News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 11411
Total votes: : 5

Last post: Today at 01:51:35 PM
Re: Forum gossip thread by deport_liberals

avatar_DKG

Options to save Canada's crumbling public health care

Started by DKG, August 18, 2024, 02:06:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Window Lickers are viewing this topic.

DKG

Quote from: Sea on August 19, 2024, 08:04:56 PMReally ashamed Herman, especially when you need it most. I pay $60. Per month, for pretty good coverage. It's the fucking insurance companies that make it expensive
Seamoron picks up where he left off. Not comprehending posts and threads.

horse sense

Quote from: Shen Li on August 19, 2024, 09:48:18 PMI'm sooooooo glad I don't have to deal with failing Canadian health care anymore.

Here in SG, I can see a doctor within a day. If I need testing, same day. If I needed a procedure done, within a week.

And we provide much better care cheaper than Canada.

I will admit to being astonished by the waiting periods in Canada. But I suppose I ought not have been too surprised. If you want something mismanaged and to cost an arm and a leg into the bargain, getting the government to take care of it is your best option to achieving both.

Socialized healthcare sucks donkeycock. I'd just as soon have all those clowns in the public service stripped of their paycheques and encouraged to produce something other than red tape. Taxes could then be lowered and I could better manage with what I produce, squirreling away a sizeable hedge against any future potential costs I might incur and reasonably certain I wouldn't be contributing to some socialist shitweasel to bludge off my dime while blowing all his ill gotten welfare monies on gold coins and other stupid trinkets.

DKG

Quote from: horse sense on August 21, 2024, 03:33:03 AMI will admit to being astonished by the waiting periods in Canada. But I suppose I ought not have been too surprised. If you want something mismanaged and to cost an arm and a leg into the bargain, getting the government to take care of it is your best option to achieving both.

Socialized healthcare sucks donkeycock. I'd just as soon have all those clowns in the public service stripped of their paycheques and encouraged to produce something other than red tape. Taxes could then be lowered and I could better manage with what I produce, squirreling away a sizeable hedge against any future potential costs I might incur and reasonably certain I wouldn't be contributing to some socialist shitweasel to bludge off my dime while blowing all his ill gotten welfare monies on gold coins and other stupid trinkets.
No other country delivers health care the way we do. No other country should model health care delivery on the Canadian model.

It is no sustainable either.

hard R

Quote from: DKG on August 21, 2024, 07:03:57 AMNo other country delivers health care the way we do. No other country should model health care delivery on the Canadian model.

It is no sustainable either.
Take a look at England's NHS sometime. Or Australia's Medicare for that matter.

Government mismanagement of socialized medicine is not a problem unique to Canada.

Herman

Quote from: hard R on August 21, 2024, 06:58:01 PMTake a look at England's NHS sometime. Or Australia's Medicare for that matter.

Government mismanagement of socialized medicine is not a problem unique to Canada.
They both allow more private options than Canaduh.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

hard R

Quote from: Herman on August 21, 2024, 07:36:05 PMThey both allow more private options than Canaduh.
That they do. They also require the private options to contribute to the government subsidized system under threat of practitioners losing their license to work, effectively rendering the private sector a thinly veneered public system, given that its workforce and its clients are subsidizing the openly public model.

And that's before we consider how many non-taxpaying illegal migrants get bumped to the head of the queue while the locals get to wait their turn. 
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Oerdin

Privatize all of it.  The government can run a basic insurance program but all actual healthcare providers should be privately run to make them more efficient.  Competition between providers will also do the same.

Holland or Japan are good examples of this approach.

hard R

Quote from: Oerdin on August 22, 2024, 04:34:53 AMPrivatize all of it.  The government can run a basic insurance program but all actual healthcare providers should be privately run to make them more efficient.  Competition between providers will also do the same.

Holland or Japan are good examples of this approach.
Guarding against collusion between those organisations and the public service might also be something to keep an eye on too. We'd want to avoid the kinds of relationships that media outlets and various Silicon Valley companies have been known to enjoy with the government at the common man's expense. The revolving door that operates between pharma companies and regulatory bodies like the FDA and CDC does not serve us even remotely adequately.

On a different note, I'm glad you popped in here actually. I've been pawing through the Open Ink link you posted earlier in the shoutbox; a tidy collection of well researched and unbiased presentations highlighting the events of 2020's election I think and I imagine there's a few in my circle that could benefit from watching them. Thankyou for sharing them.

DKG

Quote from: Oerdin on August 22, 2024, 04:34:53 AMPrivatize all of it.  The government can run a basic insurance program but all actual healthcare providers should be privately run to make them more efficient.  Competition between providers will also do the same.

Holland or Japan are good examples of this approach.
I don't mind the government running a basic health delivery program, but mostn health care delivery should be in private hands to keepn costs lower and service better.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

DKG

Quote from: hard R on August 22, 2024, 01:39:09 AMThey also require the private options to contribute to the government subsidized system under threat of practitioners losing their license to work,
How do they do that?

Oerdin


Lokmar

Quote from: DKG on August 22, 2024, 07:06:44 AMI don't mind the government running a basic health delivery program, but mostn health care delivery should be in private hands to keepn costs lower and service better.

Thats what caused the problem ITFP. Give government power and they ALWAYS expand and try to take over. Its the nature of government. Thats why our founders created the best form of government ever known to mankind when they broke the government into 3 or arguable 5 opposed branches. We fucked up when we allowed the government to better "do the will of the people". Fixing government so that it works leads to slavery.

Herman

Even by single payer systems, Canada's health care system is the shits.

DKG

Quote from: Lokmar on August 22, 2024, 10:41:34 AMThats what caused the problem ITFP. Give government power and they ALWAYS expand and try to take over. Its the nature of government. Thats why our founders created the best form of government ever known to mankind when they broke the government into 3 or arguable 5 opposed branches. We fucked up when we allowed the government to better "do the will of the people". Fixing government so that it works leads to slavery.
Ours is just not efficient. You saw the post about the block grants. That is wasteful.

hard R

Quote from: DKG on August 22, 2024, 07:08:23 AMHow do they do that?
Exactly as I said. The government enforces the rule that private practicioners contribute a portion of their working hours to the public healthcare sector by revoking their license to practice at all if they do not. Effectively it's a tax without the money component; those hours that the private carers are forced to invest in the publick healthcare model are hours they might otherwise be devoting to the private.

And if they don't comply, they don't get to practice at all. Period.

As for the clients, they get to pay into the public service slush fund via taxes they cannot avoid paying without having the taxman breathing down their necks. They could have full comprehensive private coverage, they still must pay the levy for the public medicare.

Oh, and the slush fund regularly gets dipped into to fund other, non-medical related things. I believe I mentioned this previously.

So, yes I can agree with you that the Canadian model truly sucks, based exclusively on the inordinately long waiting queues that one is faced with to access services. But you cannot tell me that places like England or Australia are better simply because there are "private options", not when those models are overseen by the same type of corrupt fuckwads that mishandle the service on Canadian shores.

Believe me, I wish it were otherwise. It might give us an example to rub people's noses in and show them how it should be done.

Quick Reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Is the "D" in Django silent? Yes or No? (must be lower case):
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Is Alticus a dick sucking fairy? (answer is opposite of no):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview