First year of Clinton's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
First year of Obama's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
First year of Biden's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
that's three years, three democrat presidents so NO resistance from the top on down
simple question is: Why didn't democrats codify roe vs wade at any one of these golden opportunities ?
It's almost as if they want to hold on to this card to make elections about something so controversial instead of their failing policy records!
My body, my choice! Until its an experimental drug they want to try on you.
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 11, 2024, 09:46:06 AMFirst year of Clinton's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
First year of Obama's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
First year of Biden's presidency democrats hold both the house and the senate for his first year
that's three years, three democrat presidents so NO resistance from the top on down
simple question is: Why didn't democrats codify roe vs wade at any one of these golden opportunities ?
It's almost as if they want to hold on to this card to make elections about something so controversial instead of their failing policy records!
My body, my choice! Until its an experimental drug they want to try on you.
That's certainly something to think about Biggie.
Quote from: formosan on July 11, 2024, 10:39:04 AMThat's certainly something to think about Biggie.
The democrat puppet masters at the top knew the vulnerability in having a precedent govern this issue as opposed to to clear legislation solidifying the matter. And they did nothing. They did nothing because they WANT this to be an issue that divides us and invigorates their idiot base.
If Biden cared about the matter as much as he says he does his first act, even before being inaugurated, would have been to pick up the phone and get Nancy Pelosi on the legislation draft immediately so that it could be ready for a house vote by Jan 21st. It could have then moved on to a Democrat controlled senate and could have been on his desk by Mid march at the latest.
But he didn't do that. And neither did any elected member in a democrat controlled congress. And the question an intelligent person has to ask themselves is why.
and the most striking is the fact that this scenario played itself out THREE times since roe vs wade was decided with the same outcome all three times.
Abortion is a wedge issue. It is not an issue for most people who work for a living.
Abortion was created because suburban white women were getting knocked up by their infidelity partners while hubby was working his butt off to provide for a good home.
Quote from: Prof Emeritus at Fawk U on July 11, 2024, 05:21:44 PMAbortion was created because suburban white women were getting knocked up by their infidelity partners while hubby was working his butt off to provide for a good home.
I was unaware of that Prof Emeritus.
:s_laugh:
Quote from: Brent on July 11, 2024, 12:20:35 PMAbortion is a wedge issue. It is not an issue for most people who work for a living.
Abortion wasn't an issue when men and women knew sex had consequences (except with whores and male sluts of no financial merit).
We were all just as horny as we are now but there was a voice of reason in the back of our heads.
If Americans are willing to travel to china and russia to BUY a fucking kid, maybe abortion SHOULD be outlawed!!!!
Abortion is a distraction issue created by the chattering classes.
Married men or guys in live in relationships who find out their children aren't their own are still ordered by many courts to financially provide for that bastard child/children.
I've got a female relative who pulled that shit and financially raped her ex-husband years later when he DNA tested the kids.
3 of the 4 weren't his.
Her defence team argued that it would be traumatic if the kids found out that their dad wasn't their dad... so the courts decided to strip his retirement fund.
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 12:26:40 PMMarried men or guys in live in relationships who find out their children aren't their own are still ordered by many courts to financially provide for that bastard child/children.
I've got a female relative who pulled that shit and financially raped her ex-husband years later when he DNA tested the kids.
3 of the 4 weren't his.
Her defence team argued that it would be traumatic if the kids found out that their dad wasn't their dad... so the courts decided to strip his retirement fund.
I see your courts in Australia are just as bad as the ones here
so I'm guessing to keep such a lie afloat they restrained him from ever speaking too or seeing these kids again?
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 12:26:40 PMMarried men or guys in live in relationships who find out their children aren't their own are still ordered by many courts to financially provide for that bastard child/children.
I've got a female relative who pulled that shit and financially raped her ex-husband years later when he DNA tested the kids.
3 of the 4 weren't his.
Her defence team argued that it would be traumatic if the kids found out that their dad wasn't their dad... so the courts decided to strip his retirement fund.
That dude should get to murder her by setting her on fire and he should get off scott free!
See, thats complete emotional woman think and its ruined the justice system! REPEAL THE 19TH!!!!
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 12, 2024, 12:31:28 PMI see your courts in Australia are just as bad as the ones here
so I'm guessing to keep such a lie afloat they restrained him from ever speaking too or seeing these kids again?
They'd have to kill me.
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 12, 2024, 12:31:28 PMI see your courts in Australia are just as bad as the ones here
so I'm guessing to keep such a lie afloat they restrained him from ever speaking too or seeing these kids again?
That was in the States in the 90's but I've had a sister in law almost repeat the same thing in Australia shortly after.
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 12:43:18 PMThat was in the States in the 90's but I've had a sister in law almost repeat the same thing in Australia shortly after.
Shit like that goes on in plain sight and in stark contrast to anything that would even slightly resemble justice; and then they act bewildered when we look at their 34 felony guilty verdict, laugh and keep accelerating forward along the same righteous path undeterred.
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on July 12, 2024, 12:48:58 PMShit like that goes on in plain sight and in stark contrast to anything that would even slightly resemble justice; and then they act bewildered when we look at their 34 felony guilty verdict, laugh and keep accelerating forward along the same righteous path undeterred.
These bitches commit fraud but unlike a bank robber or rapist, they get off Scott free and the guy has to pay for the proceedings.
MGTOW has a legitimate gripe or concern.
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 01:04:30 PMThese bitches commit fraud but unlike a bank robber or rapist, they get off Scott free and the guy has to pay for the proceedings.
MGTOW has a legitimate gripe or concern.
Yep. I know.
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 01:04:30 PMThese bitches commit fraud but unlike a bank robber or rapist, they get off Scott free and the guy has to pay for the proceedings.
MGTOW has a legitimate gripe or concern.
I worked with a guy that got married right before deployment, his 304 wife started fucking some ancient POS white dude, then she fucked some nigger too, I think had the nigger in her meat hooks, thinking she was all his, then managed to get knocked up by the old white fucker, both drove his car into the ground, she spent all his money, had the kid and put the deployed dudes name on the birth certificate, he finally came back from Iraq and divorced her, had to keep paying support, eventually got his name off via DNA testing, never recovered anything.
Seriously, If I were on the jury during a murder trial, I'd acquit!!!!!
Quote from: Lokmar on July 12, 2024, 01:10:48 PMI worked with a guy that got married right before deployment, his 304 wife started fucking some ancient POS white dude, then she fucked some nigger too, I think had the nigger in her meat hooks, thinking she was all his, then managed to get knocked up by the old white fucker, both drove his car into the ground, she spent all his money, had the kid and put the deployed dudes name on the birth certificate, he finally came back from Iraq and divorced her, had to keep paying support, eventually got his name off via DNA testing, never recovered anything.
Seriously, If I were on the jury during a murder trial, I'd acquit!!!!!
Hmmm....that sounds like one heckuva good deal....
LokmarL okmeer!
Somebody shore got the best of that one, eh?
Fuck off, Johomo...
Nobody wants to read your shitposts.
Quote from: Brent on July 12, 2024, 12:17:05 PMAbortion is a distraction issue created by the chattering classes.
Singapore allows abortion up to 16 weeks which is too late in my opinion. All women who seek an abortion are required to attend counselling. Then there is a 48 hour cooling off period before an abortion can be performed.
Quote from: Lokmar on July 12, 2024, 01:10:48 PMI worked with a guy that got married right before deployment, his 304 wife started fucking some ancient POS white dude, then she fucked some nigger too, I think had the nigger in her meat hooks, thinking she was all his, then managed to get knocked up by the old white fucker, both drove his car into the ground, she spent all his money, had the kid and put the deployed dudes name on the birth certificate, he finally came back from Iraq and divorced her, had to keep paying support, eventually got his name off via DNA testing, never recovered anything.
Seriously, If I were on the jury during a murder trial, I'd acquit!!!!!
There is some law that if you are married the law says your spouse is the father traditionally, thank goodness for DNA incase the spouse isn't.....
THE reason I know this is because Meghan Markle's second child is assumed to be Harry's without any proof but that isn't good enough for a royal child. It's why the public want proof that Lilibucks who is 7th in the line of succession is Harry's real child and came out of Meghan's body. We have been discussing this in Lady C private YouTube channel.
Quote from: caskur on July 13, 2024, 03:08:05 AMThere is some law that if you are married the law says your spouse is the father traditionally, thank goodness for DNA incase the spouse isn't.....
THE reason I know this is because Meghan Markle's second child is assumed to be Harry's without any proof but that isn't good enough for a royal child. It's why the public want proof that Lilibucks who is 7th in the line of succession is Harry's real child and came out of Meghan's body. We have been discussing this in Lady C private YouTube channel.
Too bad it aint like the good old days when a woman would have to grab the horns on the altar and await God's judgement. If she was a slut, God struck her dead on the spot.
Quote from: Frood on July 12, 2024, 01:29:49 PMFuck off, Johomo...
Nobody wants to read your shitposts.
Not even one person.