul. A cross section that is probably more morally fluent and better suited to the American than 80% of the slobs that were born here.
This I cannot stand with and will never stand with it. I don't care what that makes me in the eyes of anyone.
All I know is that I like their asylum and immmigration laws and especially their enforcement. Which is why Poland is one of the safest countries in Europe.
Posted by Brent
- Today at 11:54:14 AMQuote from: Dove on January 12, 2026, 02:01:32 PMScott LoBaio (or however his spelled) is awesome.I just did a search. He is different from most artists.
Do you know who he is? He is a sort of activists who was painting flags all over.
I would LOVE to have one of his US Flag paintings. Seriously. I would hang that right above the mantel of the fireplace. I have LARGE cobblestone fireplace and one of his flag paintings would be awesome to have there.
I dont know why but everytime I see a video of his, I feel better lol.
You would like him. He is Sicilian and a New Yorker lol
Posted by formosan
- Today at 10:21:09 AMQuote from: DKG on Today at 09:35:11 AMTim Walz has just walked himself into the heart of a political storm he never expected. Back in 2020, under the guise of "police reform," Walz signed into law a bill that gave officers the explicit right to use deadly force on a vehicle accelerating toward them, without needing the car to physically make contact first.My brother is a policeman.....the Minnesota law that Governor Walz signed into law is similar to Canadian law.
It's a law that's now playing a huge role in the current media circus surrounding the Renee Good shooting — but here's the twist: Walz himself wrote the law that made this possible.
A 2020 Minnesota law came to light after a federal agent shot a woman who tried to drive away from a stop.
The law, signed by Gov. Tim Walz, says if a car moves toward a cop and they think it's a real threat, they don't have to wait to get hit.
All they need is to feel like it's a real threat. No impact required.
Tragic as it was, it's not hard to see why Trump supporters are pointing out the irony.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2010207718032781635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2010207718032781635%7Ctwgr%5E82e1460c631b77c21935e9ade7564942e6be8554%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgazetteller.com%2Fexposed-tim-walz-signed-the-2020-law-that-let-officers-shoot-cars-moving-toward-them-the-same-deadly-force-law-that-made-the-renee-good-shooting-100-legal-and-justified%2F
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 09:52:33 AMQuote from: DKG on Today at 09:46:00 AMThe politicians telling them it is okay are the same ones who passed laws that say the opposite.exactly -- rotten fucking scum
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 09:52:02 AMQuote from: DKG on Today at 09:32:54 AMI believe Biggie would agree that hustlers like them must go. He was referring to ones working illegally on construction sites for example.that is exactly the ones I am referring to and the ONLY ones I am referring to.
The people I am advocating for make up 1% of the illegal population. If that.
They are hardworking, law abiding (aside from the initial crime), morally upright, community building people of faith and moral compass. A very small contingent worthy of mercy due to a demonstrated history of being a better human beings than 99% of the current left.
Why this is so difficult for my side to understand I'll just never know. We cannot get out of our own way it seems and with these hardline attitudes we are destined to lose this war...
I completely understand the frustration with the current state of affairs and I counter with "part of the reason the scum on the left created this problem in the first place IS so that you have this reaction" this is the left trolling us on the right and we are taking the bait hook line and sinker.. as you will never get a reasonably minded person who sits on the fence to vote in favor of throwing away good people like they were garbage .People can get on board when you are bouncing some societal leech, scam artist, violent criminal or pedophile.
but to grab a person who's been a hardworking person of moral character for decades and exile them to what pretty much amounts to a death sentence? Nah, no decent human being is going to get on board with that.. and to be frank here, if this is what my party has become I might just sit out the next election as I want no part of that. And I am about as right wing as you can possibly get .... so just imagine the mind of the independent fence sitter.
Posted by DKG
- Today at 09:46:00 AMQuote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 09:40:20 AMAmazing how the left will sink so low so as to say "but she was just fleeing"The politicians telling them it is okay are the same ones who passed laws that say the opposite.
so when officers imitate a stop and make it clear a person is being detained it's ok to flee now?
The mixed messages are by design. they want the idiots on tiktok and the other forms of mental poison ravaging our youth to walk away with the idea that fleeing a scene AFTER being told by LEOs to freeze is perfectly acceptable and will not lead to a negative outcome
these people are the worst kinds of societal parasites imaginable
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 09:40:20 AMQuote from: DKG on Today at 09:35:11 AMTim Walz has just walked himself into the heart of a political storm he never expected. Back in 2020, under the guise of "police reform," Walz signed into law a bill that gave officers the explicit right to use deadly force on a vehicle accelerating toward them, without needing the car to physically make contact first.
It's a law that's now playing a huge role in the current media circus surrounding the Renee Good shooting — but here's the twist: Walz himself wrote the law that made this possible.
A 2020 Minnesota law came to light after a federal agent shot a woman who tried to drive away from a stop.
The law, signed by Gov. Tim Walz, says if a car moves toward a cop and they think it's a real threat, they don't have to wait to get hit.
All they need is to feel like it's a real threat. No impact required.
Tragic as it was, it's not hard to see why Trump supporters are pointing out the irony.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2010207718032781635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2010207718032781635%7Ctwgr%5E82e1460c631b77c21935e9ade7564942e6be8554%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgazetteller.com%2Fexposed-tim-walz-signed-the-2020-law-that-let-officers-shoot-cars-moving-toward-them-the-same-deadly-force-law-that-made-the-renee-good-shooting-100-legal-and-justified%2F
Amazing how the left will sink so low so as to say "but she was just fleeing"
so when officers imitate a stop and make it clear a person is being detained it's ok to flee now?
The mixed messages are by design. they want the idiots on tiktok and the other forms of mental poison ravaging our youth to walk away with the idea that fleeing a scene AFTER being told by LEOs to freeze is perfectly acceptable and will not lead to a negative outcome
these people are the worst kinds of societal parasites imaginable
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 09:35:42 AMQuote from: Frood on Today at 09:23:39 AMThey do that too. They consider the income tax as the cost of remaining illegal... a write off. I believe Trump just ended a Biden/Obama rule that banks must loan to illegals..
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2026/01/12/trump-cancels-biden-rules-forcing-banks-to-give-loans-to-illegals/
you have to wonder how those scumbags got a law like that to pass in the first place.
Forcing a bank to lend to people who are in the act of committing a crime is absurd and is part of the risk profile a bank NEEDS to evaluate when determining if the candidate is loan worthy
these people truly were on a mission to destroy this country
Posted by DKG
- Today at 09:35:11 AMTim Walz has just walked himself into the heart of a political storm he never expected. Back in 2020, under the guise of "police reform," Walz signed into law a bill that gave officers the explicit right to use deadly force on a vehicle accelerating toward them, without needing the car to physically make contact first.
It's a law that's now playing a huge role in the current media circus surrounding the Renee Good shooting — but here's the twist: Walz himself wrote the law that made this possible.
A 2020 Minnesota law came to light after a federal agent shot a woman who tried to drive away from a stop.
The law, signed by Gov. Tim Walz, says if a car moves toward a cop and they think it's a real threat, they don't have to wait to get hit.
All they need is to feel like it's a real threat. No impact required.
Tragic as it was, it's not hard to see why Trump supporters are pointing out the irony.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2010207718032781635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2010207718032781635%7Ctwgr%5E82e1460c631b77c21935e9ade7564942e6be8554%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgazetteller.com%2Fexposed-tim-walz-signed-the-2020-law-that-let-officers-shoot-cars-moving-toward-them-the-same-deadly-force-law-that-made-the-renee-good-shooting-100-legal-and-justified%2F
It's a law that's now playing a huge role in the current media circus surrounding the Renee Good shooting — but here's the twist: Walz himself wrote the law that made this possible.
A 2020 Minnesota law came to light after a federal agent shot a woman who tried to drive away from a stop.
The law, signed by Gov. Tim Walz, says if a car moves toward a cop and they think it's a real threat, they don't have to wait to get hit.
All they need is to feel like it's a real threat. No impact required.
Tragic as it was, it's not hard to see why Trump supporters are pointing out the irony.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2010207718032781635?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2010207718032781635%7Ctwgr%5E82e1460c631b77c21935e9ade7564942e6be8554%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgazetteller.com%2Fexposed-tim-walz-signed-the-2020-law-that-let-officers-shoot-cars-moving-toward-them-the-same-deadly-force-law-that-made-the-renee-good-shooting-100-legal-and-justified%2F
Posted by DKG
- Today at 09:32:54 AMQuote from: Frood on Today at 04:50:13 AMSo not only illegally immigrated but identity and financial fraud to boot.I believe Biggie would agree that hustlers like them must go. He was referring to ones working illegally on construction sites for example.
That's a career criminal history.
Chuck out every one of those illegal criminal motherfuckers. No mercy.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 09:23:39 AMQuote from: Dove on Today at 07:26:36 AMI dont understand how fraudulently paying taxes helps that is what i mean.
They can be just as under the radar not paying taxes at all cant they? They'd keep more money.
Or are they using these false SSNs for things like financing cars or homes? Because that would make more sense to me.
They do that too. They consider the income tax as the cost of remaining illegal... a write off. I believe Trump just ended a Biden/Obama rule that banks must loan to illegals..
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2026/01/12/trump-cancels-biden-rules-forcing-banks-to-give-loans-to-illegals/