News:

SMF - Just Installed!


Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Is Alticus a dick sucking fairy? (answer is opposite of no):
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Shen Li
 - May 02, 2025, 08:26:00 PM
Cali would be the biggest contributor to equalization after Alberta leaves.

I wonder how Californians will feel about having fewer MP's than Quebec despite having 4.5 times the population as La Belle Provence.
Posted by Herman
 - May 02, 2025, 03:16:00 PM
I would rather have two Quebecs mooching off of us than one Commifornia in Canada.
We will be part of the US before that ever happens.
Posted by Brent
 - May 02, 2025, 12:37:22 PM
As a Canadian, this is not a a good deal for us. All the members of the View voting in our elections. :gross:
Posted by formosan
 - May 02, 2025, 11:37:39 AM
I read there is some support for California, Oregon, and Washington state to join Canada..

I don't know if it's organized like what is happening in Alberta right now.
Posted by DKG
 - May 02, 2025, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: Oliver the Second on May 01, 2025, 10:48:23 PMI wouldn't trade the land but I would trade the people in a heartbeat.
California's land area is 155,973   square miles.

Alberta's land area is 255,290 square miles.

Saskatchewan is 251,366 square miles.

The US would gain roughly 150,000 square miles in this trade.
Posted by Herman
 - May 01, 2025, 11:54:29 PM
Quote from: Oliver the Second on May 01, 2025, 10:48:23 PMI wouldn't trade the land but I would trade the people in a heartbeat.
Alberta has a lot of oil and Saskatchewan has more potash than just about anywhere else on earth.
Posted by Oliver the Second
 - May 01, 2025, 10:48:23 PM

I wouldn't trade the land but I would trade the people in a heartbeat.
Posted by Herman
 - May 01, 2025, 09:23:54 PM
Quote from: Lokmar on May 01, 2025, 08:42:32 PMI am apprehensive about how liberal a disarmed people are.
I own a couple of rifles. Most rural folks here do. I used to own a lot more than that.

Think of it this way, you lose a bunch Jane Fondas but gain a bunch of old Hermans.
Posted by Lokmar
 - May 01, 2025, 08:42:32 PM
I am apprehensive about how liberal a disarmed people are.
Posted by Shen Li
 - May 01, 2025, 08:13:17 PM
If I was an American, FUCK YES!!
Posted by Herman
 - May 01, 2025, 03:49:39 PM
This is a question for Americans and Canadians.

The benefit for urban progtard Canadians:
The Conservative Party would become the size of the Greens
No more of that nasty oil and much less natural gas
You can carbon tax yourselves into the stone age
Ottawa will have no opposition to forcing everyone to trade in their gas guzzling F-150's for electric skateboards

The benefit for red state Americans:
The world's largest reserves of potash
The third largest reserves of recoverable oil.
The best beef on the planet
The democRATs would become a permanent opposition party federally
Lake Louise is your own.