The House passed a resolution honouring Charlie Kirk and condemning his assassination. Fifty eight democRATs voted against including to nobody's surprise AOC. She used her floor speech to smear Charlie Kirk. 

Quote from: Herman on September 19, 2025, 09:37:58 PMThe House passed a resolution honouring Charlie Kirk and condemning his assassination. Fifty eight democRATs voted against including to nobody's surprise AOC. She used her floor speech to smear Charlie Kirk. 

Isn't it rich the likes of AOC, Kamala Harris and Tampon Tim Walz are whining about free speech being under attack. The 3 elected queens of qancel qulture.

The behaviour of Democrats even the so called mainstream elected variety since the murder of Charlie Kirk has been disgiusting.

Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) said she still thinks Kirk has "vile" views.

Then the New Jersey Democrat claimed that Kirk supported restricting the rights of women and black people.

"Charlie Kirk was advocating for a Christian nationalist government and to roll back the rights of women and Black people — this flies in the face of every value I hold dear and that I fight for," Sherril continued. "But the Constitution protects free speech, even for those I vehemently oppose."

Sherrill is running for governor of New Jersey in November as the Democratic Party candidate. She will run against Republican Jack Ciattarelli.

Ciattarelli responded to Sherrill's comments, writing on X, "Mikie Sherrill's hypocrisy knows no bounds."

He also described her comments about Kirk as "inexcusable and disqualifying."

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) responded to Sherrill's remarks directly in her comments section with, "You can't just say crap like that — especially when it's not true."

I hope Erika Kirk sues the NJ gubernatorial candidate for libel.

Quote from: DKG on September 21, 2025, 10:54:31 AMThe behaviour of Democrats even the so called mainstream elected variety since the murder of Charlie Kirk has been disgiusting.

Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) said she still thinks Kirk has "vile" views.

Then the New Jersey Democrat claimed that Kirk supported restricting the rights of women and black people.

"Charlie Kirk was advocating for a Christian nationalist government and to roll back the rights of women and Black people — this flies in the face of every value I hold dear and that I fight for," Sherril continued. "But the Constitution protects free speech, even for those I vehemently oppose."

Sherrill is running for governor of New Jersey in November as the Democratic Party candidate. She will run against Republican Jack Ciattarelli.

Ciattarelli responded to Sherrill's comments, writing on X, "Mikie Sherrill's hypocrisy knows no bounds."

He also described her comments about Kirk as "inexcusable and disqualifying."

Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) responded to Sherrill's remarks directly in her comments section with, "You can't just say crap like that — especially when it's not true."

I hope Erika Kirk sues the NJ gubernatorial candidate for libel.

If she sued everybody who slandered her late husband half the United States population would have to appear in court.

Quote from: Herman on September 18, 2025, 09:33:45 PM

I guess they forgot all the times Jimmy made them the punchline to his "jokes".

Ahh well, if nothing else it exposes the rainbow flag for what it has become... a flag of convenience.

Quote from: . on September 22, 2025, 03:43:31 AMI guess they forgot all the times Jimmy made them the punchline to his "jokes".

Ahh well, if nothing else it exposes the rainbow flag for what it has become... a flag of convenience.

Every cause of the far left is one of convenience at a certain point in time.

Quote from: DKG on September 22, 2025, 07:32:59 AMEvery cause of the far left is one of convenience at a certain point in time.

I suspect you're right. Take that pride flag in the meme; not a lot of people know this, but when the rainbow flag was first used to represent the lesbian/gay movement, its colours were not chosen to represent bumfucking or pillowbiting or carpet munching, but for qualities of person and nature. The one stripe that referred to sex in any manner at all (pink) was removed from the flag very early on, ironically making the flag more "inclusive" than any variant before or since.

Again... the qualities the colours were chosen to represent are in no way the sole preserve of what anyone chooses to do with their genitals... making every flag that followed an attempt to divide and segregate not only members of the alphabet brigade, but everyone outside of it as well. And the left's tolerance if not open encouragement of this practice is but one more example of their innate desire to divide and conquer those it pretends to represent. To dominate and enslave, just as that other delightful creation of theirs (the Ku Klux Klan) was explicitly designed to dominate and enslave.

Understand this much, supremacist rhetoric is an outgrowth of the far left's practices far more readily than anything on the right. The proof of it is in everything they get their grubby little paws on. The reason is obvious; they cannot exist on merit, only by creating problems for the rest of us do they provide even the most tenuous of validity for their disruptive influence.

And they will lie as much to themselves as they do to you and I that their cause is just. Whereas if they simply shut the fuck up and went away, then the rest of us would be doing not just simply "fine", but also a whole lot better for it. Any "convenience" is solely for their own ends, it is not meant for the rest of society. No, not even for the zippertittied niggerfaggots of the world.

You're welcome.

Less focus on victimhood and more focus on opportunity, merit and hustle.

Quote from: knows things on September 22, 2025, 11:50:23 AMI suspect you're right. Take that pride flag in the meme; not a lot of people know this, but when the rainbow flag was first used to represent the lesbian/gay movement, its colours were not chosen to represent bumfucking or pillowbiting or carpet munching, but for qualities of person and nature. The one stripe that referred to sex in any manner at all (pink) was removed from the flag very early on, ironically making the flag more "inclusive" than any variant before or since.

Again... the qualities the colours were chosen to represent are in no way the sole preserve of what anyone chooses to do with their genitals... making every flag that followed an attempt to divide and segregate not only members of the alphabet brigade, but everyone outside of it as well. And the left's tolerance if not open encouragement of this practice is but one more example of their innate desire to divide and conquer those it pretends to represent. To dominate and enslave, just as that other delightful creation of theirs (the Ku Klux Klan) was explicitly designed to dominate and enslave.

Understand this much, supremacist rhetoric is an outgrowth of the far left's practices far more readily than anything on the right. The proof of it is in everything they get their grubby little paws on. The reason is obvious; they cannot exist on merit, only by creating problems for the rest of us do they provide even the most tenuous of validity for their disruptive influence.

And they will lie as much to themselves as they do to you and I that their cause is just. Whereas if they simply shut the fuck up and went away, then the rest of us would be doing not just simply "fine", but also a whole lot better for it. Any "convenience" is solely for their own ends, it is not meant for the rest of society. No, not even for the zippertittied niggerfaggots of the world.

You're welcome.

Jo Jo and I are old enough to remember when our community's color was pink.